Voluntary motion events in Uyghur child language

References

1. Allen, S., Özyürek, A., Kita, S., Brown, A., Turanli, R., & Ishizuka, T.
   (2003) Early speech about manner and path in Turkish and English: Universal or language-specific?InB. Beachley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th annual Boston University conference on language development (pp.63-72). Cascadilla Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Allen, S., Özyürek, A., Kita, S., Brown, A., Furman, R., & Ishizuka, T.
   (2007) Language-specific and universal influences in children’s syntactic packaging of Manner and Path: a comparison of English, Japanese, and Turkish. Cognition, 102(1), 16–48. 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.12.006
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2005.12.006 [Google Scholar]
3. Aske, J.
   (1989) Path predicates in English and Spanish: A closer look. Paper presented at the15th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, University of California, Berkeley.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Boeschoten, H.
   (2022) Chaghatay. InL. Johanson & É. Á. Csato (Eds.), The Turkic languages (pp. 160–173). Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bowerman, M., & Choi, S.
   (2003) Space under construction: Language-specific spatial categorization in first language acquisition. InD. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought (pp. 387–427). The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/4117.003.0021
   https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4117.003.0021 [Google Scholar]
6. Bunger, A., Trueswell, J., & Papafragou, A.
   (2012) The relation between event apprehension and utterance formulation in children: evidence from linguistic omissions. Cognition, 122(2), 135–149. 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.10.002
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2011.10.002 [Google Scholar]
7. Croft, W., Barðdal, J., Hollmann, W., Sotirova, V., & Taoka, C.
   (2010) Revising Talmy’s typological classification of complex event constructions. InH. C. Boas (Ed.), Contrastive studies in construction grammar (pp. 201–235). John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.10.09cro
   https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.10.09cro [Google Scholar]
8. Delage, A., & Frauenfelder, U.
   (2019) Syntax and working memory in typically-developing children. Language, Interaction and Acquisition, 10(2), 141–176. 10.1075/lia.18013.del
   https://doi.org/10.1075/lia.18013.del [Google Scholar]
9. Furman-Turanli, R.
   (2012) Caused motion events in Turkish: Verbal and gestural representation in adults and children. LOT.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Furman, R., Küntay, A. C., & Özyürek, A.
    (2014) Early language-specificity of children’s event encoding in speech and gesture: evidence from caused motion in Turkish. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29(5), 620–634. 10.1080/01690965.2013.824993
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2013.824993 [Google Scholar]
11. Gerwien, J., & von Stutterheim, C.
    (2021) Describing motion events. InA. H. Juker & H. Hausendorf (Eds.), Pragmatics of space (pp.153–179). Walter de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Gerwien, J., & von Stutterheim, C.
    (2022) Conceptual blending across ontological domains: References to time and space in motion events by Tunisian Arabic speakers of L2 German. Frontiers in Communication. 71:856805. 10.3389/fcomm.2022.856805
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2022.856805 [Google Scholar]
13. Goschler, J., & Stefanowitsch, A.
    (Eds.) (2013) Variation and change in the encoding of motion events. John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.41
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.41 [Google Scholar]
14. Harr, A.-K.
    (2012) Language-specific factors in first language acquisition: The expression of motion events in French and German. Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9781614511748
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614511748 [Google Scholar]
15. Harr, A.-K., & Hickmann, M.
    (2013) How German and French children express voluntary motion. InC. Paradis, J. Hudson & U. Magnusson (Eds.), The construal of spatial meaning: Windows into conceptual space (pp. 194–213). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199641635.003.0011
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199641635.003.0011 [Google Scholar]
16. Hendriks, H., Hickmann, M., & Pastorino-Campos, C.
    (2021) Running or crossing? Children’s expression of voluntary motion in English, German, and French. Journal of Child Language, 49(3), 578–601. 10.1017/S0305000921000271
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000921000271 [Google Scholar]
