« Et le chien aussi i’ regarde »

References

1. Barnes, B.
   (1985) The pragmatics of left detachment in spoken standard French. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pb.vi.3
   https://doi.org/10.1075/pb.vi.3 [Google Scholar]
2. Benazzo, S.
   (2005) Le développement des lectes d’apprenants et l’acquisition de la portée à distance en L2. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Etrangère, 23, 65–93. 10.4000/aile.1710
   https://doi.org/10.4000/aile.1710 [Google Scholar]
3. Benazzo, S., & Andorno, C.
   (2010) Discourse cohesion and topic discontinuity in native and learner production. Changing topic entities on maintained predicates. EUROSLA Yearbook, 10, 92–118. 10.1075/eurosla.10.07ben
   https://doi.org/10.1075/eurosla.10.07ben [Google Scholar]
4. Benazzo, S., Dimroth, C., Perdue, C., & Watorek, M.
   (2004) Le rôle des particules additives dans la construction de la cohésion discursive en langue maternelle et en langue étrangère. Langage, 155, 76–105. 10.3917/lang.155.0076
   https://doi.org/10.3917/lang.155.0076 [Google Scholar]
5. Benazzo, S., & Dimroth, C.
   (2015) Additive particles in Romance and Germanic languages: Are they really similar?Linguistik Online, 71(2), 9–30.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Benazzo, S., & Patin, C.
   (2017) French additive particle aussi: Does prosody matter?InA.-M. De Cesare, & C. Andorno (Eds.), Focus on additivity. Adverbial modifiers in Romance, Germanic and Slavic languages (pp.107–136). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.278.04ben
   https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.278.04ben [Google Scholar]
7. Benazzo, S., & Paykin, K.
   (2017) Additive relations in L2 French: Contrasting acquisitional trends of Italian and Russian learners. InA. M. De Cesare, & C. Andorno (Eds.), Focus on additivity. Adverbial modifiers in Romance, Germanic and Slavic languages (pp.265–309). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.278.09ben
   https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.278.09ben [Google Scholar]
8. Blumenthal, P.
   (1985) Aussi et auch: deux faux amis?Französisch Heute, 2, 144–150.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Bonvin, A., & Dimroth, C.
   (2016) Additive linking in second language discourse: Lexical, syntactic and discourse organizational choices in intermediate and advanced learners of L2 German with L1 French. Discours. Revue de Linguistique, Psycholinguistique et Informatique, 18, 3–34.
   [Google Scholar]
10. De Cesare, A.-M.
    (2010) On the focusing function of focusing adverbs: A discussion based on Italian data. Linguistik Online, 44(4), 99–116.
    [Google Scholar]
11. De Cesare, A.-M.
    (2015) Additive focus adverbs in canonical word orders. A corpus-based study of It. anche, Fr. aussi and E. also in written news. Linguistik Online, 71(2), 31–56.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Diao-Klaeger, S., & Thörle, B.
    (2013) Diskursmarker in L2. InC. Bürgel, & D. Siepmann (Eds.), Sprachwissenschaft – Fremdsprachendidaktik: Neue Impulse (pp.145–160). Baltmannsweiler: Schneider Hohengehren.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Dimroth, C.
    (2004) Fokuspartikeln und Informationsgliederung im Deutschen. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Dimroth, C., Andorno, C., Benazzo, S., & Verhagen, J.
    (2010) Given claims about new topics. How Romance and Germanic speakers link changed and maintained information in narrative discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(12), 3328–3344. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.05.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.05.009 [Google Scholar]
15. Dimroth, C., & Watorek, M.
    (2000) The scope of additive particles in basic learner languages. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22(3), 307–336. 10.1017/S0272263100003028
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100003028 [Google Scholar]
16. Engel, H.
    (2014) La dislocation dans le français oral d’apprenants suédophones: emploi et développement. InC. Lindqvist, & C. Bardel (Eds.), The acquisition of French as a second language: New developmental perspectives (pp.53–73). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/bct.62.04eng
    https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.62.04eng [Google Scholar]
17. Gülich, E.
    (1982) La ‘phrase segmentée’ en français et en allemand : une technique particulière à la communication orale. InM. Petit (Ed.), Didactique des langues étrangères. Français, Allemand. Actes du colloque tenu à l’Université de Lyon II en mars 1981 (pp.33–66). Lyon.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Hentschel, E., & Weydt, H.
