Volume 12, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1879-7865
  • E-ISSN: 1879-7873
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



A goal of early research on language processing was to characterize what is universal about language. Much of the past research focused on native speakers because the native language has been considered as providing privileged truths about acquisition, comprehension, and production. Populations or circumstances that deviated from these idealized norms were of interest but not regarded as essential to our understanding of language. In the past two decades, there has been a marked change in our understanding of how variation in language experience may inform the central and enduring questions about language. There is now evidence for significant plasticity in language learning beyond early childhood, and variation in language experience has been shown to influence both language learning and processing. In this paper, we feature what we take to be the most exciting recent new discoveries suggesting that variation in language experience provides a lens into the linguistic, cognitive, and neural mechanisms that enable language processing.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Abutalebi, J., & Green, D.
    (2007) Bilingual language production: The neurocognition of language representation and control. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 20(3), 242–275. doi:  10.1016/j.jneuroling.2006.10.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2006.10.003 [Google Scholar]
  2. Acheson, D. J., & Hagoort, P.
    (2014) Twisting tongues to test for conflict-monitoring in speech production. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 206. doi:  10.3389/fnhum.2014.00206
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00206 [Google Scholar]
  3. Allen, K., Pereira, F., Botvinick, M., & Goldberg, A. E.
    (2012) Distinguishing grammatical constructions with fMRI pattern analysis. Brain and Language, 123(3), 174–182. doi:  10.1016/j.bandl.2012.08.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2012.08.005 [Google Scholar]
  4. Altmann, G. T. M., & Kamide, Y.
    (1999) Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition, 73(3), 247–264. doi:  10.1016/S0010‑0277(99)00059‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00059-1 [Google Scholar]
  5. American Academy of Arts and Sciences
    American Academy of Arts and Sciences (2017) America’s languages: Investing in language education for the 21st century. Cambridge, MA: American Academy of Arts and Sciences.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Au, T. K., Knightly, L. M., Jun, S.-A., & Oh, J. S.
    (2002) Overhearing a language during childhood. Psychological Science, 13(3), 238–243. doi:  10.1111/1467‑9280.00444
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00444 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bartolotti, J., Marian, V., Schroeder, S., & Shook, A.
    (2011) Bilingualism and inhibitory control influence statistical learning of novel word forms. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 324. doi:  10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00324
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00324 [Google Scholar]
  8. Baum, S., & Titone, D.
    (2014) Moving toward a neuroplasticity view of bilingualism, executive control, and aging. Applied Psycholinguistics, 35(5), 857–894. doi:  10.1017/S0142716414000174
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716414000174 [Google Scholar]
  9. Baus, C., Costa, A., & Carreiras, M.
    (2013) On the effects of second language immersion on first language production. Acta Psychologica, 142(3), 402–409. doi:  10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.01.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.01.010 [Google Scholar]
  10. Beatty-Martínez, A. L., Navarro-Torres, C. A., & Dussias, P. E.
    (2020a) Codes-witching: A bilingual toolkit for opportunistic speech planning. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1699. doi:  10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01699
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01699 [Google Scholar]
  11. Beatty-Martínez, A. L., Navarro-Torres, C. A., Dussias, P. E., Bajo, M. T., Guzzardo-Tamargo, R., & Kroll, J. F.
    (2020b) Interactional context mediates the consequences of bilingualism for language and cognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 46, 1022–1047. doi:  10.1037/xlm0000770
    https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000770 [Google Scholar]
  12. Bialystok, E.
    (2017) The bilingual adaptation: How minds accommodate experience. Psychological Bulletin, 143(3), 233–262. doi:  10.1037/bul0000099
    https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000099 [Google Scholar]
  13. Bialystok, E., & Kroll, J. F.
    (2017) The neurobiology of language: Looking beyond monolinguals. A special issue of Biolinguistics celebrating the 50-year anniversary of Eric Lenneberg’s Biological foundations of language. Biolinguistics, 11, 339–352.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Bice, K., & Kroll, J. F.
