The /s/ ~ /z/ voice contrast in L1 French, L1 Spanish and L1 Italian learners of L2 English

References

1. Abdelli-Beruh, N. B.
   (2012) Voicing and devoicing assimilation of French /s/ and /z/. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 41(5), 371–386. 10.1007/s10936‑011‑9187‑x
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-011-9187-x [Google Scholar]
2. Baroni, A.
   (2014) Element theory and the magic of /s/. InE. Cyran & J. Szpyra Kozłowska (Eds.), Crossing phonetics-phonology lines (pp.3–30). Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J.
   (2013) Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001 [Google Scholar]
4. Bassetti, B., Hayes-Harb, R., & Escudero, P.
   (2015) Second language phonology at the interface between acoustic and orthographic input. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36(1), 1–6. 10.1017/S0142716414000393
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716414000393 [Google Scholar]
5. Bassetti, B., Sokolovic-Perovic, M., Mairano, P., & Cerni, T.
   (2018) Orthography-induced length contrasts in the second language phonological systems of experienced speakers of English as a Second Language: Evidence from minimal pairs. Language and Speech, 61(4), 577–598. 10.1177/0023830918780141
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830918780141 [Google Scholar]
6. Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S.
   (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1). doi:  10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 [Google Scholar]
7. Bertinetto, P. M., & Loporcaro, M.
   (2005) The sound pattern of Standard Italian, as compared with the varieties spoken in Florence, Milan and Rome. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 35(2), 132–151. doi:  10.1017/S0025100305002148
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100305002148 [Google Scholar]
8. Best, C.
   (1995) A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception. InW. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp.171–206). York: York Press.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Best, C. T., & Tyler, M.
   (2007) Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. InO. S. Bohn & M. Munro (Eds.), Second-language speech learning: The role of language experience in speech perception and production. A Festschrift in honour of James E. Flege (pp.13–34). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.17.07bes
   https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.17.07bes [Google Scholar]
10. Boersma, P., & Weenink, D.
    (2001) Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International, 5, 341–345.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Bradley, T. G., & Delforge, A. M.
    (2006) Systemic contrast and the diachrony of Spanish sibilant voicing. InR. Gess & D. Arteaga (Eds.), Historical Romance linguistics: Retrospective and perspectives (p.19–52). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi:  10.1075/cilt.274.04bra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.274.04bra [Google Scholar]
12. Broniś, O.
    (2016) Italian vowel paragoge in loanword adaptation. Phonological analysis of the Roman variety of Standard Italian. Italian Journal of Linguistics, 28(2), 25–68.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Brown, A.
    (1988) Functional load and the teaching of pronunciation. TESOL Quarterly, 22(4), 593. doi:  10.2307/3587258
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3587258 [Google Scholar]
14. Canepari, L., & Giovannelli, B.
    (2008) La buona pronuncia italiana del terzo millennio. Rome: Aracne.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Catford, J. C.
    (1987) Phonetics and the teaching of pronunciation: A systemic description of the teaching of English phonology. InJ. Morley (Ed.), Current perspectives on pronunciation: Practices anchored in theory (pp.83–100). Washington D.C.: TESOL.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Cole, R. A., & Cooper, W. E.
    (1975) Perception of voicing in English affricates and fricatives. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 58(6), 1280–1287. 10.1121/1.380810
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.380810 [Google Scholar]
17. Contreras Roa, L., Mairano, P., Capliez, M. & Bouzon, C.
    (2020) Voice assimilation of morphemic -s in the L2 English of L1 French, L1 Italian and L1 Spanish learners. Anglophonia – French Journal of English Linguistics, 30, 1–22. 10.4000/anglophonia.3711
    https://doi.org/10.4000/anglophonia.3711 [Google Scholar]
