oa Becoming a member in social worlds

References

1. Antaki, C.
   (2012) Conversation analysis and identity in interaction. InC. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics (pp. 1000–1004). Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0201
   https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0201 [Google Scholar]
2. Arditty, J., & Vasseur, M. T.
   (1999) Interaction et langue étrangère : Présentation. Langages, 1341, 2–19. 10.3406/lgge.1999.2189
   https://doi.org/10.3406/lgge.1999.2189 [Google Scholar]
3. Atkinson, D.
   (Ed.) (2011) Alternative approaches to second language acquisition. Routledge. 10.4324/9780203830932
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203830932 [Google Scholar]
4. Bange, P.
   (1992) A propos de la communication et de l’apprentissage de L2. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Étrangère, 11, 53–85. 10.4000/aile.4875
   https://doi.org/10.4000/aile.4875 [Google Scholar]
5. Berger, E.
   (2016) Prendre la parole en L2. Regard sur la compétence d’interaction en classe. Peter Lang. 10.3726/978‑3‑0351‑0935‑1
   https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-0351-0935-1 [Google Scholar]
6. Block, D.
   (2003) The social turn in second language acquisition.Edinburgh University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Blum-Kulka, S., House, J., & Kasper, G.
   (1989) Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies. Ablex.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Brouwer, C. E., & Wagner, J.
   (2004) Developmental issues in second language conversation. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11, 29–47. 10.1558/japl.1.1.29.55873
   https://doi.org/10.1558/japl.1.1.29.55873 [Google Scholar]
9. Burdelski, M. J., & Howard, K. M.
   (Eds.) (2020) Language socialization in the classroom. Culture, interaction, and language development. Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Canale, M., & Swain, M.
    (1980) Theoretical aspects of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 11, 1–47. 10.1093/applin/1.1.1
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/1.1.1 [Google Scholar]
11. Cekaite, A.
    (2007) A child’s development of interactional competence in a Swedish L2 classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 91(1), 45–62. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2007.00509.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00509.x [Google Scholar]
12. Cekaite, A.
    (2012) Affective stances in teacher — novice student interactions: language, embodiment, and willingness to learn. Language in Society, 411, 641–670. 10.1017/S0047404512000681
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404512000681 [Google Scholar]
13. de Bot, K., Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M.
    (2007) A dynamic systems theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 101, 7–21. 10.1017/S1366728906002732
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728906002732 [Google Scholar]
14. De Pietro, J. -F., Matthey, M., & Py, B.
    (1989) Acquisition et contrat didactique : les séquences potentiellement acquisitionnelles dans la conversation exolingue. Actes du troisième colloque régional de linguistique, Strasbourg, 28–29 avril 1988 (pp. 99–124). Université des Sciences humaines/Université Louis Pasteur.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Deppermann, A.
    (2018) Changes in turn-design over interactional histories — the case of instructions in driving school lessons. InA. Deppermann & J. Streeck (Eds.), Time in embodied interaction: Synchronicity and sequentiality of multi-modal resources (pp. 293–324). John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.293.09dep
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.293.09dep [Google Scholar]
16. Deppermann, A., & Pekarek Doehler, S.
    (2021) Longitudinal conversation analysis: Introduction to the special issue. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 541, 127–141. 10.1080/08351813.2021.1899707
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2021.1899707 [Google Scholar]
17. Douglas Fir Group
    Douglas Fir Group (2016) A transdisciplinary framework for SLA in a multilingual world. The Modern Language Journal, 100(S1), 19–47. 10.1111/modl.12301
    https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12301 [Google Scholar]
18. Duff, P. A.
    (2017) Volume editor’s introduction to “Language Socialization”. InP. A. Duff & S. May (Eds.), Language Socialization (3rd ed., pp. xi–xvii). Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑02255‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02255-0 [Google Scholar]
19. Duff, P. A., & May, S.
    (Eds.) (2017) Language socialization (3rd ed.). Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑02255‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02255-0 [Google Scholar]
20. Duff, P. A., & Talmy, S.
    (2011) Language socialization approaches to second language acquisition: Social, cultural, and linguistic development in additional languages. InD. Atkinson (Ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 95–116). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Ellis, N. C.
