1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Language, Interaction and Acquisition
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of L’expression tu sais dans la gestion de problèmes lexicaux en français langue seconde
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Résumé

Cette étude, menée dans l’esprit de l’analyse conversationnelle (AC), se propose d’investiguer l’emploi de par des apprenants du français langue seconde (L2), en situation de problème lexical. Nos résultats résonnent avec l’étude de Clayman & Raymond (2021) sur , et montrent que est utilisé à la fois pour gérer des problèmes de production et de compréhension. Les locuteurs débutants utilisent d’abord afin de gérer des problèmes de production, alors que les apprenants plus avancés l’utilisent également afin de gérer des problèmes de compréhension. Les analyses mettent ainsi en lumière la diversification fonctionnelle de au fil de l’apprentissage et illustrent la manière dont les apprenants utilisent leur répertoire linguistique afin d’accomplir un éventail toujours plus large d’actions dans l’interaction, et développent, en leur L2, une (Pekarek Doehler, 2018).

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lia.24025.jui
2025-12-19
2026-01-13

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/lia.24025.jui
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Andersen, H. L.
    (1997) Les propositions parenthétiques en français parlé. Thèse de doctorat, Université de Copenhague.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Beeching, K., & Crible, L.
    (2022) Crosslinguistic paths of pragmatic development: The acquisition of actually en fait by British and French children. Pragmatics & Cognition, (), –. 10.1075/pc.21027.bee
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.21027.bee [Google Scholar]
  3. Borreguero Zuloaga, M., & Thörle, B.
    (2016) Discourse markers in second language acquisition: Studies on Italian and French as L2. Language, Interaction and Acquisition, (), –. 10.1075/lia.7.1.001in
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lia.7.1.001in [Google Scholar]
  4. Buysse, L.
    (2017) The pragmatic marker you know in learner Englishes. Journal of Pragmatics, , –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2017.09.010
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.09.010 [Google Scholar]
  5. Clayman, S. E., & Raymond, C. W.
    (2021) An adjunct to repair: You know in speech production and understanding difficulties. Research on Language and Social Interaction, (), –. 10.1080/08351813.2020.1864157
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2020.1864157 [Google Scholar]
  6. Debras, C.
    (2021) Multimodal profiles of je (ne) sais pas in spoken French. Journal of Pragmatics, , –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.05.018
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.05.018 [Google Scholar]
  7. Détrie, C.
    (2012) Le rôle de la spectacularisation du savoir dans l’interlocution : Les contours interpersonnels et les types d’intersubjectivité engagés par la particule tu sais/vous savez. InC. Douay & D. Roulland (Eds.), L’interlocution comme paramètre (pp.–). Rivages linguistiques (Presses Universitaires de Rennes).
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Donaire, M. L.
    (2016) Le savoir partagé comme source d’énonciation : Les marqueurs je sais, tu sais, vous savez. Scolia. Revue de linguistique, , –. 10.4000/scolia.484
     https://doi.org/10.4000/scolia.484 [Google Scholar]
  9. Dostie, G.
    (2004) Pragmaticalisation et marqueurs discursifs : analyse sémantique et traitement lexicographique (1ère édition.). De Boeck Supérieur. 10.3917/dbu.dosti.2004.01
     https://doi.org/10.3917/dbu.dosti.2004.01 [Google Scholar]
  10. Dostie, G., & De Sève, S.
    (1999) Du savoir à la collaboration. Étude pragma-sémantique et traitement lexicographique de t’sais. Revue de sémantique et pragmatique, , –.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Erman, B.
    (2001) Pragmatic markers revisited with a focus on you know in adult and adolescent talk. Journal of Pragmatics, (), –. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(00)00066‑7
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(00)00066-7 [Google Scholar]
  12. Eskildsen, S. W.
    (2011) The L2 inventory in action: Usage-based linguistics and conversation analysis in second language acquisition. InG. Pallotti & J. Wagner (Eds.), Learning as social practice: Conversation-analytic perspectives (pp.–). National Foreign Language Resource Center.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Eskildsen, S. W., & Pekarek Doehler, S.
    (Eds.) (2022) Emergent L2 grammar-for-interaction: Toward an interactional usage-based SLA. The Modern Language Journal, ().
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Fant, L., & Hancock, V.