18. Crystal, T. H., & House, A. S.
    (1988a) Segmental durations in connected-speech signals: Current results. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 83(4), 1553–1573. 10.1121/1.395911
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.395911 [Google Scholar]
19. Crystal, T. H., & House, A. S.
    (1988b) Segmental durations in connected-speech signals: Syllabic stress. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 83(4), 1574–1585. doi:  10.1121/1.395912
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.395912 [Google Scholar]
20. Davidson, J.
    (2019) Intervocalic /s/ voicing in Andean Spanish: Problematizing the assessment of contact-induced change. InG. L. Thompson & S. M. Alvord (Eds.), Contact, community, and connections: Current approaches to Spanish in multilingual populations (pp.111–146). Wilmington, DE: Vernon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Davidson, J.
    (2021). Intervocalic /s/-voicing in Spanish in contact with Catalan. InE. Núñez Ed. Sibilants in Spanish: Diachronic and sociolinguistic analysis (pp.95–127). Routledge. 10.4324/9781003153948‑5
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003153948-5 [Google Scholar]
22. Delattre, P.
    (1965) Comparing phonetic features of English, French, German and Spanish. London: Harrap.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Docherty, G. J.
    (1992) The timing of voicing in British English obstruents. Netherlands Phonetics Archives, 9. Berlin: Foris. 10.1515/9783110872637
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110872637 [Google Scholar]
24. Eckman, F. R.
    (1977) Markedness and the contrastive analysis hypothesis. Language Learning, 27, 315–330. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1977.tb00124.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1977.tb00124.x [Google Scholar]
25. Eckman, F. R.
    (2008) Typological markedness and second language phonology. InH. C. Hansen Edwards & M. L. Zampini (Eds.) Phonology and second language acquisition (pp.95–115). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sibil.36.06eck
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.36.06eck [Google Scholar]
26. Esposito, A.
    (2002) On vowel height and consonantal voicing effects: Data from Italian. Phonetica, 59(4), 197–231. 10.1159/000068347
    https://doi.org/10.1159/000068347 [Google Scholar]
27. Farnetani, E., & Kori, S.
    (1986) Effects of syllable and word structure on segmental durations in spoken Italian. Speech Communication, 5(1), 17–34. 10.1016/0167‑6393(86)90027‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6393(86)90027-0 [Google Scholar]
28. Faudree, M. C., & Fujimaki, A.
    (2020) Exceptions to markedness universals and novel use of Weibull analysis in the acquisition of obstruent voicing contrasts by Japanese speakers of English. Academia Journal of Educational Research, 8(3), 117–137.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Flege, J. E.
    (1995) Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. InW. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp.233–277). York: York Press. doi:  10.1111/j.1600‑0404.1995.tb01710.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0404.1995.tb01710.x [Google Scholar]
30. Flege, J. E., & Bohn, O. S.
    (2020) The revised Speech Learning Model (SLM-r). InR. Wayland (Ed.), Second language speech learning: Theoretical and empirical progress (pp.3–83). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Flege, J. E., Munro, M. J., & MacKay, I. R.
    (1995) Effects of age of second-language learning on the production of English consonants. Speech Communication, 16 (1), 1–26. 10.1016/0167‑6393(94)00044‑B
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6393(94)00044-B [Google Scholar]
32. Greenberg, J.
    (2005) Language universals. The Hague: Mouton De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110899771
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110899771 [Google Scholar]
33. Grice, M., Savino, M., & Roettger, T. B.
    (2018) Word final schwa is driven by intonation – The case of Bari Italian. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 143(4), 2474–2486. 10.1121/1.5030923
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5030923 [Google Scholar]
34. Gros-Bonfiglioli, A.
    (forthcoming). L’utilisation du linking en anglais : le cas d’apprenants francophones dans IPCE-IPAC. PhD Thesis, University of Paris Nanterre.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Haggard, M.
