1887
Volume 7, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1879-7865
  • E-ISSN: 1879-7873
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

English, an international language, is widely taught and learnt as a foreign language in France. However, French learners face pronunciation difficulties, as the two languages differ both on the segmental level (i.e. individual sounds) and on the suprasegmental, prosodic level (i.e. stress, rhythm, intonation). It has been argued that focus on the prosodic features of the target language (L2) would improve learners’ oral skills. Nevertheless, very few studies have brought evidence of the greater role of prosody in the acquisition of a second or foreign language. The current study seeks to address this gap by directly comparing prosody-centred and segment-centred teaching to determine whether one approach is more effective than the other in the improvement of L2 oral perception skills. The study shows that both teaching approaches enabled French EFL learners to improve their perception skills; however, neither method proved to have a stronger impact, suggesting that both segmental and suprasegmental aspects should both be addressed in L2 teaching.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lia.7.2.03cap
2017-02-13
2019-12-05
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abercrombie, D
    (1967) Elements of general phonetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Akita, M
    (2005) The effectiveness of a prosody-oriented approach in L2 perception and pronunciation training. Gakujyutsu Kenkyuu, 53, 1–22.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Alazard, C. , Astésano, C. , Billières, M. , & Espesser, R
    (2011) Rôle de la prosodie dans la structuration du discours—Proposition d'une méthodologie d'enseignement de l'oral vers l'écrit en français langue étrangère. In H.-Y. Yoo & E. Delais-Roussarie (Eds.), Actes d'IDP 2009 (pp.49–61). Paris.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Anderson-Hsieh, J. , Johnson, R. , & Koehler, K
    (1992) The relationship between native speaker judgements of non-native pronunciation and deviance in segmentals, prosody, and syllable structure. Language Learning, 42(4), 529–555. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1992.tb01043.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1992.tb01043.x [Google Scholar]
  5. Brown, A
    (1988) Functional load and the teaching of pronunciation. TESOL Quarterly22(4), 593–606. doi: 10.2307/3587258
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3587258 [Google Scholar]
  6. Burgess, J. , & Spencer, S
    (2000) Phonology and pronunciation in integrated language teaching and teacher education. System, 28, 191–215. doi: 10.1016/S0346‑251X(00)00007‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(00)00007-5 [Google Scholar]
  7. Cruttenden, A
    (2008) Gimson's pronunciation of English (7th ed.). London: Hodder Education.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Derwing, T.M. , & Munro, M.J
    (2005) Second language accent and pronunciation teaching: A research-based approach. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 379–397. doi: 10.2307/3588486
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3588486 [Google Scholar]
  9. Derwing, T.M. , Munro, M.J. , & Wiebe, G
    (1998) Evidence in favor of a broad framework for pronunciation instruction. Language Learning, 48(3), 393–410. doi: 10.1111/0023‑8333.00047
    https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00047 [Google Scholar]
  10. Derwing, T.M. , & Rossiter, M.J
    (2003) The effects of pronunciation instruction on the accuracy, fluency, and complexity of L2-accented speech. Applied Language Learning, 13, 1–18.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Firth, S
    (1992) Pronunciation syllabus design: A question of focus. In P. Avery & S. Ehrlich (Eds.), Teaching American English pronunciation (pp. 173–183). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Flege, J.E
    (1987) The production of new and similar phones in a foreign language: Evidence for the effect of equivalence classification. Journal of Phonetics, 15, 47–65.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Fraser, H
    (2001) Teaching pronunciation – A handbook for teachers and trainers. Sydney: TAFE Access Division.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Frodden, C. , & McNulty, M
    (1996) A new look at suprasegmentals. Íkala, 1(1-2), 101–116.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Gilbert, J.B
    (1984) Clear speech: Pronunciation and listening comprehension in American English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Gray, M
    (2001) Place et rôle de l'intonation dans l'apprentissage de l'anglais. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Université Paris XII – Val de Marne, France.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Hahn, L.D
    (2004) Primary stress and intelligibility: Research to motivate the teaching of suprasegmentals. TESOL Quarterly, 38(2), 201–223. doi: 10.2307/3588378
