1887
image of The complementary contributions of oral and written modalities to the development of verbal
morphology
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

In this study, we longitudinally investigate the use of verbal and morphological means to narrate past and present events. We compare oral and written personal narratives from two Syrian learners of L2 French (one beginner and one intermediate) across three data collection points over seven months. By analysing all verbal constructions in relation to the context of occurrence (past or non-past), we examine their constituents and the evolution of form-function mappings over time. Our results show that the written production, particularly in the beginner learner, reveals the production of a wider range of morphological choices and tense distinctions compared to oral production. By highlighting the use of verbal strategies in both the oral and written modalities, this study underscores the complementary contributions of each mode to the gradual mastery of French verbal morphology.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lia.24027.sad
2026-02-17
2026-03-06
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ågren, M.
    (2013) The impact of spoken French on the acquisition of written French in child L2 learners. The Journal of Language Teaching and Learning, , –.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Al-Balushi, R.
    (2019) Subject licensing in non-verbal clauses in Arabic. Brill’s Journal of Afroasiatic Languages and Linguistics, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Al-Asbahy, M. A., & Aleemuddin, S.
    (2016) Tenses in Arabic Language. Global Journal for Research Analysis, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Al-Horais, N.
    (2006) Arabic verbless sentences: Is there a null VP?Pragmalingüística, , –. 10.25267/Pragmalinguistica.2006.i14.07
    https://doi.org/10.25267/Pragmalinguistica.2006.i14.07 [Google Scholar]
  5. Alotaibi, A. S.
    (2017) The copula in Arabic: Description and analysis. PhD Thesis. University of Essex.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. AlShahrani, A.
    (2018) The acquisition of past temporality by two ESL learners at different levels of proficiency. Studies in Literature and Language, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bamhamed, M.
    (2000) Traitement en temps réel des énoncés complexes: Étude comparative interlangues (arabe / français). Presses universitaires du Septentrion.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bardovi-Harlig, K.
    (1999) From morpheme studies to temporal semantics: Tense-aspect research in SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, , –. 10.1017/S0272263199003010
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263199003010 [Google Scholar]
  9. Bartning, I.
    (1997) L’apprenant dit avancé et son acquisition d’une langue étrangère: Tour d’horizon et esquisse d’une caractérisation de la variété avancée. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Étrangère, , –. 10.4000/aile.1316
    https://doi.org/10.4000/aile.1316 [Google Scholar]
  10. Bartning, I., & Schlyter, S.
    (2004) Itinéraires acquisitionnels et stades de développement en français L2. French Language Studies, , –. 10.1017/S0959269504001802
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959269504001802 [Google Scholar]
  11. Benazzo, S., Dimroth, C., & Andorno, C.
    (2023) Back to the Basic Variety: Does it emerge only with specific learner profiles, environments and languages?InC. Granget, I. Repiso, & G. Fon Sing (Eds), Language, creoles, varieties: From emergence to transmission (pp.–). Language Science Press [online: https://langsci-press.org/catalog/book/409]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Benazzo, S., & Starren, M.
    (2007) L’émergence de moyens grammaticaux pour exprimer les relations temporelles en L2. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Etrangère, , –. 10.4000/aile.2513
    https://doi.org/10.4000/aile.2513 [Google Scholar]
  13. Bhardwaj, M., Dietrich, R., & Noyau, C.
    (Eds.) (1988) Second Language Acquisition by Adult Immigrants: Temporality. European Science Foundation.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Bley-Vroman, R.
    (1983) The comparative fallacy in interlanguage studies: The case of systematicity. Language Learning, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Bonami, O.
    (2014) La structure fine des paradigmes de flexion [Accreditation to Supervise Research (HDR), Tome I, Université Paris Diderot].
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Boneh, N.
    (2003) La représentation syntaxique du temps: Le cas de l’hébreu moderne, de l’arabe standard et dialectal. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Université Paris. [https://theses.fr/2003PA082213]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Brown, J. S., McDonald, J. L., Brown, T. L., & Carr, T. H.
    (1988) Adapting to processing demands in discourse production: The case of handwriting. Journal of Experimental Psychology, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Brustad, K. E.
    (2000) The Syntax of Spoken Arabic: A Comparative Study of Moroccan, Egyptian, Syrian, and Kuwaiti Dialects. Georgetown University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Cowell, M. W.
    (1964) A reference grammar of Syrian Arabic. Georgetown University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. De Blasio, E.