    (1978) The devoicing of voiced fricatives. Journal of Phonetics, 6(2), 95–102. doi:  10.1016/S0095‑4470(19)31101‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(19)31101-5 [Google Scholar]
36. Hawkins, S.
    (2010) Phonological features, auditory objects, and illusions. Journal of Phonetics, 38(1), 60–89. 10.1016/j.wocn.2009.02.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2009.02.001 [Google Scholar]
37. Hawkins, S., & Nguyen, N.
    (2004) Influence of syllable-coda voicing on the acoustic properties of syllable-onset/l/in English. Journal of Phonetics, 32(2), 199–231. 10.1016/S0095‑4470(03)00031‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(03)00031-7 [Google Scholar]
38. Hernández-Campoy, J. M., & Trudgill, P.
    (2002) Functional compensation and southern peninsular Spanish /s/ loss. Folia Linguistica Historica, 23, 141–167. 10.1515/flih.2002.23.1‑2.31
    https://doi.org/10.1515/flih.2002.23.1-2.31 [Google Scholar]
39. Herry-Bénit, N., Lopez, S., Tennant, J., & Kamiyama, T.
    (forthcoming). IPCE-IPAC Interphonology of Contemporary English: Methodological issues. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research.
    [Google Scholar]
40. House, A. S.
    (1961) On vowel duration in English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 33(9), 1174–1178. doi:  10.1121/1.1908941
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1908941 [Google Scholar]
41. House, A. S., & Fairbanks, G.
    (1953) The influence of consonant environment upon the secondary acoustical characteristics of vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 25(1), 105–113. 10.1121/1.1906982
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1906982 [Google Scholar]
42. Hualde, J. I.
    (2005) The sounds of Spanish with audio CD. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Jatteau, A., Vasilescu, I., Lamel, L., & Adda-Decker, M.
    (2019) Final devoicing of fricatives in French: Studying variation in largescale corpora with automatic alignment. InS. Calhoun, P. Escudero, M. Tabain, & P. Warren (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Melbourne, Australia 2019 (pp.295–299). Canberra, Australia: Australasian Speech Science and Technology Association Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Kessler, B., & Treiman, R.
    (1997) Syllable structure and the distribution of phonemes in English syllables. Journal of Memory and Language, 37(3), 295–311. 10.1006/jmla.1997.2522
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1997.2522 [Google Scholar]
45. Kisler, T., Reichel, U. D., & Schiel, F.
    (2017) Multilingual processing of speech via web services. Computer Speech & Language, 45(September), 326–347. 10.1016/j.csl.2017.01.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csl.2017.01.005 [Google Scholar]
46. Klatt, D. H.
    (1976) Linguistic uses of segmental duration in English: Acoustic and perceptual evidence. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 59(5), 1208–1221. 10.1121/1.380986
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.380986 [Google Scholar]
47. Krämer, M.
    (2005) Contiguity and non-derived environment blocking of s-voicing in Lombardian and Tuscan Italian. Probus, 17(2), 227–251. 10.1515/prbs.2005.17.2.227
    https://doi.org/10.1515/prbs.2005.17.2.227 [Google Scholar]
48. Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B.
    (2017) lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 1–26. 10.18637/jss.v082.i13
    https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13 [Google Scholar]
49. Laeufer, C.
    (1992) Patterns of voicing-conditioned vowel duration in French and English. Journal of Phonetics, 20(4), 411–440. 10.1016/S0095‑4470(19)30648‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30648-5 [Google Scholar]
50. Lenth, R.
    (2019) emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means. R package version 1.3.4. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans
    [Google Scholar]
51. Limesurvey Project Team
    Limesurvey Project Team (2012) Limesurvey: An Open Source Survey Tool. www.limesurvey.org
52. Lisker, L., & Abramson, A. S.
    (1964) A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: Acoustical measurements. Word, 20(3), 384–422. 10.1080/00437956.1964.11659830
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1964.11659830 [Google Scholar]
53. Maddieson, I.
    (1984) Patterns of sounds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511753459
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511753459 [Google Scholar]
54. Magno Caldognetto, E., Ferrero, F., Vagges, K., & Bagno, M.
    (1979) Indici acustici e indici percettivi nel riconoscimento dei suoni linguistici (con applicazione alle consonanti occlusive dell’italiano). Acta Phoniatrica Latina, 2, 219–246.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Mairano, P., Bouzon, C., Capliez, M., & De Iacovo, V.
