L’expression du déplacement en italien L2

References

1. Anastasio, S.
   (2018) L’expression de la référence à l’espace en italien et en français L2. Une étude comparative. Thèse de doctorat non publiée. Université de Paris 8, Paris.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bartning, I.
   (1997) L’apprenant dit avancé et son acquisition d’une langue étrangère. Tour d’horizon et esquisse d’une caractérisation de la variété avancée. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Étrangère, 9, 9–50.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bartning, I.
   (2009) The advanced learner variety: 10 years later. InE. Labeau (Ed.). The advanced learner variety. The case of French (pp.11–40). Bern: Peter Lang.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bartning, I., & Schlyter, S.
   (2004) Itinéraires acquisitionnels et stades de développement en français L2. Journal of French Languages Studies, 14(3), 281–299. 10.1017/S0959269504001802
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959269504001802 [Google Scholar]
5. Beavers, J., Levin, B., & Wei Tham, S.
   (2010) The typology of motion expressions revisited. Linguistics, 46, 331–377. 10.1017/S0022226709990272
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226709990272 [Google Scholar]
6. Berman, R., & Slobin, D. I.
   (Eds.) (1994) Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Berthele, R.
   (2013) Disentangling manner and path. Evidence from varieties of German and Romance. InJ. Goschler & A. Stefanowitsch (Eds.), Variation and change in the encoding of motion events (pp.55–75). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.41.03ber
   https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.41.03ber [Google Scholar]
8. Borillo, A.
   (1998) L’espace et son expression en français. Paris: Ophrys.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Cadierno, T.
   (2004) Expressing motion events in a second language: a cognitive typological perspective. InM. Achard & S. Neimeier (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics, second language acquisition and foreign language pedagogy (pp.13–49). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Cadierno, T., & Ruiz, L.
    (2006) Motion events in Spanish L2 acquisition. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 4(1), 183–216. 10.1075/arcl.4.08cad
    https://doi.org/10.1075/arcl.4.08cad [Google Scholar]
11. Cardini, F. E.
    (2008) Manner of motion saliency: An inquiry into Italian. Cognitive Linguistics, 19(4), 533–569. 10.1515/COGL.2008.021
    https://doi.org/10.1515/COGL.2008.021 [Google Scholar]
12. Carroll, M., & Stutterheim, v. C.
    (1997) Relation entre grammaticalisation et conceptualisation et implications sur l’acquisition d’une langue étrangère. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Étrangère, 9, 83–115.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Cini, M.
    (Ed.) (2008) I verbi sintagmatici in italiano e nelle varietà dialettali. Stato dell’arte e prospettive di ricerca. Frankfurt : Peter Lang. 10.3726/978‑3‑653‑01094‑7
    https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-01094-7 [Google Scholar]
14. Demagny, A. C.
    (2013) Temporalité et espace en langue seconde : contraintes typologiques dans l’acquisition du français par l’adulte anglophone. Thèse de doctorat non publiée. Université de Paris 8, Paris.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Fagard, B., Stosic, D., & Cerruti, M.
    (2017) Within-type variation in Satellite-framed languages: The case of Serbian. STUF, 70(4), 637–660.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Filipović, L., & Ibarretxe-Antuñano
    (2015) Motion. InE. Dąbrowska & D. Divjak (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp.526–545). Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110292022‑026
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110292022-026 [Google Scholar]
17. Hendriks, H., & Hickmann, M.
    (2011) Expressing voluntary motion in a second language: English learners of French. InV. Cook & B. Bassetti (Eds.), Language and bilingual cognition (pp.315–340). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Hendriks, H., Hickmann, M., & Demagny, A.-C.
    (2008) How adult English learners of French express caused motion: a comparison with English and French natives. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Étrangère, 27, 15–41.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Iacobini, C.
    (2008) Presenza e uso dei verbi sintagmatici nel parlato dell’italiano. InM. Cini (Ed.). I verbi sintagmatici in italiano e nelle varietà dialettali. Stato dell’arte e prospettive di ricerca (pp.103–119). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Iacobini, C., & Fagard, B.
    (2011) A diachronic approach to variation and change in the typology of motion event expression. A case study: From Latin to Romance. Cahiers de Faits de Langue, 3, 151–172.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I.
    (2004) Motion events in Basque narratives. InS. Strömqvist & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual PerspectivesVol.2 (pp.89–111). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I.
    (2009) Path salience in motion events. InJ. Guo, E. Lieven, N. Budwing, S. Tripp, K. Nakamura & S. Őzçalişkan (Eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: Research in the tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin (pp.403–414). New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I.
    (2015) Going beyond motion events typology: The case of Basque as a verb-framed language. Folia Linguistica, 49(2), 307–352. 10.1515/flin‑2015‑0012
    https://doi.org/10.1515/flin-2015-0012 [Google Scholar]
24. Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I., & Hijazo Gascón, A.
    (2012) Variation in motion events. Theory and applications. InL. Filipović & K. M. Jaszczolt (Eds.), Space and time in languages and cultures. Linguistic diversity (pp.349–371). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.36.19iba
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.36.19iba [Google Scholar]
25. Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I., & Hijazo Gascón, A.
