oa A multi-dimensional analysis of backchannels in L1 German, L1 Italian and L2 German

References

1. Albert, A., Cangemi, F., Ellison, T. M., & Grice, M.
   (2020) ProPer: PROsodic analysis with periodic energy. 10.17605/OSF.IO/28EA5
   https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/28EA5
2. Amador-Moreno, C. P., McCarthy, M., & O’Keeffe, A.
   (2013) Can English provide a framework for Spanish response tokens?InJ. Romero-Trillo (Ed.), Yearbook of corpus linguistics and pragmatics 2013 (pp. 175–201). Springer. 10.1007/978‑94‑007‑6250‑3_9
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6250-3_9 [Google Scholar]
3. Anderson, A. H., Bader, M., Bard, E. G., Boyle, E., Doherty, G., Garrod, S.
   , … others (1991) The HCRC map task corpus. Language and Speech, 34(4), 351–366. 10.1177/002383099103400404
   https://doi.org/10.1177/002383099103400404 [Google Scholar]
4. Berry, A.
   (1994) Spanish and American turn-taking styles: A comparative study. Pragmatics and Language Learning Monograph Series, 51, 180–190.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Boersma, P., & Weenink, D.
   (2021) Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [computer programme]. Version, 6.2 (Version 6.2). [Retrieval date: 12/11/2024]
   [Google Scholar]
6. Borras, J., & Llanes, A.
   (2019) Re-examining the impact of study abroad on L2 development: a critical overview. The Language Learning Journal, 491, 1–14. 10.1080/09571736.2019.1642941
   https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2019.1642941 [Google Scholar]
7. Campbell-Larsen, J.
   (2015) Interactional competence in second language acquisition. Kwansei Gakuin University Humanities Review, 191, 265–287.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Cangemi, F.
   (2015) Mausmooth [Praat script]. Retrieved fromhttps://ifl.phil-fak.uni-koeln.de/sites/linguistik/Phonetik/pdf-publications/2015/cangemi2015mausmooth.pdf [Retrieval date: 12/11/2024]
9. Cangemi, F., Albert, A., & Grice, M.
   (2019) Modelling intonation: Beyond segments and tonal targets. InS. Calhoun, P. Escudero, M. Tabain & P. Warren (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, (Melbourne) Australia (pp.572–576).
   [Google Scholar]
10. Castello, E., & Gesuato, S.
    (2019) Holding up one’s end of the conversation in spoken English: Lexical backchannels in L2 examination discourse. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, 5(2), 231–252. 10.1075/ijlcr.17020.cas
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr.17020.cas [Google Scholar]
11. Clancy, P. M., Thompson, S. A., Suzuki, R., & Tao, H.
    (1996) The conversational use of reactive tokens in English, Japanese, and Mandarin. Journal of Pragmatics, 26(3), 355–387. 10.1016/0378‑2166(95)00036‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(95)00036-4 [Google Scholar]
12. Cogo, A.
    (2009) Accommodating difference in ELF Conversations: A study of pragmatic strategies. InA. Mauranen & E. Ranta, (Eds.), English as a Lingua Franca: Studies and findings (pp. 254–273). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Council of Europe (CEFR)
    Council of Europe (CEFR) (2001) Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Cutrone, P.
    (2005) A case study examining backchannels in conversations between Japanese-British dyads. Multilingua. Journal of Cross-Cultural and Interlanguage Communication, 24(3), 237–274. 10.1515/mult.2005.24.3.237
    https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.2005.24.3.237 [Google Scholar]
15. Cutrone, P.
    (2014) A cross-cultural examination of the backchannel behavior of Japanese and Americans: Considerations for Japanese EFL learners. Intercultural Pragmatics, 11(1), 83–120. 10.1515/ip‑2014‑0004
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2014-0004 [Google Scholar]
16. Derwing, T., & Munro, M.
    (2009) Putting accent in its place: Rethinking obstacles to communication. Language Teaching, 42(4), 476–490. 10.1017/S026144480800551X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144480800551X [Google Scholar]
17. Dideriksen, C., Fusaroli, R., Tylén, K., Dingemanse, M., & Christiansen, M. H.
    (2019) Contextualizing conversational strategies: backchannel, repair and linguistic alignment in spontaneous and task-oriented conversations. InProceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 411 (pp. 261–267). Cognitive Science Society. 10.31234/osf.io/fd8y9
    https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/fd8y9 [Google Scholar]
18. Drummond, K., & Hopper, R.
    (1993) Back channels revisited: Acknowledgment tokens and speakership incipiency. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 26(2), 157–177. 10.1207/s15327973rlsi2602_3
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi2602_3 [Google Scholar]
19. Duncan, S.
    (1974) On the structure of speaker-auditor interaction during speaking turns. Language in Society, 3(2), 161–180. 10.1017/S0047404500004322
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500004322 [Google Scholar]
20. Duncan, S., & Fiske, D. W.
    (1977) Face-to-face interaction: Research, methods, and theory. Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Edlund, J., Heldner, M., & Pelcé, A.