    (2019) Acoustic distances, Pillai scores and LDA classification scores as metrics of L2 comprehensibility and nativelikeness. InS. Calhoun, P. Escudero, M. Tabain, & P. Warren (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Melbourne, Australia 2019 (pp.1104–1108). Canberra, Australia: Australasian Speech Science and Technology Association Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Major, R. C., & Faudree, M. C.
    (1996) Markedness universals and the acquisition of voicing contrasts by Korean speakers of English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(1), 69–90. 10.1017/S0272263100014686
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100014686 [Google Scholar]
57. Mines, M. A., Hanson, B. F., & Shoup, J. E.
    (1978) Frequency of occurrence of phonemes in conversational English. Language and Speech, 21(3), 221–241. 10.1177/002383097802100302
    https://doi.org/10.1177/002383097802100302 [Google Scholar]
58. Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M.
    (2006) The functional load principle in ESL pronunciation instruction: An exploratory study. System, 34(4), 520–531. 10.1016/j.system.2006.09.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2006.09.004 [Google Scholar]
59. Nocchi, N., & Filipponio, L.
    (2012) Lo vuoi co[z]ì o co[s]ì? A sociophonetic study on sibilants in the regional Italian of Livorno (Tuscany). Proceedings of the workshop ‘Sociophonetics, at the crossroads of speech variation, processing and communication’ (pp.53–56). Pisa: Edizioni della normale.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Nocchi, N., & Schmid, S.
    (2007) Lenition of voiceless fricatives in two varieties of southern Italian. InJ. Trouvain & W. J. Barry (Eds.), Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp.1497–1500). Saarbrücken: Institute of Phonetics, Saarland University.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Ohala, J. J.
    (1983) The origin of sound patterns in vocal tract constraints. InP. McNeilage (Ed.) The production of speech (pp.189–216). New York: Springer-Verlag. 10.1007/978‑1‑4613‑8202‑7_9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8202-7_9 [Google Scholar]
62. O’Shaughnessy, D.
    (1981) A study of French vowel and consonant durations. Journal of Phonetics, 9(4), 385–406. 10.1016/S0095‑4470(19)31016‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(19)31016-2 [Google Scholar]
63. Peterson, G. E., & Lehiste, I.
    (1960) Duration of syllable nuclei in English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 32(6), 693–703. doi:  10.1121/1.1908183
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1908183 [Google Scholar]
64. Pirello, K., Blumstein, S. E., & Kurowski, K.
    (1997) The characteristics of voicing in syllable-initial fricatives in American English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101(6), 3754–3765. 10.1121/1.418334
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.418334 [Google Scholar]
65. Plag, I., Homann, J., & Kunter, G.
    (2017) Homophony and morphology: The acoustics of word-final S in English. Journal of Linguistics, 53(1), 181–216. doi:  10.1017/S0022226715000183
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226715000183 [Google Scholar]
66. R Core Team
    R Core Team (2014) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved fromwww.r-project.org/
    [Google Scholar]
67. Raphael, L. J.
    (1972) Preceding vowel duration as a cue to the perception of the voicing characteristic of word-final consonants in American English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 51(4B), 1296–1303. doi:  10.1121/1.1912974
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1912974 [Google Scholar]
68. Schielzeth, H.
    (2010) Simple means to improve the interpretability of regression coefficients. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 1(2), 103–113. 10.1111/j.2041‑210X.2010.00012.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2010.00012.x [Google Scholar]
