1887
image of The road of second language discovery
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The point of departure for this position paper is that social interaction is the primordial scene of human social life (Schegloff, 1987). It follows from this observation that it is also the primary setting for learning a second language (L2), which implies that studying the complexities of L2 learning necessitates an understanding of social interaction on its own terms with methodological rigour (Pekarek Doehler & Eskildsen, 2022). Drawing on conversation analysis and usage-based models of language, I examine the local-social worlds of L2 speakers’ daily lives and map out their L2 learning processes and practices. This article reports on findings from one L2 speaker, and one conclusion that emerges is that the interactional histories she co-constructs and shares with her friends are crucial to understanding the history of her learning — what I will describe as her road of L2 discovery. My data come from recordings of L2 Danish students’ real-life social activities with friends and service encounters with strangers.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lia.23046.esk
2026-01-06
2026-01-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aljaafreh, A., & Lantolf, J. P.
    (1994) Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development. Modern Language Journal, (), –. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1994.tb02064.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1994.tb02064.x [Google Scholar]
  2. Atkinson, D.
    (2014) Language learning in mindbodyworld: A sociocognitive approach to second language acquisition. Language Teaching, (), –. 10.1017/S0261444813000153
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444813000153 [Google Scholar]
  3. Brouwer, C. E.
    (2003) Word searches in NNS-NS interaction: Opportunities for language learning?Modern Language Journal, (), –. 10.1111/1540‑4781.00206
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4781.00206 [Google Scholar]
  4. Brouwer, C. E., & Wagner, J.
    (2004) Developmental issues in second language conversation. Journal of Applied Linguistics, , –. 10.1558/japl.1.1.29.55873
    https://doi.org/10.1558/japl.1.1.29.55873 [Google Scholar]
  5. Cekaite, A.
    (2007) A child’s development of interactional competence in a Swedish L2 classroom. Modern Language Journal, (), –. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2007.00509.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00509.x [Google Scholar]
  6. Clark, H. H.
    (1985) Language use and language users. InG. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp.–). Harper and Row.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. de Bot, K., Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M.
    (2007) A dynamic systems theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, , –. 10.1017/S1366728906002732
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728906002732 [Google Scholar]
  8. Deppermann, A.
    (2018) Changes in turn-design over interactional histories — the case of instructions in driving school lessons. InA. Deppermann & J. Streeck (Eds.), Time in embodied interaction. Synchronicity and sequentiality of multimodal resources (pp.–). John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.293.09dep
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.293.09dep [Google Scholar]
  9. Deppermann, A., & Pekarek Doehler, S.
    (2021) Longitudinal conversation analysis — an introduction to the special issue. Research on Language and Social Interaction, (), –. 10.1080/08351813.2021.1899707
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2021.1899707 [Google Scholar]
  10. Douglas Fir Group
    Douglas Fir Group (2016) A transdisciplinary framework for SLA in a multilingual world. Modern Language Journal, (), –. 10.1111/modl.12301
    https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12301 [Google Scholar]
  11. Downey Bartlett, N. J.
    (2010) A double shot 2% mocha latte, please, with whip: Service encounters in two coffee shops and at a coffee cart. InM. Long (Ed.), Second language needs analysis (pp.–). Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Ellis, N. C.
    (2002) Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, , –. 10.1017/S0272263102002024
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263102002024 [Google Scholar]
  13. Ellis, N. C., & Cadierno, T.
    (2009) Constructing a second language: Introduction to the special section. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, , –. 10.1075/arcl.7.05ell
    https://doi.org/10.1075/arcl.7.05ell [Google Scholar]
