1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Language, Interaction and Acquisition
  4. Volume 14, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 14, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1879-7865
  • E-ISSN: 1879-7873
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This study examines crosslinguistic vocal register variations (pitch level and range) within speakers of L1 French-L2 English and L1 English-L2 French. Participants were recorded on three tasks: reading aloud, video retelling, and free speech, in both French and English. A separate analysis of the f  of voiced pauses in relation to vocal register is presented. The main hypothesis is that French is spoken on a higher vocal register than English, the difference being due to the divergent prosodic systems of the two languages, as opposed to an effect of the language status for the speaker (L1 or L2). The results partially confirm it, although the L1 and the task type influence the language effect. In addition, results indicate that pitch level and pitch range can vary independently; that the task has a significant effect on vocal register; and that the f  of voiced pauses is lower than the average speaking f , thus impacting its measure and raising methodological issues for the study of vocal register.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lia.00018.dro
2024-03-22
2024-12-05

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/lia.00018.dro
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abercrombie, D.
    (1967) Elements of general phonetics. Edinburgh University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Abu-Al-Makarem, A., & Petrosino, L.
    (2007) Reading and spontaneous speaking fundamental frequency of young Arabic men for Arabic and English languages: A comparative study. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 105(2), 572–580. 10.2466/pms.105.2.572‑580
     https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.105.2.572-580 [Google Scholar]
  3. Altenberg, E. P., & Ferrand, C. T.
    (2006) Fundamental frequency in monolingual English, bilingual English-Russian, and bilingual English-Cantonese young adult women. Journal of Voice, 201, 89–96. 10.1016/j.jvoice.2005.01.005
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2005.01.005 [Google Scholar]
  4. Aoyama, K., & Guion, S. G.
    (2007) Prosody in second language acquisition: An acoustic analysis on duration and F 0 range. InO. S. Bohn & M. Munro (Eds.), Language experience in second language speech learning (pp. 281–297). John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.17.24aoy
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.17.24aoy [Google Scholar]
  5. Astésano, C.
    (2016) The prosodic characterization of reference French. InS. Detey, J. Durand, B. Laks, & C. Lyche (Eds.), Varieties of spoken French: A source book (pp. 68–85). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199573714.003.0006
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199573714.003.0006 [Google Scholar]
  6. Beckman, M. E.
    (1986) Stress and non-stress accent. Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110874020
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110874020 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bertrand, R., Blache, P., Espesser, R., Ferrée, C., Meunier, B., Priego-Valverde, B., & Rauzy, S.
    (2008) Le CID – Corpus of Interactional Data – Annotation et exploitation multimodale de parole conversationnelle. Traitement Automatique des Langues, 49(3), 1–30.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Bissonnette, S.
    (2003) Le registre du lecteur de bulletin de nouvelles québécois et français: Un reflet de l’idéal vocal de ces communautés linguistiques?InM. Demers (Ed.), Registre et voix sociale (pp. 17–34). Nota Bene.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Boersma, P., & Weenink, D.
    (2019) Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 6.0.52, www.praat.org/
  10. Braun, A.
    (1994) Sprechstimmlage und Muttersprache [Pitch range and mother tongue]. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik, 21, 170–178.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Campione, E., & Véronis, J.
    (1998) A statistical study of pitch target points in five languages. InProceedings of the 5th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP 1998), paper 0845, 10.21437/ICSLP.1998‑155
     https://doi.org/10.21437/ICSLP.1998-155 [Google Scholar]
  12. (2005) Pauses and hesitations in French spontaneous speech. InProceedings of DiSS’05, Disfluency in Spontaneous Speech. Aix-en-Provence, France, 43–46.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Chevrie-Muller, C., Salomon, D., & Ferrey, G.
    (1971) Contribution à l’établissement de quelques constantes physiologiques de la voix parlée de la femme adolescente, adulte et âgée. Journal Français d’Oto-Rhino-Laryngologie, XVI1, 433–455.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Cutler, A., & Butterfield, S.
    (1992) Rhythmic cues to speech segmentation: Evidence from juncture misperception. Journal of Memory and Language, 31(2), 218–236. 10.1016/0749‑596X(92)90012‑M
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(92)90012-M [Google Scholar]
  15. Daly, N., & Zue, V.
    (1992) Statistical and linguistic analyses of F 0 in read and spontaneous speech. InProceedings of the Second International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, Banff, Canada, 763–766. 10.21437/ICSLP.1992‑233
     https://doi.org/10.21437/ICSLP.1992-233 [Google Scholar]
  16. De Looze, C.
    (2010) Analyse et interprétation de l’empan temporel des variations prosodiques en français et en anglais. Doctoral dissertation, Université de Provence-Aix-Marseille I.
