Adaptive functions of neurobehavioral plasticity in language learning and processing

References

1. Amichetti, N., White, A., & Wingfield, A.
   (2016) Multiple solutions to the same problem: utilization of plausibility and syntax in sentence comprehension by older adults with impaired hearing. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 789. doi:  10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00789
   https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00789 [Google Scholar]
2. Bates, E.
   (1999) Plasticity, localization and language development. InS. Broman & J. Fletcher (Eds.), The changing nervous system: Neurobehavioral consequences of early brain disorders (pp.214–253). New York: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bates, E., & Elman, J.
   (1996) Learning rediscovered. Science, 274(5294), 1849–1850. 10.1126/science.274.5294.1849
   https://doi.org/10.1126/science.274.5294.1849 [Google Scholar]
4. Bates, E., Thal, D., Trauner, D., Fenson, J., Aram, D., Eisele, J., & Nass, R.
   (1997) From first words to grammar in children with focal brain injury. Developmental Neuropsychology, 13, 275–343. 10.1080/87565649709540682
   https://doi.org/10.1080/87565649709540682 [Google Scholar]
5. Bates, E., & Roe, K.
   (2001) Language development in children with unilateral brain injury. InC. Nelson & M. Luciana (Eds.), Handbook of developmental cognitive neuroscience (pp.281–307). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bates, E., Devescovi, A., & Wulfeck, B.
   (2001) Psycholinguistics: A cross-language perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 369–398. 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.369
   https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.369 [Google Scholar]
7. Bates, E., Reilly, J., Wulfeck, B., Dronkers, N., Opie, M., Fenson, J., Kriz, S., Jeffries, R., Miller, L., & Herbst, K.
   (2002) Differential effects of unilateral lesions on language production. Production in children and adults. Brain and Language, 79(2), 223–265. 10.1006/brln.2001.2482
   https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.2001.2482 [Google Scholar]
8. Bates, E., Thal, D., Finlay, B., & Clancy, B.
   (2003) Early language development and its neural correlates. InS. Segalowitz & I. Rapin (Eds.), Handbook of neuropsychology, Vol.8, Child neuropsychology (pp.525–592). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Beese, C., Werkle-Bergner, M., Lindenberger, U., Friederici, A., & Meyer, L.
   (2019) Adult age differences in the benefit of syntactic and semantic constraints for sentence processing. Psychology and Aging, 34(1), 43–55. 10.1037/pag0000300
   https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000300 [Google Scholar]
10. Best, C. & McRoberts, G.
    (2003) Infant perception of nonnative consonant contrasts that adults assimilate in different ways. Language and Speech, 46, 183–216. 10.1177/00238309030460020701
    https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309030460020701 [Google Scholar]
11. Bialystok, E.
    (2017) The bilingual adaptation: How minds accommodate experience. Psychological Bulletin, 143(3), 233–262. 10.1037/bul0000099
    https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000099 [Google Scholar]
12. Bickel, C., Pantel, J., Eysenbach, K., & Schröder, J.
    (2000) Syntactic comprehension deficits in Alzheimer’s Disease. Brain and Language, 71, 432–448. 10.1006/brln.1999.2277
    https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1999.2277 [Google Scholar]
13. Blackwell, A., & Bates, E.
    (1995) Inducing agrammatic profiles in normal: Evidence for the selective vulnerability of morphology under cognitive resource limitation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7, 228–257. 10.1162/jocn.1995.7.2.228
    https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.1995.7.2.228 [Google Scholar]
14. Boysson-Bardies, B., & Vihman, M.
    (1991) Adaptation to language: evidence from babbling and first words in four languages. Language, 67, 297–319. 10.1353/lan.1991.0045
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1991.0045 [Google Scholar]
15. Brauer, J., Xiao, Y., Poulain, T., Friederici, A., & Schirmer, A.
    (2016) Frequency of maternal touch predicts resting activity and connectivity of the developing social brain. Cerebral Cortex, 26(8), 3544–3552. 10.1093/cercor/bhw137
    https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhw137 [Google Scholar]
16. Brooks, R., & Meltzoff, A.
    (2002) The importance of the eyes: How infants interpret adult looking behavior. Developmental Psychology, 38(6), 958–966. 10.1037/0012‑1649.38.6.958
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.38.6.958 [Google Scholar]