    (2002) Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 241, 143–188. 10.1017/S0272263102002024
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263102002024 [Google Scholar]
22. Ellis, N. C.
    , & Ferreira-Junior, F. (2009) Construction learning as a function of frequency, frequency distribution, and function. The Modern Language Journal, 98(3), 370–385. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2009.00896.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00896.x [Google Scholar]
23. Ellis, R.
    (2009) The study of second language acquisition (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Eskildsen, S. W.
    (2011) The L2 inventory in action: Conversation analysis and usage-based linguistics in SLA. InG. Pallotti & J. Wagner (Eds.), L2 learning as social practice: Conversation-analytic perspectives (pp. 337–373). National Foreign Language Resource Center, University of Hawai’i at Manoa.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Eskildsen, S. W., & Pekarek Doehler, S.
    (Eds.) (2022) Emergent L2 grammar-for-interaction: Toward an interactional usage-based SLA. Special issue ofThe Modern Language Journal, 106, S1.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Firth, A., & Wagner, J.
    (1997) On discourse, communication, and (some) fundamental concepts in SLA Research. Modern Language Journal, 811, 286–300. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1997.tb05480.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1997.tb05480.x [Google Scholar]
27. Gardner, R.
    (2007) “Broken starts”: Bricolage in turn starts in second language talk. InZ. Hua, P. Seedhouse, L. R. Wei & V. Cook (Eds.), Language learning and teaching as social inter-action (pp. 58–71). Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230591240_5
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230591240_5 [Google Scholar]
28. Gardner, R., & Wagner, J.
    (Eds.) (2004) Second language conversations. Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Garfinkel, H.
    (1967) Studies in ethnomethodology. Prentice-Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Goffman, E.
    (1976) Interaction rituals. Essays in face to face behavior. Doubleday.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Greer, T.
    (2019) Initiating and delivering news of the day: Interactional competence as joint-development. Journal of Pragmatics, 1461, 150–164. 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.08.019
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.08.019 [Google Scholar]
32. Gülich, E.
    (1986) L’organisation conversationnelle des énoncés inachevés et de leur achèvement interactif en ‘situation de contact’. DRLAV, Documentation et Recherche en Linguistique Allemande Vincennes, 34–35, 161–182. 10.3406/drlav.1986.1042
    https://doi.org/10.3406/drlav.1986.1042 [Google Scholar]
33. Hall, J. K.
    (1993) The role of oral practices in the accomplishment of our everyday lives: The sociocultural dimension of interaction with implications for the learning of another language. Applied Linguistics, 14(2), 145–166. 10.1093/applin/14.2.145
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/14.2.145 [Google Scholar]
34. Hall, J. K.
    (1995) “Aw man, where you going?”: Classroom interaction and the development of L2 interactional competence. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 6(2), 37–62. 10.5070/L462005217
    https://doi.org/10.5070/L462005217 [Google Scholar]
35. Hellermann, J.
    (2008) Social actions for classroom language learning. Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Hellermann, J., Eskildsen, S., Pekarek Doehler, S., & Piirainen-Marsch, A.
    (Eds.) (2019) Conversation analytic research on learning-in-action: The complex ecology of L2 interaction in the wild. Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑22165‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22165-2 [Google Scholar]
37. Hymes, H. D.
    (1972) On communicative competence. InJ. B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics: Selected readings (pp. 269–293). Penguin.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Ishida, M.
    (2009) Development of interactional competence: Changes in the use of ne in L2 Japanese during study abroad. InH. T. Nguyen & G. Kasper (Eds.), Talk-in-interaction: Multilingual perspectives (pp.351–387). National Foreign Language Resource Centre-University of Hawaii.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Kasper, G.
