1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Language, Interaction and Acquisition
  4. Volume 11, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 11, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1879-7865
  • E-ISSN: 1879-7873
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Résumé

L’objectif principal de cette étude pilote est de tester expérimentalement ce que nous appelons l’Hypothèse d’Isochronie Syllabique Initiale. Selon cette hypothèse, les apprenants de L2 passent par une phase initiale pendant laquelle leurs productions orales présentent les caractéristiques rythmiques des langues dites à isochronie syllabique (telles que l’espagnol et le français). Pour cela, nous analysons des récits oraux d’apprenantes débutantes de français ayant le suédois pour langue maternelle ( = 6). Ces productions sont comparées à celles d’un groupe de locutrices natives du français ( = 6) et d’un groupe de locutrices natives du suédois ( = 6). Les caractéristiques rythmiques des récits en français L2, français L1 et suédois L1 sont étudiées à partir de deux mesures acoustiques, notamment le coefficient de variation de la durée syllabique, dont l’utilisation est préconisée par Patel (2008) pour déterminer si une langue est de type accentuel ou syllabique. Les mesures acoustiques employées permettent de confirmer que le français et le suédois appartiennent à des familles rythmiques distinctes. Les résultats de l’étude vont cependant à l’encontre de l’Hypothèse d’Isochronie Syllabique Initiale.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lia.19009.eng
2020-11-25
2024-12-13

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/lia.19009.eng
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abercrombie, D.
    (1967) Elements of general phonetics. Edinburgh : Edinburgh University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Arvaniti, A.
    (2009) Rhythm, timing and the timing of rhythm. Phonetica66, 46–63. 10.1159/000208930
     https://doi.org/10.1159/000208930 [Google Scholar]
  3. Arvaniti, A., & Ross, T.
    (2012) Rhythm classes and speech perception. Phonetica66(1–2), 1–15.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Astésano, C.
    (2001) Rythme et accentuation en français : invariance et variabilité stylistique. Paris: L’Harmattan.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Astésano, C., & Bertrand, R.
    (2016) Accentuation et niveaux de constituance en français : enjeux phonologiques et psycholinguistiques. Langue française191(3), 11–30. 10.3917/lf.191.0011
     https://doi.org/10.3917/lf.191.0011 [Google Scholar]
  6. Astésano, C., Gurman Bard, E., & Turk, A.
    (2007) Structural influences on initial accent placement in French. Language and speech50(3), 423–446. 10.1177/00238309070500030501
     https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309070500030501 [Google Scholar]
  7. Barry, W. J., Andreeva, B., Russo, M., Dimitrova, S., & Kostadinova, T.
    (2003) Do rhythm measures tell us anything about language type?InProceedings of the 15th ICPhS (2693–2696). Barcelone.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Bartning, I., & Schlyter, S.
    (2004) Itinéraires acquisitionnels et stades de développement en français L2. French Language Studies14, 281–299. 10.1017/S0959269504001802
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959269504001802 [Google Scholar]
  9. Best, C. T.
    (1994) The emergence of native-language phonological influences in infants: A perceptual assimilation model. InJ. C. Goodman & H. C. Nusbaum (Eds.), The development of speech perception: The transition from speech sounds to spoken words (pp.167–224). Cambridge, MA, US: The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Boersma, P., & Weenink, D.
    (2019) Praat: doing phonetics by computer, www.fon.hum.uva.nl/praat/, page consultée le7 mars 2019.
  11. Boula de Mareüil, P., & Vieru-Dimulescu, B.
    (2006) The contribution of prosody to the perception of foreign accent. Phonetica63, 247–267. 10.1159/000097308
     https://doi.org/10.1159/000097308 [Google Scholar]
  12. Bruce, G.
    (1987) How floating is focal accent?InK. Gregersen & H. Basbøll (Eds.), Nordic prosody IV (41–49). Odense : Odense University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Dauer, R. M.
    (1983) Stress-timing and syllable-timing reanalyzed. Journal of Phonetics11(1), 51–62. 10.1016/S0095‑4470(19)30776‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30776-4 [Google Scholar]
  14. Delais-Roussarie, E., Post, B., Avanzi, M., Buthke, C., Di Cristo, A., Feldhausen, I., Jun, S. A., Martin, P., Meisenburg, T., Rialland, A., & Sichel-Bazin, R.
    (2015) Intonational phonology of French: Developing a ToBI system for French. InS. Frota & P. Prieto (Eds.), Intonation in Romance (pp.63–100). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199685332.003.0003
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199685332.003.0003 [Google Scholar]
  15. Delattre, P.
    (1966) Accent final en français : accent d’intensité, accent de hauteur, accent de durée. InStudies in French and comparative phonetics (pp.65–68). La Hague: Mouton & Co.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Detey, S., Durand, J., Laks, B., & Lyche, C.
