Effets du feedback correctif écrit direct et indirect sur la réécriture du texte et les subséquentes productions d’apprenants de l’italien LV3 au lycée

References

1. Ashwell, T.
   (2000) Patterns of teacher response to student writing in a multiple-draft composition classroom: Is content feedback followed by form feedback the best method?Journal of Second Language Writing, 9(3), 227–257. 10.1016/S1060‑3743(00)00027‑8
   https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(00)00027-8 [Google Scholar]
2. Bitchener, J.
   (2008) Evidence in support of written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 171, 102–118. 10.1016/j.jslw.2007.11.004
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.11.004 [Google Scholar]
3. Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U.
   (2008) The value of written corrective feedback for migrant and international students. Language Teaching Research, 121, 409–431. 10.1177/1362168808089924
   https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168808089924 [Google Scholar]
4. Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U.
   (2010a) The contribution of written corrective feedback to language development: A ten month investigation. Applied Linguistics, 31(2), 193–214.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U.
   (2010b) Written corrective feedback and advanced ESL learners. Journal of Second Language Writing, 19(4), 207–217. 10.1016/j.jslw.2010.10.002
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2010.10.002 [Google Scholar]
6. Bitchener, J., & Storch, N.
   (2016) Written corrective feedback for L2 development. Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781783095056
   https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783095056 [Google Scholar]
7. Chandler, J.
   (2003) The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(3), 267–296. 10.1016/S1060‑3743(03)00038‑9
   https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(03)00038-9 [Google Scholar]
8. Christenson, S., Reschly, A., & Wylie, C.
   (2012) Handbook of Research on Student Engagement. Springer. 10.1007/978‑1‑4614‑2018‑7
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7 [Google Scholar]
9. Conseil de l’Europe
   Conseil de l’Europe (2001) Cadre européen commun de référence pour les langues : apprendre, enseigner, évaluer. Didier.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Ellis, R.
    (2008) A typology of written corrective feedback types. ELT journal, 63(2), 97–107. 10.1093/elt/ccn023
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccn023 [Google Scholar]
11. Ellis, R.
    (2010) Epilogue: A framework for investigating oral and written corrective feedback. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 335–349. 10.1017/S0272263109990544
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990544 [Google Scholar]
12. Ellis, R., Sheen, Y., Murakami, M., & Takashima, H.
    (2008) The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context. System, 36(3), 353–371. 10.1016/j.system.2008.02.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2008.02.001 [Google Scholar]
13. Fathman, A., & Whalley, E.
    (1990) Teacher response to student writing: Focus on form versus content. InB. Kroll (Ed.), Second Language Writing: Research insights for the classroom (178–190). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524551.016
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524551.016 [Google Scholar]
14. Ferris, D.
    (2010) Second language writing research and written corrective feedback in SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 321, 181–201. 10.1017/S0272263109990490
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990490 [Google Scholar]
15. Ferris, D.
    (2012) Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition and writing studies. Language Teaching, 45(4), 446–459. 10.1017/S0261444812000250
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444812000250 [Google Scholar]
16. Ferris, D., & Kurzer, K.
    (2019) Does error feedback help L2 writers? Latest evidence on the efficacy of written corrective feedback. InK. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues (106–124). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108635547.008
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108635547.008 [Google Scholar]
17. Ferris, D., Liu, H., Sinha, A., & Senna, M.
    (2013) Written corrective feedback for individual L2 writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(3), 307–29. 10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.009 [Google Scholar]
18. Ferris, D., & Roberts, B.
    (2001) Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be?Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(3), 161–184. 10.1016/S1060‑3743(01)00039‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00039-X [Google Scholar]
19. Gass, S.
    (2005) Input and interaction. InC. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp.224–255). Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Goldstein, L.
    (2006) Feedback and revision in second language writing: Contextual, teacher, and student variables. InK. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues (pp.185–205). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524742.012
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524742.012 [Google Scholar]
21. Guo, Q.
    (2015) The effectiveness of written CF for L2 development: A mixed-method study of written CF types, error categories and proficiency levels. Doctoral dissertation, Auckland University of Technology.
22. Han, Y.
    (2017) Mediating and being mediated: Learner beliefs and learner engagement with written corrective feedback. System, 691, 133–42. 10.1016/j.system.2017.07.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.07.003 [Google Scholar]
23. Iwashita, N.
    (2003) Negative feedback and positive evidence in task-based interaction: Differential effects on L2 development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25(1), 1–36. 10.1017/S0272263103000019
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263103000019 [Google Scholar]
24. Karim, K., & Nassaji, H.
    (2020) The revision and transfer effects of direct and indirect comprehensive corrective feedback on ESL students’ writing. Language Teaching Research, 24(4), 519–539. 10.1177/1362168818802469
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168818802469 [Google Scholar]
25. Lalande, J. F.
    (1982) Reducing composition errors: An experiment. The Modern Language Journal, 661, 140–149. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1982.tb06973.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1982.tb06973.x [Google Scholar]
26. La Russa, F., & Nuzzo, E.
    (2016) Effetti del feedback diretto e indiretto sulla produzione scritta di apprendenti di italiano LS. Rassegna italiana di linguistica applicata, 11, 93–107.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Lee, I.