    (2009) Prosodic features of very short utterances in dialogue. InM. Vainio, R. Aulanko & O. Aaltonen (Eds.), Nordic prosody — Proceedings of the Xth conference (pp. 57–68). Citeseer.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Fellegy, A. M.
    (1995) Patterns and functions of minimal response. American Speech. International Journal of Educational Best Practices, 2(1), 186–199. 10.2307/455815
    https://doi.org/10.2307/455815 [Google Scholar]
23. Fraser, C., & Kelly, B. F.
    (2012) Listening between the lines: social assumptions around foreign accents. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 35(1), 74–93. 10.1075/aral.35.1.04fra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.35.1.04fra [Google Scholar]
24. Freed, B. F., Segalowitz, N., & Dewey, D. P.
    (2004) Context of learning and second language fluency in French: Comparing regular classroom, study abroad, and intensive domestic immersion programs. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(2), 275–301. 10.1017/S0272263104262064
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263104262064 [Google Scholar]
25. Fries, C. C.
    (1952) The structure of English. Harcourt & Brice.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Fusaroli, R., & Tylén, K.
    (2016) Investigating conversational dynamics: Interactive alignment, interpersonal synergy, and collective task performance. Cognitive Science, 40(1), 145–171. 10.1111/cogs.12251
    https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12251 [Google Scholar]
27. Galaczi, E. D.
    (2014) Interactional competence across proficiency levels: How do learners manage interaction in paired speaking tests?Applied Linguistics, 35(5), 553–574. 10.1093/applin/amt017
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt017 [Google Scholar]
28. Gardner, R.
    (2001) When listeners talk: Response tokens and listener stance. John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.92
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.92 [Google Scholar]
29. Gilquin, G.
    (2016) Discourse markers in L2 English. From classroom to naturalistic input. InO. Timofeeva, A.-C. Gardner, A. Honkapohja, & S. Chevalier (Eds.), New approaches to English linguistics (213–249). John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.177.09gil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.177.09gil [Google Scholar]
30. Girgin, U., & Brandt, A.
    (2020) Creating space for learning through ‘Mm hm’ in a L2 classroom: Implications for L2 classroom interactional competence. Classroom Discourse, 11(1), 61–79. 10.1080/19463014.2019.1603115
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2019.1603115 [Google Scholar]
31. Goodwin, C.
    (1986) Audience diversity, participation and interpretation. Text — Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 6(3), 283–316. 10.1515/text.1.1986.6.3.283
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1986.6.3.283 [Google Scholar]
32. Grice, M., & Savino, M.
    (2003) Map tasks in Italian: Asking questions about given, accessible and new information. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 21, 153–180. 10.5565/rev/catjl.48
    https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/catjl.48 [Google Scholar]
33. Ha, K.-P.
    (2012) Prosody in Vietnamese: Intonational form and function of short utterances in conversation (Unpublished PhD dissertation). Canberra: The Australian National University; Asia-Pacific Linguistics (SEAMLES).
    [Google Scholar]
34. Ha, K.-P., Ebner, S., & Grice, M.
    (2016) Speech prosody and possible misunderstandings in intercultural talk: A study of listener behaviour in standard Vietnamese and German dialogues. Proceedings of Speech Prosody, (Boston) USA (pp.801–805). 10.21437/SpeechProsody.2016‑164
    https://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2016-164 [Google Scholar]
35. Hall, J. K.
    (1995) (Re)creating our worlds with words: A sociohistorical perspective of face-to-face interaction. Applied Linguistics, 16(2), 206–232. 10.1093/applin/16.2.206
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/16.2.206 [Google Scholar]
36. Hasegawa, Y.
    (2014) Japanese: A linguistic introduction. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139507127
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139507127 [Google Scholar]
37. He, A. W., & Young, R.
    (1998) Language proficiency interviews: A discourse approach. Talking and Testing: Discourse Approaches to the Assessment of Oral Proficiency, 141, 1–24. 10.1075/sibil.14.02he
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.14.02he [Google Scholar]
38. Heinz, B.
    (2003) Backchannel responses as strategic responses in bilingual speakers’ conversations. Journal of Pragmatics, 35(7), 1113–1142. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)00190‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00190-X [Google Scholar]
39. Heritage, J.
    (1984) A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. InJ. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 299–345). Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Jacoby, S., & Ochs, E.
