Lending a hand to speech

References

1. Ahmadian, M. J., & Tavakoli, M.
   (2011) The effects of simultaneous use of careful online planning and task repetition on accuracy, fluency, and complexity of EFL learners’ oral production. Language Teaching Research, 151, 35–59. 10.1177/1362168810383329
   https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168810383329 [Google Scholar]
2. Alibali, M. W., Kita, S., & Young, A. J.
   (2000) Gesture and the process of speech production: We think, therefore we gesture. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15(6), 593–613. 10.1080/016909600750040571
   https://doi.org/10.1080/016909600750040571 [Google Scholar]
3. Alibali, M. W., Heath, D. C., & Myers, H. J.
   (2001) Effects of visibility between speaker and listener on gesture production: Some gestures are meant to be seen. Journal of Memory and Language, 441, 169–188. 10.1006/jmla.2000.2752
   https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2000.2752 [Google Scholar]
4. Andreeva, B., & Dimitrova, S.
   (2022) Prosodic characteristics of Bulgarian-accented German: Prosodic units and prenuclear pitch accents. Languages, 71, 1–18. 10.3390/languages7040263
   https://doi.org/10.3390/languages7040263 [Google Scholar]
5. Andreeva, B., Demenko, G., Wolska, M., Möbius, B., Zimmerer, F., Jügler, J., & Trouvain, J.
   (2014) Comparison of pitch range and pitch variation in Slavic and German languages. InN. Campbell, D. Gibbon, & D. Hirst (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th international conference on speech prosody (pp. 776–780). Retrieved fromhttps://www.isca-speech.org/archive_v0/SpeechProsody_2014/
   [Google Scholar]
6. Arevart, S., & Nation, P.
   (1993) Adjusting fluency and grammar through repetition. InJ. Oller (Ed.), Methods that work: Ideas for language teachers (pp. 298–308). Heinle & Heinle.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J.
   (2013) Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 681, 255–278. 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001 [Google Scholar]
8. Blomgren, M., Chen, Y., Ng, M. L., & Gilbert, H. R.
   (1998) Acoustic, aerodynamic, physiologic, and perceptual properties of modal and vocal fry registers. Journal of Acoustic Society of America, 103(5), 2649–2658. 10.1121/1.422785
   https://doi.org/10.1121/1.422785 [Google Scholar]
9. Boersma, P., & Weenink, D.
   (2018) Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 6.0.37. Retrieved on March14 2018fromwww.praat.org/
10. Bosker, H., Pinget, A., Quené, H., Sanders, T., & de Jong, N.
    (2013) What makes speech sound fluent? The contributions of pauses, speed and repairs. Language Testing, 301, 159–175. 10.1177/0265532212455394
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532212455394 [Google Scholar]
11. Bretz, F., Hothorn, T., & Westfall, P.
    (2010) Multiple comparisons using R. CRC Press.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Bruin, J.
    (2014) R library: Contrast coding systems for categorical variables. Retrieved fromhttps://stats.idre.ucla.edu/r/library/r-library-contrast-coding-systems-for-categorical-variables/
13. Busà, M. G.
    (2007) New perspectives in teaching pronunciation. InA. Baldry, M. Pavesi, C. Taylor Torsello, & C. Taylor (Eds.), From DIDACTAS to eCoLingua: An ongoing research project on translation and corpus linguistics (pp. 171–188). EUT.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Busà, M. G., & Urbani, M.
    (2011) A cross linguistic analysis of pitch range in English L1 and L2. InW. S. Lee & E. Zee (Eds.), Proceedings of 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 380–383). Retrieved fromhttps://www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/icphs-proceedings/ICPhS2011/index.htm
    [Google Scholar]
15. Butterworth, B.
    (1975) Hesitation and semantic planning in speech. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 41, 75–87. 10.1007/BF01066991
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01066991 [Google Scholar]
16. Bygate, M.
    (2001) Effects of task repetition on the structure and control of oral language. InM. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks (pp. 23–48). Harlow Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Calbris, G.
    (2008) From left to right…: Coverbal gestures and their symbolic use of space. InA. Cienki & C. Müller (Eds.), Metaphor and gesture (pp. 27–53). John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Cavicchio, F., & Poesio, M.
