1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Language, Interaction and Acquisition
  4. Volume 13, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 13, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1879-7865
  • E-ISSN: 1879-7873
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Résumé

Cet article compare la production des clitiques objets directs (OD) et indirects (OI) chez les enfants francophones. L’analyse s’appuie, d’une part, sur des données spontanées du corpus York de la base de données CHILDES, et d’autre part, sur des données induites récoltées auprès de 48 enfants francophones âgés de 3;03 à 5;02 ans. Les résultats montrent que les enfants préfèrent l’omission des clitiques OD et OI à toute autre possibilité, et maintiennent l’omission des clitiques OI pendant plus longtemps que celle des clitiques OD. Nous concluons qu’il existe une asymétrie dans l’acquisition des clitiques objets. Nous proposons que cette asymétrie provient d’une asymétrie structurelle dans la grammaire cible en ce que les enfants possèdent la configuration computationnelle, mais doivent toujours apprendre le contenu lexical de chaque verbe afin de restreindre la portée des omissions.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lia.21003.bel
2022-08-24
2023-12-01

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/lia.21003.bel
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Babyonyshev, M., & Marin, S.
    (2006) Acquisition of pronominal clitics in Romanian. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 5, 17–44. 10.5565/rev/catjl.71
     https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/catjl.71 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bello, S.
    (2012) Identifying indirect objects in L1 French: An elicitation task. InP. Caxaj (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2012 Canadian Linguistics Association Annual Conference. homes.chass.utoronto.ca/~cla-acl/actes2012/Bello_2012.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  3. (2017) Prolegomenon to the study of indirect objects in French L1 Acquisition [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Toronto.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Castilla, A. P.
    (2008) Developmental measures of morphosyntactic acquisition in monolingual 3-, 4-, 5-year-old Spanish-speaking children [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Toronto.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Costa, J., Lobo, M., Carmona, J., & Silva, C.
    (2008) Clitic omission in European Portuguese: Correlation with null objects?InA. Gavarró & M. João Freitas (Eds.), Language acquisition and development: Proceedings of GALA 2007 (pp.133–143). Cambridge Scholars Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Cummins, S., & Roberge, Y.
    (2005) A modular account of null objects in French. Syntax, 8(1), 44–64. 10.1111/j.1467‑9612.2005.00074.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9612.2005.00074.x [Google Scholar]
  7. Cummins, S., Roberge, Y., & Troberg, M.
    (2010) L’objet indirect en français : Sens, représentations et évolution. InC. Leblanc, F. Martineau, & Y. Frenette (Eds.), Vues sur le Français du Canada (pp.77–112). Presses de l’Université Laval.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. De Cat, C., & Plunkett, B.
    (2002) Qu’est-ce qu’i(l) dit, celui+là?: Notes méthodologiques sur la transcription d’un corpus francophone. Romanistische Korpuslinguistik: Korpora und gesprochene Sprache / Romance Corpus Linguistics: Corpora and Spoken Language. Narr Verlag. CD-rom.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Delage, H., & Frauenfelder, U. H.
    (2019) Syntax and working memory in typically-developing children. Language, Interaction and Acquisition, 10(2), 141–176. 10.1075/lia.18013.del
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lia.18013.del [Google Scholar]
  10. Fillmore, C. J.
    (1986) Pragmatically controlled zero anaphora. Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 95–107. 10.3765/bls.v12i0.1866
     https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v12i0.1866 [Google Scholar]
  11. Gavarró, A., & Mosella, M.
    (2009) Testing syntactic and pragmatic accounts of clitic omission. InJ. Crawford, K. Otaki, & M. Takahashi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition North America (25–35). Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Grüter, T.
    (2006) Object clitics and null objects in the acquisition of French [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. McGill University, Canada.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Hopper, P. J., & Thompson, S. A.
    (1980) Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language, 56(2), 251–299. 10.1353/lan.1980.0017
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1980.0017 [Google Scholar]
  14. Hughes, M. E., & Allen, S.
    (2013) The effect of individual discourse-pragmatic features on referential choice in child English. Journal of Pragmatics, 56(1), 15–30. 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.05.005
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.05.005 [Google Scholar]
  15. Jakubowicz, C., Müller, N., Riemer, B., & Rigaut, C.
    (1997) The case of subject and object omission in French and German. BUCLD21 (pp.331–342). Cascadilla Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Larjavaara, M.
    (2000) Présence ou absence de l’objet. Limites du possible en français contemporain. Helsinki: Academia Scientiarum Fennica.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Lyczkowski, D.
    (1999) Adquieretelo: On the acquisition of pronominal object clitics in Spanish [Unpublished undergraduate thesis]. Harvard University.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. MacWhinney, B.
    (2000) The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk. Third Edition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Müller, N., Schmitz, K., Cantone, K., & Kupisch, T.
    (2006) Null arguments in monolingual children: A comparison of Italian and French. InV. Torrens & L. Escobar (Eds.), The acquisition of syntax in Romance languages (pp.69–95). John Benjamins. 10.1075/lald.41.05mul