    (2004) Participant orientations in German conversation-for-learning. The Modern Language Journal, 88(4), 551–567. 10.1111/j.0026‑7902.2004.t01‑18‑.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.t01-18-.x [Google Scholar]
40. Kasper, G., & Dahl, M.
    (1991) Research methods in interlanguage pragmatics. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 215–247. 10.1017/S0272263100009955
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100009955 [Google Scholar]
41. Kim, D. R.
    (2020) Emergence of proactive self-initiated self-repair as an indicator of L2 IC development. Applied Linguistics, 41(6), 901–921. 10.1093/applin/amz047
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amz047 [Google Scholar]
42. Kim, Y.
    (2009) The Korean discourse markers — nuntey and kuntey in native-nonnative conversation: An acquisitional perspective. InH. T. Nguyen & G. Kasper (Eds.), Talk-in-interaction: Multilingual perspectives (pp. 317–350). University of Hawai’i, National Foreign Language Resource Center.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Kim, Y.
    (2017) Topic initiation in conversation-for-learning: Developmental and pedagogical perspectives. English Teaching, 72(1), 73–103. 10.15858/engtea.72.1.201703.73
    https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.72.1.201703.73 [Google Scholar]
44. Krafft, U., & Dausendschön-Gay, U.
    (1993) La séquence analytique. Bulletin CILA, 571, 137–157.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Kurhila, S.
    (2006) Second language interaction. John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.145
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.145 [Google Scholar]
46. Lantolf, J. P., & Pavlenko, A.
    (1995) Sociocultural theory and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 151, 108–124. 10.1017/S0267190500002646
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190500002646 [Google Scholar]
47. Larsen-Freeman, D.
    (2006) The emergence of complexity, fluency, and accuracy in the oral and written production of five Chinese learners of English. Applied Linguistics, 271, 590–619. 10.1093/applin/aml029
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml029 [Google Scholar]
48. Lave, J., & Wenger, E.
    (1991) Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511815355
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355 [Google Scholar]
49. Markee, N.
    (2000) Conversation analysis. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 10.4324/9781410606471
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410606471 [Google Scholar]
50. Markee, N.
    (2008) Toward a learning behavior tracking methodology for CA-for-SLA. Applied Linguistics, 291, 404–427. 10.1093/applin/amm052
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm052 [Google Scholar]
51. Mori, J.
    (2004) Negotiating sequential boundaries and learning opportunities: A case from a Japanese language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 88(4), 536–550. 10.1111/j.0026‑7902.2004.t01‑17‑.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.t01-17-.x [Google Scholar]
52. Nguyen, H. T.
    (2011) A longitudinal microanalysis of a second language learner’s participation. InG. Pallotti & J. Wagner (Eds.), L2 learning as social practice: Conversation-analytic perspectives (pp. 17–44). University of Hawai’i, National Foreign Language Resource Center.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Nguyen, H. T., & Malabarba, T.
    (2024) Developing interactional competence at the workplace: Learning English as a foreign language on the shop floor. Routledge. 10.4324/9781003125778
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003125778 [Google Scholar]
54. Norton, B., & McKinney, C.
    (2011) An identity approach to second language acquisition. InD. Atkinson (Ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 73–94). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Ochs, E., & Schieffelin, B.
    (1984) Language acquisition and socialization: Three developmental stories. InR. A. Shweder & R. A. LeVine (Eds.), Culture theory: Essays on mind, self, and emotion (pp. 276–320). Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Ochs, E., & Schieffelin, B.
    (2017) Language socialization: An historical overview. InP. A. Duff & S. May (Eds.), Language Socialization (3rd ed., pp. 3–16). Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑02255‑0_1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02255-0_1 [Google Scholar]
57. Ohta, A. S.
    (1999) Interacitonal routines and the socialization of interactional style in adult learners of Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics, 131, 1493–1512. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(98)00115‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00115-5 [Google Scholar]
58. Pekarek Doehler, S.
    (2018) Elaborations on L2 interactional competence: The development of L2 grammar-for-interaction. Classroom Discourse, 9(1), 3–24. 10.1080/19463014.2018.1437759
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2018.1437759 [Google Scholar]
59. Pekarek Doehler, S., & Berger, E.
    (2018) L2 interactional competence as increased ability for context-sensitive conduct: A longitudinal study of story-openings. Applied Linguistics, 39(4), 555–578.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Pekarek Doehler, S., & Berger, E.
