1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Language, Interaction and Acquisition
  4. Volume 16, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 16, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1879-7865
  • E-ISSN: 1879-7873
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This conversation analytic study draws on a longitudinal corpus of landline phone calls. The material under examination comprises seven calls in English made between 1987 and 1991 between J (English L2 speaker), a European spare part provider, and T, a representative of a British company. Over the years in the course of these conversations, the character of the calls changes: J and T not only conduct business but also build a strong personal relationship. Through changing practices for (1) opening the calls and transitioning to the reason for the calls, (2) producing and responding to laughter tokens, and (3) using personal address terms to accomplish closings, the calls become more personal, knowledge is shared, and the two participants maintain conversational topics other than routine business. Unlike in other recent studies in the field, the changes cannot be traced back to trouble in the talk and its solutions but emerge in the slow building of shared experiences and personal knowledge over time.

© 2025 John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lia.23047.esk
2025-10-09
2025-11-09

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/lia.23047.esk
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Brouwer, C. E., & Wagner, J.
    (2004) Developmental issues in second language conversation. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11, 29–47. 10.1558/japl.1.1.29.55873
     https://doi.org/10.1558/japl.1.1.29.55873 [Google Scholar]
  2. Clayman, S. E.
    (2010) Address terms in the service of other actions: The case of news interview talk. Discourse & Communication, 4(2), 161–183. 10.1177/1750481310364330
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481310364330 [Google Scholar]
  3. (2012) Address terms in the organization of turns at talk: The case of pivotal turn extensions. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(13), 1853–1867. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.08.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.08.001 [Google Scholar]
  4. Deppermann, A., & Pekarek Doehler, S.
    (2021) Longitudinal conversation analysis — an introduction to the special issue. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 54(2), 127–141. 10.1080/08351813.2021.1899707
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2021.1899707 [Google Scholar]
  5. Eskildsen, S. W.
    (2015) What counts as a developmental sequence? Exemplar-based L2 learning of English questions. Language Learning65(1), 33–62. 10.1111/lang.12090
     https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12090 [Google Scholar]
  6. (2020) Creativity and routinisation in L2 English — two usage-based case-studies. InW. Lowie, M. Michel, A. Rousse-Malpat, M. Keijzer & R. Steinkrauss (Eds), Usage-based dynamics in second language development (pp. 107–129). Multilingual Matters. 10.2307/jj.22730678.10
     https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.22730678.10 [Google Scholar]
  7. (2025) The road of L2 discovery. Language, Interaction and Acquisition, 16(2).
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Eskildsen, S. W., & Kasper, G.
    (2019) Interactional usage-based L2 pragmatics: From form-meaning pairings to construction-action relations. InN. Taguchi (Ed.), The handbook of second language acquisition and pragmatics (pp. 176–191). Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Firth, A.
    (1995) Talking for a change: commodity negotiations by telephone. InA. Firth (Ed.), The discourse of negotiation. Studies of language in the workplace (pp. 183–222). Pergamon Press. 10.1016/B978‑0‑08‑042400‑2.50014‑5
     https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-042400-2.50014-5 [Google Scholar]
  10. Firth, A., & Wagner, J.
    (1997) On discourse, communication, and (some) fundamental concepts in SLA research. Modern Language Journal, 811, 285–300. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1997.tb05480.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1997.tb05480.x [Google Scholar]
  11. Greer, T.
    (2018) Learning to say grace. Social Interaction. Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality, Vol. 1(1). 10.7146/si.v1i1.105499
     https://doi.org/10.7146/si.v1i1.105499 [Google Scholar]
  12. Günthner, S.
    (2022) Relationship building in oncological doctor-patient interaction. InC. Scarvaglieri, E. -M. Graf & T. Spranz-Fogasy (Eds.), Relationships in organized helping. Analyzing interaction in psychotherapy, medical encounters, coaching and in social media (pp195–219). John Benjamin. 10.1075/pbns.331.09gun
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.331.09gun [Google Scholar]
  13. Hall, J. K.
    (1995) ‘Aw, man, where you goin’?’: Classroom interaction and the development of L2 interactional competence. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 61, 37–62. 10.5070/L462005217
     https://doi.org/10.5070/L462005217 [Google Scholar]
  14. Hall, J. K., Hellermann, J., & Pekarek Doehler, S.
    (Eds.) (2011) L2 interactional competence and development. Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847694072
     https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847694072 [Google Scholar]
  15. He, A. W., & Young, R.
    (1998) Language proficiency interviews: A discourse approach. In. R. Young & A. W. He (Eds.), Talking and testing: Discourse approaches to the assessment of oral proficiency (pp. 1–24). John Benjamins. 10.1075/sibil.14.02he
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.14.02he [Google Scholar]