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.41.05mul [Google Scholar]
  20. Noailly, M.
    (1997) Les mystères de la transitivité invisible. Langages, 127, 96–109. 10.3406/lgge.1997.2127
     https://doi.org/10.3406/lgge.1997.2127 [Google Scholar]
  21. Pérez-Leroux, A. T., Pirvulescu, M., & Roberge, Y.
    (2008) Null objects in child language: Syntax and the lexicon. Lingua, 118, 370–398. 10.1016/j.lingua.2007.07.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2007.07.002 [Google Scholar]
  22. (2017) Direct objects and language acquisition. Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Pirvulescu, M.
    (2006) Implications of clitic omission in early French: Spontaneous vs. elicited production. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 5, 221–236. 10.5565/rev/catjl.70
     https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/catjl.70 [Google Scholar]
  24. Pirvulescu, M., & Hill, V.
    (2011) Object clitic omission in French-speaking children: Effects of the elicitation task. Language Acquisition19(1): 73–81. 10.1080/10489223.2011.634660
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10489223.2011.634660 [Google Scholar]
  25. Pirvulescu, M., Pérez-Leroux, A. T., Roberge, Y., & Strik, N.
    (2012) Clitic production across tasks in young French-speaking children. InA. K. Biller, E. Y. Chung, & A. E. Kimball (Eds.), BUCLD 36: Proceedings of the 36th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp.461–473). Cascadilla Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Pirvulescu, M., Pérez-Leroux, A. T., Roberge, Y., Strik, N., & Thomas, D.
    (2014) Bilingual effects: Exploring object omission in pronominal languages. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17(3), 495–510. 10.1017/S1366728913000631
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728913000631 [Google Scholar]
  27. Roberge, Y., & Troberg, M.
    (2007) Thematic indirect objects in French. Journal of French Language Studies, 17(3), 297–322. 10.1017/S0959269507003018
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959269507003018 [Google Scholar]
  28. Schmitz, K.
    (2012) Clitics in the acquisition of inalienable possession in French. InP. Larranaga, & P. Guijarro-Fuentes (Eds.), Pronouns and clitics in early language (pp.175–208). Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110238815.175
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110238815.175 [Google Scholar]
  29. Schmitz, K., Cantone, K., Müller, N., & Kupisch, T.
    (2004) Clitic realizations and omissions in early child grammar: A comparison of Italian and French. Paper delivered at theRomance Turn, Workshop on the Acquisition of Romance Languages, Madrid.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Serratrice, L., Sorace, A., & Paoli, S.
    (2004) Cross-linguistic influence at the syntax-pragmatics interface: Subjects and objects in English-Italian bilingual and monolingual acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7, 183–205. 10.1017/S1366728904001610
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728904001610 [Google Scholar]
  31. Sigurðsson, H. A.
    (2011) Conditions on argument drop. Linguistic Inquiry, 42(2), 267–304. 10.1162/LING_a_00042
     https://doi.org/10.1162/LING_a_00042 [Google Scholar]
  32. Silva, C.
    (2010) Asymmetries in the acquisition of different types of clitics in European Portuguese. InV. Torrens, L. Escobar, A. Gavarró, & J. Gutiérrez (Eds.), Movement and clitics: Adult and child grammar (pp.361–388). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Skarabela, B., Allen, S., & Scott-Phillips, T.
    (2013) Joint attention helps explain why children omit new referents. Journals of Pragmatics, 56, 5–14. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.08.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.08.003 [Google Scholar]
  34. Sportiche, D.
    (1996) Clitic constructions. InJ. Rooryck, & L. Zaring (Eds.), Phrase structure and the lexicon (pp.213–276). Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑015‑8617‑7_9
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8617-7_9 [Google Scholar]
  35. (1998) Partitions and atoms of clause structure: Subjects, agreement, case and clitics. Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Tuller, L., Delage, H., Monjauze, C., Piller, A.-G., & Barthez, M.-A.
    (2011) Clitic pronoun production as a measure of atypical language development in French. Lingua, 121(3), 423–441. 10.1016/j.lingua.2010.10.008
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2010.10.008 [Google Scholar]
  37. Weissenborn, J., Kail, M., & Friederici, A.
    (1990) Language-particular or language-independent factors in acquisition? Children’s comprehension of object pronouns in Dutch, French and German. First Language, 10(29), 141–166. 10.1177/014272379001002904
     https://doi.org/10.1177/014272379001002904 [Google Scholar]
  38. Wexler, K., Gavarró, A., & Torrens, V.
    (2003) Feature checking and object clitic omission in child Catalan and Spanish. InR. Bok-Bennema, B. Hollebrandse, & B. Kampers-Manhe (Eds.), Going Romance 2002 (pp.253–268). John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.256.15wex
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.256.15wex [Google Scholar]
  39. Zesiger, P., Zesiger, L. C., Arabatzi, M., Baranzini, L., Cronel-Ohayon, S., Franck, J., Frauenfelder, U. H., Hamann, C., & Rizzi, L.
    (2010) The acquisition of pronouns by French children: A parallel study of production and comprehension. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31(4), 571–603. 10.1017/S0142716410000147
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716410000147 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/lia.21003.bel
Loading
L’acquisition des objets directs et indirects en français L1
Language, Interaction and Acquisition 13, 63 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1075/lia.21003.bel
/content/journals/10.1075/lia.21003.bel
/content/journals/10.1075/lia.21003.bel
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): acquisition de la langue maternelle; clitique objet; français; morphosyntaxe

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error