    (2009) Multimodal Corpora Annotation: Validation Methods to Assess Coding Scheme Reliability. InM. Kipp, J.-C. Martin, P. Paggio, and D. Heylen (Eds.), Multimodal CorporaLNAI 5509, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 109–121.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Cienki, A., & Müller, C.
    (Eds.) (2008) Metaphor and gesture. John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Chu, M., Meyer, A., Foulkes, L., & Kita, S.
    (2014) Individual differences in frequency and saliency of speech-accompanying gestures: The role of cognitive abilities and empathy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1431, 694–709. 10.1037/a0033861
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033861 [Google Scholar]
21. Cravotta, A., Prieto, P., & Busà, M. G.
    (2021) Exploring the effects of encouraging the use of gestures on speech. Speech Communication, 1351, 25–36. 10.1016/j.specom.2021.09.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2021.09.005 [Google Scholar]
22. Cruttenden, A.
    (1986) Intonation. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
23. de Bot, K.
    (1992) A bilingual production model: Levelt’s speaking model adapted. Applied Linguistics, 131, 1–24.
    [Google Scholar]
24. De Jong, N. H., Steinel, M. P., Florijn, A. F., Schoonen, R., & Hulstijn, J. H.
    (2012) Linguistic skills and speaking fluency in a L2. Applied Psycholinguistics, 331, 1–24.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Doughty, C. J.
    (2005) Instructed SLA: Constraints, compensation, and enhancement. InC. J. Doughty, & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 1–39). John Wiley & Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Dörnyei, Z., & Kormos, J.
    (1998) Problem-solving mechanisms in L2 communication: a psycholinguistic perspective. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20(3), 349–385. 10.1017/S0272263198003039
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263198003039 [Google Scholar]
27. Ellis, R.
    (2005) Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language: a psychometric Study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 271, 141–172. 10.1017/S0272263105050096
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263105050096 [Google Scholar]
28. Ellis, R., & Barkhuizen, G.
    (2005) Analysing learner language. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Esteve-Gibert, N., & Prieto, P.
    (2013) Prosodic structure shapes the temporal realisation of intonation and manual gesture movements. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 56(3), 850–864. 10.1044/1092‑4388(2012/12‑0049)
    https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2012/12-0049) [Google Scholar]
30. Ferrero, F., Magno Caldognetto, E., & Cosi, P.
    (1996) Sui piani formantici acustici e uditivi delle vocali di uomo, donna e bambino. InA. Perretti & P. Simonetti (Eds.), Atti del XXIV Convegno Nazionale dell’A.I.A. (pp. 169–178). Arti Grafiche Padovane.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Gao, M.
    (2021) Comparison of pitch variation and pitch range in L1 and L2 Mandarin Chinese. Poster presented at the1st International Conference on Tone and Intonation (TAI). Retrieved fromurn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:du-39054. 10.21437/TAI.2021‑12
    https://doi.org/10.21437/TAI.2021-12 [Google Scholar]
32. Gillespie, M., James, A. N., Federmeier, K. D., & Watson, D. G.
    (2014) Verbal working memory predicts co-speech gesture: Evidence from individual differences. Cognition, 1321, 174–180. 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.03.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.03.012 [Google Scholar]
33. Gluhareva, D., & Prieto, P.
    (2017) Training with rhythmic beat gestures favors L2 pronunciation in discourse-demanding situations. Language Teaching Research, 21(5), 609–631. 10.1177/1362168816651463
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816651463 [Google Scholar]
34. Graziano, M., Nicoladis, E., & Marentette, P.
    (2020) How referential gestures align with speech: Evidence from monolingual and bilingual speakers. Language Learning, 701, 266–304. 10.1111/lang.12376
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12376 [Google Scholar]
35. Goodwin, M., & Goodwin, C.
    (1986) Gesture and coparticipation in the activity of searching for a word. Semiotica, 62(1–2), 51–76.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Gósy, M., Gyarmathy, D., & Beke, A.