    (2022) A preliminary study on the verbal system of the syrian dialect of ṭarṭūs. Annali Di Ca’ Foscari. Serie Orientale, (), –. 10.30687/AnnOr/2385‑3042/2022/01/007
    https://doi.org/10.30687/AnnOr/2385-3042/2022/01/007 [Google Scholar]
  21. Dietrich, R., Klein, W., & Noyau, C.
    (Eds) (1995) The acquisition of temporality in a second language. John Benjamins. 10.1075/sibil.7
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.7 [Google Scholar]
  22. El Hadari, T.
    (2022) The acquisition of the English temporal system: A developmental perspective. Journal of Language Teaching, (), –. 10.54475/jlt.2022.009
    https://doi.org/10.54475/jlt.2022.009 [Google Scholar]
  23. Fayol, M.
    (2024) L’acquisition de l’écrit. Presses Universitaires de France.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Giacomi, A., Stoffel, H., & Véronique, G. D.
    (Eds) (2000) Appropriation du français par des marocains arabophones à Marseille. Publications de l’Université de Provence.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Gilabert, R., Manchón, R., & Vasylets, O.
    (2016) Mode in theoretical and empirical TBLT research: Advancing research agendas. Annual Review of Applied Lingistics, , –. 10.1017/S0267190515000112
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190515000112 [Google Scholar]
  26. Granfeldt, J.
    (2008) Speaking and writing in L2 French: Exploring effects on fluency, complexity and accuracy. InS. Van Daele, A. Housen, M. Pierrard, I. Vedder, & F. Kuiken (Eds), Complexity, accuracy and fluency in second language use, learning and teaching (pp.–). University of Brussels.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Granget, C.
    (2017) Variabilité des formes verbales en français L2: Une question d’alphabétisation?Bulletin Suisse de Linguistique Appliquée, , –.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. (2019) Le sens des constructions verbales auxiliées [Accreditation to Supervise Research (HDR), University of Toulouse Jean Jaurès]. [ https://hal.science/tel-04925748v1/document]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Granget, C., & Saddour, I.
    (2024) Il faut dire oui dans la classe mais ouais dans la rue: Vers une appropriation critique de la variété hégémonique. InC. Bruley & L. Cadet (Eds), Enseigner en contexte migratoire. Enjeux et pratiques de classe (pp.–). Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Gunnarsson-Largy, C.
    (2022) La production écrite en français L2: Focus sur le processus de formulation [Accreditation to Supervise Research (HDR), Université de Toulouse Jean Jaurès]. https://hal.science/tel-03640707v1/document
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Hallman, P.
    (2015) The Arabic imperfective. Brill’s Journal of Afroasiatic Languages and Linguistics, , –. 10.1163/18776930‑00701004
    https://doi.org/10.1163/18776930-00701004 [Google Scholar]
  32. (2017) Participles in Syrian Arabic. InH. Ouali (Ed.), Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics XXIX: Papers from the Annual Symposium on Arabic Linguistics, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 2015 (pp.–). John Benjamins. 10.1075/sal.5.07hal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sal.5.07hal [Google Scholar]
  33. Harsch, C.
    (2017) Proficiency. ELT Journal, (), –. 10.1093/elt/ccw067
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccw067 [Google Scholar]
  34. Hazout, I.
    (2010) Verbless sentences and clause structure. Linguistic Inquiry, (), –. 10.1162/LING_a_00005
    https://doi.org/10.1162/LING_a_00005 [Google Scholar]
  35. Herschensohn, J.
    (2001) Missing inflection in second language French: Accidental infinitives and other verbal deficits. Second Language Research, (), –. 10.1177/026765830101700303
    https://doi.org/10.1177/026765830101700303 [Google Scholar]
  36. Holes, C.
    (2004) Modern Arabic: Structures, functions, and varieties. Georgetown University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Howard, M.
    (2002) Les interrelations entre les facteurs contextuels et l’emploi des temps du passé: Une étude d’apprenants avancés du français. Revue Française de Linguistique Appliquée, (), –. 10.3917/rfla.072.0039
    https://doi.org/10.3917/rfla.072.0039 [Google Scholar]
  38. (Ed.) (2021) The acquisition of French as a second language (Vol.). MDPI.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Izquierdo, J., & Kihlstedt, M.