    (2015) Native language change during early stages of second language learning. NeuroReport, 26(16), 966–971. doi:  10.1097/WNR.0000000000000453
    https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0000000000000453 [Google Scholar]
  15. (2019) English only? Monolinguals in linguistically diverse contexts have an edge in language learning. Brain and Language, 196, 104644. doi:  10.1016/j.bandl.2019.104644
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2019.104644 [Google Scholar]
  16. Birdsong, D.
    (2018) Plasticity, variability and age in second language acquisition and bilingualism. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 81. doi:  10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00081
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00081 [Google Scholar]
  17. Blank, I., Kanwisher, N., & Fedorenko, E.
    (2014) A functional dissociation between language and multiple-demand systems revealed in patterns of BOLD signal fluctuations. Journal of Neurophysiology, 112(5), 1105–1118. doi:  10.1152/jn.00884.2013
    https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00884.2013 [Google Scholar]
  18. Bogulski, C. A., Bice, K., & Kroll, J. F.
    (2019) Bilingualism as a desirable difficulty: Advantages in word learning depend on regulation of the dominant language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 22(5), 1052–1067. doi:  10.1017/S1366728918000858
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728918000858 [Google Scholar]
  19. Boudewyn, M. A., Long, D. L., & Swaab, T. Y.
    (2012) Cognitive control influences the use of meaning relations during spoken sentence comprehension. Neuropsychologia, 50(11), 2659–2668. doi:  10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.07.019
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.07.019 [Google Scholar]
  20. Chang, C. B.
    (2013) A novelty effect in phonetic drift of the native language. Journal of Phonetics, 41(6), 520–533. doi:  10.1016/j.wocn.2013.09.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2013.09.006 [Google Scholar]
  21. Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A.
    (1983) Individual differences in integrating information between and within sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9(4), 561–584.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Declerck, M.
    (2020) What about proactive language control?Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 27(1), 24–35. doi:  10.3758/s13423‑019‑01654‑1
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01654-1 [Google Scholar]
  23. Declerck, M., & Philipp, A. M.
    (2015) A review of control processes and their locus in language switching. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(6), 1630–1645. doi:  10.3758/s13423‑015‑0836‑1
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0836-1 [Google Scholar]
  24. DeKeyser, R. M.
    (2000) The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22(4), 499–533. doi:  10.1017/S0272263100004022
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100004022 [Google Scholar]
  25. Dijkstra, T., van Jaarsveld, H., & Brinke, S. T.
    (1998) Interlingual homograph recognition: Effects of task demands and language intermixing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1(1), 51–66. doi:  10.1017/S1366728998000121
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728998000121 [Google Scholar]
  26. Dussias, P. E., & Sagarra, N.
    (2007) The effect of exposure on syntactic parsing in Spanish-English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10(1), 101–116. doi:  10.1017/S1366728906002847
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728906002847 [Google Scholar]
  27. Edelman, G. M., & Gally, J. A.
    (2001) Degeneracy and complexity in biological systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(24), 13763. 10.1073/pnas.231499798
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.231499798 [Google Scholar]
  28. Engelhardt, P. E., Nigg, J. T., & Ferreira, F.
    (2017) Executive function and intelligence in the resolution of temporary syntactic ambiguity: An individual differences investigation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70(7), 1263–1281. doi:  10.1080/17470218.2016.1178785
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2016.1178785 [Google Scholar]
  29. Engle, R. W., & Kane, M. J.
    (2004) Executive attention, working memory capacity, and a two-factor theory of cognitive control. InB. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory, Vol.44 (p.145–199). Elsevier Science.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Ferjan Ramírez, N., Ramírez, R. R., Clarke, M., Taulu, S., & Kuhl, P. K.
    (2017) Speech discrimination in 11-month-old bilingual and monolingual infants: A magnetoencephalography study. Developmental Science, 20(1), e12427. doi:  10.1111/desc.12427
    https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12427 [Google Scholar]
  31. Flege, J. E.
    (2007) Language contact in bilingualism: Phonetic system interactions. InHualde, J. I. & Cole, J. (Eds.), Laboratory phonology (Vol.9, pp.353–382). Berlin, New-York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Flege, J. E., Yeni-Komshian, G. H., & Liu, S.
    (1999) Age constraints on second-language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language, 41(1), 78–104. doi:  10.1006/jmla.1999.2638
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1999.2638 [Google Scholar]
  33. Fricke, M., Zirnstein, M., Navarro-Torres, C., & Kroll, J. F.
    (2019) Bilingualism reveals fundamental variation in language processing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 22(1), 200–207. doi:  10.1017/S1366728918000482
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728918000482 [Google Scholar]
  34. Goldberg, A. E.
    (2019) Explain me this: Creativity, competition, and the partial productivity of constructions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Green, D. W.