17. Cabeza, R.
    (2002) Hemispheric asymmetry reduction in older adults: The Harold Model. Psychology and Aging, 17, 85–100. 10.1037/0882‑7974.17.1.85
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.17.1.85 [Google Scholar]
18. Chiron, C., Jambaque, I., Nabbout, R., Lounes, R., Syrota, A., & Dulac, O.
    (1997) The right brain hemisphere is dominant in human infants. Brain, 120, 1057–1065. 10.1093/brain/120.6.1057
    https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/120.6.1057 [Google Scholar]
19. Cook, V.
    (ed.) (2003) Effects of the second language on the first. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781853596346
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853596346 [Google Scholar]
20. Davis, S., Dennis, N., Daselaar, S., Fleck, M., & Cabeza, R.
    (2008) Que PASA? The posterior-anterior shift in aging. Cerebral Cortex, 18, 1201–1209. 10.1093/cercor/bhm155
    https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhm155 [Google Scholar]
21. De Houwer, A.
    (2005) Early bilingual acquisition: Focus on morphosyntax and the Separate Development Hypothesis. InJ. Kroll & A. de Groot (Eds.) Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp.30–48). New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Devescovi, A., & D’Amico, S.
    (2005) The Competition Model. Crosslinguistic studies of onlineprocessing. InM. Tomasello & D. Slobin (Eds.) Beyond Nature-Nurture. Essays in Honor of Elizabeth Bates (pp.165–191). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Dick, F., Bates, E., Ferstl, E., & Friederici, A.
    (1999) Receptive agrammatism in English- and German-speaking college students processing under stress. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11 (Suppl.1), 48.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Elman, J.
    (2001) Connectionism and language acquisition. InM. Tomasello & E. Bates (Eds.) Language development/ The essential readings (pp.295–307). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Elman, J., Bates, E., Johnson, M., Karmiloff-Smith, A., Parisi, D., & Plunkett, K.
    (1996) Rethinking innateness. A connectionist perspective on development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Engle, R.
    (2002) Working memory capacity as executive attention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 19–23. 10.1111/1467‑8721.00160
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00160 [Google Scholar]
27. Fedorenko, E., & Thompson-Schill, S.
    (2014) Reworking the language network. Trends in Cognitive Science, 18(3), 120–126. 10.1016/j.tics.2013.12.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.12.006 [Google Scholar]
28. Fenson, L., Marchmann, V., Thal, D., Dale, P., Reznick, J., & Bates, E.
    (2006) MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories: User’s guide and technical manual. Baltimore: Brookes.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Fernald, A., & Simon, T.
    (1984) Expanded intonation contours in mothers’ speech to newborns. Developmental Psychology, 20, 104–113. 10.1037/0012‑1649.20.1.104
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.20.1.104 [Google Scholar]
30. Friederici, A., Brauer, J., & Lohmann, G.
    (2011) Maturation of the language network: From inter- to intrahemispheric connectives. PLoS ONE, 6(6), 20726. 10.1371/journal.pone.0020726
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020726 [Google Scholar]
31. Genesee, F.
    (2002) Portraits of the bilingual child. InV. Cook (Ed.), Portraits of the L2 User (pp.167–178). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781853595851‑009
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853595851-009 [Google Scholar]
32. Greenough, W., Black, J., & Wallace, C.
    (1987) Experience and brain development. Child Development, 58(3), 539–559. 10.2307/1130197
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1130197 [Google Scholar]
33. Grosjean, F.
    (1989) Neurolinguists, beware! The bilingual is not two monolinguals in one person. Brain and Language, 36, 3–15. 10.1016/0093‑934X(89)90048‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(89)90048-5 [Google Scholar]
34. Gullberg, M.
    (1994) Who is doing what to whom? Testing the Competition Model on Swedish. Working Papers at the Department of Linguistics and Phonetics. Lund: Lund University.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Hari, R., & Kujala, M.
    (2009) Brain basis of human social interaction: From concepts to brain imaging. Physiological Reviews, 89(2), 453–479. 10.1152/physrev.00041.2007
    https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00041.2007 [Google Scholar]
36. Hasher, L., Lustig, C., & Zacks, R.
    (2007) Inhibitory mechanisms and the control of attention. InA. Conway, C. Jarrold, M. Kane, A. Miyake, & A. Towse (Eds.), Variation in working memory (pp.227–249). NewYork: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Hauser, M., Newport, E., & Aslin, R.