    (2017) Phonetic analysis of filled pauses based on a Hungarian-English learner corpus. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, 3(2), 149–174. 10.1075/ijlcr.3.2.03gos
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr.3.2.03gos [Google Scholar]
37. Götz, S.
    (2013) Fluency in native and non-native English speech. John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.53
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.53 [Google Scholar]
38. Gullberg, M.
    (1998) Gesture as a communication strategy in second language discourse: A study of learners of French and Swedish. Lund University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Hagoort, P., & Indefrey, P.
    (2014) The neurobiology of language beyond single words. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 371, 347–362. 10.1146/annurev‑neuro‑071013‑013847
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-neuro-071013-013847 [Google Scholar]
40. Herment, S., &, Tortel, A.
    (2022) The intonation contour of non-finality revisited Implications for EFL teaching. InA. Kirkova-Naskova, A. Henderson, & J. Fouz-González (Eds.), English pronunciation instruction: Research-based insights (pp. 176–195). John Benjamins.10.1075/aals.19.08her
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.19.08her [Google Scholar]
41. Hincks, R.
    (2005) Measuring liveliness in presentation speech. InProceedings of Interspeech 2005 (pp. 765–768). Retrieved fromhttps://www.isca-archive.org/interspeech_2005/hincks05_interspeech.html. 10.21437/Interspeech.2005‑353
    https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2005-353 [Google Scholar]
42. Hirata, Y., Kelly, S., Huang, J., & Manansala, M.
    (2014) Effect of hand gestures on auditory learning of second-language vowel length contrasts. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 571, 2090–2101. 10.1044/2014_JSLHR‑S‑14‑0049
    https://doi.org/10.1044/2014_JSLHR-S-14-0049 [Google Scholar]
43. Hoetjes, M., & van Maastricht, L.
    (2020) Using gesture to facilitate L2 phoneme acquisition: The importance of gesture and phoneme complexity. Frontiers in Psychology, 111, 575032. 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.575032
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.575032 [Google Scholar]
44. Hoetjes, M., Krahmer, E., & Swerts, M.
    (2014) Does our speech change when we cannot gesture?Speech Communication, 571. 257–267.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Holler, J., & Stevens, R.
    (2007) The effect of common ground on how speakers use gesture and speech to represent size information. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 26(1), 4–27. 10.1177/0261927X06296428
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X06296428 [Google Scholar]
46. Housen, A., & Pierrard, M.
    (2006) Investigating instructed second language acquisition. InA. Housen, & M. Pierrard (Eds.), Investigations in instructed second language acquisition (pp. 12–27). Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Indefrey, P.
    (2011) The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components: A critical update. Frontiers in Psychology, 2(255), 1–16. 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00255
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00255 [Google Scholar]
48. Kearney, E., & Guenther, F. H.
    (2019) Articulating: The neural mechanisms of speech production. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 34(9), 1214–1229. 10.1080/23273798.2019.1589541
    https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2019.1589541 [Google Scholar]
49. Keating, P., & Kuo, G.
    (2012) Comparison of speaking fundamental frequency in English and Mandarin. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 132(2), 1050–1060. 10.1121/1.4730893
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4730893 [Google Scholar]
50. Kelly, S. D., McDevitt, T., & Esch, M.
    (2009) Brief training with co-speech gesture lends a hand to word learning in a foreign language. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24(2), 313–334. 10.1080/01690960802365567
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960802365567 [Google Scholar]
51. Kita, S.
    (2000) Hito wa naze jesuchaa o suru noka [why do people gesture?]. Ninchikagaku [Cognitive Studies], 7(1), 9–21.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Kita, S., & Özyürek, A.
    (2003) What does cross-linguistic variation in semantic coordination of speech and gesture reveal?: Evidence for an interface representation of spatial thinking and speaking. Journal of Memory and Language, 48(1), 16–32. 10.1016/S0749‑596X(02)00505‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00505-3 [Google Scholar]
53. Kormos, J.
    (1999) Monitoring and self-repair in L2. Language Learning, 491, 303–342. 10.1111/0023‑8333.00090
    https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00090 [Google Scholar]
54. Kormos, J.
    (2006) Speech production and L2 acquisition. Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Kormos, J.