    (1998) Mental control of the bilingual lexico-semantic system. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1(2), 67–81. doi:  10.1017/S1366728998000133
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728998000133 [Google Scholar]
  36. Green, D. W., & Abutalebi, J.
    (2013) Language control in bilinguals: The adaptive control hypothesis. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25(5), 515–530. doi:  10.1080/20445911.2013.796377
    https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2013.796377 [Google Scholar]
  37. Green, D. W., Crinion, J., & Price, C. J.
    (2006) Convergence, degeneracy, and control. Language Learning, 56(s1), 99–125. doi:  10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2006.00357.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2006.00357.x [Google Scholar]
  38. Green, D. W., & Kroll, J. F.
    (2019) The neurolinguistics of bilingualism. InG. de Zubicaray & N. Schiller (Eds.), Oxford handbook of neurolinguistics. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Green, D. W., & Wei, L.
    (2016) Code-switching and language control. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19(5), 883–884. doi:  10.1017/S1366728916000018
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728916000018 [Google Scholar]
  40. Grosjean, F.
    (1989) Neurolinguists, beware! The bilingual is not two monolinguals in one person. Bilingualism and Neurolinguistics, 36(1), 3–15. doi:  10.1016/0093‑934X(89)90048‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(89)90048-5 [Google Scholar]
  41. Gullifer, J. W., Chai, X. J., Whitford, V., Pivneva, I., Baum, S., Klein, D., & Titone, D.
    (2018) Bilingual experience and resting-state brain connectivity: Impacts of L2 age of acquisition and social diversity of language use on control networks. Neuropsychologia, 117, 123–134. doi:  10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.04.037
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.04.037 [Google Scholar]
  42. Guo, T., Liu, H., Misra, M., & Kroll, J. F.
    (2011) Local and global inhibition in bilingual word production: fMRI evidence from Chinese-English bilinguals. NeuroImage, 56(4), 2300–2309. doi:  10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.03.049
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.03.049 [Google Scholar]
  43. Hahn, M., Jurafsky, D., & Futrell, R.
    (2020) Universals of word order reflect optimization of grammars for efficient communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(5), 2347. doi:  10.1073/pnas.1910923117
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1910923117 [Google Scholar]
  44. Hirosh, Z., & Degani, T.
    (2018) Direct and indirect effects of multilingualism on novel language learning: An integrative review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(3), 892–916. doi:  10.3758/s13423‑017‑1315‑7
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1315-7 [Google Scholar]
  45. Hoshino, N., & Kroll, J. F.
    (2008) Cognate effects in picture naming: does cross-language activation survive a change of script?Cognition, 106(1), 501–511. doi:  10.1016/j.cognition.2007.02.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.02.001 [Google Scholar]
  46. Hsu, N. S., Jaeggi, S. M., & Novick, J. M.
    (2017) A common neural hub resolves syntactic and non-syntactic conflict through cooperation with task-specific networks. Brain and Language, 166, 63–77. doi:  10.1016/j.bandl.2016.12.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2016.12.006 [Google Scholar]
  47. Hsu, N. S., Kuchinsky, S. E., & Novick, J. M.
    (2021) Direct impact of cognitive control on sentence processing and comprehension. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 36(2), 211–239. doi:  10.1080/23273798.2020.1836379
    https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2020.1836379 [Google Scholar]
  48. Hsu, N. S., & Novick, J. M.
    (2016) Dynamic engagement of cognitive control modulates recovery from misinterpretation during real-time language processing. Psychological Science, 27(4), 572–582. doi:  10.1177/0956797615625223
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615625223 [Google Scholar]
  49. Humphreys, G. F., & Gennari, S. P.
    (2014) Competitive mechanisms in sentence processing: Common and distinct production and reading comprehension networks linked to the prefrontal cortex. NeuroImage, 84, 354–366. doi:  10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.08.059
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.08.059 [Google Scholar]
  50. Iverson, P., Kuhl, P. K., Akahane-Yamada, R., Diesch, E., Tohkura, Y., Kettermann, A., & Siebert, C.
    (2003) A perceptual interference account of acquisition difficulties for non-native phonemes. Cognition, 87(1), B47–B57. doi:  10.1016/S0010‑0277(02)00198‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00198-1 [Google Scholar]
  51. Jacobs, A., Fricke, M., & Kroll, J. F.
    (2016) Cross-language activation begins during speech planning and extends into second language speech. Language Learning, 66(2), 324–353. doi:  10.1111/lang.12148
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12148 [Google Scholar]