    (2001) Segmentation of the speech stream in a non -human primate: statistical learning in cotton-top tamarins. Cognition, 78, 53–64. 10.1016/S0010‑0277(00)00132‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00132-3 [Google Scholar]
38. Hickok, G., & Poeppel, D.
    (2007) The cortical organization of speech processing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience8, 393–402. 10.1038/nrn2113
    https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2113 [Google Scholar]
39. Isel, F., & Kail, M.
    (2019) Neuroplasticity, network connectivity and language processing across the lifespan. Brain and Cognition, Special Issue, 134, 67–70. 10.1016/j.bandc.2019.05.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2019.05.005 [Google Scholar]
40. Kail, M.
    (1989) Cue validity, cue cost and processing types in sentence comprehension in French and Spanish. InB. MacWhinney & E. Bates (Eds.), The cross-linguistic study of sentence processing (pp.72–112). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Kail, M.
    (1999) Linguistic variations and cognitive constraints in the processing and the acquisition of language. InC. Fuchs & S. Robert (Eds.), Language diversity and cognitive representations (pp.179–194). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.3.15kai
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.3.15kai [Google Scholar]
42. Kail, M.
    (2004) Online grammaticality judgments in French children and adults. A crosslinguistic perspective. Journal of Child Language, 31, 713–737. 10.1017/S030500090400649X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S030500090400649X [Google Scholar]
43. Kail, M.
    (2012) Online sentence processing from children and adults: General and specific constraints. A crosslinguistic study in four languages. InM. Watorek, S. Benazzo, & M. Hickmann (Eds.), Comparative perspectives on language acquisition. A tribute to Clive Perdue (pp.586–615). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847696045‑031
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847696045-031 [Google Scholar]
44. Kail, M., & Hickmann, M.
    (2010) New perspectives in the study of first and second language acquisition: Linguistic and cognitive constraints. InM. Kail & M. Hickmann (Eds.). Language acquisition across linguistic and cognitive systems (pp.1–14). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lald.52.01kai
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.52.01kai [Google Scholar]
45. Kail, M., Costa, A., & Hub Faria, I.
    (2010) On-line grammaticality judgments: A comparative study of French and Portuguese. InM. Kail & M. Hickmann (Eds.), Language acquisition across linguistic and cognitive systems (pp.179–205). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lald.52.13kai
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.52.13kai [Google Scholar]
46. Kail, M., Kihlstedt, M., & Bonnet, P.
    (2012a) On-line sentence processing in Swedish: Crosslinguistic developmental comparisons with French. Journal of Child Language, 39(1), 28–60. 10.1017/S0305000910000723
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000910000723 [Google Scholar]
47. Kail, M., Kihlstedt, M., & Bonnet, P.
    (2018) On-line sentence processing in simultaneous French/Swedish bilinguals. InM. Hickmann, E. Veneziano, & H. Jisa (Eds.), Sources of variation in first language acquisition. Languages, contexts and learners (pp.313–338). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tilar.22.16kai
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.22.16kai [Google Scholar]
48. Kail, M., Lemaire, P., & Lecacheur, M.
    (2012b) Online grammaticality judgments in young and older French adults. Experimental Aging Research, 38, 1–22. 10.1080/0361073X.2012.660031
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0361073X.2012.660031 [Google Scholar]
49. Kail, R., & Salthouse, T.
    (1994) Processing speed as a mental capacity. Acta Psychologica, 86, 199–225. 10.1016/0001‑6918(94)90003‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(94)90003-5 [Google Scholar]
50. Karmiloff-Smith, A.
    (1992) Beyond modularity: A developmental perspective on cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Kempe, V., & MacWhinney, B.
    (1999) Processing of morphological and semantic cues in Russian and German. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14(2), 129–171. 10.1080/016909699386329
    https://doi.org/10.1080/016909699386329 [Google Scholar]
52. Kennedy, D., & Adolphs, R.
    (2012) The social brain in psychiatric and neurological disorders. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(11), 559–572. 10.1016/j.tics.2012.09.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2012.09.006 [Google Scholar]
53. Kroll, J., & Bialystok, E.
    (2013) Understanding the consequences of bilingualism for language processing and cognition. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25(5), 497–514. 10.1080/20445911.2013.799170
    https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2013.799170 [Google Scholar]
54. Kroll, J., Dussias, P., Bice, K., & Perrotti, L.
    (2015) Bilingualism, mind and the brain. Annual Review of Linguistics1, 377–394. 10.1146/annurev‑linguist‑030514‑124937
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguist-030514-124937 [Google Scholar]
55. Kuhl, P.
    (1998) The development of speech and language. InT. Carey, R. Menzel, & C. Shatz (Eds.), Mechanistic relationship between development and learning (pp.53–73). New York, NY: John Wiley & So Ldt.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Kuhl, P.