69. Schmid, S.
    (2012) The pronunciation of voiced obstruents in L2 French: A preliminary study of Swiss German learners. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 48(1), 627–659. 10.1515/psicl‑2012‑0028
    https://doi.org/10.1515/psicl-2012-0028 [Google Scholar]
70. Schmid, S., & Wachter, S.
    (2015) Le ostruenti sonore nella pronuncia dell’italiano di apprendenti svizzero-tedeschi. InM. Vayra, C. Avesani, & F. Tamburini (Eds.), Il farsi e disfarsi del linguaggio. Acquisizione, mutamento e destrutturazione della struttura sonora del linguaggio/Language acquisition and language loss. Acquisition, change and disorders of the language sound structure. (pp.203–217). Milano: Officinaventuno Milano.
    [Google Scholar]
71. Smith, C. L.
    (1997) The devoicing of /z/ in American English: Effects of local and prosodic context. Journal of Phonetics, 25(4), 471–500. doi:  10.1006/jpho.1997.0053
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1997.0053 [Google Scholar]
72. Stevens, K. N.
    (1980) Acoustic correlates of some phonetic categories. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 68(3), 836–842. 10.1121/1.384823
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.384823 [Google Scholar]
73. Stevens, K. N., Blumstein, S. E., Glicksman, L., Burton, M., & Kurowski, K.
    (1992) Acoustic and perceptual characteristics of voicing in fricatives and fricative clusters. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 91(5), 2979–3000. doi:  10.1121/1.402933
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.402933 [Google Scholar]
74. Strobl, C., Boulesteix, A. L., Kneib, T., Augustin, T., & Zeileis, A.
    (2008) Conditional variable importance for random forests. BMC Bioinformatics, 9(1), 307. 10.1186/1471‑2105‑9‑307
    https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-9-307 [Google Scholar]
75. Tagliamonte, S. A., & Baayen, R. H.
    (2012) Models, forests, and trees of York English: Was/were variation as a case study for statistical practice. Language Variation and Change, 24(2), 135–178. 10.1017/S0954394512000129
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394512000129 [Google Scholar]
76. Torreira, F., & Ernestus, M.
    (2012) Weakening of intervocalic /s/ in the Nijmegen Corpus of Casual Spanish. Phonetica, 69(3), 124–148. 10.1159/000343635
    https://doi.org/10.1159/000343635 [Google Scholar]
77. Trifu-Dejeu, I.
    (forthcoming). The interphonology of /r/ in French learners of English in the IPCE-IPAC corpus. PhD dissertation, University of Paris Nanterre.
78. van Summers, W.
    (1987) Effects of stress and final-consonant voicing on vowel production: Articulatory and acoustic analyses. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 82(3), 847–863. 10.1121/1.395284
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.395284 [Google Scholar]
79. van Summers, W.
    (1988) F1 structure provides information for final-consonant voicing. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 84(2), 485–492. 10.1121/1.396826
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.396826 [Google Scholar]
80. Vieru-Dimulescu, B., Boula de Mareüil, P., & Adda-Decker, M.
    (2007) Characterizing non-native French accents using automatic alignement. InJ. Trouvain & W. J. Barry (Eds.), Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp.2217–2220). Saarbrücken: Institute of Phonetics, Saarland University.
    [Google Scholar]
81. Walsh, T., & Parker, F.
    (1983) Vowel length and vowel transition: Cues to [±voice] in post-vocalic stops. Journal of Phonetics, 11(4), 407–412. 10.1016/S0095‑4470(19)30840‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30840-X [Google Scholar]
82. Wickham, H.
    (2016) ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. New York: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑24277‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4 [Google Scholar]
83. Wiltshire, C.
    (2002) Variation in Spanish aspiration and prosodic boundary constraints. InD. Cresti, T. Satterfield, C. Tortora (Eds.), Current issues in linguistic theory: Selected papers from the XXIXth Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (pp.375–389). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.220.25wil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.220.25wil [Google Scholar]