  16. Hellermann, J.
    (2008) Social actions for classroom language learning. Multilingual Matters.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. (2011) Members’ methods, members’ competencies: Looking for evidence of language learning in longitudinal investigations of other initiated repair. InJ. K. Hall, J. Hellermann & S. Pekarek Doehler (Eds.), L2 interactional competence and development (pp. 147–172). Multilingual Matters. 10.2307/jj.29308505.11
     https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.29308505.11 [Google Scholar]
  18. Holt, E.
    (2010) The last laugh: Shared laughter and topic termination. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(6), 1513–1525. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.01.011
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.01.011 [Google Scholar]
  19. Hutchins, E.
    (1995) Cognition in the wild. MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/1881.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/1881.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  20. Jacknick, C. M.
    (2013) ‘Cause the textbook says…’: laughter and student challenges in the ESL classroom. InP. Glenn & E. Holt (Eds.), Studies of laughter in interaction (pp. 185–200). Bloomsbury. 10.5040/9781472542069.ch‑009
     https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472542069.ch-009 [Google Scholar]
  21. Jefferson, G.
    (1979) A technique for inviting laughter and its subsequent acceptance/declination. InG. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 79–96). Irvington.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. (1984) On the organization of laughter in talk about troubles. InJ. M. Atkinson & H. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 346–369). Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. (2010) Sometimes a frog in your throat is just a frog in your throat: Gutturals as (sometimes) laughter-implicative. Journal of Pragmatics, 421, 1476–1484. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.01.012
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.01.012 [Google Scholar]
  24. Kasper, G., & Wagner, J.
    (2014) Conversation analysis in applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 341, 171–212. 10.1017/S0267190514000014
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190514000014 [Google Scholar]
  25. Kim, S.
    (2023) Development of interactional practices for initiating and extending small talk in service encounters. Journal of Pragmatics, 2171, 85–108. 10.1016/j.pragma.2023.09.010
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2023.09.010 [Google Scholar]
  26. Kim, Y.
    (2016) Development of L2 interactional competence: Being a story recipient in L2 English conversation. Discourse and Cognition, 231, 1–28. 10.15718/discog.2016.23.1.1
     https://doi.org/10.15718/discog.2016.23.1.1 [Google Scholar]
  27. König, C.
    (2020) A conversation analysis approach to French L2 learning: Introducing and closing topics in everyday interactions. Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Koshik, I.
    (2002) Designedly incomplete utterances: A pedagogical practice for eliciting knowledge displays in error correction sequences. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 35(3), 277–309. 10.1207/S15327973RLSI3503_2
     https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327973RLSI3503_2 [Google Scholar]
  29. Larsen-Freeman, D.
    (2004) CA-for-SLA? It all depends…The Modern Language Journal, 88(4), 603–607.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Lave, J.
    (1988) Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics, and culture in everyday life. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511609268
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609268 [Google Scholar]
  31. Malabarba, T.
    (2022) Requesting on WhatsApp: The interplay of interactional competence and deontics in English as an additional language. TESOL in Context, 30(2), 9–36. 10.21153/tesol2022vol30no2art1516
     https://doi.org/10.21153/tesol2022vol30no2art1516 [Google Scholar]
  32. Markee, N., & Kasper, G.
    (2004) Classroom talks: An introduction. Modern Language Journal, 881, 491–500. 10.1111/j.0026‑7902.2004.t01‑14‑.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.t01-14-.x [Google Scholar]
  33. Maynard, D. W., & Clayman, S. E.
    (1991) The diversity of ethnomethodology. Annual Review of Sociology, 171, 385–418. 10.1146/annurev.so.17.080191.002125
     https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.17.080191.002125 [Google Scholar]
  34. Mondada, L., & Pekarek Doehler, S.
    (2004) Second language acquisition as situated practice: Task accomplishment in the French second language classroom. Modern Language Journal, 88(4), 501–518. 10.1111/j.0026‑7902.2004.t01‑15‑.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.t01-15-.x [Google Scholar]
  35. Nguyen, H. T.
    (2011) Developing interactional competence: A conversation-analytic study of patient consultations in pharmacy. Palgrave MacMillan.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. (2018) Interactional practices across settings: From classroom role-plays to workplace patient consultations. Applied Linguistics, 391, 213–235. 10.1093/applin/amw007
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amw007 [Google Scholar]
  37. (2019) Turn design as longitudinal achievement: Learning on the shop floor. InJ. Hellermann, S. W. Eskildsen, S. Pekarek Doehler & A. Piirainen-Marsh (Eds.), Conversation analytic research on learning-in-action: The complex ecology of L2 interaction ‘in the wild’ (pp. 77–103). Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑22165‑2_4
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22165-2_4 [Google Scholar]