17. Hickmann, M.
    (2007) Static and dynamic location in French: Developmental and cross-linguistic perspectives. InM. Aurnague, M. Hickmann & L. Vieu (Eds.), The categorisation of spatial entities in language and cognition (pp. 205–231). John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.20.12hic
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.20.12hic [Google Scholar]
18. Hickmann, M., Taranne, P., & Bonnet, P.
    (2009) Motion in first language acquisition: Manner and Path in French and English child language. Journal of Child Language, 36(4), 705–741. 10.1017/S0305000908009215
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000908009215 [Google Scholar]
19. Hickmann, M., Hendriks, H., & Harr, A.
    (2018) Caused motion across child languages: a comparison of English, German and French. Journal of Child Language, 45(6), 1247–1274. 10.1017/S0305000918000168
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000918000168 [Google Scholar]
20. Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I
    (2009) Path salience in motion events. InJ. Guo, E. Lieven, N. Budwig, S. Ervin-Tripp, K. Nakamura & Ş. Özčalışkan (Eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: Research in the tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin (pp. 403–414). Psychology Press.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Jackendoff, R.
    (1983) Semantics and cognition. MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Ji, Y., Hendriks, H., & Hickmann, M.
    (2011) Children’s expression of voluntary motion events in English and Chinese. Journal of Foreign Languages, 34(4), 2-22.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Johanson, L.
    (1995) On Turkic converb clauses. InM. Haspelmath & E. König (Eds.), Converbs in cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 313–348). Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110884463‑010
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110884463-010 [Google Scholar]
24. Kidd, E., & Garcia, R.
    (2022) How diverse is child language acquisition research?First Language, 42(6), 703–735. 10.1177/01427237211066405
    https://doi.org/10.1177/01427237211066405 [Google Scholar]
25. Lambert, M., von Stutterheim, C., Carroll, M., & Gerwien, J.
    (2022) Under the surface: A survey of principles of language use in advanced L2 speakers. Language, Interaction and Acquisition, 13(1), 1–28. 10.1075/lia.21014.lam
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lia.21014.lam [Google Scholar]
26. Levelt, W. J. M.
    (1981) The speaker’s linearization problem. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 2951, 305–315.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Lewandowski, W.
    (2020) Variable motion event encoding within languages and language types: a usage-based perspective. Language and Cognition, 13(1), 34–65.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Lewandowski, W., & Mateu, J.
    (2020) Motion events again: Delimiting constructional patterns. Lingua, 2471, 1–25. 10.1016/j.lingua.2020.102956
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2020.102956 [Google Scholar]
29. Ma, R.
    (2012) The development of minority education and the practice of bilingual education in Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region. InG. H. Beckett & G. A. Postiglione (Eds.), China’s assimilationist policy: The impact on indigenous/minority literacy and social harmony (pp. 33–74). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Montero-Melis, G.
    (2021) Consistency in motion event encoding across languages. Frontiers in Psychology, 121, 625153. 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.625153
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.625153 [Google Scholar]
31. Özçalışkan, Ş.
    (2015) Ways of crossing a spatial boundary in typologically distinct languages. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36(2), 485–508. 10.1017/S0142716413000325
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716413000325 [Google Scholar]
32. Özçalışkan, Ş., & Emerson, S. N.
    (2016) Learning to think, talk, and gesture about motion in language-specific ways: Insights from Turkish. InB. Haznedar & N. Ketrez (Eds.), Trends in language acquisition research. The acquisition of Turkish in childhood (pp. 177–191). John Benjamins. 10.1075/tilar.20.08ozc
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.20.08ozc [Google Scholar]
33. Özçalışkan, Ş., & Slobin, D.
    (1999) Learning how to search for the frog: Expression of manner of motion in English, Spanish, and Turkish. InA. Greenhill, H. Littlefield & C. Tano (Eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd annual Boston University conference on language development (pp. 541–552). Cascadilla Press.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Özyürek, A., Kita, A., Allen, S., & Brown, A.