    (2019) L2 imperfective functions with verb types in written narratives: A cross–sectional study with instructed hispanophone learners of French. The Modern Language Journal, (), –. 10.1111/modl.12539
    https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12539 [Google Scholar]
  40. Kihlstedt, M.
    (2002) L’emploi de l’imparfait en français par des locuteurs suédophones et des locuteurs natifs. Revue Française de Linguistique Appliquée, (), –. 10.3917/rfla.072.0007
    https://doi.org/10.3917/rfla.072.0007 [Google Scholar]
  41. Kihm, A.
    (2024) Le français parlé: Esquisse de morphologie flexionnelle. Editions Thierry Marchaisse.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Klein, W.
    (1994) Time in language. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Klein, W., Dietrich, R., & Noyau, C.
    (1993) The acquisition of temporality. InC. Perdue (Ed.), Adult language acquisition: Cross linguistic perspectives (Vol., pp.–). Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Klein, W., & Perdue, C.
    (1997) The basic variety (or: Couldn’t languages be much simpler?). Second Language Research, (), –. 10.1191/026765897666879396
    https://doi.org/10.1191/026765897666879396 [Google Scholar]
  45. Kramsch, C., & Vork Steffensen, S.
    (2008) Ecological perspectives on second language acquisition and socialization. InN. H. Hornberger (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and education (pp.–). Springer. 10.1007/978‑0‑387‑30424‑3_194
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-30424-3_194 [Google Scholar]
  46. Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I.
    (2011) Task complexity and linguistic performance in L2 writing and speaking: The effect of mode. InP. Robinson (Ed.), Second language task complexity: Researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp.–). John Benjamins. 10.1075/tblt.2.09ch4
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.2.09ch4 [Google Scholar]
  47. Kurvers, J., Stockmann, W., & Dalderop, K.
    (2015) Learning apart together: Student profiles in adult literacy classes in the Netherlands. LESLLA Symposium Proceedings, (), –. 10.5281/ZENODO.8022474
    https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.8022474 [Google Scholar]
  48. Labeau, E.
    (2002) The acquisition of French past tenses by tutored anglophone advanced learners: Is aspect enough? PhD Thesis, Aston University. https://publications.aston.ac.uk/id/eprint/14846/?utm_source=chatgpt.com
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Leclercq, P.
    (2020) Transcribing interlanguage: The case of verb-final [e] in L2 French. InA. Edmonds, P. Leclercq & A. Gudmestad (Eds), Interpreting language-learning data (pp.–). Language Science Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. MacWhinney, B.
    (2000) The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk (3rd edition). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Michot, M. -E., & Pierrard, M.
    (2016) L’appariement forme-fonction en FL2: Le développement de l’emploi des formes verbales du passé et la primauté du marquage de l’aspect. SHS Web of Conferences, . 10.1051/shsconf/20162710008
    https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20162710008 [Google Scholar]
  52. Norton, B.
    (2013) Identity and language learning: Extending the conversation. Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Noyau, C.
    (1990) The development of means for temporality in the guided acquisition of L2: Cross-linguistic perspectives. InHans. W. Dechert (Ed.), Current Trends in European Second Language Acquisition Perspectives (pp.–). Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. (1997) Processus de grammaticalisation dans l’acquisition de langues étrangères: La morphologie temporelle. InC. Martinot (Ed.), L’acquisition de la syntaxe (pp.–). Annales Littéraires de l’Université de Franche-Comté.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. (1998) Le développement de la temporalité dans le récit: Processus de morphologisation et construction du texte. Studi Italiani di Linguistica Teorica e Applicata, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Noyau, C., El Tayeb, H., Vasseur, M. -T., & Véronique, G. D.
    (1995) The acquisition of French. InR. Dietrich, W. Klein, & C. Noyau (Eds), The acquisition of temporality in a second language (pp.–). John Benjamins. 10.1075/sibil.7.07noy
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.7.07noy [Google Scholar]
  57. Oller, J. W.
    (1983) A consensus for the eighties?InJ. W. Oller (Ed.), Issues in Language Testing Research (pp.–). Newbury House.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Palmer, A. S., & Bachman, L. F.
    (1981) Basic concerns in test validation. InELT Documents 111—Issues in Language Testing (pp.–). British Council.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Pedersen, T.
    (1996) Fishing for exactness. Proceedings of the South-Central SAS Users Group Conference (SCSUG-96). The South-Central SAS Users Group Conference, Austin. 10.48550/arXiv.cmp‑lg/9608010
    https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.cmp-lg/9608010 [Google Scholar]
  60. Perdue, C.
    (Ed.) (1993a) Adult language acquisition: Cross-linguistic perspectives. Vol. I: Field methods. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. (Ed.) (1993b) Adult language acquisition: Cross-linguistic perspectives. Vol. II: The results. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Perdue, C., & Klein, W.
