1887
Volume 18, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1387-6759
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9897
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This article examines the concept of defectivity in the verbal system of Spanish, Portuguese and Catalan. Building on previous studies on defective verbs in Spanish and Portuguese I investigate why there are no such defective verbs in Catalan. I conclude that the structure of the verbal paradigm in Catalan non-first conjugation verbs is radically different from that of the other languages; Catalan verbs constitute paradigms which correspond to regular patterns of inflection whereas Spanish and Portuguese display non-predictable types of root allomorphy which require all non-first conjugation verbs to have a memorised form for the rhizotonic forms of the verb. Theoretically, this type of defectivity poses problems for models of inflectional morphology and suggests that the patterns of frequent verbs can become general rules for all verbs of a particular conjugation.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lic.00002.one
2018-02-22
2019-12-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ackema, P. and Neeleman, A.
    2004Beyond morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199267286.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199267286.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  2. Alarcos Llorach, E.
    1994Gramática de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Albright, A.
    2003 A quantitative study of Spanish paradigm gaps. InWest Coast Conference on Formal Linguistic 22 Proceedings, G. Garding and M. Tsujimura (eds), 117–151. Somerville: Cascadilla Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. 2006 Lexical and morphological conditioning of paradigm gaps. InWhen nothing wins: Modeling ungrammaticality in OT, C. Rice (ed), 33–63. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. (in press b). Lexical and morphological conditioning of paradigm gaps. InWhen nothing wins: Modeling ungrammaticality in OT, C. Rice ed Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Alcoba, S.
    1999 La flexión verbal. InGramática descriptiva de la lengua española, vol.3, I. Bosque and V. Demonte (eds), 4915–4991. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Anderson, S.
    1992A-Morphous morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511586262
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511586262 [Google Scholar]
  8. Aronoff, M.
    1976Word formation in generative grammar. Cambridge: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. 1994Morphology by itself. Cambridge: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Baayen, R. H. , Dijkstra, T. and Schreuder, R.
    1997 Singulars and plurals in Dutch: evidence for a parallel dual-route model. Journal of Memory and Language37: 94–117. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1997.2509
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1997.2509 [Google Scholar]
  11. Baayen, R. , McQueen, J. D. and Schreuder, R.
    2003 Frequency effects in regular inflectional morphology: revisiting Dutch plurals. InMorphological structure in language processing, R. H. Baayen and R. Schreuder (eds), 355–390. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110910186.355
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110910186.355 [Google Scholar]
  12. Beard, R.
    1995Lexeme-morpheme base morphology: a general theory of inflection and word formation. Albany: State University of New York.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Bello, A.
    1908Gramática de la lengua castellana. Buenos Aires: Sopena.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Blevins, J. P.
    2006 Word-based morphology. Journal of Linguistics42: 531–573. doi: 10.1017/S0022226706004191
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226706004191 [Google Scholar]
  15. 2016Word and Paradigm Morphology. Cambridge: CUP. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199593545.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199593545.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  16. Bloomfield, L.
    1933Language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Butt, J. and Benjamin, C.
    2004A new reference grammar of modern Spanish. London: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Bybee, J.
    1985Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.9
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.9 [Google Scholar]
  19. 1999 Use impacts morphological representation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences22: 1016–1017. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X99252223
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X99252223 [Google Scholar]
  20. 2001Phonology and language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511612886
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511612886 [Google Scholar]
  21. 2010Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511750526
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750526 [Google Scholar]
  22. Bybee, J. and Pardo, E.
    1981 On lexical and morphological conditioning of alternations: a nonce-probe experiment with Spanish verbs. Linguistics19: 937–968. doi: 10.1515/ling.1981.19.9‑10.937
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1981.19.9-10.937 [Google Scholar]
  23. Caramazza, A. , Laudanna, A. and Burani, C.
    1988 Lexical access and inflectional morphology. Cognition28: 298–232. doi: 10.1016/0010‑0277(88)90017‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(88)90017-0 [Google Scholar]
  24. Clahsen, H.
    1999 Lexical entries and rules of language: a multi-disciplinary study of German inflection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences22: 991–1060. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X99002228
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X99002228 [Google Scholar]
  25. Cunha, C. and Cintra, L.
    1984Nova gramática do português contemporâneo. Rio de Janeiro: Nova Fronteira.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Daland, R. , Sims, A. and Pierrehumbert, J.
    2007 Much ado about nothing: a social network model of Russian paradigmatic gaps. InProceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics in Prague. Czech Republic, 24–29June 2007.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. de Sá Nogueira, R.
    1945Dicionário de verbos portugueses conjugados. Lisboa: Livraria Clássica.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Divjak, D.
    2010Structuring the lexicon: A clustered model for near-synonymy. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter Mouton. doi: 10.1515/9783110220599
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110220599 [Google Scholar]
  29. Dunn, J.
    1928A grammar of the Portuguese language. Hispanic Society of America.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Eddington, D.
    2000 Spanish stress assignment within the analogical modeling of language. Language76: 92–109. doi: 10.1353/lan.2000.0022
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2000.0022 [Google Scholar]
  31. 2006 Paradigm uniformity and analogy: the capitalistic versus militaristic debate. International Journal of English Studies6: 1–18.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Elvira, J.