    (2010) Les variétés du français parlé dans l’espace francophone. Paris: Ophrys.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Di Cristo, A.
    (2016) Les musiques du français parlé. Essais sur l’accentuation, la métrique, le rythme, le phrasé prosodique et l’intonation du français contemporain. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110479645
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110479645 [Google Scholar]
  18. Engstrand, O.
    (2004) Fonetikens grunder. Lund : Studentlitteratur.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Fant, G., Kruckenberg, A., & Nord, L.
    (1991) Durational correlates of stress in Swedish, French and English. Journal of phonetics19, 351–365. 10.1016/S0095‑4470(19)30327‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30327-4 [Google Scholar]
  20. Flege, J. E.
    (1995) Second language speech learning: theory, findings and problems. InW. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: theoretical and methodological issues (233–277). Timonium: York Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Forsberg Lundell, F., Bartning, I., Engel, H., Gudmundson, A., Hancock, V., & Lindqvist, C.
    (2014) Beyond advanced stages in high-level spoken French L2. Journal of French Language Studies24(2), 255–280. 10.1017/S0959269513000057
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959269513000057 [Google Scholar]
  22. Gibbon, D.
    (2015) Speech rhythms – modeling the groove. InR. Vogel & R. van de Vijver (Eds.), Rhythm in cognition and grammar: A Germanic perspective (pp.108–161). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Grabe, E., & Low, E. L.
    (2002) Durational variability in speech and the rhythm class hypothesis. Papers in laboratory phonology7, 515–546.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Gut, U.
    (2009) Non-native speech: A corpus-based analysis of phonological and phonetic properties of L2 English and German. Francfort: Peter Lang. 10.3726/978‑3‑653‑01155‑5
     https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-01155-5 [Google Scholar]
  25. Hahn, L. D.
    (2004) Primary stress and intelligibility: Research to motivate the teaching of suprasegmentals. TESOL Quarterly38, 201–223. 10.2307/3588378
     https://doi.org/10.2307/3588378 [Google Scholar]
  26. Hincks, R.
    (2010) Speaking rate and information content in English lingua franca oral presentations. English for specific purposes29(1), 4–18. 10.1016/j.esp.2009.05.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2009.05.004 [Google Scholar]
  27. InterFra
    InterFra (2019) InterFra (Språkbanken). https://spraakbanken.gu.se/eng/resource/interfra, page consultée le1février 2019.
  28. Jun, S.-A., & Fougeron, C.
    (2000) A phonological model of French intonation. InA. Botinis (Ed.), Intonation: analysis, modeling and technology (pp.209–242). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑4317‑2_10
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4317-2_10 [Google Scholar]
  29. (2002) Realizations of accentual phrase in French intonation. Probus14, 147–172. 10.1515/prbs.2002.002
     https://doi.org/10.1515/prbs.2002.002 [Google Scholar]
  30. Klein, W., & Perdue, C.
    (1997) The basic variety (or: Could not languages be much simpler?). Second Language Research13(4), 301–347. 10.1191/026765897666879396
     https://doi.org/10.1191/026765897666879396 [Google Scholar]
  31. Kohler, K.
    (2009) Rhythm in speech and language: A new research paradigm. Phonetica66, 29–45. 10.1159/000208929
     https://doi.org/10.1159/000208929 [Google Scholar]
  32. Léon, P.
    (2011) Phonétisme et prononciations du français. Paris: Armand Colin.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Léon, M., & Léon, P.
    (2009) La prononciation du français. Paris: Armand Colin.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Major, R. C.
    (2014) [2001] Foreign Accent. The ontology and phylogeny of second language phonology. Londres : Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Martin, P.
    (2004) Intonation de la phrase dans les langues romanes : l’exception du français. Langue française141, 36–55.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Morel, M.-A.
    (1992) lntonation et thématisation. L’Information Grammaticale54, 26–35. 10.3406/igram.1992.3196
     https://doi.org/10.3406/igram.1992.3196 [Google Scholar]
  37. Myrberg, S.
    (2010) The intonational phonology of Stockholm Swedish. Doctoral dissertation, Acta Universitatis Stockholmiensis.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Nishinuma, Y., & Duez, D.
    (1987) Étude perceptive de l’organisation temporelle de l’énoncé en français. Travaux de l’Institut de Phonétique d’Aix11, 184–201.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Ordin, M., & Polyanskaya, L.
    (2014) Development of timing patterns in first and second languages. System42, 244–257. 10.1016/j.system.2013.12.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.12.004 [Google Scholar]
  40. (2015) Acquisition of speech rhythm in a second language by learners with rhythmically different native languages. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America138(2), 533–545. 10.1121/1.4923359
     https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4923359 [Google Scholar]
  41. Ordin, M., Polyanskaya, L., & Ulbrich, C.
    (2011) Acquisition of timing patterns in second language. In12th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association (pp.1129–1132).