    (2004) Early language acquisition: Cracking the speech code. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 831–841. 10.1038/nrn1533
    https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1533 [Google Scholar]
57. Kuhl, P.
    (2007) Is speech learning “gated” by the social brain?Developmental Science, 10(1), 110–120. 10.1111/j.1467‑7687.2007.00572.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00572.x [Google Scholar]
58. Kuhl, P., & Meltzoff, A.
    (1996) Infant vocalizations in response to speech: Vocal imitation and developmental change. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 100 (4Pt1) 2425–2438. 10.1121/1.417951
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.417951 [Google Scholar]
59. Kuhl, P., Tsao, F., & Liu, H.
    (2003) Foreign- language experience in infancy: effects of short-term exposure and social interaction on phonetic learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100, 9096–9101. 10.1073/pnas.1532872100
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1532872100 [Google Scholar]
60. Kuhl, P., Convoy, B., Padden, D., Nelson, T., & Pruitt, J.
    (2005) Early speech perception and later language development: Implications for the “critical period”. Language Learning and Development, 1 (3&4), 237–264. 10.1207/s15473341lld0103&4_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15473341lld0103&4_2 [Google Scholar]
61. Kuhl, P., Stevens, E., Hayashi, A., Deguchi, A., Kiritani, S., & Iverson, P.
    (2006) Infants show facilitation for native language phonetic perception between 6 and 12 months. Developmental Science, 9, 13–21. 10.1111/j.1467‑7687.2006.00468.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2006.00468.x [Google Scholar]
62. Kuhl, P., Ramirez, R., Bosseler, A., Lotus Lin, J. -F., & Imada, T.
    (2014) Infants’ brain responses to speech suggest Analysis by Synthesis. PNAS111, 31, 11238–11245. 10.1073/pnas.1410963111
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1410963111 [Google Scholar]
63. Lautrey, J.
    (2003) A pluralist approach to cognitive differentiation and development. InR. Sternberg, J. Lautrey, & T. Lubart (Eds.), Models of intelligence: International perspectives (pp.117–131). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Lenneberg, E.
    (1967) Biological foundations of language. New York NY: Wiley. 10.1080/21548331.1967.11707799
    https://doi.org/10.1080/21548331.1967.11707799 [Google Scholar]
65. Lindenberger, U.
    (2014) Human cognitive aging: Corriger la fortune?Science, 346, 6209, 572–578. 10.1126/science.1254403
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1254403 [Google Scholar]
66. Liu, H., Bates, E., & Li, P.
    (1992) Sentence interpretation in bilingual speakers of English and Chinese. Applied Psycholinguistics, 13, 451–484. 10.1017/S0142716400005762
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716400005762 [Google Scholar]
67. Lövdén, M., Bäckman, L., Lindenberger, U., Schaefer, S., & Schmiedek, F.
    (2010) A theoretical framework for the study of adult cognitive plasticity. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 659–676. 10.1037/a0020080
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020080 [Google Scholar]
68. MacDonald, M., Almor, A., Henderson, V., Kempler, D., & Andersen, E.
    (2001) Assessing working memory and language comprehension in Alzheimer’s Disease. Brain and Language78, 17–42. 10.1006/brln.2000.2436
    https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.2000.2436 [Google Scholar]
69. Mackay, D., & James, L.
    (2004) Sequencing, speech production, and selective effects of aging on phonological and morphological speech errors. Psychology and Aging19, 93–107. 10.1037/0882‑7974.19.1.93
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.19.1.93 [Google Scholar]
70. MacWhinney, B.
    (1987) The Competition Model. InB. MacWhinney (Ed.). Mechanisms of language acquisition (pp.249–308). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
    [Google Scholar]
71. MacWhinney, B., & E. Bates
    (Eds.) (1989) The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
72. Marchman, V., Miller, R., & Bates, E.
    (1991) Babble and first words in infants with focal brain injury. Applied Psycholinguistics, 12(1), 1–22. 10.1017/S0142716400009358
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716400009358 [Google Scholar]
73. Martinez, A., Moses, P., Frank, L., Buxton, R., Wong, E., & Stiles, J.
    (1997) Hemispheric asymmetries in global and local processing: Evidence from fRMI. NeuroReport, 8(7), 1685–1689. 10.1097/00001756‑199705060‑00025
    https://doi.org/10.1097/00001756-199705060-00025 [Google Scholar]