    (2019) On the reflexive relation between developing L2 interactional competence and evolving social relationships: A longitudinal study of word-searches in the “wild”. InJ. Hellermann, S. W. Eskildsen, S. Pekarek Doehler & A. Piirainen-Marsh (Eds.), Conversation analytic research on learning-in-action: The complex ecology of L2 interaction in the wild (pp. 51–75). Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑22165‑2_3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22165-2_3 [Google Scholar]
61. Pekarek Doehler, S., & Eskildsen, S.
    (2022) Emergent L2 grammars in and for social interaction. Introduction to the Special Issue. The Modern Language Journal, 1061, 3–22. 10.1111/modl.12759
    https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12759 [Google Scholar]
62. Pekarek Doehler, S., & Skogmyr Marian, K.
    (in press). The conversation analysis approach to second language acquisition. InD. Atkinson, & E. Taylor Eds. Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (2nd ed.). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Pekarek Doehler, S., & Thörle, B.
    (2024) Discourse markers and second language acquisition. InM. -B. Mosegaard Hansen, & J. Visconti (Eds.), Manual of discourse markers in romance (pp. 377–411). De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110711202‑013
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110711202-013 [Google Scholar]
64. Porquier, R.
    (1984) Communication exolingue et apprentissage des langues. InB. Py (Ed.), Acquisition d’une langue étrangère III (39–52). Presses Universitaires de Vincennes.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G.
    (1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. 10.1353/lan.1974.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010 [Google Scholar]
66. Schütz, A.
    (1972) Collected papers I. The problem of social reality. Springer. 10.1007/978‑94‑010‑2851‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2851-6 [Google Scholar]
67. Seedhouse, P.
    (2004) The interactional architecture of the language classroom: A conversation analysis perspective. Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
68. Skogmyr Marian, K.
    (2018) “Qu’est-ce que maman dit ?”: l’accomplissement des directives en français L2 par un jeune homme au pair. Travaux Neuchâtelois de Linguistique, 68, 27–38. 10.26034/tranel.2018.2851
    https://doi.org/10.26034/tranel.2018.2851 [Google Scholar]
69. Skogmyr Marian, K.
    (2022) The development of L2 interactional competence: A multimodal study of complaining in French interactions. Routledge. 10.4324/9781003271215
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003271215 [Google Scholar]
70. Skogmyr Marian, K.
    (2024) Longitudinal change in linguistic resources for interaction: The case of tu vois (‘you see’) in L2 French. Interactional Linguistics, 4(1), 3–37. 10.1075/il.23001.sko
    https://doi.org/10.1075/il.23001.sko [Google Scholar]
71. Vygotsky, L. S.
    (1978) Mind in society. Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
72. Wagner, J., Pekarek Doehler, S., & González-Martínez, E.
    (2018) Longitudinal research on the organization of social interaction: Current developments and methodological challenges. InS. Pekarek Doehler, J. Wagner & E. González-Martínez (Eds.), Longitudinal studies on the organization of social interaction (pp. 3–35). Springer. 10.1057/978‑1‑137‑57007‑9_1
    https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57007-9_1 [Google Scholar]
73. Young, R. F.
    (2000, March11–14). Interactional competence: Challenges for validity [Conference presentation]. AAAL 2000, Vancouver, BC.
    [Google Scholar]
74. Young, R. F.
    (2003) Learning to talk the talk and walk the walk: Interactional competence in academic spoken English. North Eastern Illinois University Working Papers in Linguistics, 21, 26–44.
    [Google Scholar]
75. Zheng, Y., Ortega, L., Pekarek Doehler, S., Sasaki, M., Eskildsen, S. W., & Gao, X.
    (2025) Praxeology, humanism, equity, and mixed methods: Four pillars for advancing second language acquisition and teaching. The Modern Language Journal, 1091, 64–89. 10.1111/modl.12977
    https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12977 [Google Scholar]