    (2015) Marqueurs discursifs connectifs chez des locuteurs de L2 très avancés : le cas de alors et donc en français et de entonces en espagnol. InM. Borreguero Zuloaga & S. Gómez-Jordana Ferary (Eds.), Marqueurs du discours dans les langues romanes: une approche contrastive (pp.–). Lambert Lucas.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Fielder, S.
    (2020) Tu sais (‘you know’) and t’sais (‘y’know’) in spoken French. Travaux neuchâtelois de linguistique, , –. 10.26034/tranel.2020.2890
     https://doi.org/10.26034/tranel.2020.2890 [Google Scholar]
  16. Forsberg, F.
    (2008) Le langage préfabriqué : Formes, fonctions et fréquences en français parlé L2 et L1 (Vol.). Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Fox Tree, J. E., & Schrock, J. C.
    (2002) Basic meanings of you know and I mean. Journal of Pragmatics, (), –. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)00027‑9
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00027-9 [Google Scholar]
  18. Garfinkel, H.
    (1967) Studies in ethnomethodology. Polity Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Goffman E.
    (1981) Forms of talk. University of Pennsylvania Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Goodwin, M. H., & Goodwin, C.
    (1986) Gesture and coparticipation in the activity of searching for a word. Semiotica, , –.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Guillot, M. N.
    (2012) Conversational management and pragmatic discrimination in foreign talk: Overlap in advanced L2 French. Intercultural Pragmatics, (), –. 10.1515/ip‑2012‑0019
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2012-0019 [Google Scholar]
  22. Hancock, V.
    (1997) Parce que : un connecteur macro-syntaxique. L’emploi de parce que chez des apprenants de français langue étrangère et des locuteurs natifs. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Étrangère, , –. 10.4000/aile.731
     https://doi.org/10.4000/aile.731 [Google Scholar]
  23. (2000) Quelques connecteurs et modalisateurs dans le français parlé d’apprenants avancés. Étude comparative entre suédophones et locuteurs natifs.Thèse de doctorat, Université de Stockholm.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Heritage, J.
    (1984) A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. InM. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in Conversation Analysis (pp.–). Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. House, J.
    (2009) Subjectivity in English as Lingua Franca discourse: The case of you know. Intercultural Pragmatics, , –. 10.1515/IPRG.2009.010
     https://doi.org/10.1515/IPRG.2009.010 [Google Scholar]
  26. (2013) Developing pragmatic competence in English as a lingua franca: Using discourse markers to express (inter)subjectivity and connectivity. Journal of Pragmatics, , –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.03.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.03.001 [Google Scholar]
  27. Jefferson, G.
    (2004) Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. InG. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation Analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp.–). John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.125.02jef
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef [Google Scholar]
  28. Juillet, M.
    (2024) L’emploi de parce que micro-syntaxique en français L2 : une étude interactionnelle et multimodale. SHS Web of Conferences, . EDP Sciences. 10.1051/shsconf/202419101008
     https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202419101008 [Google Scholar]
  29. Kasper, G. & Wagner, J.
    (2011) A conversation-analytic approach to second language acquisition. InD. Atkinson (Ed.), Alternative approaches to Second Language Acquisition (pp.–). Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Keevallik, L.
    (2018) What does embodied interaction tell us about grammar?Research on Language and Social Interaction, (), –. 10.1080/08351813.2018.1413887
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2018.1413887 [Google Scholar]
  31. Kendon, A.
    (2004) Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511807572
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807572 [Google Scholar]
  32. Kowalczuk, T.
    (2024) L’emploi de tu sais par des apprenants de français L2. Bulletin VALS-ASLA, , –.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Leinonen, I.
    (2022) Multimodal try-marking for securing recipient understanding of codeswitched lexical items in everyday ELF conversations. Social Interaction. Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality, (), –. 10.7146/si.v5i2.124481
     https://doi.org/10.7146/si.v5i2.124481 [Google Scholar]
  34. Mondada, L.
    (2014) The local constitution of multimodal resources for social interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, , –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.04.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.04.004 [Google Scholar]
  35. (2018) Multiple temporalities of language and body in interaction: Challenges for transcribing multimodality. Research on Language and Social Interaction, (), –. 10.1080/08351813.2018.1413878
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2018.1413878 [Google Scholar]
  36. Östman, J. O.