    (2011) Speech production and the cognition hypothesis. InP. Robinson (Ed.), L2 task complexity: Researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp. 39–60). John Benjamins. 10.1075/tblt.2.06ch2
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.2.06ch2 [Google Scholar]
56. Krauss, R. M.
    (1998) Why do we gesture when we speak?Current Directions in Psychological Science, 71, 54–60. 10.1111/1467‑8721.ep13175642
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep13175642 [Google Scholar]
57. Krauss, R. M., Chen, Y., & Gottesman, R. F.
    (2000) Lexical gestures and lexical access: A process model. InD. McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 261–283). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620850.017
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620850.017 [Google Scholar]
58. Kushch, O., & Prieto, P.
    (2016) The effects of pitch accentuation and beat gestures on information recall in contrastive discourse. InJ. Barnes, A. Brugos, S. Shattuck-Hufnagel, & N. Veilleux. Proceedings of the Speech Prosody (pp. 922–925). International Speech Communication Association. 10.21437/SpeechProsody.2016‑189
    https://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2016-189 [Google Scholar]
59. Kushch, O., Igualada, A., & Prieto, P.
    (2018) Prominence in speech and gesture favour second language novel word learning. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 33(8), 992–1004. 10.1080/23273798.2018.1435894
    https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2018.1435894 [Google Scholar]
60. Lazaraton, A.
    (2004) Gesture and speech in the vocabulary explanations of one ESL teacher: A microanalytic inquiry. Language Learning, 54(1), 79–117. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2004.00249.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00249.x [Google Scholar]
61. Levelt, W. J. M.
    (1989) Speaking: From intention to articulation. MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Levelt, W. J. M.
    (1999) Producing spoken language: A blueprint of the speaker. InC. Brown & P. Hagoort (Eds.), Neurocognition of language (pp. 83–122). Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Lichtman, K.
    (2021) What about fluency? Implicit vs. explicit training affects artificial mini-language production. Applied Linguistics, 42(4), 668–691. 10.1093/applin/amaa054
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amaa054 [Google Scholar]
64. Lin, Y. L.
    (2021) Gestures as scaffolding for L2 narrative recall: The role of gesture type, task complexity, and working memory. Language Teaching Research. 10.1177/13621688211044584
    https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211044584 [Google Scholar]
65. Liu, D., & Reed, M.
    (2021) Exploring the complexity of the L2 intonation system: An acoustic and eye-tracking study. Frontiers in Communication, 61, 627316. 10.3389/fcomm.2021.627316
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.627316 [Google Scholar]
66. Loehr, D. P.
    (2012) Temporal, structural, and pragmatic synchrony between intonation and gesture. Laboratory Phonology, 3(1), 71–89. 10.1515/lp‑2012‑0006
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lp-2012-0006 [Google Scholar]
67. Lynch, T., & Maclean, J.
    (2000) Exploring the benefits of task repetition and recycling for classroom language learning. Language Teaching Research, 41, 221–250. 10.1177/136216880000400303
    https://doi.org/10.1177/136216880000400303 [Google Scholar]
68. Ma, S., & Jin, G.
    (2022) The relationship between different types of co-speech gestures and L2 speech performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 131, 941114. 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.941114
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.941114 [Google Scholar]
69. Macedonia, M.
    (2014) Bringing back the body into the mind: Gestures enhance word learning in foreign language. Frontiers in Psychology, 51, 1467. 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01467
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01467 [Google Scholar]
70. Macedonia, M., Müller, K., & Friederici, A. D.
    (2011) The impact of iconic gestures on foreign language word learning and its neural substrate. Human Brain Mapping, 321, 982–998. 10.1002/hbm.21084
    https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.21084 [Google Scholar]
71. Macedonia, M., & von Kriegstein, K.
    (2012) Gestures enhance foreign language learning. Biolinguistics, 61, 393–416. 10.5964/bioling.8931
    https://doi.org/10.5964/bioling.8931 [Google Scholar]
72. McCafferty, S. G.
    (2002) Gesture and creating zones of proximal development for second language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 86(2), 192–203. 10.1111/1540‑4781.00144
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4781.00144 [Google Scholar]
73. McClave, E.
    (1998) Pitch and manual gestures. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 271, 69–89. 10.1023/A:1023274823974
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023274823974 [Google Scholar]
74. McNeill, D.
    (1992) Hand and mind. University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