    (2008) Development of cross-linguistic variation in speech and gesture: Motion events in English and Turkish. Developmental Psychology,44(4), 1040–1054. 10.1037/0012‑1649.44.4.1040
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.44.4.1040 [Google Scholar]
35. Pruden, S. M., Roseberry, S., Göksun, T., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Golinkoff, R. M.
    (2013) Infant categorization of path relations during dynamic events. Child Development, 84(1), 331–345. 10.1111/j.1467‑8624.2012.01843.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01843.x [Google Scholar]
36. Pulverman, R., Song, L., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Pruden, S. M., & Golinkoff, R. M.
    (2013) Preverbal infants’ attention to manner and path: Foundations for learning relational terms. Child Development, 84(1), 241–252. 10.1111/cdev.12030
    https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12030 [Google Scholar]
37. R Core Team
    R Core Team (2013) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.r-project.org/
    [Google Scholar]
38. Ragagnin, E.
    (2016) Uyghur Language. InR. Sybesma, W. Behr, Y. Gu, Z. Handel, J. Huang, & J. Myers (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Chinese language and linguistics, Vol.41, 476–482.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Slobin, D.
    (1996) From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking”. InJ. Gumperz & S. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 70–96). Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Slobin, D.
    (2004) The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. InS. Strömqvist & L. Verhoven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives (pp. 219–257). Psychology Press.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Slobin, D.
    (2006) What makes manner of motion salient? Explorations in linguistic typology, discourse, and cognition. InM. Hickmann & S. Robert (Eds.), Space in languages: linguistic systems and cognitive categories (pp. 59–81). John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.66.05slo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.66.05slo [Google Scholar]
42. Slobin, D.
    (2022) Capturing what remains: A commentary on Kidd and Garcia (2022). First Language, 42(6), 818–822. 10.1177/01427237221096085
    https://doi.org/10.1177/01427237221096085 [Google Scholar]
43. Slobin, D., & Hoiting, N.
    (1994) Reference to movement in spoken and signed languages: Typological considerations. Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 11, 487–505. 10.3765/bls.v20i1.1466
    https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v20i1.1466 [Google Scholar]
44. Slobin, D., Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I., Kopecka, A., & Majid, A.
    (2014) Manners of human gait: a crosslinguistic event-naming study. Cognitive Linguistics, 25(4), 701–741. 10.1515/cog‑2014‑0061
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2014-0061 [Google Scholar]
45. Talmy, L.
    (2000) Toward a cognitive semantics: Typology and process in concept structuring. The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Tusun, A.
    (2022) Motion events in Modern Uyghur narrative discourse. InC. Shei & S. Li (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of Asian linguistics (pp.93–109). Routledge. 10.4324/9781003090205‑7
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003090205-7 [Google Scholar]
47. Tusun, A.
    (2023) Uyghur–Chinese early successive adult bilinguals’ construal of caused motion events. Language and Cognition, 15(3), 427–452.10.1017/langcog.2023.7
    https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2023.7 [Google Scholar]
48. Tusun, A., & Hendriks, H.
    (2019) Voluntary motion events in Uyghur: A typological perspective. Lingua, 2261, 69–88. 10.1016/j.lingua.2019.05.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2019.05.003 [Google Scholar]
49. Tusun, A., & Hendriks, H.
    (2022) Caused motion expressions in Modern Uyghur: A typological perspective. Linguistics, 60(5), 1663–1705. 10.1515/ling‑2020‑0098
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2020-0098 [Google Scholar]
50. Tusun, A., Wang, Y., & Abula, A.
    (2024) Moving in L2 Chinese from childhood to adulthood: Developmental and crosslinguistic factors in bilingual event construal. International Journal of Bilingualism, 1–19. 10.1177/13670069241286423
    https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069241286423 [Google Scholar]
51. von Stutterheim, C., Lambert, M., & Gerwien, J.
    (2021) Limitations of the role of frequency in L2 acquisition. Language and Cognition, 13(2), 291–321.10.1017/langcog.2021.5
    https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2021.5 [Google Scholar]
52. Yakup, A.
    (2020) Uyghur and Uzbek, the Southeastern Turkic languages. InM. M. Robbeets & A. Savelyev (Eds.), The Oxford guide to the transeuroasian languages (pp. 411–429). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198804628.003.0026
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198804628.003.0026 [Google Scholar]