    (1981) You know. John Benjamins. 10.1075/pb.ii.7
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pb.ii.7 [Google Scholar]
  37. Pekarek Doehler, S.
    (2018) Elaborations on L2 interactional competence: The development of L2 grammar-for-interaction. Classroom Discourse, (), –. 10.1080/19463014.2018.1437759
     https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2018.1437759 [Google Scholar]
  38. (2024) How grammar-for-interaction emerges over time: Evidence from second language talk. InM. Selting & D. Barth-Weingarten (Eds.), New perspectives in interactional linguistic research (pp.–). John Benjamins. 10.1075/slsi.36.12pek
     https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.36.12pek [Google Scholar]
  39. Pekarek Doehler, S., & Skogmyr Marian, K.
    (2022) Functional diversification and progressive routinization of a multiword expression in and for social interaction: A longitudinal L2 study. The Modern Language Journal, (), –. 10.1111/modl.12758
     https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12758 [Google Scholar]
  40. Pekarek Doehler, S., & Thörle, B.
    (2024) Discourse markers and second language acquisition. InM.-B. Mosegaard Hansen & J. Visconti (Eds.), Manual of discourse markers in Romance (pp.–). De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110711202‑013
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110711202-013 [Google Scholar]
  41. Pellet, S. H.
    (2006) The development of competence in French interlanguage pragmatics: The case of the discourse marker ‘donc’. Thèse de doctorat, Université du Texas.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Rossano, F.
    (2012) Gaze behavior in face-to-face interaction.Thèse de doctorat, Radboud University Nijmegen.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G.
    (1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, (), –. 10.1353/lan.1974.0010
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010 [Google Scholar]
  44. Sacks, H., & Schegloff, E. A.
    (1979) Two preferences in the organization of reference to persons in conversation and their interaction. InG. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp.–). Irvington.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H.
    (1977) The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, (), –. 10.1353/lan.1977.0041
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1977.0041 [Google Scholar]
  46. Schiffrin, D.
    (1987) Discourse markers. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511611841
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611841 [Google Scholar]
  47. Schirm, S.
    (2024) From doing work on your own talk to doing work on others’ talk: The longitudinal development of also ‘so’ in L2 German. Interactional Linguistics(), –. 10.1075/il.23008.sch
     https://doi.org/10.1075/il.23008.sch [Google Scholar]
  48. Skogmyr Marian, K.
    (2022) The development of L2 interactional competence: A multimodal study of complaining in French interactions. Routledge. 10.4324/9781003271215
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003271215 [Google Scholar]
  49. (2024) Longitudinal change in linguistic resources for interaction: The case of tu vois (‘you see’) in L2 French. Interactional Linguistics, (), –. 10.1075/il.23001.sko
     https://doi.org/10.1075/il.23001.sko [Google Scholar]
  50. Skogmyr Marian, K., & Balaman, U.
    (2018) Second language interactional competence and its development: An overview of conversation analytic research on interactional change over time. Language and Linguistics Compass, (), –. 10.1111/lnc3.12285
     https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12285 [Google Scholar]
  51. Stenström, A. -B.
    (1990) Pauses in monologue and dialogue. InJ. Svartvik (Ed.), The London-Lund Corpus of spoken English: Description and research (pp.–). Lund University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. (1994) An introduction to spoken interaction. Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Theodórsdóttir, G., & Eskildsen, S. W.
    (2022) Accumulating semiotic resources for social actions: A case study of L2 Icelandic in the wild. The Modern Language Journal, (), –. 10.1111/modl.12752
     https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12752 [Google Scholar]
  54. Thörle, B.
    (2020) « Et le chien aussi i’regarde » Particule additive aussi et structure informationnelle en français L2. Language, Interaction and Acquisition, (), –. 10.1075/lia.19006.tho
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lia.19006.tho [Google Scholar]
  55. Tutin, A.
    (2019) Phrases préfabriquées des interactions : Quelques observations sur le corpus CLAPI. Cahiers de lexicologie, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Vincent, D.
    (1993) Les ponctuants de la langue et autres mots du discours. Nuit Blanche.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Xue, W., & Lei, L.
    (2016) Functions of you know and I mean in academic seminar discussions by ELF speakers. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1515/cjal‑2016‑0019
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cjal-2016-0019 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/lia.24025.jui
Loading
L’expression tu sais dans la gestion de problèmes lexicaux en français langue seconde
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/lia.24025.jui
/content/journals/10.1075/lia.24025.jui
/content/journals/10.1075/lia.24025.jui
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: acquisition des langues ; tu sais ‘you know’ ; tu sais ; conversation analysis ; analyse conversationnelle ; multimodalité. ; second language acquisition ; longitudinal ; multimodality

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error