  52. Johnson, J. S., & Newport, E. L.
    (1989) Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology, 21(1), 60–99. doi:  10.1016/0010‑0285(89)90003‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(89)90003-0 [Google Scholar]
  53. Kaushanskaya, M., & Marian, V.
    (2009) The bilingual advantage in novel word learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(4), 705–710. doi:  10.3758/PBR.16.4.705
    https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.4.705 [Google Scholar]
  54. Kroll, J. F., Dussias, P. E., Bice, K., & Perrotti, L.
    (2015) Bilingualism, mind, and brain. Annual Review of Linguistics, 1(1), 377–394. doi:  10.1146/annurev‑linguist‑030514‑124937
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguist-030514-124937 [Google Scholar]
  55. Kroll, J. F., Michael, E., Tokowicz, N., & Dufour, R.
    (2002) The development of lexical fluency in a second language. Second Language Research, 18(2), 137–171. doi:  10.1191/0267658302sr201oa
    https://doi.org/10.1191/0267658302sr201oa [Google Scholar]
  56. Kroll, J. F., Takahesu Tabori, A., & Mech, E.
    (2017) Beyond typical learning: Variation in language experience as a lens to the developing mind. Applied Psycholinguistics, 38(6), 1336–1340. doi:  10.1017/S0142716417000315
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716417000315 [Google Scholar]
  57. Kroll, J. F., & Tokowicz, N.
    (2005) Models of bilingual representation and processing. InJ. F. Kroll & A. M. B. De Groot (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp.531–553). New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Kuhl, P. K.
    (1993) Innate predispositions and the effects of experience in speech perception: The native language magnet theory. InB. de Boysson-Bardies, S. de Schonen, P. Jusczyk, P. McNeilage, & J. Morton (Eds.), Developmental neurocognition: Speech and face processing in the first year of life (pp.259–274). Dordrecht: Springer. doi:  10.1007/978‑94‑015‑8234‑6_22
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8234-6_22 [Google Scholar]
  59. (2004) Early language acquisition: Cracking the speech code. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5(11), 831–843. doi:  10.1038/nrn1533
    https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1533 [Google Scholar]
  60. Kuhl, P. K., Conboy, B. T., Coffey-Corina, S., Padden, D., Rivera-Gaxiola, M., & Nelson, T.
    (2008) Phonetic learning as a pathway to language: New data and native language magnet theory expanded (NLM-e). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 363(1493), 979–1000. doi:  10.1098/rstb.2007.2154
    https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.2154 [Google Scholar]
  61. Kuhl, P. K., Stevens, E., Hayashi, A., Deguchi, T., Kiritani, S., & Iverson, P.
    (2006) Infants show a facilitation effect for native language phonetic perception between 6 and 12 months. Developmental Science, 9(2), F13–F21. doi:  10.1111/j.1467‑7687.2006.00468.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2006.00468.x [Google Scholar]
  62. Kuhl, P., Williams, K., Lacerda, F., Stevens, K., & Lindblom, B.
    (1992) Linguistic experience alters phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age. Science, 255(5044), 606. doi:  10.1126/science.1736364
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1736364 [Google Scholar]
  63. Lenneberg, E. H.
    (1967) The biological foundations of language. Hospital Practice, 2(12), 59–67. doi:  10.1080/21548331.1967.11707799
    https://doi.org/10.1080/21548331.1967.11707799 [Google Scholar]
  64. Li, P., Legault, J., & Litcofsky, K. A.
    (2014) Neuroplasticity as a function of second language learning: Anatomical changes in the human brain. Cortex, 58, 301–324. doi:  10.1016/j.cortex.2014.05.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2014.05.001 [Google Scholar]
  65. Linck, J. A., Kroll, J. F., & Sunderman, G.
    (2009) Losing access to the native language while immersed in a second language: Evidence for the role of inhibition in second-language learning. Psychological Science, 20(12), 1507–1515. doi:  10.1111/j.1467‑9280.2009.02480.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02480.x [Google Scholar]
  66. Luk, G., & Bialystok, E.
    (2013) Bilingualism is not a categorical variable: Interaction between language proficiency and usage. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25(5), 605–621. doi:  10.1080/20445911.2013.795574
    https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2013.795574 [Google Scholar]
  67. MacWhinney, B.
    (2005) A unified model of language acquisition. InJ. F. Kroll & A. M. B. De Groot (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp.49–67). New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. MacDonald, M. C., Pearlmutter, N. J., & Seidenberg, M. S.