  17. De Looze, C., & Hirst, D.
    (2010) L’échelle OME (Octave-MEdiane): une échelle naturelle pour la mélodie de la parole. InProceedings of the XXVIIIème Journées d’Etude sur la Parole, Mons, Belgium, 229–232.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Demers, M.
    (2000) Le registre en voix parlée : un indicateur social pour homme seulement. InProceedings of the XXIIIèmes Journées d’Etude sur la Parole, Aussois, France, 19–23.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. (2003) La voix du plus fort : étude acoustique sur le registre vocal en tant qu’indicateur sociolectal et dialectal en français spontané. InM. Demers (Ed.), Registre et voix sociale (pp. 79–121). Nota Bene.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Di Cristo, A.
    (2016) Les musiques du français parlé : Essais sur l’accentuation, la métrique, le rythme, le phrasé prosodique et l’intonation du français contemporain. De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110479645
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110479645 [Google Scholar]
  21. Duez, D.
    (2001) Caractéristiques acoustiques et phonétiques des pauses remplies dans la conversation en français. Travaux Interdisciplinaires du Laboratoire Parole et Langage d’Aix-en-Provence (TIPA)201, 31–48.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Fodor, J. D.
    (2002) Prosodic disambiguation in silent reading. North East Linguistics Society, 32(1), 113–132.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Gfroerer, S., & Wagner, I.
    (1994) Fundamental frequency in forensic speech samples. InA. Braun & J.-P. Köster (Eds.), Studies in forensic phonetics (pp. 41–48). WVT.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Goldman-Eisler, F.
    (1968) Psycholinguistics. Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Gordon, M., & Ladefoged, P.
    (2001) Phonation types: a cross-linguistic overview. Journal of phonetics, 29(4), 383–406. 10.1006/jpho.2001.0147
     https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.2001.0147 [Google Scholar]
  26. Graham, C.
    (2013) Revisiting f 0 range production in Japanese-English simultaneous bilinguals. Annual Report of UC Berkeley Phonology Lab, 110–125. 10.5070/P78WP244GC
     https://doi.org/10.5070/P78WP244GC [Google Scholar]
  27. Gregersen, T., MacIntyre, P. D., & Meza, M. D.
    (2014) The motion of emotion: Idiodynamic case studies of learners’ foreign language anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 981, 574–588. 10.1111/modl.12084
     https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12084 [Google Scholar]
  28. Guaitella, I.
    (1990) Propositions pour une méthode d’analyse de l’intonation en parole spontanée. Journal de Physique Colloques, 511, C2-515-518. 10.1051/jphyscol:19902121
     https://doi.org/10.1051/jphyscol:19902121 [Google Scholar]
  29. Hall, E. T., & Hall, M. R.
    (1990) Understanding cultural differences: Germans, French and Americans. Intercultural press.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Hamers, J. F., & Blanc, M.
    (2000) Bilinguality and bilingualism. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511605796
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511605796 [Google Scholar]
  31. Hart, J. T., Collier, R., & Cohen, A.
    (1990) A perceptual study of intonation: an experimental-phonetic approach to speech melody. Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Henton, C. G.
    (1989) Fact and fiction in the description of female and male pitch. Language & Communication, 91, 299–311. 10.1016/0271‑5309(89)90026‑8
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0271-5309(89)90026-8 [Google Scholar]
  33. Hirst, D., & Di Cristo, A.
    (Eds.) (1998) Intonation systems: A survey of twenty languages. Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Hollien, H., & Ship, T.
    (1972) Speaking fundamental frequency and chronological age in males. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research, 151, 155–159. 10.1044/jshr.1501.155
     https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.1501.155 [Google Scholar]
  35. Johns-Lewis, C.
    (1986) Intonation in discourse. College Hill Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Keating, P., & Kuo, G.
    (2012) Comparison of speaking fundamental frequency in English and Mandarin. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 132(2), 1050–1060. 10.1121/1.4730893
     https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4730893 [Google Scholar]
  37. Koch, P., & Oesterreicher, W.
    (2001) Langage parlé et langage écrit. InG. L. Holtus, M. Metzeltin, & C. Schmitt (Eds.). Lexikon der Romanistischen Linguistik, I/21 (pp. 584–627). Niemeyer.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B.
    (2017) lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 1–26. 10.18637/jss.v082.i13
     https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13 [Google Scholar]
  39. Ladd, R.
    (1996) Intonational phonology. Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Laver, J.