    (1995) Co-construction: An introduction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28(3), 171–183. 10.1207/s15327973rlsi2803_1
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi2803_1 [Google Scholar]
41. Janz, A.
    (2022) Navigating common ground using feedback in conversation — A phonetic analysis [MA thesis]. University of Cologne.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Jefferson, G.
    (1984) Notes on a systematic deployment of the acknowledgement tokens “yeah” and “mm hm.” Tilburg Papers in Language and Literature, 301, 1–18. 10.1080/08351818409389201
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351818409389201 [Google Scholar]
43. Kasper, G., & Wagner, J.
    (2011) A conversation-analytic approach to second language acquisition. InD. Atkinson (Ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 117–142). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Kendon, A.
    (1967) Some functions of gaze-direction in social interaction. Acta Psychologica, 261, 22–63. 10.1016/0001‑6918(67)90005‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(67)90005-4 [Google Scholar]
45. Kjellmer, G.
    (2009) Where do we backchannel?: On the use of mm, mhm, uh huh and such like. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 14(1), 81–112. 10.1075/ijcl.14.1.05kje
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.14.1.05kje [Google Scholar]
46. Kousidis, S. & Dorran, D.
    (2009) Monitoring convergence of temporal features in spontaneous dialogue speech. 1st Young Researchers Workshop on Speech Technology, University College Dublin. Dublin, Ireland, 25th April. URL:https://arrow.tudublin.ie/dmccon/1/
    [Google Scholar]
47. Kraaz, M., & Bernaisch, T.
    (2022) Backchannels and the pragmatics of South Asian Englishes. World Englishes, 41(2), 224–243. 10.1111/weng.12522
    https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12522 [Google Scholar]
48. Kraut, R. E., Lewis, S. H., & Swezey, L. W.
    (1982) Listener responsiveness and the coordination of conversation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(4), 718–731. 10.1037/0022‑3514.43.4.718
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.43.4.718 [Google Scholar]
49. Lambertz, K.
    (2011) Back-channelling: The use of yeah and mm to portray engaged listenership. Griffith Working Papers in Pragmatics and Intercultural Communication, 41, 11–18.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Li, H. Z.
    (2006) Backchannel responses as misleading feedback in intercultural discourse. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 35(2), 99–116. 10.1080/17475750600909253
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17475750600909253 [Google Scholar]
51. Li, H. Z., Cui, Y., & Wang, Z.
    (2010) Backchannel responses and enjoyment of the conversation: The more does not necessarily mean the better. International Journal of Psychological Studies, 2(1), 25. 10.5539/ijps.v2n1p25
    https://doi.org/10.5539/ijps.v2n1p25 [Google Scholar]
52. Maynard, Senko K.
    (1997) Analyzing Interactional Management in Native/Non-Native English Conversation: A Case of Listener Response. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 35(1), 37–60.
    [Google Scholar]
53. McCarthy, M.
    (2009) Rethinking spoken fluency. Estudios de Lingüística Inglesa Aplicada, 91, 11–29.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Mifka-Profozic, N.
    (2023) Interactive alignment in L2 Learning: The link between social interaction and psycholinguistic phenomena. Education Sciences, 13(8), 792. 10.3390/educsci13080792
    https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13080792 [Google Scholar]
55. Nurjaleka, L.
    (2019) Backchannel behavior in interview discourse: A contrastive study between Japanese and Indonesian. InE. Kurniawan, A. Danuwijaya, M. Zifana & L. Hakim (Eds.), Eleventh Conference on Applied Linguistics (CONAPLIN 2018) (pp. 451–457). Atlantis Press. 10.2991/conaplin‑18.2019.300
    https://doi.org/10.2991/conaplin-18.2019.300 [Google Scholar]
56. Osborne, J.
    (2011) Fluency, complexity and informativeness in native and non-native speech. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 16(2), 276–298. 10.1075/ijcl.16.2.06osb
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.16.2.06osb [Google Scholar]
57. Piccardo, E., North, B., & Goodier, T.
    (2019) Broadening the scope of language education: Mediation, plurilingualism, and collaborative learning: The CEFR companion volume. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 15(1).
    [Google Scholar]
58. Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S.