    1993 Verbos defectivos en español. Actas do XXIX Congreso de Lingüística e Filoloxía Románicas 5. Fundación Pedro Barrié de la Maza, Conde Fenosa. 573–580.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Enghels, R. and Jansegers, M.
    2013 On the crosslinguistic equivalence of sentir(e) in Romance languages: A contrastive study in semantics. Linguistics51(5): 957–991. doi: 10.1515/ling‑2013‑0034
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2013-0034 [Google Scholar]
  34. Hills, E. , Ford, J. and Coutinho de Siquiera, J.
    1925A Portuguese grammar. Boston; New York: D.C. Heath and Company.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Hutchinson, A. and Lloyd, J.
    2003Portuguese: an essential grammar. New York; London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Maiden, M.
    2001 A strange affinity: perfecto y tiempos afines. Bulletin of Hispanic Studies78: 441–464. doi: 10.3828/bhs.78.4.441
    https://doi.org/10.3828/bhs.78.4.441 [Google Scholar]
  37. 2001 Di nuovo sulle alternanze velari nel verbo italiano e spagnolo. Cuadernos de filología italiana8: 39–61.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. 2004 Morphological Autonomy and Diachrony. Yearbook of Morphology, G. Booij and J. van Marle (eds), 137–75. London: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Matthews, P. H.
    1991Morphology. Cambridge: CUP. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139166485
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166485 [Google Scholar]
  40. O’Neill, P.
    2009 Los verbos defectivos en la lengua española: estudio sincrónico y diacrónico descriptivo basado en datos de corpus. Boletín de la Real Academia Española300: 255–287.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. 2010 Una explicación teórica de la defectividad verbal en la lengua española. Boletín de la Real Academia Española302: 265–289.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. 2011a Alternancias vocálicas en el presente de los verbos en -ir. Un análisis desde la Morfología Autónoma. Revista de la Historia de la Lengua Española6: 87–129.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. 2011b New perspectives on the effects of yod in Ibero-Romance. Bulletin of Spanish Studies89(5): 665–697. doi: 10.1080/14753820.2012.696175
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14753820.2012.696175 [Google Scholar]
  44. 2011c The Evolution of ‘el pretérito y tiempos afines’ in Ibero-Romance. Bulletin of Hispanic Studies88: 851–878. doi: 10.3828/bhs.2011.47
    https://doi.org/10.3828/bhs.2011.47 [Google Scholar]
  45. 2011d The Ibero-Romance Verb: allomorphy and the notion of the morphome. DPhil thesis. Available atwww.academia.edu [https://sheffield.academia.edu/PaulONeill].
  46. 2014 The morphome in constructive and abstractive models of morphology. Morphology24: 25–70. doi: 10.1007/s11525‑014‑9232‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-014-9232-1 [Google Scholar]
  47. 2015 The Origin and Spread of Velar Allomorphy in the Spanish Verb. Bulletin of Hispanic Studies92(5): 489–518. doi: 10.3828/bhs.2015.29
    https://doi.org/10.3828/bhs.2015.29 [Google Scholar]
  48. O’Neill
    (forthcoming (a)). Defective verbs in Portuguese: a corpus study.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. (forthcoming (b)). Inflectional Defectiveness.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. (forthcoming (c)). Defective verbs in Spanish and Portuguese and the role of frequency in morphological paradigms.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Real Academia Española
    Real Academia Española 1854Gramática de la lengua castellana. Madrid: Imprenta Nacional.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Real Academia Española
    Real Academia Española 1973Esbozo de una nueva gramática de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Real Academia Española y la Asociación de Academias de la Lengua
    Real Academia Española y la Asociación de Academias de la Lengua 2009Nueva gramática de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Salvá, V.
    1830Gramática de la lengua castellana. Paris: Demonville.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Scalise, S.
    1984Generative morphology. Dordrecht: Foris.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Seco, M.
    1989Gramatica esencial del español: introduccion al estudio de la lengua. Madrid: Aguilar.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Silva, E. and Tavares, A.
    1977Dicionário dos verbos portugueses: conjugação e regências. Porto: Porto Editora.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Sims, A.
    2007Minding the gaps: Inflectional defectiveness in paradigmatic morphology. PhD thesis: Linguistics Department, The Ohio State University.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. 2016Inflectional Defectiveness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Skousen, R.
    1989Analogical modeling of language. Dordrecht: Kluwer/Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Stemberger, J. and MacWhinney, B.
    1988 Are inflected forms stored in the lexicon?InTheoretical Morphology. Approaches in modern linguistics, M. Hammond and M. Noonan (eds), 101–116. San Diego: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Stump, G.
    2001Inflectional morphology: a theory of paradigm structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511486333
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486333 [Google Scholar]
  63. Vázquez Cuesta, P. and Méndes da Luz, M.
    1971Gramática portuguesa. Madrid: Gredos.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Wheeler, M.
    2011 The evolution of a morphome in Catalan verb inflection, with evidence from a medieval corpus. InMorphological Autonomy: Perspectives from Romance Inflectional Morphology, M. Maiden , J. C. Smith , M. Goldbach and M. -O. Hinzelin (eds), 183–210. Oxford: OUP. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199589982.003.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199589982.003.0010 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/lic.00002.one
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/lic.00002.one
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Catalan/Portuguese/Spanish , defectiveness , defectivity , morphomes and paradigms
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error