    (1992) Why does the production of some learners not grammaticalize? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, , –. 10.1017/S0272263100011116
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100011116 [Google Scholar]
  63. Polio, C.
    (2012) The relevance of second language acquisition theory to the written error correction debate. Journal of Second Language Writing, , –.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. (2017) Second language writing development: A research agenda. Language Teaching, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. R Core Team
    R Core Team (2024) R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version Version 2024.04.2+764) [Computer software]. RStudio, PBC. https://www.rstudio.com/
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Santens, S., Verroens, F., & Hadermann, P.
    (2022) L’acquisition de la morphologie verbale française par des apprenants néerlandophones à l’oral et à l’écrit. Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française — CMLF 2022, . 10.1051/shsconf/202213806013
    https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202213806013 [Google Scholar]
  67. Schimke, S.
    (2013) Dummy verbs and the acquisition of verb raising in L2 German and French. InE. Blom, I. van de Craats & J. Verhagen (Eds), Dummy auxiliaries in first and second language acquisition (pp.–). De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9781614513476.307
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614513476.307 [Google Scholar]
  68. Serrano, R., Tragant, E., & Llanes, À.
    (2012) A longitudinal analysis of the effects of one year abroad. The Canadian Modern Language Review, (), –. 10.3138/cmlr.68.2.138
    https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.68.2.138 [Google Scholar]
  69. Son, M.
    (2024) L2 language development in oral and written modalities. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, (), –. 10.1017/S0272263124000329
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263124000329 [Google Scholar]
  70. Starren, M.
    (2001) The second time: The acquisition of temporality in Dutch and French as a second language. LOT.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Thomas, A.
    (2017) Le développement des formes dans les contextes de l’infinitif par des apprenants suédophones du français L2. Bulletin Suisse de Linguistique Appliquée, , –.
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Trévisiol, P.
    (2012) The development of reference to time and space in French L3: Evidence from narratives. InM. Watorek, S. Benazzo, & M. Hickmann (Eds.), Comparative perspectives on language acquisition: A tribute to Clive Perdue (pp.–). Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  73. van de Craats, I., Kurvers, J., & Young-Scholten, M.
    (2006) Research on low-educated second language and literacy acquisition. InR. van Hout (Ed.), Low-educated second language and literacy acquisition (LESLLA): Proceedings of the inaugural symposium (Vol., pp.–). LOT Occasional Series.
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Véronique, G. D.
    (2017) Vers l’énoncé complexe en français langue étrangère: Quelques voies de développement. InP. Hadermann & D. Van Raemdonck (Eds.), ComplexitéS (pp.–). Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Véronique, G. D.
    (2000a) La temporalité. InA. Giacomi, H. Stoffel & G. D. Véronique (Eds), Appropriation du français par des marocains arabophones à Marseille: Bilan d’une recherche (pp.–). Publications de l’Université de Provence.
    [Google Scholar]
  76. (2000b) Observations préliminaires sur li dans l’interlangue d’Abdelmalek. InA. Giacomi, H. Stoffel & G. D. Véronique (Eds), Appropriation du français par des marocains arabophones à Marseille: Bilan d’une recherche (pp.–). Publications de l’Université de Provence.
    [Google Scholar]
  77. (2021) L’acquisition de la langue du pays de travail par des populations de migrants. InP. Leclercq, A. Edmonds & E. Sneed German (Eds), Introduction à l’acquisition des langues étrangères (pp.–). De Boeck Supérieur. 10.3917/dbu.lecle.2021.01.0389
    https://doi.org/10.3917/dbu.lecle.2021.01.0389 [Google Scholar]
  78. Wandeweerd, N., Housen, A., & Paquot, M.
    (2023) Comparing the longitudinal development of phraseological complexity across oral and written tasks. Studies in Second Language Acquisition and Teaching, , –. 10.1017/S0272263122000389
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263122000389 [Google Scholar]
  79. Zalbidea, J.
    (2017) ‘One task fits all’? The roles of task complexity, modality, and working memory capacity in L2 performance. The Modern Language Journal, (), –. 10.1111/modl.12389
    https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12389 [Google Scholar]
  80. (2021) On the scope of output in SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, , –. 10.1017/S0272263120000261
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263120000261 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/lia.24027.sad
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/lia.24027.sad
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error