    (2006) Alignment as the basis for successful communication. Research on Language and Computation, 41, 203–228. 10.1007/s11168‑006‑9004‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11168-006-9004-0 [Google Scholar]
59. Richards, B. J., & Malvern, D. D.
    (2000) Accommodation in oral interviews between foreign language learners and teachers who are not native speakers. Studia Linguistica, 54(2), 260–271. 10.1111/1467‑9582.00065
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9582.00065 [Google Scholar]
60. Rossiter, M. J.
    (2009) Perceptions of L2 fluency by native and non-native speakers of English. Canadian Modern Language Review, 65(3), 395–412. 10.3138/cmlr.65.3.395
    https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.65.3.395 [Google Scholar]
61. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G.
    (1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. 10.1353/lan.1974.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010 [Google Scholar]
62. Saito, K., Ilkan, M., Magne, V., Tran, M. N., & Suzuki, S.
    (2018) Acoustic characteristics and learner profiles of low-, mid- and high-level second language fluency. Applied Psycholinguistics, 39(3), 593–617. 10.1017/S0142716417000571
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716417000571 [Google Scholar]
63. Savignon, S.
    (1990) Communicative language teaching: Definitions and directions. Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics, 11, 207–217.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Savignon, S. J.
    (2005) Communicative language teaching: Strategies and goals. InE. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 635–651). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Savino, M.
    (2010) Intonational strategies for backchanneling in Italian Map Task dialogues. InA. Botinis (Ed.), Third ISCA workshop on experimental linguistics (pp. 157–160). URL: linglab.phil.uoa.gr
    [Google Scholar]
66. Savino, M.
    (2011) The intonation of backchannels in Italian task-oriented dialogues: Cues to turn-taking dynamics, information status and speaker’s attitude. InZ. Vetulani (Ed.), Proceedings of the 5th Language and Technology Conference: Human language technology as a challenge for Computer Science and Linguistics, (pp. 370–374). URL: https://hdl.handle.net/11586/40703
    [Google Scholar]
67. Savino, M.
    (2014) The intonation of backchannel tokens in Italian collaborative dialogues. InZ. Vetulani & J. Mariani (Eds.), Human language technology challenges for computer sciences and linguistics. Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑08958‑4_3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08958-4_3 [Google Scholar]
68. Savino, M., Sbranna, S., Ventura, C., Albert, A., & Grice, M.
    (2022) Imitating intonation in a non-native variety: the influence of the native repertoire. Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2022 (739–743). 10.21437/SpeechProsody.2022‑150
    https://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2022-150 [Google Scholar]
69. Sbranna, S., Cangemi, F., & Grice, M.
    (2020) Quantifying L2 interactional competence. InL. Romito (Ed.), Language change under contact conditions: acquisitional contexts, languages, dialects and minorities in Italy and around the world (pp. 383–405). Officinaventuno. 10.17469/O2107AISV000018
    https://doi.org/10.17469/O2107AISV000018 [Google Scholar]
70. Sbranna, S., Möking, E., Wehrle, S., & Grice, M.
    (2022) Backchannelling across languages: Rate, lexical choice and intonation in L1 Italian, L1 German and L2 German. 11th International Conference on Speech Prosody 2022 10.21437/SpeechProsody.2022‑149
    https://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2022-149 [Google Scholar]
71. Sbranna, S., Ventura, C., Albert, A., & Grice, M.
    (2023) Prosodic marking of information status in Italian. Journal of Phonetics, 971, 101212. 10.1016/j.wocn.2023.101212
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2023.101212 [Google Scholar]
72. Sbranna, S., Wehrle, S., & Grice, M.
    (2022) The use of backchannels and other very short utterances by Italian learners of German. InR. Orrico & L. Schettino (Eds.), The position of the speaker in interaction: attitudes, intentions, and emotions in verbal communication (pp. 149–169). Officinaventuno.
    [Google Scholar]
73. Schegloff, E. A.
    (1982) Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of “uh huh” and other things that come between sentences. Analyzing Discourse: Text and Talk, 711, 71–93.
    [Google Scholar]
74. Shannon, C. E.
    (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal27(3), 379–423.
    [Google Scholar]
75. Shelley, L., & Gonzalez, F.
    (2013) Back channeling: Function of back channeling and L1 effects on back channeling in L2. Linguistic Portfolios, 2(1), 98–108.
    [Google Scholar]
76. Simon, C.
    (2018) The functions of active listening responses. Behavioural Processes, 1571, 47–53. 10.1016/j.beproc.2018.08.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2018.08.013 [Google Scholar]
77. Spaniol, M., Janz, A., Wehrle, S., Vogeley, K., & Grice, M.
    (2023) Multimodal signalling: the interplay of oral and visual feedback in conversation. InR. Skarnitzl & J. Volín (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, (Prague) Czech Republic (pp.4110–4114). International Phonetic Association.