    (1994) The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review, 101(4), 676–703. doi:  10.1037/0033‑295X.101.4.676
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.101.4.676 [Google Scholar]
  69. Marian, V., & Sprivey, M.
    (2003) Competing activation in bilingual language processing: Within- and between-language competition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 6(2), 97–115. doi:  10.1017/S1366728903001068
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728903001068 [Google Scholar]
  70. Mason, P. H., Domínguez, D. J. F., Winter, B., & Grignolio, A.
    (2015) Hidden in plain view: Degeneracy in complex systems. Biosystems, 128, 1–8. doi:  10.1016/j.biosystems.2014.12.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystems.2014.12.003 [Google Scholar]
  71. McLaughlin, J., Osterhout, L., & Kim, A.
    (2004) Neural correlates of second-language word learning: Minimal instruction produces rapid change. Nature Neuroscience, 7(7), 703–704. doi:  10.1038/nn1264
    https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1264 [Google Scholar]
  72. Meuter, R. F. I., & Allport, A.
    (1999) Bilingual language switching in naming: Asymmetrical costs of language selection. Journal of Memory and Language, 40(1), 25–40. doi:  10.1006/jmla.1998.2602
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1998.2602 [Google Scholar]
  73. Midgley, K. J., Holcomb, P. J., & Grainger, J.
    (2011) Effects of cognate status on word comprehension in second language learners: An ERP investigation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(7), 1634–1647. doi:  10.1162/jocn.2010.21463
    https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2010.21463 [Google Scholar]
  74. Misra, M., Guo, T., Bobb, S. C., & Kroll, J. F.
    (2012) When bilinguals choose a single word to speak: Electrophysiological evidence for inhibition of the native language. Journal of Memory and Language, 67(1), 224–237. doi:  10.1016/j.jml.2012.05.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.05.001 [Google Scholar]
  75. Morford, J. P., Wilkinson, E., Villwock, A., Piñar, P., & Kroll, J. F.
    (2011) When deaf signers read English: Do written words activate their sign translations?Cognition, 118(2), 286–292. doi:  10.1016/j.cognition.2010.11.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.11.006 [Google Scholar]
  76. Navarro-Torres, C. A., Garcia, D. L., Chidambaram, V., & Kroll, J. F.
    (2019) Cognitive control facilitates attentional disengagement during second language comprehension. Brain Sciences, 9(5), 95. doi:  10.3390/brainsci9050095
    https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci9050095 [Google Scholar]
  77. Nozari, N.
    (2018) How special is language production? Perspectives from monitoring and control. InK. D. Federmeier & D. G. Watson (Eds.), Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol.68, pp.179–213). Cambridge: Academic Press. doi:  10.1016/bs.plm.2018.08.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.plm.2018.08.006 [Google Scholar]
  78. Perani, D., & Abutalebi, J.
    (2005) The neural basis of first and second language processing. Cognitive Neuroscience, 15(2), 202–206. doi:  10.1016/j.conb.2005.03.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2005.03.007 [Google Scholar]
  79. Petitto, L. A., Berens, M. S., Kovelman, I., Dubins, M. H., Jasinska, K., & Shalinsky, M.
    (2012) The “Perceptual Wedge Hypothesis” as the basis for bilingual babies’ phonetic processing advantage: New insights from fNIRS brain imaging. Brain and Language, 121(2), 130–143. doi:  10.1016/j.bandl.2011.05.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2011.05.003 [Google Scholar]
  80. Pienemann, M., Di Biase, B., Kawaguchi, S., & Håkansson, G.
    (2005) Processing constraints on L1 transfer. InJ. F. Kroll & A. M. B. De Groot (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp.128–153). New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Pierce, L. J., Chen, J.-K., Delcenserie, A., Genesee, F., & Klein, D.
    (2015) Past experience shapes ongoing neural patterns for language. Nature Communications, 6(1), 10073. doi:  10.1038/ncomms10073
    https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10073 [Google Scholar]
  82. Pierce, L. J., Klein, D., Chen, J. K., Delcenserie, A., & Genesee, F.
    (2014) Mapping the unconscious maintenance of a lost first language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(48), 17314-17319. 10.1073/pnas.1409411111
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1409411111 [Google Scholar]
  83. Pons, F., Bosch, L., & Lewkowicz, D. J.
    (2015) Bilingualism modulates infants’ selective attention to the mouth of a talking face. Psychological Science, 26(4), 490–498. doi:  10.1177/0956797614568320
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614568320 [Google Scholar]
