Volume 8, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1879-7865
  • E-ISSN: 1879-7873
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes


Gesture can illustrate objects and events in the world by iconically reproducing elements of those objects and events. Children do not begin to express ideas iconically, however, until after they have begun to use conventional forms. In this paper, we investigate how children’s use of iconic resources in gesture relates to the developing structure of their communicative systems. Using longitudinal video corpora, we compare the emergence of manual iconicity in hearing children who are learning a spoken language (co-speech gesture) to the emergence of manual iconicity in a deaf child who is creating a manual system of communication (homesign). We focus on one particular element of iconic gesture – the shape of the hand (handshape). We ask how handshape is used as an iconic resource in 1–5-year-olds, and how it relates to the semantic content of children’s communicative acts. We find that patterns of handshape development are broadly similar between co-speech gesture and homesign, suggesting that the building blocks underlying children's ability to iconically map manual forms to meaning are shared across different communicative systems: those where gesture is produced alongside speech, and those where gesture is the primary mode of communication.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Acredolo, L. P. , & Goodwyn, S. W.
    (1985) Symbolic gesturing in language development. Human Development28(1), 40–49. doi: 10.1159/000272934
    https://doi.org/10.1159/000272934 [Google Scholar]
  2. (1988) Symbolic gesturing in normal infants. Child Development59, 450–466. doi: 10.2307/1130324
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1130324 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bates, E.
    (1976) Language and context: The acquisition of pragmatics. New York, NY: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bates, E. , Benigni, L. , Bretherton, I. , Camaioni, L. , & Volterra, V.
    (1979) The emergence of symbols: Cognition and communication in infancy. New York, NY: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Benedicto, E. , & Brentari, D.
    (2004) Where did all the arguments go? Argument-changing properties of classifiers in ASL. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory22(4), 743–810. doi: 10.1007/s11049‑003‑4698‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-003-4698-2 [Google Scholar]
  6. Boyatzis, C. J. , & Watson, M. W.
    (1993) Preschool children's symbolic representation of objects through gestures. Child Development64(3), 729–735. doi: 10.2307/1131214
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1131214 [Google Scholar]
  7. Brentari, D. , DiRenzo, A. , Keane, J. , & Volterra, V.
    (2015) Cognitive, Cultural, and Linguistic Sources of a Handshape Distinction Expressing Agentivity. Topics in Cognitive Science7, 95–123. doi: 10.1111/tops.12123
    https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12123 [Google Scholar]
  8. Butcher, C. , Mylander, C. , & Goldin-Meadow, S.
    (1991) Displaced communication in a self-styled gesture system: Pointing at the non-present. Cognitive Development6, 315–342. doi: 10.1016/0885‑2014(91)90042‑C
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0885-2014(91)90042-C [Google Scholar]
  9. Calbris, G.
    (2011) Elements of meaning in gesture (Vol.5). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/gs.5
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.5 [Google Scholar]
  10. Capirci, O. , Contaldo, A. , Caselli, M. C. , & Volterra, V.
    (2005) From action to language through gesture: A longitudinal perspective. Gesture5(1–1), 155–177. doi: 10.1075/gest.5.1‑2.12cap
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.5.1-2.12cap [Google Scholar]
  11. Cartmill, E. A. , Demir, O. E. , & Goldin-Meadow, S.
    (2011) Studying gesture. In E. Hoff (Ed.), The guide to research methods in child language (pp.208–225). West Sussex, England: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Cartmill, E. A. , Novack, M. , Loftus, W. , Goldin-Meadow, S.
    (in preparation) Tracing the development of gesture: Does iconic gesture become more abstract over time?
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Caselli, M. C. , Rinaldi, P. , Stefanini, S. , & Volterra, V.
    (2012) Early Action and Gesture “Vocabulary” and Its Relation With Word Comprehension and Production. Child Development83(2), 526–542.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Emmorey, K. , & Herzig, M.
    (2003) Categorical versus gradient properties of classifier constructions in ASL. In K. Emmorey (Ed.), Perspectives on Classifier Constructions in Signed Languages (pp.221–246). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Feldman, H. , Goldin-Meadow, S. , & Gleitman, L.
    (1978) Beyond Herodotus: The creation of language by linguistically deprived deaf children. In A. Lock (Ed.), Action, symbol, and gesture: The emergence of language (pp.351–414). New York, NY: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Franklin, A. , Giannakidou, A. , & Goldin-Meadow, S.
    (2011) Negation, questions, and structure building in a homesign system. Cognition118, 398–416. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.08.017
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.08.017 [Google Scholar]
  17. Givón, T.
    (1979) On understanding grammar. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Goldin-Meadow, S.