75. McNeill, D.
    (2005) Gesture and thought. University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226514642.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226514642.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
76. Mennen, I.
    (2007) Phonological and phonetic influences in non-native intonation. InJ. Trouvain, & U. Gut (Eds.), Non-native prosody. Phonetic description and teaching practice (pp. 53–76). Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110198751.1.53
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110198751.1.53 [Google Scholar]
77. Mennen, I., Schaeffler, F., & Docherty, G.
    (2008) A methodological study into the linguistic dimensions of pitch range differences between German and English. InP. L. Barbosa, S. Madureira, & C. Reis. Proceedings of the IV Conference on Speech Prosody (pp. 527–530). ISCA Archivewww.isca-speech.org/archive/sp2008
    [Google Scholar]
78. Mennen, I., Schaeffler, F., Watt, N., & Miller, N.
    (2008) An autosegmental-metrical investigation of intonation in people with Parkinson’s Disease. Asia-Pacific Journal of Speech Language and Hearing, 11(4), 205–219. 10.1179/136132808805335545
    https://doi.org/10.1179/136132808805335545 [Google Scholar]
79. Mennen, I., Schaeffler, F., Docherty, G.
    (2012) Cross-language differences in fundamental frequency range: A comparison of English and German. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 131(3), 2249–2260. 10.1121/1.3681950
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3681950 [Google Scholar]
80. Mittelberg, I., & Waugh, L. R.
    (2009) Metonymy first, metaphor second: A cognitive-semiotic approach to multimodal figures of thought in co-speech gesture. InC. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 329–356). Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
81. Morett, L. M., & Chang, L. Y.
    (2014) Emphasising sound and meaning: Pitch gestures enhance Mandarin lexical tone acquisition. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 98(3), 773–794.
    [Google Scholar]
82. Morett, L. M., & Fraundorf, S. H.
    (2019) Listeners consider alternative speaker productions in discourse comprehension and memory: Evidence from beat gesture and pitch accenting. Memory and Cognition, 471, 1515–1530. 10.3758/s13421‑019‑00945‑1
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-019-00945-1 [Google Scholar]
83. Mori, J., & Hayashi, M.
    (2006) The achievement of intersubjectivity through embodied completions: A study of interactions between first and second language speakers. Applied Linguistics, 271, 195–219. 10.1093/applin/aml014
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml014 [Google Scholar]
84. Morris, D., Collett, P., Marsh, P., & O’Shaughnessy, M.
    (1980) Gestures: Their origins and distribution. New York.
85. Morsella, E., & Krauss, R. M.
    (2004) The role of gestures in spatial working memory and speech. American Journal of Psychology, 1171, 411–424. 10.2307/4149008
    https://doi.org/10.2307/4149008 [Google Scholar]
86. Nergis, A.
    (2021) Can explicit instruction of formulaic sequences enhance L2 oral fluency?Lingua, 2551, 1–21. 10.1016/j.lingua.2021.103072
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2021.103072 [Google Scholar]
87. Nguyen, A. T., & Dao, D. M.
    (2018) The acquisition of question intonation by Vietnamese learners of English. Asian Journal of Second Foreign Language Education, 3(3), 1–13. 10.1186/s40862‑018‑0044‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-018-0044-4 [Google Scholar]
88. Núñez, R.
    (2008) A fresh look at the foundations of mathematics: Gesture and the psychological reality of conceptual metaphor. InA. Cienki & C. Müller (Eds.), Metaphor and gesture (pp. 93–114). John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
89. Pang, F., & Skehan, P.
    (2014) Self-reported planning behaviour and L2 performance in narrative retelling. InP. Skehan (Ed.), Processing perspectives on task performance (pp. 95–128). John Benjamins. 10.1075/tblt.5.04pan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.5.04pan [Google Scholar]
90. Patterson, D.
    (2000) A linguistic approach to pitch range modelling. University of Edinburgh.