    ( 2013) Handbuch der deutschen Grammatik. Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110312973
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110312973 [Google Scholar]
19. Höhle, T.
    (1992) Über Verum-Fokus im Deutschen. InJ. Jacobs (Ed.), Informationsstruktur und Grammatik (pp.112–141). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. 10.1007/978‑3‑663‑12176‑3_5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-12176-3_5 [Google Scholar]
20. Koch, P., & Oesterreicher, W.
    (1990) Gesprochene Sprache in der Romania: Französisch, Italienisch, Spanisch. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783111372914
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111372914 [Google Scholar]
21. König, E.
    (1993) Focus particles. InA. von Stechow, & J. Jacobs (Eds.), Syntax/Syntax: Ein internationales Handbuch zeitgenössischer Forschung/An international handbook of contemporary research (pp.978–987). Berlin: de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Klein, W., & von Stutterheim, C.
    (1992) Quaestio und referentielle Bewegung. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik, 86, 67–92.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Krifka, M.
    (1998) Additive particles under stress. InD. Strolovitch, & A. Lawson (Eds.), Proceedings of semantics and linguistic theory (SALT) VIII (pp.11–128). Cornell U.: CLC Publications. https://journals.linguisticsociety.org/proceedings/index.php/SALT/article/view/2799/2539
    [Google Scholar]
24. Lambrecht, K.
    (1994) Information structure and sentence form. Topic, focus and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620607
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620607 [Google Scholar]
25. Li, C. N., & Thompson, S.
    (1976) Subject and topic. A new typology of language. InC. N. Li (Ed.), Subject and topic (pp.457–489). New York/San Francisco/London: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Métrich, R., & Faucher, E.
    (2009) Wörterbuch deutscher Partikeln. Unter Berücksichtigung ihrer französischen Äquivalente. Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110217971
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110217971 [Google Scholar]
27. Nølke, H.
    (1983) Les adverbes paradigmatisants: fonction et analyse. Copenhagen: Akademisk Forlag.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Selting, M., Auer, P., Barth-Weingarten, D., Bergmann, J., Bergmann, P., Birkner, K., & Uhmann, S.
    (2011) A system for transcribing talk-in-interaction: GAT 2 translated and adapted for English by Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen and Dagmar Barth-Weingarten. Gesprächsforschung – Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion, 12, 1–51. www.gespraechsforschung-ozs.de/heft2011/px-gat2-englisch.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
29. Thörle, B.
    (2016) Turn openings in L2 French: An interactional approach to discourse marker acquisition. Language, Interaction and Acquisition, 7(1), 117–144. 10.1075/lia.7.1.05tho
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lia.7.1.05tho [Google Scholar]
30. Turco, G., Dimroth, C., & Braun, B.
    (2012) Intonational means to mark Verum Focus in German and French. Language and Speech, 54(4), 461–491. 10.1177/0023830912460506
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830912460506 [Google Scholar]
31. Véronique, Georges Daniel
    (2014) The acquisition of additive scope particles by Moroccan Arabic L1 learners of French. InC. Lindqvist, & C. Bardel (Eds.), The acquisition of French as a second language: New developmental perspectives (pp.117–141). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/bct.62.07ver
    https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.62.07ver [Google Scholar]
32. Watorek, M.
    (2008) L’étude de l’acquisition des particules de portée comme révélateur du travail de l’appropriation d’une L2 : quelques implications en didactique des langues étrangères. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Étrangère, 27, 123–142. 10.4000/aile.4363
    https://doi.org/10.4000/aile.4363 [Google Scholar]
33. Wehr, B.
    (1984) Diskurs-Strategien im Romanischen. Ein Beitrag zur romanischen Syntax. Tübingen: Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Wehr, B.
    (2019) Syntax und Pragmatik: Topic- und Focus-Markierungen im Französischen und Italienischen. InE. Lavric, C. Konecny, C. Konzett-Firth, W. Pöckl, M. Messner, & E. Jacinto García (Eds.), Comparatio delectat III. Akten der VIII. Internationalen Arbeitstagung zum romanisch-deutschen und innerromanischen Sprachvergleich, Innsbruck, 29.8.-1.9.2016. Zweiter Band (pp.423–456). Berlin: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]