    (1994) Principles of phonetics. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139166621
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166621 [Google Scholar]
  41. Lenth, R., & Lenth, M. R.
    (2018) Package ‘lsmeans’. The American Statistician, 34(4), 216–221.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Léon, P. R., & Martin, P.
    (1970) Prolégomènes à l’étude des structures intonatives. Marcel Didier.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Lee, B., & Sidtis, D. V. L.
    (2017) The bilingual voice: Vocal characteristics when speaking two languages across speech tasks. Speech, Language and Hearing, 20(3), 174–185. 10.1080/2050571X.2016.1273572
     https://doi.org/10.1080/2050571X.2016.1273572 [Google Scholar]
  44. Majewski, W., Hollien, H., & Zalewski, J.
    (1972) Speaking fundamental frequency of Polish adult males. Phonetica, 25(2), 119–125. 10.1159/000259375
     https://doi.org/10.1159/000259375 [Google Scholar]
  45. Ménard, L.
    (2003) Le registre en tant que marqueur prosodique de dialectalité : le cas du français du Québec et de la France. InM. Demers (Ed.), Registre et voix sociale (pp. 35–58). Nota Bene.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Mennen, I., Schaeffler, F., & Docherty, G.
    (2007) Pitching it differently: A comparison of the pitch ranges of German and English speakers. InProceedings. of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Saarbrücken, Germany, 1769–1772.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. (2012) Cross-language differences in fundamental frequency range: A comparison of English and German. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 131(3), 2249–2260. 10.1121/1.3681950
     https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3681950 [Google Scholar]
  48. Nevo, L., Nevo, C., & Oliveira, G.
    (2015) A comparison of vocal parameters in adult bilingual Hebrew-English speakers. InCoDAS, 271, Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia, 483–491. 10.1590/2317‑1782/20152015096
     https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20152015096 [Google Scholar]
  49. Nolan, F.
    (2003) Intonational equivalence: An experimental evaluation of pitch scales. InProceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Barcelona, Spain, 391, 771–774.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Ordin, M., & Mennen, I.
    (2015) Comparison of fundamental frequency in Welsh and English in bilingual speech. InProceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Glasgow, UK, 1–5.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Passoni, E., de Leeuw, E., & Levon, E.
    (2019) Two languages, two pitch ranges: The case of Japanese-English sequential bilinguals. InProceedings of the 19th International Congress on Phonetic Sciences, Melbourne, Australia, 1650–1654.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Pépiot, E.
    (2014) Male and female speech: a study of mean f 0, f 0 range, phonation type and speech rate in Parisian French and American English speakers. InProceedings of Speech Prosody71, Dublin, Ireland, 305–309. 10.21437/SpeechProsody.2014‑49
     https://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2014-49 [Google Scholar]
  53. Pike, K. L.
    (1945) The intonation of American English. University of Michigan Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. RStudio Team
    RStudio Team (2020) RStudio: Integrated Development for R. RStudio, PBC, Boston, MA. URLwww.rstudio.com/
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Révis, J.
    (2013) La voix et soi : Ce que notre voix dit de nous. De Boeck Superieur.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Rietveld, T., & Vermillion, P.
    (2003) Cues for perceived pitch register. Phonetica, 60(4), 261–272. 10.1159/000076376
     https://doi.org/10.1159/000076376 [Google Scholar]
  57. Roach, K. D., Cornett-Devito, M. M., & Devito, R.
    (2005) A cross-cultural comparison of instructor communication in American and French classrooms. Communication Quarterly, 53(1), 87–107. 10.1080/01463370500056127
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01463370500056127 [Google Scholar]
  58. Rousseau, M. C.
    (2013) Changement de langue, changement de voix ? Une étude comparative de l’effet du statut des langues anglaise et française au Québec sur la prosodie de la voix de locuteurs bilingues. Master’s thesis, Université du Québec à Montréal.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Scharff-Rethfeldt, W., Miller, N., & Mennen, I.