    [Google Scholar]
91. Peters, J., Frank, M., & Rohloff, M.
    (2020) Pitch range variation in High German (L1) and Low German (L2). InProceedings of the 10th International Conference on Speech Prosody (pp. 650–654). 10.21437/SpeechProsody.2020‑133
    https://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2020-133 [Google Scholar]
92. Pika, S., Nicoladis, E., & Marentette, P. F.
    (2006) A cross-cultural study on the use of gestures: Evidence for cross-linguistic transfer?Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 91, 319–327. 10.1017/S1366728906002665
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728906002665 [Google Scholar]
93. Pine, K. J., Bird, H., & Kirk, E.
    (2007) The effects of prohibiting gestures on children’s lexical retrieval ability. Developmental Science, 101, 747–754. 10.1111/j.1467‑7687.2007.00610.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00610.x [Google Scholar]
94. Pinheiro, J., Bates, D., DebRoy, S., Sarkar, D., & R Core Team
    (2020) nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. R package version 3.1–149. Retrieved fromhttps://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme
    [Google Scholar]
95. Poesio, M., & Artstein, R.
    (2008) Introduction to the special issue on ambiguity and semantic judgments. Research on Language and Computation, 61, 241–245. 10.1007/s11168‑008‑9057‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11168-008-9057-3 [Google Scholar]
96. Quinn-Allen, L. Q.
    (1995) The effects of emblematic gestures on the development and access of mental representations of French expressions. The Modern Language Journal, 791, 521–529. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1995.tb05454.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1995.tb05454.x [Google Scholar]
97. Rauscher, F. H., Krauss, R. M. & Chen, Y.
    (1996) Gesture, speech, and lexical access: The role of lexical movements in speech production. Psychological Science, 7(4), 226–231. 10.1111/j.1467‑9280.1996.tb00364.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00364.x [Google Scholar]
98. Robinson, P.
    (1996) Learning simple and complex second language rules under implicit, incidental, rule-search, and instructed conditions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(1), 27–67. 10.1017/S0272263100014674
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100014674 [Google Scholar]
99. Rohrer, D., & Pashler, H.
    (2007) Increasing retention without increasing study time. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(4), 183–186. 10.1111/j.1467‑8721.2007.00500.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00500.x [Google Scholar]
100. Rousse-Malpat, A., Koote, L., Steinkrauss, R., & Verspoor, M.
     (2021) Parlez-vous francais? Effects of structure-based versus dynamic-usage-based approaches on oral proficiency. Language Teaching Research. 10.1177/13621688211040298
     https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211040298 [Google Scholar]
101. Santiago, F., & Delais-Roussarie, E.
     (2014) What explains the distribution and form of non-final rising contours in French as an L2?InConcordia Working Papers in Applied Linguistics Vol. 5 (pp. 561–579). Retrieved fromdoe.concordia.ca/copal/volumes/
     [Google Scholar]
102. Schmidt, R.
     (2000) Attention. InP. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3–32). Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
103. Schwab, S., & Goldman, J. P.
     (2016) Do speakers show different F0 when they speak in different languages? The case of English, French and German. InProceedings of Speech Prosody 2016. Retrieved fromhttps://www.isca-speech.org/archive/speechprosody_2016/. 10.21437/SpeechProsody.2016‑2
     https://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2016-2 [Google Scholar]
104. Segalowitz, N.
     (2010) Cognitive bases of L2 fluency. Routledge. 10.4324/9780203851357
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203851357 [Google Scholar]
105. Segalowitz, N.
     (2016) Second language fluency and its underlying cognitive and social determinants. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 54(2), 79–95. 10.1515/iral‑2016‑9991
     https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2016-9991 [Google Scholar]
106. Seyfeddinipur, M.
     (2006) Disfluency: Interrupting speech and gesture. Doctoral thesis. Radboud University.
     [Google Scholar]
107. Shattuck-Hufnagel, S., Yasinnik, Y., Veilleux, N., & Renwick, M.
     (2007) A method for studying the time alignment of gestures and prosody in American English: ‘Hits’ and pitch accents in academic-lecture-style speech. InA. Esposito, M. Bratanic, E. Keller & M. Marinaro (Eds.), Fundamentals of verbal and nonverbal communication and the biometric issue (pp. 34–44). IOS Press.