  14. Eskildsen, S. W.
    (2011) The L2 inventory in action: Conversation analysis and usage-based linguistics in SLA. InG. Pallotti & J. Wagner (Eds.), L2 learning as social practice: Conversation-analytic perspectives (pp.–). University of Hawai‘i, National Foreign Language Resource Center.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. (2012) L2 negation constructions at work. Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2012.00698.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00698.x [Google Scholar]
  16. (2015) What counts as a developmental sequence? Exemplar-based L2 learning of English questions. Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/lang.12090
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12090 [Google Scholar]
  17. (2018) “We’re learning a lot of new words”: Encountering new L2 vocabulary outside of class. Modern Language Journal, (), –. 10.1111/modl.12451
    https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12451 [Google Scholar]
  18. (2019) Learning behaviors in the wild: How people achieve L2 learning outside of class. InHellermann, J., Eskildsen, S. W., Pekarek Doehler, S. & Piirainen-Marsh, A. (Eds.), Conversation analytic research on learning-in-action: The complex ecology of second language interaction ‘in the wild’ (pp.–). Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑22165‑2_5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22165-2_5 [Google Scholar]
  19. (2022a) Participant-driven L2 learning in the wild: An overview and its pedagogical implications. InH. Reinders, C. Lai & P. Sundqvist (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language learning and teaching beyond the classroom (pp.–). Routledge. 10.4324/9781003048169‑6
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003048169-6 [Google Scholar]
  20. (2022b) Sproglæring udenfor klasserummet — eller hvorfor language learning in the wild? [Language learning beyond the classroom — or why language learning in the wild?] FOKUS, , –.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Eskildsen, S. W., & Cadierno, T.
    (2015) Advancing usage-based approaches to L2 studies. InT. Cadierno & S. W. Eskildsen (Eds.), Usage-based perspectives on second language learning, (pp.–). Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110378528‑003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110378528-003 [Google Scholar]
  22. Eskildsen, S. W., & Wagner, J.
    (2015) Sprogbrugsbaseret læring i en tosproget hverdag. En forskningsoversigt over sprogbrugsbaseret andetsprogstilegnelse og sprogpædagogiske implikationer. [Usage-based learning in everyday bilingual practice. usage-based learning in everyday bilingual practice. A survey of usage-based second language acquisition research with implications for teaching.] Nydanske Sprogstudier, , –. 10.7146/nys.v48i48.21136
    https://doi.org/10.7146/nys.v48i48.21136 [Google Scholar]
  23. Eskildsen, S. W., & Theodórsdóttir, G.
    (2017) Constructing L2 learning spaces: Ways to achieve learning inside and outside the classroom. Applied Linguistics, , –. 10.1093/applin/amv010
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amv010 [Google Scholar]
  24. Eskildsen, S. W., & Wagner, J.
    (2018) “Language learning in the wild” som praksisorienteret sprogundervisning [Language learning in the wild as praxis-oriented language teaching]. Sprogforum, , –.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. (2025) Becoming friends: Establishing social relations with an L2 business partner on the phone. Language, Interaction and Acquisition, (), –. 10.1075/lia.23047.esk
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lia.23047.esk [Google Scholar]
  26. Firth, A., & Wagner, J.
    (1997) On discourse, communication, and (some) fundamental concepts in SLA research. Modern Language Journal, , –. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1997.tb05480.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1997.tb05480.x [Google Scholar]
  27. Hauser, E.
    (2013) Stability and change in one adult’s second language English negation. Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/lang.12012
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12012 [Google Scholar]
  28. Hazel, S.
    (2018) Discovering interactional authenticity: Tracking theatre practitioners across rehearsals. InS. Pekarek Doehler, J. Wagner & E. González-Martinez (Eds.), Longitudinal studies on the organization of social interaction (pp.–). Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/978‑1‑137‑57007‑9_9
    https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57007-9_9 [Google Scholar]
  29. Hellermann, J.
    (2008) Social actions for classroom learning. Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Horbowicz, P., & Nordanger, M.
    (2022) Epistemic constructions in L2 Norwegian: A usage-based longitudinal study of formulaic and productive patterns. Language and Cognition, , –. 10.1017/langcog.2021.9
    https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2021.9 [Google Scholar]
  31. (2025) Managing the flow of talk: A longitudinal case study of the multiword expression det er sant in L2 Norwegian interactions. Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1093/applin/amae006
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amae006 [Google Scholar]
  32. Jefferson, G.
    (1979) A technique for inviting laughter and its subsequent acceptance / declination. InG. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp.–). Irvington.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Kasper, G., & Wagner, J.
    (2011) A conversation analytic approach to second language acquisition. InD. Atkinson (Ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp.–). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. (2014) Conversation analysis in applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, , –. 10.1017/S0267190514000014
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190514000014 [Google Scholar]
  35. König, C.
    (2020) A conversation analysis approach to French L2 learning: Introducing and closing topics in everyday interactions. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Kim, S.