    [Google Scholar]
78. Stocksmeier, T., Kopp, S., & Gibbon, D.
    (2007) Synthesis of prosodic attitudinal variants in German backchannel ja. Proceedings of Interspeech 2007 (Antwerp) (pp. 1290–1293). 10.21437/Interspeech.2007‑232
    https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2007-232 [Google Scholar]
79. Tao, H., & Thompson, S. A.
    (1991) English backchannels in Mandarin conversations: A case study of superstratum pragmatic “interference.”Journal of Pragmatics, 16(3), 209–223. 10.1016/0378‑2166(91)90093‑D
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(91)90093-D [Google Scholar]
80. Tavakoli, P., & Skehan, P.
    (2005) Strategic planning, task structure, and performance testing. InR. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 239–273). John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.11.15tav
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.11.15tav [Google Scholar]
81. Tolins, J., & Fox Tree, J. E.
    (2014) Addressee backchannels steer narrative development. Journal of Pragmatics, 701, 152–164. 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.06.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.06.006 [Google Scholar]
82. Tottie, G.
    (1991) Conversational style in British and American English: The case of backchannels. InK. Aijmer & B. Altenberg (Eds.), English Corpus Linguistics (pp. 254–271). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
83. Tsai, P. S., & Chu, W. H.
    (2017) The use of discourse markers among Mandarin Chinese teachers, and Chinese as second language and Chinese as foreign language learners. Applied Linguistics, 38(5), 638–665.
    [Google Scholar]
84. Ward, N., & Tsukahara, W.
    (2000) Prosodic features which cue back-channel responses in English and Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(8), 1177–1207. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(99)00109‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00109-5 [Google Scholar]
85. Watson-Gegeo, K. A.
    (2004) Mind, language, and epistemology: Toward a language socialization paradigm for SLA. The Modern Language Journal, 88(3), 331–350. 10.1111/j.0026‑7902.2004.00233.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.00233.x [Google Scholar]
86. Wehrle, S.
    (2021) A multi-dimensional analysis of conversation and intonation in autism spectrum disorderUnpublished PhD dissertation. University of Cologne.
    [Google Scholar]
87. Wehrle, S., & Grice, M.
    (2019) Function and prosodic form of backchannels in L1 and L2 German. Hanyang international symposium on phonetics and cognitive sciences of language [Conference presentation abstract], (Seoul) South Korea.
    [Google Scholar]
88. Wehrle, S., Grice, M., & Vogeley, K.
    (2024) Filled pauses produced by autistic adults differ in prosodic realisation, but not rate or lexical type. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 541, 2513–2525. 10.1007/s10803‑023‑06000‑y
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-023-06000-y [Google Scholar]
89. Wehrle, S., Roettger, T. B., & Grice, M.
    (2018) Exploring the dynamics of backchannel interpretation: The meandering mouse paradigm. ProsLang -Workshop on the Processing of Prosody across Languages and Varieties [Conference presentation], (Wellington) New Zealand. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334363725_Function_and_Prosodic_Form_of_Backchannels_in_L1_and_L2_German
    [Google Scholar]
90. Wehrle, S., Vogeley, K., & Grice, M.
    (2024) Backchannels in conversations between autistic adults are less frequent and less diverse prosodically and lexically. Language and Cognition, 16(1), 108–133. 10.1017/langcog.2023.21
    https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2023.21 [Google Scholar]
91. White, S.
    (1989) Backchannels across cultures: A study of Americans and Japanese. Language in Society, 18(1), 59–76. 10.1017/S0047404500013270
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500013270 [Google Scholar]
92. Winter, B., & Grice, M.
    (2021) Independence and generalizability in linguistics. Linguistics, 59(5), 1251–1277. 10.1515/ling‑2019‑0049
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2019-0049 [Google Scholar]
93. Wolf, J. P.
    (2008) The effects of backchannels on fluency in L2 oral task production. System, 36(2), 279–294. 10.1016/j.system.2007.11.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2007.11.007 [Google Scholar]
94. Yngve, V. H.
    (1970) On getting a word in edgewise. Chicago Linguistics Society, 6th Meeting, 1970 (pp. 567–578).
    [Google Scholar]
95. Young, R. F.
    (2011) Interactional competence in language learning, teaching, and testing. InE. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (Vol.21) (pp. 426–443). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
96. Yuan, F., & Ellis, R.
    (2003) The effects of pre-task planning and on-line planning on fluency, complexity and accuracy in L2 monologic oral production. Applied Linguistics, 24(1), 1–27. 10.1093/applin/24.1.1
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/24.1.1 [Google Scholar]