    (1979) Structure in a manual communication system developed without a conventional language model: Language without a helping hand. In H. Whitaker & H. A. Whitaker (Eds.), Studies in Neurolinguistics (Vol.4). New York: Academic Press. doi: 10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑746304‑9.50010‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-746304-9.50010-0 [Google Scholar]
  19. (2003) The resilience of language: What gesture creation in deaf children can tell us about how all children learn language. New York: Psychology Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. (2014) How gesture helps children learn language. In I. Arnon , M. Casillas , C. Kurumada & B. Estigarribia (Eds.) Language in Interaction. Studies in honor of Eve V. Clark, (pp.157–171). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Goldin-Meadow, S. , Butcher, C. , Mylander, C. , & Dodge, M.
    (1994) Nouns and verbs in a self-styled gesture system: What’s in a name?Cognitive Psychology27, 259–319. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1994.1018
    https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1994.1018 [Google Scholar]
  22. Goldin-Meadow, S. , Levine, S. C. , Hedges, L. V. , Huttenlocher, J. , Raudenbush, S. , & Small, S.
    (2014) New evidence about language and cognitive development based on a longitudinal study: Hypotheses for intervention. American Psychologist69(6), 588–599. doi: 10.1037/a0036886
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036886 [Google Scholar]
  23. Goldin-Meadow, S. , & Mylander, C.
    (1984) Gestural communication in deaf children: The effects and non-effects of parental input on early language development. Monographs of the Society for Re- search in Child Development49, 1–121. doi: 10.2307/1165838
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1165838 [Google Scholar]
  24. (1998) Spontaneous sign systems created by deaf children in two cultures. Nature91, 279–281. doi: 10.1038/34646
    https://doi.org/10.1038/34646 [Google Scholar]
  25. Goldin-Meadow, S. , Mylander, C. , & Butcher, C.
    (1995) The resilience of combinatorial structure at the word level: Morphology in self-styled gesture systems. Cognition56(3), 195–262. doi: 10.1016/0010‑0277(95)00662‑I
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(95)00662-I [Google Scholar]
  26. Goldin-Meadow, S. , Mylander, C. , & Franklin, A.
    (2007) How children make language out of gesture: Morphological structure in gesture systems developed by American and Chinese deaf children. Cognitive Psychology55(2), 87–135. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.08.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.08.001 [Google Scholar]
  27. Goodrich, W. , & Hudson Kam, C. L.
    (2009) Co‐speech gesture as input in verb learning. Developmental science12(1), 81–87. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑7687.2008.00735.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00735.x [Google Scholar]
  28. Haviland, J. B.
    (2013) The emerging grammar of nouns in a first generation sign language: specification, iconicity, and syntax. Gesture13(3), 309–353. doi: 10.1075/gest.13.3.04hav
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.13.3.04hav [Google Scholar]
  29. Hawkins, John A.
    (1988) Explaining language universals. In J. A. Hawkins (Ed.), Explaining language universals (pp.3–28). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Hopper, P. J. & Thompson, S. A.
    (1984) The iconicity of the universal categories ‘noun’ and ‘verbs’. In J. Haiman (Ed.), Iconicity in syntax (pp.151–183). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Hunsicker, D. , & Goldin-Meadow, S.
    (2013) How handshape type can distinguish between nouns and verbs in homesign. Gesture13(3), 354–376. doi: 10.1075/gest.13.3.05hun
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.13.3.05hun [Google Scholar]
  32. Iverson, J. M. , Capirci, O. , & Caselli, M. C.
    (1994) From communication to language in two modalities. Cognitive Development9(1), 23–43. doi: 10.1016/0885‑2014(94)90018‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0885-2014(94)90018-3 [Google Scholar]
  33. Marentette, P. , & Nicoladis, E.
    (2011) Preschoolers’ interpretations of gesture: Label or action associate?Cognition121(3), 386–399. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.08.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2011.08.012 [Google Scholar]
  34. Marentette, P. , Pettenati, P. , Bello, A. , & Volterra, V.
    (2016) Gesture and Symbolic Representation in Italian and English‐Speaking Canadian 2‐Year‐Olds. Child development87(3), 944–961. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12523
    https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12523 [Google Scholar]
  35. McNeill, D.
    (1992) Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Meier, R. P. , Mauk, C. E. , Cheek, A. , & Moreland, C. J.