    (2019) “We limit under twenty centu charge okay?”: Routinization of an idiosyncratic multiword expression. InJ. Hellermann, S. W. Eskildsen, S. Pekarek Doehler & A. Piirainen–Marsh (Eds.), Conversation analytic research on learning-in-action. The complex ecology of second language interaction ‘in the wild’ (pp.–). Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑22165‑2_2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22165-2_2 [Google Scholar]
  37. (2023) Development of interactional practices for initiating and extending small talk in service encounters. Journal of Pragmatics, , –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2023.09.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2023.09.010 [Google Scholar]
  38. Kim, Y.
    (2016) Development of L2 interactional competence: Being a story recipient in L2 English conversation. Discourse and Cognition, , –. 10.15718/discog.2016.23.1.1
    https://doi.org/10.15718/discog.2016.23.1.1 [Google Scholar]
  39. Kramsch, C., & Whiteside, A.
    (2008) Language ecology in multilingual settings. Towards a theory of symbolic competence. Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1093/applin/amn022
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amn022 [Google Scholar]
  40. Larsen-Freeman, D.
    (2015) Complexity theory. InB. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition — an introduction (pp.–). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Lesonen, S., Steinkrauss, R., Suni, M., & Verspoor, M.
    (2020) Lexically specific vs. productive constructions in L2 Finnish. Language and Cognition, , –. 10.1017/langcog.2020.12
    https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2020.12 [Google Scholar]
  42. Lesonen, S., Suni, M., Steinkrauss, R., & Verspoor, M.
    (2018) From conceptualization to construction in Finnish as an L2. Pragmatics and Cognition, , –. 10.1075/pc.17016.les
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.17016.les [Google Scholar]
  43. Lilja, N., & Piirainen-Marsh, A.
    (2019) Connecting the language classroom and the wild: Re-enactments of language use experiences. Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1093/applin/amx045
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amx045 [Google Scholar]
  44. Long, M.
    (1981) Input, interaction, and second language acquisition. InH. Winitz (Ed.), Native language and foreign language acquisition (pp.–). The New York Academy of Science. 10.1111/j.1749‑6632.1981.tb42014.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1981.tb42014.x [Google Scholar]
  45. MacWhinney, B.
    (2015) Multidimensional SLA. InT. Cadierno & S. W. Eskildsen (Eds.), Usage-based perspectives on second language learning (pp.–). De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110378528‑004
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110378528-004 [Google Scholar]
  46. Malabarba, T.
    (2022) Requesting on WhatsApp: The interplay of interactional competence and deontics in English as an additional language. TESOL in Context, (), –. 10.21153/tesol2022vol30no2art1516
    https://doi.org/10.21153/tesol2022vol30no2art1516 [Google Scholar]
  47. Markee, N., & Kasper, G.
    (2004) Classroom talks: An introduction. Modern Language Journal, (), –. 10.1111/j.0026‑7902.2004.t01‑14‑.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.t01-14-.x [Google Scholar]
  48. Nguyen, H. T.
    (2019) Turn design as longitudinal achievement: Learning on the shop floor. InJ. Hellermann, S. W. Eskildsen, S. Pekarek Doehler & A. Piirainen–Marsh (Eds.), Conversation analytic research on learning-in-action. The complex ecology of second language interaction ‘in the wild’ (pp.–). Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑22165‑2_4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22165-2_4 [Google Scholar]
  49. Nguyen, H. T., & Malabarba, T.
    (2024) Developing interactional competence at the workplace: Learning English as a foreign language on the shop floor. Routledge. 10.4324/9781003125778
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003125778 [Google Scholar]
  50. Pekarek Doehler, S.
    (2018) Elaborations on L2 interactional competence: The development of L2 grammar-for-interaction. Classroom Discourse, , –. 10.1080/19463014.2018.1437759
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2018.1437759 [Google Scholar]
  51. Pekarek Doehler, S., & Balaman, U.
    (2021) The routinization of grammar as a social action format: A longitudinal study of video-mediated interactions. Research on Language and Social Interaction, , –. 10.1080/08351813.2021.1899710
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2021.1899710 [Google Scholar]
  52. Pekarek Doehler, S., & Berger, E.
    (2019) On the reflexive relation between developing l2 interactional competence and evolving social relationships: A longitudinal study of word-searches in the ‘wild’. InJ. Hellermann, S. W. Eskildsen, S. Pekarek Doehler & A. Piirainen-Marsh (Eds.), Conversation analytic research on learning-in-action: The complex ecology of second language interaction ‘in the wild’ (pp.–). Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑22165‑2_3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22165-2_3 [Google Scholar]
