L’acquisition des objets directs et indirects en français L1

References

1. Babyonyshev, M., & Marin, S.
   (2006) Acquisition of pronominal clitics in Romanian. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 5, 17–44. 10.5565/rev/catjl.71
   https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/catjl.71 [Google Scholar]
2. Bello, S.
   (2012) Identifying indirect objects in L1 French: An elicitation task. InP. Caxaj (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2012 Canadian Linguistics Association Annual Conference. homes.chass.utoronto.ca/~cla-acl/actes2012/Bello_2012.pdf
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bello, S.
   (2017) Prolegomenon to the study of indirect objects in French L1 Acquisition [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Toronto.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Castilla, A. P.
   (2008) Developmental measures of morphosyntactic acquisition in monolingual 3-, 4-, 5-year-old Spanish-speaking children [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Toronto.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Costa, J., Lobo, M., Carmona, J., & Silva, C.
   (2008) Clitic omission in European Portuguese: Correlation with null objects?InA. Gavarró & M. João Freitas (Eds.), Language acquisition and development: Proceedings of GALA 2007 (pp.133–143). Cambridge Scholars Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Cummins, S., & Roberge, Y.
   (2005) A modular account of null objects in French. Syntax, 8(1), 44–64. 10.1111/j.1467‑9612.2005.00074.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9612.2005.00074.x [Google Scholar]
7. Cummins, S., Roberge, Y., & Troberg, M.
   (2010) L’objet indirect en français : Sens, représentations et évolution. InC. Leblanc, F. Martineau, & Y. Frenette (Eds.), Vues sur le Français du Canada (pp.77–112). Presses de l’Université Laval.
   [Google Scholar]
8. De Cat, C., & Plunkett, B.
   (2002) Qu’est-ce qu’i(l) dit, celui+là?: Notes méthodologiques sur la transcription d’un corpus francophone. Romanistische Korpuslinguistik: Korpora und gesprochene Sprache / Romance Corpus Linguistics: Corpora and Spoken Language. Narr Verlag. CD-rom.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Delage, H., & Frauenfelder, U. H.
   (2019) Syntax and working memory in typically-developing children. Language, Interaction and Acquisition, 10(2), 141–176. 10.1075/lia.18013.del
   https://doi.org/10.1075/lia.18013.del [Google Scholar]
10. Fillmore, C. J.
    (1986) Pragmatically controlled zero anaphora. Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 95–107. 10.3765/bls.v12i0.1866
    https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v12i0.1866 [Google Scholar]
11. Gavarró, A., & Mosella, M.
    (2009) Testing syntactic and pragmatic accounts of clitic omission. InJ. Crawford, K. Otaki, & M. Takahashi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition North America (25–35). Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Grüter, T.
    (2006) Object clitics and null objects in the acquisition of French [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. McGill University, Canada.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Hopper, P. J., & Thompson, S. A.
    (1980) Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language, 56(2), 251–299. 10.1353/lan.1980.0017
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1980.0017 [Google Scholar]
14. Hughes, M. E., & Allen, S.
    (2013) The effect of individual discourse-pragmatic features on referential choice in child English. Journal of Pragmatics, 56(1), 15–30. 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.05.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.05.005 [Google Scholar]
15. Jakubowicz, C., Müller, N., Riemer, B., & Rigaut, C.
    (1997) The case of subject and object omission in French and German. BUCLD21 (pp.331–342). Cascadilla Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Larjavaara, M.
    (2000) Présence ou absence de l’objet. Limites du possible en français contemporain. Helsinki: Academia Scientiarum Fennica.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Lyczkowski, D.
    (1999) Adquieretelo: On the acquisition of pronominal object clitics in Spanish [Unpublished undergraduate thesis]. Harvard University.
    [Google Scholar]
18. MacWhinney, B.
    (2000) The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk. Third Edition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Müller, N., Schmitz, K., Cantone, K., & Kupisch, T.
    (2006) Null arguments in monolingual children: A comparison of Italian and French. InV. Torrens & L. Escobar (Eds.), The acquisition of syntax in Romance languages (pp.69–95). John Benjamins. 10.1075/lald.41.05mul
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.41.05mul [Google Scholar]
20. Noailly, M.
    (1997) Les mystères de la transitivité invisible. Langages, 127, 96–109. 10.3406/lgge.1997.2127
    https://doi.org/10.3406/lgge.1997.2127 [Google Scholar]
21. Pérez-Leroux, A. T., Pirvulescu, M., & Roberge, Y.
    (2008) Null objects in child language: Syntax and the lexicon. Lingua, 118, 370–398. 10.1016/j.lingua.2007.07.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2007.07.002 [Google Scholar]
22. Pérez-Leroux, A. T., Pirvulescu, M., & Roberge, Y.
    (2017) Direct objects and language acquisition. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Pirvulescu, M.