  84. Rossi, E., Newman, S., Kroll, J. F., & Diaz, M. T.
    (2018) Neural signatures of inhibitory control in bilingual spoken production. Cortex, 108, 50–66. doi:  10.1016/j.cortex.2018.07.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2018.07.009 [Google Scholar]
  85. Sabourin, L., Stowe, L. A., & de Haan, G. J.
    (2006) Transfer effects in learning a second language grammatical gender system. Second Language Research, 22(1), 1–29. doi:  10.1191/0267658306sr259oa
    https://doi.org/10.1191/0267658306sr259oa [Google Scholar]
  86. Schmid, M. S.
    (2010) Languages at play: The relevance of L1 attrition to the study of bilingualism. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13(1), 1–7. doi:  10.1017/S1366728909990368
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728909990368 [Google Scholar]
  87. Schwartz, A. I., Kroll, J. F., & Diaz, M.
    (2007) Reading words in Spanish and English: Mapping orthography to phonology in two languages. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22(1), 106–129. doi:  10.1080/01690960500463920
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960500463920 [Google Scholar]
  88. Scontras, G., Fuchs, Z., & Polinsky, M.
    (2015) Heritage language and linguistic theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1545. doi:  10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01545
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01545 [Google Scholar]
  89. Sebastián-Gallés, N., Albareda-Castellot, B., Weikum, W. M., & Werker, J. F.
    (2012) A bilingual advantage in visual language discrimination in infancy. Psychological Science, 23(9), 994–999. doi:  10.1177/0956797612436817
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612436817 [Google Scholar]
  90. Stasenko, A., Hays, C., Wierenga, C. E., & Gollan, T. H.
    (2020) Cognitive control regions are recruited in bilinguals’ silent reading of mixed-language paragraphs. Brain and Language, 204, 104754. doi:  10.1016/j.bandl.2020.104754
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2020.104754 [Google Scholar]
  91. Weikum, W. M., Vouloumanos, A., Navarra, J., Soto-Faraco, S., Sebastián-Gallés, N., & Werker, J. F.
    (2007) Visual language discrimination in infancy. Science, 316(5828), 1159. doi:  10.1126/science.1137686
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1137686 [Google Scholar]
  92. Werker, J. F., & Tees, R. C.
    (1984) Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life. Infant Behavior and Development, 7(1), 49–63. doi:  10.1016/S0163‑6383(84)80022‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0163-6383(84)80022-3 [Google Scholar]
  93. Wong, P. C. M., Warrier, C. M., Penhune, V. B., Roy, A. K., Sadehh, A., Parrish, T. B., & Zatorre, R. J.
    (2008) Volume of left Heschl’s gyrus and linguistic pitch learning. Cerebral Cortex, 18(4), 828–836. doi:  10.1093/cercor/bhm115
    https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhm115 [Google Scholar]
  94. van Assche, E., Duyck, W., & Gollan, T. H.
    (2013) Whole-language and item-specific control in bilingual language production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(6), 1781–1792. doi:  10.1037/a0032859
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032859 [Google Scholar]
  95. van den Heuvel, M. P., & Sporns, O.
    (2013) Network hubs in the human brain. Special Issue: The Connectome, 17(12), 683–696. doi:  10.1016/j.tics.2013.09.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.09.012 [Google Scholar]
  96. van hell, J. G., & Dijkstra, T.
    (2002) Foreign language knowledge can influence native language performance in exclusively native contexts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(4), 780–789. doi:  10.3758/BF03196335
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196335 [Google Scholar]
  97. Vuong, L. C., & Martin, R. C.
    (2014) Domain-specific executive control and the revision of misinterpretations in sentence comprehension. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29(3), 312–325. doi:  10.1080/01690965.2013.836231
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2013.836231 [Google Scholar]
  98. Zirnstein, M., Bice, K., & Kroll, J. F.
    (2019) Variation in language experience shapes the consequences of bilingualism. InI. A. Sekerina, L. Spradlin, & V. V. Valian (Eds.), Bilingualism and executive function: An interdisciplinary approach (pp.35–48). Amsterdam, NL: John Benjamins Publishers. doi:  10.1075/sibil.57.03zir
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.57.03zir [Google Scholar]
  99. Zirnstein, M., van Hell, J. G., & Kroll, J. F.
    (2018) Cognitive control ability mediates prediction costs in monolinguals and bilinguals. Cognition, 176, 87–106. doi:  10.1016/j.cognition.2018.03.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.03.001 [Google Scholar]

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error