    (2013) Same family, different paths. InGoschler, J. & Stefanowitsch, A. (Eds.), Variation and change in the encoding of motion events (pp.39–54). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Jarvis, S., & Pavlenko, A.
    (Eds.) (2010) Crosslinguistic influence in language and cognition. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Kellerman, E.
    (1979) La difficulté, une notion difficile. Encrages. N° spécial de linguistique appliquée, 16–21.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Kellerman, E., & Sharwood-Smith, M.
    (Eds.) (1986) Crosslinguistic influence and second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Klein, W.
    (1989) L’acquisition d’une langue étrangère. Paris : Arman Colin.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Kopecka, A.
    (2006) The semantic structure of motion events in French. InHickmann, M. & S. Robert (Eds.), Space in languages: Linguistic system and cognitive categoriesVol.66. (pp.83–101). Amsterdam /Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.66.06kop
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.66.06kop [Google Scholar]
31. Kopecka, A.
    (à paraître). From a satellite- to a verb-framed pattern: A typological shift in French. InH. Cuyckens, W. De Mulder & T. Mortelmans Eds. Variation and change in adpositions of movement. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Levinson, S. C.
    (2003) Space in language and cognition: Explorations in cognitive diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511613609
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613609 [Google Scholar]
33. MacWhinney, B.
    (2000) The CHILDES Project: Tools for analyzing talk 3rd edition. Manwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Mayer, M.
    (1969) Frog, where are you. New York: Dial Press.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Pavlenko, A.
    (2011) Thinking and speaking in two languages. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847693389
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847693389 [Google Scholar]
36. Perdue, C.
    (2002) Development of L2 functional use. InV. Cook (Ed.), Portraits of the L2 user (pp.123–144). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781853595851‑007
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853595851-007 [Google Scholar]
37. Ringbom, H., & Jarvis, S.
    (2009) The importance of cross-linguistic similarity in foreign language learning. InM. H. Long & C. J. Doughty (Eds.), The Handbook of Language Teaching (pp.106–118). London: Blackwell. 10.1002/9781444315783.ch7
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444315783.ch7 [Google Scholar]
38. Simone, R.
    (1997) Esistono verbi sintagmatici in italiano ?InT. De Mauro & C. Lo Cascio (Eds.), Lessico e grammatica. Teorie linguistiche e applicazioni lessicografiche (pp.155–170). Roma: Bulzoni.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Simone, R.
    (2008) Verbi sintagmatici come costruzione e come categoria. InM. Cini (Ed.), I verbi sintagmatici in italiano e nelle varietà dialettali. Stato dell’arte e prospettive di ricerca (pp.13–30). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Slobin, D.
    (1987) Thinking for Speaking. Proceedings of the thirteenth annual meeting of the Berkeley linguistics society, 435–445. 10.3765/bls.v13i0.1826
    https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v13i0.1826 [Google Scholar]
41. Slobin, D.
    (1996) From ‘Thought and language’ to ‘thinking for speaking’. InJ. Gumperz & S. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity: Vol. Studies in the social and cultural foundations of language (pp.70–96). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Slobin, D.
    (1997) Mind, code and text. InJ. Bybee, J. Haiman & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Essays on language function and language type. Dedicated to T. Givón (pp.437–467). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.82.24slo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.82.24slo [Google Scholar]
43. Slobin, D.
    (2004) The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression in motion events. InS. Strömqvist & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives2 (pp.219–257). Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Slobin, D.
    (2006) What makes manner of motion salient? Explorations in linguistic typology, discourse and cognition. InM. Hickmann & S. Robert (Eds.), Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories (pp.59–81). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.66.05slo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.66.05slo [Google Scholar]
45. Spreafico, L.
    (2008) Tipologie di lessicalizzazioni adverbiali in alcune lingue d’Europa. InM. Cini (Ed.), I verbi sintagmatici in italiano e nelle varietà dialettali. Stato dell’arte e prospettive di ricerca (61–81). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Spreafico, L.
    (2009) Problemi di tipologia lessicale. I verbi di moto nello standard average european. Roma: Bulzoni.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Stutterheim, v. C.
    (2003) Linguistic structure and information organization. The case of very advanced learners. InS. H. Foster-Cohen & S. Pekarek Doehler (Eds.), Eurosla YearbookVol.3 (pp.183–206). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Talmy, L.
    (1983) How language structures space. InH. Pick & L. Acredolo (Eds.), Spatial orientation theory research and application (pp.225–282). New York: Plenum Press. 10.1007/978‑1‑4615‑9325‑6_11
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-9325-6_11 [Google Scholar]
49. Talmy, L.
    (1985) Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. InT. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and semantic description, vol.3: grammatical categories and the lexicon (pp.57–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Talmy, L.
    (2000) Toward a cognitive semantics. Cambridge MA: MIT PRESS.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Véronique, D.
    (Ed.) (2009) L’acquisition de la grammaire du français, langue étrangère. Paris : Didier.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Watorek, M.
    (1996) Le traitement prototypique : définitions et implications. Toegepaste Taalwetenschap in Artikelen, 55, 187–200. 10.1075/ttwia.55.15wat
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ttwia.55.15wat [Google Scholar]