  38. Nguyen, H. & Malabarba, T.
    (2024) Developing interactional competence at the workplace: Learning English as a foreign language on the shop floor. Routledge. 10.4324/9781003125778
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003125778 [Google Scholar]
  39. Pekarek Doehler, S.
    (2018) Elaborations on L2 interactional competence: The development of L2 grammar-for-interaction. Classroom Discourse, 91, 3–24. 10.1080/19463014.2018.1437759
     https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2018.1437759 [Google Scholar]
  40. Pekarek Doehler, S., & Balaman, U.
    (2021) The routinization of grammar as a social action format: A longitudinal study of video-mediated interactions. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 541, 183–202. 10.1080/08351813.2021.1899710
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2021.1899710 [Google Scholar]
  41. Pekarek Doehler, S., & Berger, E.
    (2018) L2 interactional competence as increased ability for context sensitive conduct: A longitudinal study of story openings. Applied Linguistics, 391, 555–578. 10.1093/applin/amw021
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amw021 [Google Scholar]
  42. (2019) On the reflexive relation between developing L2 interactional competence and evolving social relationships: A longitudinal study of word-searches in the ‘wild’. InJ. Hellermann, S. W. Eskildsen, S. Pekarek Doehler & A. Piirainen-Marsh (Eds.), Conversation analytic research on learning-in-action: The complex ecology of L2 interaction ‘in the wild’ (pp. 51–75). Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑22165‑2_3
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22165-2_3 [Google Scholar]
  43. Pekarek Doehler, S., & Eskildsen, S. W.
    (2022) Emergent L2 grammars in and for social interaction: Introduction to the Special Issue. The Modern Language Journal 106, 3–22. 10.1111/modl.12759
     https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12759 [Google Scholar]
  44. Pekarek Doehler, S., Wagner, J., & González-Martinez, E.
    (Eds.) (2018) Longitudinal studies on the organization of social interaction. Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/978‑1‑137‑57007‑9
     https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57007-9 [Google Scholar]
  45. Reddington, E., Clemente, I., Waring, H. Z., & Yu, D.
    (2021) ‘Doing being collegial’: Participants’ positioning work in Q&A sessions. InC. Ilie (Ed.), Questioning-answering practices across contexts and cultures (pp. 257–283). John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.323.09red
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.323.09red [Google Scholar]
  46. Rendle-Short, J.
    (2007) ‘Catherine, you’re wasting your time’: Address terms within the Australian political interview. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(9), 1503–1525. 10.1016/j.pragma.2007.02.006
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.02.006 [Google Scholar]
  47. Schegloff, E. A.
    (1968) Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist, 70(6), 1075–1095. 10.1525/aa.1968.70.6.02a00030
     https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1968.70.6.02a00030 [Google Scholar]
  48. (1979) Identification and recognition in telephone conversation openings. InG. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 23–78). Irvington Publishers.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. (1992) Introduction. InG. Jefferson (Ed.), Lectures on conversation. VolumesI & II1 (pp. ix–lxiv). Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Schegloff, E., & Sacks, H.
    (1973) Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8(4), 289–327. 10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289
     https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289 [Google Scholar]
  51. Sert, O., & Jacknick, C. M.
    (2015) Student smiles and the negotiation of epistemics in L2 classrooms. Journal of Pragmatics, 771, 97–112, 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.01.001.
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.01.001 [Google Scholar]
  52. Shively, R. L.
    (2015) Developing interactional competence during study abroad: Listener responses in L2 Spanish. System, 481, 86–98. 10.1016/j.system.2014.09.007
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.09.007 [Google Scholar]
  53. Skogmyr Marian, K.
    (2022) The development of L2 interactional competence: A multimodal study of complaining in French interactions. Routledge. 10.4324/9781003271215
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003271215 [Google Scholar]
  54. Suchman, L.
    (1987) Plans and situated actions. Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Wagner, J., & Wilkinson, R.
    (2024) Treating an error in another’s talk as laughable: Evidence from conversations involving second language speakers and speakers with aphasia. InM. Selting & D. Barth-Weingarten (Eds.), New perspectives in interactional linguistic research (pp. 360–384). John Benjamins. 10.1075/slsi.36.13wag
     https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.36.13wag [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/lia.23047.esk
Loading
Becoming friends
Language, Interaction and Acquisition 16, 39 (2025); https://doi.org/10.1075/lia.23047.esk
/content/journals/10.1075/lia.23047.esk
/content/journals/10.1075/lia.23047.esk
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): analyse conversationnelle; apprentissage des langues en milieu naturel; compétence d’interaction; conversation analysis; interactional competence; language learning in the wild; laughter; ouvertures et clôtures d’appels téléphoniques; phone call closings; phone call openings; rires

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error