  53. Pekarek Doehler, S., & Eskildsen, S. W.
    (2022) Emergent L2 Grammars in and for Social Interaction: Introduction to the Special Issue. Modern Language Journal (), –. 10.1111/modl.12759
    https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12759 [Google Scholar]
  54. Pekarek Doehler, S., & Pochon-Berger, E.
    (2015) The development of L2 interactional competence: Evidence from turn-taking organization, sequence organization, repair organization and preference organization. InT. Cadierno & S. W. Eskildsen (Eds.), Usage-based perspectives on second language learning (pp.–). Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110378528‑012
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110378528-012 [Google Scholar]
  55. Pekarek Doehler, S., & Skogmyr Marian, K.
    (2022) Functional diversification and progressive routinization of a multiword expression in and for social interaction: A longitudinal L2 study. Modern Language Journal, (), –. 10.1111/modl.12758
    https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12758 [Google Scholar]
  56. Pekarek Doehler, S., Wagner, J., & González-Martínez, E.
    (Eds.) (2018) Documenting change across time: Longitudinal studies on the organization of social interaction. Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/978‑1‑137‑57007‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57007-9 [Google Scholar]
  57. Ritzau, U., & Øhrstrøm, C.
    (2018) “Danish is really hard, don’t worry about it.”: Voksne indlæreres forestillinger om dansk som et særlig svært sprog. [“Danish is really hard, don’t worry about it.”: Adult learners’ perception of Danish as a particularly difficult language.] Nordand, (), –. 10.18261/issn.2535‑3381‑2018‑01‑02
    https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.2535-3381-2018-01-02 [Google Scholar]
  58. Roehr–Brackin, K.
    (2014) Explicit knowledge and processes from a usage-based perspective: The developmental trajectory of an instructed L2 learner. Language Learning, , –. 10.1111/lang.12081
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12081 [Google Scholar]
  59. Sacks, H., & Schegloff, E. A.
    (1979) Two preferences in the organization of reference to persons in conversation and their interaction. InG. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language. Studies in Ethnomethodology (pp.–). Irvington.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Schegloff, E. A.
    (1987) Analyzing single episodes of interaction: An exercise in conversation analysis. Social Psychology Quarterly, (), –. 10.2307/2786745
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2786745 [Google Scholar]
  61. Skogmyr Marian, K.
    (2022) The development of L2 interactional competence — a multimodal study of complaining in French interactions. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Skogmyr Marian, K., & Balaman, U.
    (2018) Second language interactional competence and its development: An overview of conversation analytic research on interactional change over time. Language and Linguistics Compass, , –. 10.1111/lnc3.12285
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12285 [Google Scholar]
  63. Skogmyr Marian, K., & Pekarek Doehler, S.
    (2025) Becoming a member in social worlds: How learning and socialization interface in L2 interactions. Introduction to the Special Issue. Language, Interaction and Acquisition, (), –. 10.1075/lia.00027.sko
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lia.00027.sko [Google Scholar]
  64. Theodórsdóttir, G.
    (2011a) Language learning activities in everyday situations: Insisting on TCU completion in second language talk. InG. Pallotti & J. Wagner (Eds.), L2 learning as a Social Practice: Conversation-Analytic Perspectives (pp.–). National Foreign Language Resource Center.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. (2011b) Second language interaction for business and learning. J. K. Hall, J. Hellermann & S. Pekarek Doehler (Eds.), L2 Interactional Competence and Development (pp.–). Multilingual Matters. 10.2307/jj.29308505.9
    https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.29308505.9 [Google Scholar]
  66. Theodórsdóttir, G., & Eskildsen, S. W.
    (2022) Accumulating L2 Semiotic Resources for Social Action: Learning Icelandic in the Wild. Modern Language Journal, (), –. 10.1111/modl.12752
    https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12752 [Google Scholar]
  67. Tomasello, M.
    (2003) Constructing a language. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Voutilainen, L., Rossano, F., & Peräkylä, A.
    (2018) Conversation analysis and psychotherapeutic change. InS. Pekarek Doehler, J. Wagner, & E. González-Martínez (Eds.), Longitudinal studies on the organization of social interaction (pp.–). Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/978‑1‑137‑57007‑9_8
    https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57007-9_8 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/lia.23046.esk
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/lia.23046.esk
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error