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Pagel, D., Madeleni, É., & Wioland, F.
    (2012) Le rythme du français parlé. Paris: Hachette.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Pamies Bertrán, A.
    (1999) Prosodic typology: on the dichotomy between stress-timed and syllable-timed languages. Language design: Journal of theoretical and experimental linguistics2, 103–130.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Pasdeloup, V.
    (2004) Le rythme n’est pas élastique : étude préliminaire de l’influence du débit de parole sur la structuration temporelle. JEP, 397–400.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Patel, A. D.
    (2008) Music, language, and the brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Pike, K. L.
    (1946) The intonation of American English. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Polyanskaya, L., & Ordin, M.
    (2015) Acquisition of speech rhythm in first language. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America138(3), 199–204. 10.1121/1.4929616
     https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4929616 [Google Scholar]
  48. Prieto, P., Vanrell, M., Astruc, L., Payne, E., & Post, B.
    (2012) Phonotactic and phrasal properties of speech rhythm. Evidence from Catalan, English, and Spanish. Speech Communication54, 681–702. 10.1016/j.specom.2011.12.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2011.12.001 [Google Scholar]
  49. Ramus, F.
    (2002) Acoustic correlates of linguistic rhythm: Perspectives. In1st International Conference on Speech Prosody, 115–120.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Ramus, F., Nespor, M., & Mehler, J.
    (1999) Correlates of linguistic rhythm in the speech signal. Cognition73(3), 265–292. 10.1016/S0010‑0277(99)00058‑X
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00058-X [Google Scholar]
  51. Rasier, L., & Hiligsmann, P.
    (2007) Prosodic transfer L1 to L2. Theoretical and methodological issues. Nouveaux cahiers de linguistique française28, 41–66.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Riad, T.
    (1997) Svenskt fonologikompendium, https://www.su.se/polopoly_fs/1.29950.1320939955!/ArtikulatoriskFonetik.pdf, page consultée le7 mars 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Roach, P.
    (1982) On the distinction between ‘stress-timed’ and ‘syllable-timed’ languages. Linguistic controversies73, 73–79.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. R project
    R project (2019) The R project for statistical computing. https://www.r-project.org/, page consultée le12 août 2019.
  55. Santiago, F., & Delais-Roussarie, E.
    (2015) The acquisition of question intonation by Mexican Spanish learners of French. InE. Delais-Roussarie, M. Avanzi & S. Herment (Eds.), Prosody and language in contact (pp.243–270). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Towell, R., Hawkins, R., & Bazergui, N.
    (1996) The development of fluency in advanced learners of French. Applied Linguistics17(1), 84–119. 10.1093/applin/17.1.84
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/17.1.84 [Google Scholar]
  57. Trofimovich, P., & Baker, W.
    (2006) Learning second language suprasegmentals: Effect of L2 experience on prosody and fluency characteristics of L2 speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition28, 1–30. 10.1017/S0272263106060013
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263106060013 [Google Scholar]
  58. Vaissière, J.
    (1977) Premiers essais d’utilisation de la durée pour la segmentation en mots dans un système de reconnaissance. VIIIièmes Journées d’Etude sur la Parole, 25–27 Mai 1977, Aix-en-Provence, 345–352.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. (1991) Rhythm, accentuation and final lengthening in French. InJ. Sundberg , Music, language, speech and brain (pp.108–120). Londres: Palgrave. 10.1007/978‑1‑349‑12670‑5_10
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-12670-5_10 [Google Scholar]
  60. Welby, P., Bertrand, R., Portes, C., & Astésano, C.
    (2019) Realization of the French initial accent: Stability and individual differences. 7th conference on Tone and Intonation in Europe (TIE), Sep. 2016 (1–3), Canterbury. hal-02160095
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Wenk, B. J., & Wioland, F.
    (1982) Is French really syllable-timed?Journal of phonetics10(2), 193–216. 10.1016/S0095‑4470(19)30957‑X
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30957-X [Google Scholar]
  62. Wioland, F.
    (2005) La vie sociale des sons du français. Paris: L’Harmattan.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/lia.19009.eng
Loading
L’Hypothèse d’Isochronie Syllabique Initiale appliquée au français L2
Language, Interaction and Acquisition 11, 268 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1075/lia.19009.eng
/content/journals/10.1075/lia.19009.eng
/content/journals/10.1075/lia.19009.eng
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): accentuation; acquisition L2; français L1 et L2; isochronie accentuelle; isochronie syllabique; rythme; suédois L1

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error