    (2008) Understanding teachers’ written feedback practices in Hong Kong secondary classrooms. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(2), 69–85. 10.1016/j.jslw.2007.10.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.10.001 [Google Scholar]
28. Leeman, J.
    (2003) Recasts and second language development: Beyond negative evidence. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25(1), 37–63. 10.1017/S0272263103000020
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263103000020 [Google Scholar]
29. Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N.
    (1999) How languages are learned. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Mackey, A., & Oliver, R.
    (2002) Interactional feedback and children’s L2 development. System, 30(4), 459–477. 10.1016/S0346‑251X(02)00049‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(02)00049-0 [Google Scholar]
31. Qi, D., & Lapkin, S.
    (2001) Exploring the role of noticing in a three-stage second language writing task. Journal of Second Language Writing, 101, 277–303. 10.1016/S1060‑3743(01)00046‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00046-7 [Google Scholar]
32. Robb, T., Ross, S., & Shortreed, I.
    (1986) Salience of feedback on error and its effect on EFL writing quality. TESOL Quarterly201, 83–93. 10.2307/3586390
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3586390 [Google Scholar]
33. Rummel, S.
    (2014) Student and teacher beliefs about written CF and the effect those beliefs have on uptake: a multiple case study of Laos and Kuwait. Doctoral dissertation. Auckland University of Technology.
34. Semke, H.
    (1984) The effects of the red pen. Foreign Language Annals, 171, 195–202. 10.1111/j.1944‑9720.1984.tb01727.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1984.tb01727.x [Google Scholar]
35. Sheen, Y.
    (2007) The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners’ acquisition of articles. Tesol Quarterly, 41(2), 255–283. 10.1002/j.1545‑7249.2007.tb00059.x
    https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00059.x [Google Scholar]
36. Sheen, Y., Wright, D., & Moldawa, A.
    (2009) Differential effects of focused and unfocused written correction on the accurate use of grammatical forms by adult ESL learners. System, 37(4), 556–569. 10.1016/j.system.2009.09.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2009.09.002 [Google Scholar]
37. Sheppard, K.
    (1992) Two feedback types: Do they make a difference?RELC Journal, 23(1), 103–110. 10.1177/003368829202300107
    https://doi.org/10.1177/003368829202300107 [Google Scholar]
38. Shintani, N., & Ellis, R.
    (2013) The comparative effect of direct written corrective feedback and metalinguistic explanation on learners’ explicit and implicit knowledge of the English indefinite article. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(3), 286–306. 10.1016/j.jslw.2013.03.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2013.03.011 [Google Scholar]
39. Shintani, N., Ellis, R., & Suzuki, W.
    (2014) Effects of written feedback and revision on learners’ accuracy in using two English grammatical structures. Language Learning, 64(1), 103–131. 10.1111/lang.12029
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12029 [Google Scholar]
40. Stefanou, C.
    (2014) L2 article use for generic and specific plural reference: The role of written corrective feedback, learner factors and awareness. Doctoral dissertation. Lancaster University.
41. Storch, N., & Wigglesworth, G.
    (2010) Learners’ processing, uptake, and retention of corrective feedback on writing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 321, 303–334. 10.1017/S0272263109990532
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990532 [Google Scholar]
42. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S.
    (1998) Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. Modern Language Journal, 831, 320–337. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1998.tb01209.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb01209.x [Google Scholar]
43. Van Beuningen, C.
    (2010) Corrective feedback in L2 writing: Theoretical perspectives, empirical insights, and future directions. International Journal of English Study, 10(2), 1–28. 10.6018/ijes/2010/2/119171
    https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes/2010/2/119171 [Google Scholar]
44. Van Beuningen, C., De Jong, N., & Kuiken, F.
    (2008) The effect of direct and indirect corrective feedback on L2 learners’ written accuracy. ITL International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1561. 279–296. 10.2143/ITL.156.0.2034439
    https://doi.org/10.2143/ITL.156.0.2034439 [Google Scholar]
45. Van Beuningen, C., De Jong, N., & Kuiken, F.
    (2012) Evidence on the effectiveness of comprehensive error correction in second language writing. Language Learning, 62(1), 1–41. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2011.00674.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00674.x [Google Scholar]
46. Zhang, Z. V., & Hyland, K.
    (2018) Student engagement with teacher and automated feedback on L2 writing. Assessing Writing, 361, 90–102. 10.1016/j.asw.2018.02.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2018.02.004 [Google Scholar]
47. Zheng, Y., & Yu, S.
    (2018) Student engagement with teacher written corrective feedback in EFL writing: A case study of Chinese lower-proficiency students. Assessing Writing, 371, 13–24.
    [Google Scholar]