     [Google Scholar]
108. Skehan, P.
     (1998) A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
109. Skehan, P.
     (2009) Modelling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency, and lexis. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 510–532. 10.1093/applin/amp047
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp047 [Google Scholar]
110. Skehan, P.
     (2014) Processing perspectives on task performance. John Benjamins. 10.1075/tblt.5
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.5 [Google Scholar]
111. Skehan, P., & Foster, P.
     (2001) Cognition and tasks. InP. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 183–205). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524780.009
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524780.009 [Google Scholar]
112. Sloetjes, H., & Wittenburg, P.
     (2008) Annotation by category – ELAN and ISO DCR. InN. Calzolari, K. Choukri, M. Bente, J. Mariani, J. Odijk, S. Piperidis, & D. Tapias (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation. Retrieved fromhttps://aclanthology.org/volumes/L08-1/
     [Google Scholar]
113. Smotrova, T., & Lantolf, J. P.
     (2013) The function of gesture in lexically focused L2 instructional conversations. Modern Language Journal, 971, 397–416. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2013.12008.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.12008.x [Google Scholar]
114. Sueyoshi, A., & Hardison, D. M.
     (2005) The role of gestures and facial cues in second language listening comprehension. Language Learning, 55(4), 661–699. 10.1111/j.0023‑8333.2005.00320.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-8333.2005.00320.x [Google Scholar]
115. Taguchi, N.
     (2008) Building language blocks in L2 Japanese: Chunk learning and the development of complexity and fluency in spoken production. Foreign Language Annals, 41(1), 132–156. 10.1111/j.1944‑9720.2008.tb03283.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2008.tb03283.x [Google Scholar]
116. Tavakoli, P., & Skehan, P.
     (2005) Strategic planning, task structure, and performance testing. InR. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language. John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.11.15tav
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.11.15tav [Google Scholar]
117. Tellier, M.
     (2008) The effect of gestures on second language memorisation by young children. Gesture, 8(2), 219–235. 10.1075/gest.8.2.06tel
     https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.8.2.06tel [Google Scholar]
118. Trouvain, J., Zimmerer, F., Möbius, B., Gósy, M., & Bonneau, A.
     (2017) Segmental, prosodic and fluency features in phonetic learner corpora: Introduction to the special issue. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, 3(2), 105–117. 10.1075/ijlcr.3.2.01tro
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr.3.2.01tro [Google Scholar]
119. Ullakanoja, R.
     (2007) Comparison of pitch range in Finnish (L1) and Russian (L2). InJ. Trouvain, & W. J. Barry (Eds), Proceedings of the 16th International congress of phonetic sciences (pp. 1701–1704). Retrieved fromwww.icphs2007.de/
     [Google Scholar]
120. Volin, J., Poesova, K., & Weingartova, L.
     (2015) Speech melody properties in English, Czech and Czech English: Reference and interference. Research in Language, 13(1), 107–123. 10.1515/rela‑2015‑0018
     https://doi.org/10.1515/rela-2015-0018 [Google Scholar]
121. Wang, L., & Chu, M.
     (2013) The role of beat gesture and pitch accent in semantic processing: An ERP study. Neuropsychologia, 51(13), 2847–2855. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.09.027
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.09.027 [Google Scholar]
122. Wang, Z.
     (2014) Online time pressure manipulations: L2 speaking performance under five types of planning and repetition conditions. InP. Skehan (Ed.), Task-based language teaching: Processing perspectives on task performance (p.27–61). John Benjamins. 10.1075/tblt.5.02wan
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.5.02wan [Google Scholar]
123. Yasinnik, Y., Renwick, M., Shattuck-Hufnagel, S.
     (2004) The timing of speech-accompanying gestures with respect to gestures. InProceedings of from sound to sense (pp. 97–102). Retrieved fromhttps://www.rle.mit.edu/soundtosense/conference/pages/contributed.htm
     [Google Scholar]
124. Zimmerer, F., Jügler, J., Andreeva, B., Möbius, B., & Trouvain, J.
     (2014) Too cautious to vary more? A comparison of pitch variation in native and non-native productions of French and German speakers. InN. Campbell, D. Gibbon, & D. Hirst (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th international conference on speech prosody (pp. 1037–1041). Retrieved fromhttps://www.isca-speech.org/archive_v0/SpeechProsody_2014/. 10.21437/SpeechProsody.2014‑197
     https://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2014-197 [Google Scholar]