A processability approach to the development of case in L2 Icelandic

References

1. Artoni, D., & Magnani, M.
   (2015) Acquiring case marking in Russian as a second language: An exploratory study on subject and object. InC. Bettoni & B. Di Biase (Eds.), Grammatical development in second languages: Exploring the boundaries of Processability Theory (pp.177–193). Amsterdam: The European Second Language Association. Retrieved fromwww.eurosla.org/eurosla-monograph-series-2/eurosla-monographs-03/
   [Google Scholar]
2. Baten, K.
   (2011) Processability Theory and German case acquisition. Language Learning, 61(2), 455–505. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2010.00615.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00615.x [Google Scholar]
3. Baten, K.
   (2013) The acquisition of the German case system by foreign learners. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/palart.2
   https://doi.org/10.1075/palart.2 [Google Scholar]
4. Bresnan, J.
   (2001) Lexical-functional syntax. Malden MA: Blackwell.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Buyl, A., & Housen, A.
   (2015) Developmental stages in receptive grammar acquisition: A Processability Theory account. Second Language Research, 31, 523–550. 10.1177/0267658315585905
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658315585905 [Google Scholar]
6. Di Biase, B., Bettoni, C., & Medojević, L.
   (2015) The development of case: A study of Serbian in contact with Australian English. InC. Bettoni & B. Di Biase (Eds.), Grammatical development in second languages: Exploring the boundaries of Processability Theory (pp.195–212). Amsterdam: The European Second Language Association. Retrieved fromwww.eurosla.org/eurosla-monograph-series-2/eurosla-monographs-03/
   [Google Scholar]
7. Di Biase, B., & Kawaguchi, S.
   (2002) Exploring the typological plausibility of Processability Theory: Language development in Italian second language and Japanese second language. Second Language Research, 18, 272–300. 10.1191/0267658302sr204oa
   https://doi.org/10.1191/0267658302sr204oa [Google Scholar]
8. Dyson, B., & Håkansson, G.
   (2017) Understanding second language processing. A focus on Processability Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/bpa.4
   https://doi.org/10.1075/bpa.4 [Google Scholar]
9. Ellis, R.
   (1994) The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Ellis, R.
    (2008) Investigating grammatical difficulty in second language learning: Implications for second language acquisition research and language testing. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 18(1), 4–22. 10.1111/j.1473‑4192.2008.00184.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2008.00184.x [Google Scholar]
11. Glahn, E., Håkansson, G., Hammarberg, B., Holmen, A., & Hvenekilde, A.
    (2001) Processability in Scandinavian second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23, 389–416. 10.1017/S0272263101003047
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263101003047 [Google Scholar]
12. Håkansson, G., & Norrby, C.
    (2007) Processability Theory applied to written and oral Swedish. InF. Mansouri (Ed.), Second language acquisition research: Theory-construction and testing (pp.81–94). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Håkansson, G., & Norrby, C.
    (2010) Environmental influence on language acquisition: Comparing second and foreign language acquisition of Swedish. Language Learning, 60(3), 628–650. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2010.00569.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00569.x [Google Scholar]
14. Håkansson, G., & Pienemann, M.
    (1999) A unified approach towards the development of Swedish as L2. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 383–420.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Jónsson, J. G.
    (2003) Not so quirky: On subject case in Icelandic. InE. Brandner & H. Zinmeister (Eds.), New perspectives on Case Theory (pp.129–164). Stanford CA: CSLI Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Kawaguchi, S.
    (2005) Argument structure and syntactic development in Japanese as a second Language. InM. Pienemann (Ed.), Cross-linguistic aspects of Processability Theory (pp.253–298). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sibil.30.10kaw
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.30.10kaw [Google Scholar]
17. Keatinge, D., & Keßler, J.-U.
    (2009) The acquisition of the passive voice in English as a foreign language: Production and perception. InKeßler and Keatinge (Eds.), Research in second language acquisition: Empirical evidence across languages (pp.69–94). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Levelt, W.
    (1989) Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Maling, J.
    (2002) Það rignir þágufalli á Íslandi [It rains dative in Iceland]. Verbs with Dative Objects in Icelandic. Íslenskt mál, 24, 31–105.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Pienemann, M.
    (1998) Language processing and second Language development: Processability Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sibil.15
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.15 [Google Scholar]
21. Pienemann, M.
    (2005) An Introduction to Processability Theory. InM. Pienemann (Ed.), Cross-linguistic aspects of Processability Theory (pp.1–60). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sibil.30.03pie
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.30.03pie [Google Scholar]
22. Pienemann, M., & Keßler, J-U.
    (2011) Studying Processability Theory: An introductory textbook. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/palart.1
    https://doi.org/10.1075/palart.1 [Google Scholar]
23. Pienemann, M., & Lenzing, A.
    (2015) Processability Theory. InB. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition. An introduction (pp.159–179). New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Pienemann, M., Di Biase, B., & Kawaguchi, S.
    (2005) Extending Processability Theory. InM. Pienemann (Ed.), Cross-linguistic aspects of Processability Theory (pp.199–251). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sibil.30.09pie
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.30.09pie [Google Scholar]
25. Rahkonen, M., & Håkansson, G.
    (2008) Production of written L2-Swedish: Processability or input frequencies?InJ.-U. Keßler (Ed.), Processability approaches to second language development and second language learning (pp.135–164). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Svavarsdóttir, Á.
    (1993) Beygingakerfi nafnorða í nútímaíslensku [Morphological system of nouns in modern Icelandic.] Reykjavík: Málvísindastofnun Háskóla Íslands.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Zaenen, A., Maling, J., & Thráinsson, H.
    (1985) Case and grammatical functions: The Icelandic passive. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 3, 441–483. 10.1007/BF00133285
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00133285 [Google Scholar]