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3588378 [Google Scholar]
  18. Halliday, M.A.K
    (1967) Intonation and grammar in British English. The Hague: Mouton. doi: 10.1515/9783111357447
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111357447 [Google Scholar]
  19. Herry-Bénit, N
    (2011) Didactique de la phonétique anglaise. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Hirst, D. , Di Cristo, A. , & Espesser, R
    (2000) Levels of representation and levels of analysis for the description of intonation systems. In M. Horne (Ed.), Prosody: Theory and experiment (pp.51–87). Dordrecht: Kluwer. doi: 10.1007/978‑94‑015‑9413‑4_4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9413-4_4 [Google Scholar]
  21. Horgues, C
    (2010) Prosodie de l'accent français en anglais et perception par des auditeurs anglophones. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Université Paris-Diderot Paris 7.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Jilka, M
    (2000) The contribution of intonation to the perception of foreign accent. Unpublished PhD dissertation. University of Stuttgart.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Kamiyama, T. , & Shinohara, S
    (2010) Role of prosody in segmental perception in L2. Sophia University Working Papers in Phonetics2010, 10–18.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Kjellin, O
    (1999) Accent addition: Prosody and perception facilitate second language acquisition. In O. Fujimura , B.D. Joseph , & B. Palek (Eds.), Proceedings of LP'98 (Linguistics and Phonetics Conference) at Ohio State University 2 (373–398). Prague: The Karolinum Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Lepage, A. , & Busa, M.G
    (2014) Intelligibility of English L2: The effects of incorrect word stress placement and incorrect vowel reduction in the speech of French and Italian learners of English. Concordia Working Papers in Applied Linguistics, 5, 387–400.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Missaglia, F
    (1999) Contrastive prosody in SLA – An empirical study with adult Italian learners of German. Proceedings of the 14 th Congress of Phonetic Sciences , 1, 551–554.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Moyer, A
    (2007) Empirical considerations on the age factor in L2 phonology. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 15(2), 109–127.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Pike, K
    (1945) The intonation of American English. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Querleu, D. , Renard, X. , Versyp, F. , Paris-Delrue, L. , & Crèpin, G
    (1988) Fetal hearing. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproduction Biology, 29, 191–212. doi: 10.1016/0028‑2243(88)90030‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-2243(88)90030-5 [Google Scholar]
  30. Reed, M
    (2012) Pronunciation tools for fostering intelligibility and communication success. ATESOL ACT Professional Development Workshop , Canberra, Australia.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Roach, P
    (2009) English phonetics and phonology – A practical course (4th ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Tajima, K. , Port, R. , & Dalby, J
    (1997) Effects of temporal correction on intelligibility of foreign-accented English. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 1–24. doi: 10.1006/jpho.1996.0031
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1996.0031 [Google Scholar]
  33. Thomson, R.I. , & Derwing, T.M
    (2014) The effectiveness of L2 pronunciation instruction: A narrative review. Applied Linguistics, Advanced online access. doi: 10.1093/applin/amu076
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu076 [Google Scholar]
  34. Ueno, N
    (1998) Teaching English pronunciation to Japanese English majors: A comparison of a suprasegmental-oriented and a segmental-oriented teaching approach. JACET Bulletin29, 207–225.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Vaissière, J
    (2002) Cross-linguistic prosodic transcription: French versus English. In N.B. Volskaya , N.D. Svetozarova , & P.A. Skrelin (Eds.), Problems and methods in experimental phonetics. In honour of the 70 th anniversary of Prof. L.V. Bondarko (pp.147–164). St Petersburg: St Petersburg State University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Vallduví, E
    (1991) The informational component. New York, NY: Garland.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Yates, K
    (2003) Teaching linguistic mimicry to improve second language pronunciation. Unpublished MA dissertation, University of North Texas, Denton.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/lia.7.2.03cap
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): English as a foreign language (EFL) , French learners , L2 perception. , prosody and segments

Most Cited This Month

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error