    (2008) The form of children’s early signs: iconic or motoric determinants?.Language learning and development4(1), 63–98. doi: 10.1080/15475440701377618
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15475440701377618 [Google Scholar]
  37. Mizuguchi, T. , & Sugai, K.
    (2002) Object-related knowledge and the production of gestures with imagined objects by preschool children. Perceptual and Motor Skills94(1), 71–79. doi: 10.2466/pms.2002.94.1.71
    https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.2002.94.1.71 [Google Scholar]
  38. Mitchell, R. W. , & Clark, H.
    (2015) Experimenter’s pantomimes influence children’s use of body part as object and imaginary object pantomimes: A replication. Journal of Cognition and Development16, 703–718. doi: 10.1080/15248372.2014.926270
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2014.926270 [Google Scholar]
  39. Namy, L. L.
    (2008) Recognition of iconicity doesn't come for free. Developmental science11(6), 841–846. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑7687.2008.00732.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00732.x [Google Scholar]
  40. Namy, L. L. , Campbell, A. L. , & Tomasello, M.
    (2004) The changing role of iconicity in non-verbal symbol learning: A U-shaped trajectory in the acquisition of arbitrary gestures. Journal of Cognition and Development5(1), 37–57. doi: 10.1207/s15327647jcd0501_3
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327647jcd0501_3 [Google Scholar]
  41. Nicoladis, E. , Mayberry, R. I. , & Genesee, F.
    (1999) Gesture and early bilingual development. Developmental Psychology35(2), 514. doi: 10.1037/0012‑1649.35.2.514
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.35.2.514 [Google Scholar]
  42. Novack, M. A. , Goldin-Meadow, S. , & Woodward, A. L.
    (2015) Learning from gesture: How early does it happen?Cognition142, 138–147. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.05.018
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2015.05.018 [Google Scholar]
  43. Novack, M. , Cartmill, E. A. , Loftus, W. & Goldin-Meadow, S.
    (in preparation). Tracing the development of gesture: Does iconic gesture become more abstract over time?
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Ortega, G. , & Ozyurek, A.
    (2016) Generalisable patterns of gesture distinguish semantic categories in communication without language. In38th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci 2016) (pp.1182–1187). Cognitive Science Society.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Overton, W. F. , & Jackson, J. P.
    (1973) The representation of imagined objects in action sequences: A developmental study. Child Development44(2), 309–314. doi: 10.2307/1128052
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1128052 [Google Scholar]
  46. Özçalışkan, Ş. , & Goldin-Meadow, S.
    (2005) Gesture is at the cutting edge of early language development. Cognition96(3), B101–B113. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.01.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2005.01.001 [Google Scholar]
  47. Özçalışkan, S. , & Goldin-Meadow, S.
    (2009) When gesture – speech combinations do and do not index linguistic change. Language and Cognitive Processes24, 190–217. doi: 10.1080/01690960801956911
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960801956911 [Google Scholar]
  48. Özçalışkan, Ş. , & Goldin-Meadow, S.
    (2011) Is there an iconic gesture spurt at 26 months?In G. Stam , & M. Ishino (Eds.), Integrating gestures: The interdisciplinary nature of gesture (pp.163–174). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/gs.4.14ozc
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.4.14ozc [Google Scholar]
  49. Padden, C. A. , Meir, I. , Hwang, S. -O. , Lepic, R. , Seegers, S. , & Sampson, T.
    (2013) Patterned iconicity in sign language lexicons. Gesture13(3), 287–308. doi: 10.1075/gest.13.3.03pad
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.13.3.03pad [Google Scholar]
  50. Pettenati, P. , Stefanini, S. , & Volterra, V.
    (2010) Motoric characteristics of representational gestures produced by young children in a naming task. Journal of Child language37(4), 887–911. doi: 10.1017/S0305000909990092
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000909990092 [Google Scholar]
  51. Rissman, L. & Goldin-Meadow, S.
    (in press) The development of causal structure without a language model. Language Learning and Development.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Rissman, L. , & Goldin-Meadow, S.
    (2017) The Development of Causal Structure without a Language Model. Language Learning and Development, 1–14. doi: 10.1080/15475441.2016.1254633
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2016.1254633 [Google Scholar]
  53. Rowe, M. L. , & Goldin-Meadow, S.
    (2009) Early gesture selectively predicts later language learning. Developmental Science12, 182–187. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑7687.2008.00764.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00764.x [Google Scholar]
  54. Sapir, E.
    (1921) Language: An introduction to the study of speech. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Schachter, P.
    (1985) Parts-of-speech systems. In T. Shopen (Ed.). Language typology and syntactic description: Clause Structure Vol. 1 (pp.3–61). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Stanfield, C. , Williamson, R. , & Özçalişkan, Ş. E. Y. D. A.
    (2014) How early do children understand gesture – speech combinations with iconic gestures?Journal of Child Language41(2), 462–71. doi: 10.1017/S0305000913000019
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000913000019 [Google Scholar]
  57. Supalla, T. , & Newport, E.
    (1978) How many seats in a chair? The derivation of nouns and verbs in American Sign Language. In P. Siple (Ed.), Understanding language through sign language research. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Tolar, T. D. , Lederberg, A. R. , Gokhale, S. , & Tomasello, M.
    (2008) The development of the ability to recognize the meaning of iconic signs. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education,13(2), 225–240. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enm045
    https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enm045 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error