74. McDonald, J.
    (1989) The acquisition of cue-category mappings. InB. MacWhinney & E. Bates (Eds.), The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing (pp.375–396). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
75. Menon, V.
    (2013) Developmental pathways to functional brain networks: emerging principles. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(2), 627–640. 10.1016/j.tics.2013.09.015
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.09.015 [Google Scholar]
76. Mills, D., Coffey-Corina, S., & Neville, H.
    (1997) Language comprehension and cerebral specialization from 13 to 20 months. InD. Thal & J. Reilly (Eds.), Origins of Communication Disorders (Special Issue). Developmental Neuropsychology, 13, 397–445. 10.1080/87565649709540685
    https://doi.org/10.1080/87565649709540685 [Google Scholar]
77. Neville, H. J., & Bavelier, D.
    (2002) Specificity and plasticity in neurocognitive development in humans. InM. Johnson, Y. Munakata, & R. Gilmore (Eds.), Brain development and cognition: A reader (pp.251–271). Blackwell Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
78. Oberauer, K., Wendland, M., & Kliegl, R.
    (2003) Age differences in working memory: The role of storage and selective access. Memory and Cognition, 31, 563–569. 10.3758/BF03196097
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196097 [Google Scholar]
79. Ramachandran, V.
    (1993) Behavioral and magnetoencephalographic correlates of plasticity in the adult human brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 90, 10413–10420. 10.1073/pnas.90.22.10413
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.90.22.10413 [Google Scholar]
80. Reilly, J., Bates, E., & Marchman, V.
    (1998) Narrative discourse in children with early focal brain injury. Brain and Language, 61(3), 335–375. 10.1006/brln.1997.1882
    https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1997.1882 [Google Scholar]
81. Reuter-Lorenz, P., Stanczak, L., & Miller, A.
    (1999) Neural recruitment and cognitive aging: Two hemispheres are better than one, especially as you age. Psychological Science, 10, 494–500. 10.1111/1467‑9280.00195
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00195 [Google Scholar]
82. Reuter-Lorenz, P., & Cappell, K.
    (2008) Neurocognitive aging and the compensation hypothesis. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 177–182. 10.1111/j.1467‑8721.2008.00570.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00570.x [Google Scholar]
83. Rivera-Gaxiola, M., Silva-Pereyra, J., & Kuhl, P.
    (2005) Brain potentials to native and non-native speech contrasts in 7- and 11-month-old American infants. Developmental Science, 8, 162–172. 10.1111/j.1467‑7687.2005.00403.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2005.00403.x [Google Scholar]
84. Rochon, E., Waters, G., & Caplan, D.
    (2000) The relationship between measures of working memory and sentence comprehension in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 43(2), 395–413. 10.1044/jslhr.4302.395
    https://doi.org/10.1044/jslhr.4302.395 [Google Scholar]
85. Saffran, J., Aslin, R., & Newport, E.
    (1996) Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science, 274, 1926–1928. 10.1126/science.274.5294.1926
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.274.5294.1926 [Google Scholar]
86. Saffran, J., Johnson, E., Aslin, R., & Newport, E.
    (1999) Statistical learning of tone sequences by human infants and adults. Cognition, 70, 27–52. 10.1016/S0010‑0277(98)00075‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00075-4 [Google Scholar]
87. Samu, D., Campbell, K., Tsvetanov, K., Shafto, M., & Tyler, L.
    (2017) Preserved cognitive functions with age are determined by domain-dependent shifts in network responsivity. Nature Communications, 8, 14743. doi:  10.1038/ncomms14743
    https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14743 [Google Scholar]
88. Sebastián-Gallés, N., Echeverria, S., & Bosch, L.
    (2005) The influence of initial exposure on the lexical representations comparing early and simultaneous bilinguals. Journal of Memory and Language, 52(2), 240–255. 10.1016/j.jml.2004.11.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2004.11.001 [Google Scholar]
89. Shafto, M., & Tyler, L.
    (2014) Language in the aging brain: The network dynamics of cognitive decline and preservation. Science, 346 (6209), 583–7. 10.1126/science.1254404
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1254404 [Google Scholar]
90. Skeide, M., & Friederici, A.
    (2016) The ontogeny of the cortical language network. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 17(5), 323–332. 10.1038/nrn.2016.23
    https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2016.23 [Google Scholar]
91. Staron, M., Bokus, B., & Kail, M.
    (2005) On-line sentence processing in Polish children and adults. InB. Bokus (Ed.), Studies in the psychology of language (pp.227–245). Warsaw: Matrix.
