1887
Volume 10, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1879-7865
  • E-ISSN: 1879-7873
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The acquisition of preverbal liaison (e.g. /ilzaʀiv/) in second language (L2) French has rarely been explored in detail in previous studies on obligatory liaison. In this study, we conducted an elicited imitation test in order to study the influence of proficiency level, modality (spoken or written), and verb frequency on the use of preverbal liaison among 42 Swedish learners of L2 French and 21 native speakers of French. The results indicate that L2 beginners had considerable difficulty with the production of preverbal liaison, while the most proficient L2 learners performed nearly as well as the native speakers. In addition, we observed that beginner learners, in contrast to the more proficient ones, performed better with written than spoken stimuli. Finally, we observed no impact of verb frequency on participant performance. Based on these results, we discuss the possible influence of input frequency (both type and token) on the production of preverbal liaison, and conclude that future studies need to address the input characteristics of the L2 classroom in more detail.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lia.17023.agr
2019-05-16
2019-07-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Andreassen, H., & Lyche, C.
    (2015) Enchaînement, liaison, accentuation chez les apprenants norvégophones. Bulletin suisse de linguistique appliquée102, 105–121.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Ågren, M.
    (2014) Production et compréhension de la morphologie verbale en FLE: les difficultés de l’accord sujet-verbe en nombre. Les Cahiers de l’AFLS19(1), 1–22.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. (2015) La liaison préverbale comme accord sujet-verbe en FLE. InE. Havu & M. Paloheimo (Eds.), L’acquisition de constructions verbales en langue étrangère. Mémoires de la Société Néophilologique de Helsinki (pp.159–174). Vanta : Hansaprint.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Ågren, M. & van de Weijer, J.
    (2013) Input frequency and the acquisition of number agreement in L1 and L2 French. Journal of French Language Studies23, 311–333. 10.1017/S0959269512000312
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959269512000312 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bybee, J.
    (2001) Frequency effects in French liaison. InJ. Bybee & P. Hopper (Eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure (pp.337–359). Amsterdam /Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.45.17byb
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.45.17byb [Google Scholar]
  6. (2008) Usage-based grammar and second language acquisition. InP. Robinson & N. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp.216–236). London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Chabanal, D. & Liégeois, L.
    (2014) Production de liaisons dans l’input parental. InC. Soum-Favaro, A. Coquillon & J. P. Chevrot (Eds.), La liaison: approches contemporaines (pp.263–282). Bern: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Chevrot, J. P., Dugua, C., & Fayol, M.
    (2009) Liaison acquisition, word segmentation and construction in French: a usage-based account. Journal of Child Language36, 557–596. 10.1017/S0305000908009124
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000908009124 [Google Scholar]
  9. Chevrot, J. P., Fayol, M. & Laks, B.
    (2005) La liaison: De la phonologie à la cognition. Langages158, 3–7. 10.3917/lang.158.0003
    https://doi.org/10.3917/lang.158.0003 [Google Scholar]
  10. Côté, M. H.
    (2017) La liaison en diatopie: Esquisse d’une typologie. Journal of French Language Studies27, 13–25. 10.1017/S0959269516000302
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959269516000302 [Google Scholar]
  11. Council of Europe
    Council of Europe (2001) Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Strasbourg: Language Policy Unit. www.coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/Source/Framework_fr.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Delattre, P.
    (1947) La liaison en français : Tendances et classifications. French Review22(2), 148–157.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. de Moras, N.
    (2011) Acquisition de la liaison et de l’enchaînement en français L2. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Western Ontario, Canada.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Detey, S., & Racine, I.
    (2019) Learning to read liaisons in French as a Foreign Language: A longitudinal study of beginner Japanese learners in Japan. Language, Interaction, and Acquisition, 10(1), 97–117. [This volume] 10.1075/lia.17020.det
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lia.17020.det [Google Scholar]
  15. DIALANG: Self-assessment tool for second language proficiency according to the six levels of the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages
    DIALANG: Self-assessment tool for second language proficiency according to the six levels of the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: https://dialangweb.lancaster.ac.uk/
  16. Dubois, J.
    (1967) Grammaire structurale du français : Le verbe. Paris: Larousse.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Durand, J., & Lyche, C.
    (2008) French liaison in the light of corpus data. Journal of French Language Studies18(1), 33–66. 10.1017/S0959269507003158
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959269507003158 [Google Scholar]
  18. Durand, J., Laks, B., & Lyche, C.
    (2009) Le projet PFC: une source de données primaires structurées. InJ. Durand, B. Laks & C. Lyche (Eds.), Phonologie, variation et accents du français (19–61). Paris: Hermès.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Erlam, R.
    (2006) Elicited imitation as a measure of implicit L2 knowledge: An empirical validation study. Applied Linguistics27(3), 464–491. 10.1093/applin/aml001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml001 [Google Scholar]
  20. Eychenne, J., & Laks, B.
    (2017) La liaison en français contemporain: normes, usages, acquisitions. Journal of French Language Studies27(1), 1–12. 10.1017/S0959269516000430
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959269516000430 [Google Scholar]
  21. Eychenne, J., Lyche, C., Durand, J., & Coquillon, A.
    (2014) Quelles données pour la liaison en français: La question des corpus. InC. Soum-Favaro, A. Coquillon & J.-P. Chevrot (Eds.), La liaison: approches contemporaines (33–60). Bern: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Ferrand, L., Bonin, P., Méot, A., Augustinova, M., New, B., Pallier, C., & Brysbaert, M.