    (2008) Unterschiede in der mittleren Sprechtonhöhe bei Deutsch/Englisch bilingualen Sprechern [Speaking fundamental frequency differences in German-English bilinguals]. Sprache Stimme Gehör, 321, 123–128. 10.1055/s‑0028‑1083799
     https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1083799 [Google Scholar]
  60. Scherer, K. R.
    (1974) Voice quality analysis of American and German speakers. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 3(3), 281–298. 10.1007/BF01069244
     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01069244 [Google Scholar]
  61. Scherer, K. R., & Oshinsky, J. S.
    (1977) Cue utilization in emotion attribution from auditory stimuli. Motivation and Emotion, 41, 331–346. 10.1007/BF00992539
     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992539 [Google Scholar]
  62. Schwab, S., & Goldman, J. P.
    (2016) Do speakers show different F 0 when they speak in different languages? The case of English, French and German. InProceedings of the 5th Conference on Speech Prosody, Boston, USA, 6–10. 10.21437/SpeechProsody.2016‑2
     https://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2016-2 [Google Scholar]
  63. Sellers, V.
    (2000) Anxiety and reading comprehension in Spanish as a foreign language. Foreign Language Annals, 33(5), 512–521. 10.1111/j.1944‑9720.2000.tb01995.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2000.tb01995.x [Google Scholar]
  64. Simon, A. C., Auchlin, A., Avanzi, M., & Goldman, J. P.
    (2010) Les phonostyles : une description prosodique des styles de parole en français. InM. Abecassis, & G. Ledegen (Eds.), Les voix des Français : en parlant, en écrivant (pp.71–88). Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Shriberg, E.
    (2001) To ‘errrr’ is human: ecology and acoustics of speech disfluencies. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 31(1), 153–169. 10.1017/S0025100301001128
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100301001128 [Google Scholar]
  66. Titze, I. R.
    (1989) Physiology and acoustic differences between male and female voices. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 85(4), 1699–1707. 10.1121/1.397959
     https://doi.org/10.1121/1.397959 [Google Scholar]
  67. Van Rossum, G., & Drake Jr, F.L.
    (1995) Python reference manual. Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica Amsterdam.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Voigt, R., Jurafsky, D., & Sumner, M.
    (2016) Between- and within-speaker effects of bilingualism on F 0 variation. InInterspeech, San Francisco, USA, 1122–1126.
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Wenk, B. J.
    (1983) Effets de rythme dans le français parlé. Recherches sur le français parlé, Vol. 5, Publications de l’Université de Provence, 147–162.
     [Google Scholar]
  70. White, R.
    (1997) Back channelling, repair, pausing, and private speech. Applied Linguistics, 18(3), 314–344. 10.1093/applin/18.3.314
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/18.3.314 [Google Scholar]
  71. Woodrow, L.
    (2006) Anxiety and speaking English as a second language. RELC Journal, 371, 308–328. 10.1177/0033688206071315
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688206071315 [Google Scholar]
  72. Xu, Y.
    (2013) ProsodyPro – A tool for large-scale systematic prosody analysis. InProceedings of Tools and Resources for the Analysis of Speech Prosody (TRASP’2013), Aix en Provence, France. 7–10.
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Xue, A., Hagstrom, F., & Hao, J.
    (2002) Speaking F 0 characteristics of young and elderly bilingual Chinese-English speakers: A functional system approach. Asian Pacific Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing, 71, 55–62. 10.1179/136132802805576544
     https://doi.org/10.1179/136132802805576544 [Google Scholar]
  74. Yamazawa, H., & Hollien, H.
    (1992) Speaking fundamental frequency patterns of Japanese women. Phonetica, 491, 128–140. 10.1159/000261907
     https://doi.org/10.1159/000261907 [Google Scholar]
  75. Yoon, S., Mok, S., Youn, J., Han, J., & Yim, D.
    (2019) Changes in fundamental frequency depending on language, context, and language proficiency for bilinguals. Phonetics and Speech Sciences, 11(1), 9–18. 10.13064/KSSS.2019.11.1.009
     https://doi.org/10.13064/KSSS.2019.11.1.009 [Google Scholar]
  76. Zimmerer, F., Jügler, J., Andreeva, B., Möbius, B., & Trouvain, J.
    (2014) Too cautious to vary more? A comparison of pitch variation in native and non-native productions of French and German speakers. InProceedings of the 7th Speech Prosody Conference, Dublin, Ireland, 1037–1041. 10.21437/SpeechProsody.2014‑197
     https://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2014-197 [Google Scholar]
  77. Zraick, R. I., Gentry, M. A., Smith-Olinde, L., & Gregg, B. A.
    (2006) The effect of speaking context on elicitation of habitual pitch. Journal of Voice20(4), 545–554. 10.1016/j.jvoice.2005.08.008
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2005.08.008 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/lia.00018.dro
Loading
Another voice for another language?
Language, Interaction and Acquisition 14, 247 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1075/lia.00018.dro
/content/journals/10.1075/lia.00018.dro
/content/journals/10.1075/lia.00018.dro
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): cross-language variations; pitch level; pitch range; voiced pauses; within-speaker effects

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error