    (2006) Implications of clitic omission in early French: Spontaneous vs. elicited production. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 5, 221–236. 10.5565/rev/catjl.70
    https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/catjl.70 [Google Scholar]
24. Pirvulescu, M., & Hill, V.
    (2011) Object clitic omission in French-speaking children: Effects of the elicitation task. Language Acquisition19(1): 73–81. 10.1080/10489223.2011.634660
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10489223.2011.634660 [Google Scholar]
25. Pirvulescu, M., Pérez-Leroux, A. T., Roberge, Y., & Strik, N.
    (2012) Clitic production across tasks in young French-speaking children. InA. K. Biller, E. Y. Chung, & A. E. Kimball (Eds.), BUCLD 36: Proceedings of the 36th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp.461–473). Cascadilla Press.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Pirvulescu, M., Pérez-Leroux, A. T., Roberge, Y., Strik, N., & Thomas, D.
    (2014) Bilingual effects: Exploring object omission in pronominal languages. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17(3), 495–510. 10.1017/S1366728913000631
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728913000631 [Google Scholar]
27. Roberge, Y., & Troberg, M.
    (2007) Thematic indirect objects in French. Journal of French Language Studies, 17(3), 297–322. 10.1017/S0959269507003018
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959269507003018 [Google Scholar]
28. Schmitz, K.
    (2012) Clitics in the acquisition of inalienable possession in French. InP. Larranaga, & P. Guijarro-Fuentes (Eds.), Pronouns and clitics in early language (pp.175–208). Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110238815.175
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110238815.175 [Google Scholar]
29. Schmitz, K., Cantone, K., Müller, N., & Kupisch, T.
    (2004) Clitic realizations and omissions in early child grammar: A comparison of Italian and French. Paper delivered at theRomance Turn, Workshop on the Acquisition of Romance Languages, Madrid.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Serratrice, L., Sorace, A., & Paoli, S.
    (2004) Cross-linguistic influence at the syntax-pragmatics interface: Subjects and objects in English-Italian bilingual and monolingual acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7, 183–205. 10.1017/S1366728904001610
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728904001610 [Google Scholar]
31. Sigurðsson, H. A.
    (2011) Conditions on argument drop. Linguistic Inquiry, 42(2), 267–304. 10.1162/LING_a_00042
    https://doi.org/10.1162/LING_a_00042 [Google Scholar]
32. Silva, C.
    (2010) Asymmetries in the acquisition of different types of clitics in European Portuguese. InV. Torrens, L. Escobar, A. Gavarró, & J. Gutiérrez (Eds.), Movement and clitics: Adult and child grammar (pp.361–388). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Skarabela, B., Allen, S., & Scott-Phillips, T.
    (2013) Joint attention helps explain why children omit new referents. Journals of Pragmatics, 56, 5–14. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.08.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.08.003 [Google Scholar]
34. Sportiche, D.
    (1996) Clitic constructions. InJ. Rooryck, & L. Zaring (Eds.), Phrase structure and the lexicon (pp.213–276). Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑015‑8617‑7_9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8617-7_9 [Google Scholar]
35. Sportiche, D.
    (1998) Partitions and atoms of clause structure: Subjects, agreement, case and clitics. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Tuller, L., Delage, H., Monjauze, C., Piller, A.-G., & Barthez, M.-A.
    (2011) Clitic pronoun production as a measure of atypical language development in French. Lingua, 121(3), 423–441. 10.1016/j.lingua.2010.10.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2010.10.008 [Google Scholar]
37. Weissenborn, J., Kail, M., & Friederici, A.
    (1990) Language-particular or language-independent factors in acquisition? Children’s comprehension of object pronouns in Dutch, French and German. First Language, 10(29), 141–166. 10.1177/014272379001002904
    https://doi.org/10.1177/014272379001002904 [Google Scholar]
38. Wexler, K., Gavarró, A., & Torrens, V.
    (2003) Feature checking and object clitic omission in child Catalan and Spanish. InR. Bok-Bennema, B. Hollebrandse, & B. Kampers-Manhe (Eds.), Going Romance 2002 (pp.253–268). John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.256.15wex
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.256.15wex [Google Scholar]
39. Zesiger, P., Zesiger, L. C., Arabatzi, M., Baranzini, L., Cronel-Ohayon, S., Franck, J., Frauenfelder, U. H., Hamann, C., & Rizzi, L.
    (2010) The acquisition of pronouns by French children: A parallel study of production and comprehension. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31(4), 571–603. 10.1017/S0142716410000147
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716410000147 [Google Scholar]