    [Google Scholar]
92. Stern, Y.
    (2009) Cognitive reserve. Neuropsychologia, 47, 2015–2028. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.03.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.03.004 [Google Scholar]
93. Stevens, K.
    (1960) Towards a model for speech recognition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 32(1), 47–55. 10.1121/1.1907874
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1907874 [Google Scholar]
94. Stiles, J.
    (2001) Neural plasticity and cognitive development. Developmental Neuropsychology, 18(2), 237–272. 10.1207/S15326942DN1802_5
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326942DN1802_5 [Google Scholar]
95. Stiles, J., & Thal, D.
    (1993) Linguistic and spatial cognitive development following early brain injury: Patterns of deficit and recovery. InM. Johnson (Ed.), Brain development and cognition: A reader (pp.643–664). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
96. Stiles, J., Brown, T., Haist, F., & Jernigan, T.
    (2015) Brain and cognitive development. InR. Lerner (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science (pp.9–62). New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons. 10.1002/9781118963418.childpsy202
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118963418.childpsy202 [Google Scholar]
97. Stine-Morrow, E., Miller, L., & Nevin, J.
    (1999) The effects of context and feedback on age differences in spoken word recognition. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 54B, 125–134. 10.1093/geronb/54B.2.P125
    https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/54B.2.P125 [Google Scholar]
98. Thal, D., Marchman, V., Stiles, J., Aram, D., Trauner, D., Nass, R., & Bates, E.
    (1991) Early lexical development in children with focal brain injury. Brain and Language, 40, 491–527. 10.1016/0093‑934X(91)90145‑Q
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(91)90145-Q [Google Scholar]
99. Thelen, E., & Smith, L.
    (1998) Dynamic Systems Theories. InW. Damon & R. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (pp.563–634). New York NY: Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
100. Tomasello, M.
     (2003) Constructing a language: A usage-tased theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
101. Trueswell, J.
     (2008) Using eye movements as a developmental measure within psycholinguistics. InI. Sekerina, E. Fernandez, & H. Clahsen (Eds.), Developmental psycholinguistics. Online methods in children’s language processing (pp.73–96). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lald.44.05tru
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.44.05tru [Google Scholar]
102. van Geert, P.
     (2003) Dynamic systems approaches and modeling of developmental processes. InJ. Valsiner & K. Conolly (Eds.), Handbook of developmental psychology (pp.640–672). London: Sage.
     [Google Scholar]
103. Verhaegen, P., & Cerella, J.
     (2002) Aging, executive control and attention: a review of meta-analyses. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 26(7), 849–857. 10.1016/S0149‑7634(02)00071‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-7634(02)00071-4 [Google Scholar]
104. Vicari, S., Albertoni, A., Chilosi, A., Cipriani, P., Cioni, G., & Bates, E.
     (2000) Plasticity and reorganization during language development in children with early injury. Cortex, 36 (1), 31–46. 10.1016/S0010‑9452(08)70834‑7
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70834-7 [Google Scholar]
105. Waters, G., & Caplan, D.
     (2001) Age, working memory and on-line processing in sentence comprehension. Psychology and Aging, 16(1), 128–144. 10.1037/0882‑7974.16.1.128
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.16.1.128 [Google Scholar]
106. Waters, G., & Caplan, D.
     (2004) Verbal working memory and on-line syntactic processing: Evidence from self-paced listening. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57A(1), 129–163. 10.1080/02724980343000170
     https://doi.org/10.1080/02724980343000170 [Google Scholar]
107. Werker, J., & Tees, R.
     (1984) Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life. Infant Behavioral Development, 7, 49–63. 10.1016/S0163‑6383(84)80022‑3
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0163-6383(84)80022-3 [Google Scholar]
108. Wulfeck, B., Bates, E., & Capasso, R.
     (1991) A crosslinguistic study of grammaticality judgments in Broca’s aphasia. Brain and Language, 41, 311–336. 10.1016/0093‑934X(91)90158‑W
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(91)90158-W [Google Scholar]
109. Wulfeck, B., Bates, E., Krupa-Kwiatowski, M., & Saltzman, D.
     (2004) Grammatical sensitivity inchildren with early focal brain injury and children with specific language impairment. Brain and Language, 88, 215–228. 10.1016/S0093‑934X(03)00100‑7
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00100-7 [Google Scholar]