    (2008) Age-of-acquisition and subjective frequency estimates for all generally known monosyllabic French words and their relation with other psycholinguistic variables. Behaviour Research Methods40(4), 1049–1054. 10.3758/BRM.40.4.1049
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.4.1049 [Google Scholar]
  23. Harnois-Delpiano, M., Cavalla, C., & Chevrot, J.-P.
    (2012) L’acquisition de la liaison en L2 : étude longitudinale des apprenants coréens de FLE et comparaison avec enfants francophones natifs. InF. Neveu (Eds.), SHS Web of Conferences Actes du 3e Congrès Mondiale de linguistique française (pp.1575–1589).
    [Google Scholar]
  24. (2019) French liaison acquisition in L1 children and L2 adults: Methodological issues in exploring differences and similarities. Language, Interaction, and Acquisition, 10(1), 45–70. [This volume] 10.1075/lia.17021.har
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lia.17021.har [Google Scholar]
  25. Howard, M.
    (2013) La liaison en français langue étrangère. Language, Interaction and Acquisition4(2), 190–231. 10.1075/lia.4.2.04how
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lia.4.2.04how [Google Scholar]
  26. Legendre, G., Barrière, I., Goyet, L., & Nazzi, T.
    (2010) Comprehension of Infrequent Subject-Verb Agreement Forms: Evidence from French-learning Children. Child Development81, 1859–1875. 10.1111/j.1467‑8624.2010.01515.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01515.x [Google Scholar]
  27. Marty, F.
    (2001) Les signaux morphologiques du français parlé. Le français moderne69(2), 211–240.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Mastromonaco, S.
    (1999) Liaison in French as a second language. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Université de Toronto, Canada.
  29. New, B., Brysbaert, M., Veronis, J., & Pallier, C.
    (2007) The use of film subtitles to estimate word frequencies. Applied Psycholinguistics28, 661–677. 10.1017/S014271640707035X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S014271640707035X [Google Scholar]
  30. Prévost, P.
    (2009) The Acquisition of French. The development of inflectional morphology and syntax in L1 acquisition, bilingualism, and L2 acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lald.51
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.51 [Google Scholar]
  31. Pustka, E.
    (2015) Die liaison im Fremdsprachenerwerb: eine Pilotstudie zu Münchner Lehramtsstudenten. Bulletin suisse de linguistique appliquée102, 43–64.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Racine, I.
    (2015) La liaison chez les apprenants hispanophones avancés de FLE. Bulletin suisse de linguistique appliquée102, 147–167.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Racine, I., & Detey, S.
    (2015) Corpus oraux, liaison et locuteurs non natifs: de la recherche en phonologie à l’enseignement du français langue étrangère. Bulletin suisse de linguistique appliquée102, 1–25.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Racine, I., Detey, S., Zay, F., & Kawaguchi, Y.
    (2012) Des atouts d’un corpus multitâches pour l’étude de la phonologie en L2: L’exemple du projet « Interphonologie du français contemporain » (IPFC). InA. Kamber & C. Skupiens (Eds.), Recherches récentes en FLE (1–19). Berne: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Shoemaker, E.
    (2010) The exploitation of fine phonetic detail in the processing of L2 French. InB. VanPatten & J. Jegerski (Eds.), Research in second language processing and parsing (259–279). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lald.53.11sho
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.53.11sho [Google Scholar]
  36. Shoemaker, E., & Wauquier, S.
    (2013) Developmental strategies in the acquisition of French liaison. Paper presented at theconference of the European Second Language Association (EuroSLA), Amsterdam, August 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. (2019) The emergence of speech segmentation in adult L2 learners of French. Language, Interaction, and Acquisition, 10(1), 22–44. [This volume] 10.1075/lia.17016.sho
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lia.17016.sho [Google Scholar]
  38. Soum-Favaro, C., Coquillon, A., & Chevrot, J. P.
    (Eds.) (2014) La liaison: Approches contemporaines. Bern: Peter Lang. 10.3726/978‑3‑0352‑0204‑5
    https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-0352-0204-5 [Google Scholar]
  39. Stridfelt, M.
    (2005) La perception du français oral par des apprenants suédois. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Institute for modern languages, Umeå University, Sweden.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Thomas, A.
    (2004) Phonetic norm versus usage in advanced French as a second language. International Review of Applied Linguistics42, 365–382. 10.1515/iral.2004.42.4.365
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2004.42.4.365 [Google Scholar]
  41. Tillman, B., Martin, S., & Pettersson, M.
    (2012) Escalade 1. Stockholm: Liber.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Wauquier, S.
    (2009) Acquisition de la liaison en L1 et L2 : Stratégies phonologiques ou lexicales ?AILE…LIA2, 93–130.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Wauquier, S., & Shoemaker, E.
    (2013) Convergence and divergence in the acquisition of French liaison by native and non-native speakers. Language, Interaction and Acquisition4(2), 161–189. 10.1075/lia.4.2.03wau
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lia.4.2.03wau [Google Scholar]
  44. Véronique, D.
    (Ed.) (2009) L’acquisition de la grammaire du français langue étrangère. Paris: Didier.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/lia.17023.agr
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/lia.17023.agr
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): French , liaison , phonology , second language acquisition , subject-verb agreement and Swedish learners

Most Cited This Month

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error