Near-synonymy in morphological structures

References

1. Ackema, P. and Neeleman, A.
   2004 Beyond morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199267286.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199267286.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
2. Alarcos Llorach, E.
   1994 Gramática de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Albright, A.
   2003 A quantitative study of Spanish paradigm gaps. InWest Coast Conference on Formal Linguistic 22 Proceedings, G. Garding and M. Tsujimura (eds), 117–151. Somerville: Cascadilla Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Albright, A.
   2006 Lexical and morphological conditioning of paradigm gaps. InWhen nothing wins: Modeling ungrammaticality in OT, C. Rice (ed), 33–63. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Albright, A.
   (in press b). Lexical and morphological conditioning of paradigm gaps. InWhen nothing wins: Modeling ungrammaticality in OT, C. Rice ed Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Alcoba, S.
   1999 La flexión verbal. InGramática descriptiva de la lengua española, vol.3, I. Bosque and V. Demonte (eds), 4915–4991. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Anderson, S.
   1992 A-Morphous morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511586262
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511586262 [Google Scholar]
8. Aronoff, M.
   1976 Word formation in generative grammar. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Aronoff, M.
   1994 Morphology by itself. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Baayen, R. H. , Dijkstra, T. and Schreuder, R.
    1997 Singulars and plurals in Dutch: evidence for a parallel dual-route model. Journal of Memory and Language37: 94–117. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1997.2509
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1997.2509 [Google Scholar]
11. Baayen, R. , McQueen, J. D. and Schreuder, R.
    2003 Frequency effects in regular inflectional morphology: revisiting Dutch plurals. InMorphological structure in language processing, R. H. Baayen and R. Schreuder (eds), 355–390. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110910186.355
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110910186.355 [Google Scholar]
12. Beard, R.
    1995 Lexeme-morpheme base morphology: a general theory of inflection and word formation. Albany: State University of New York.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Bello, A.
    1908 Gramática de la lengua castellana. Buenos Aires: Sopena.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Blevins, J. P.
    2006 Word-based morphology. Journal of Linguistics42: 531–573. doi: 10.1017/S0022226706004191
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226706004191 [Google Scholar]
15. Blevins, J. P.
    2016 Word and Paradigm Morphology. Cambridge: CUP. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199593545.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199593545.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
16. Bloomfield, L.
    1933 Language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Butt, J. and Benjamin, C.
    2004 A new reference grammar of modern Spanish. London: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Bybee, J.
    1985 Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.9
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.9 [Google Scholar]
19. Bybee, J.
    1999 Use impacts morphological representation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences22: 1016–1017. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X99252223
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X99252223 [Google Scholar]
20. Bybee, J.
    2001 Phonology and language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511612886
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511612886 [Google Scholar]
21. Bybee, J.
    2010 Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511750526
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750526 [Google Scholar]
22. Bybee, J. and Pardo, E.
    1981 On lexical and morphological conditioning of alternations: a nonce-probe experiment with Spanish verbs. Linguistics19: 937–968. doi: 10.1515/ling.1981.19.9‑10.937
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1981.19.9-10.937 [Google Scholar]
23. Caramazza, A. , Laudanna, A. and Burani, C.
    1988 Lexical access and inflectional morphology. Cognition28: 298–232. doi: 10.1016/0010‑0277(88)90017‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(88)90017-0 [Google Scholar]
24. Clahsen, H.
    1999 Lexical entries and rules of language: a multi-disciplinary study of German inflection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences22: 991–1060. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X99002228
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X99002228 [Google Scholar]
25. Cunha, C. and Cintra, L.
    1984 Nova gramática do português contemporâneo. Rio de Janeiro: Nova Fronteira.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Daland, R. , Sims, A. and Pierrehumbert, J.
    2007 Much ado about nothing: a social network model of Russian paradigmatic gaps. InProceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics in Prague. Czech Republic, 24–29June 2007.
    [Google Scholar]
27. de Sá Nogueira, R.
    1945 Dicionário de verbos portugueses conjugados. Lisboa: Livraria Clássica.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Divjak, D.
    2010 Structuring the lexicon: A clustered model for near-synonymy. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter Mouton. doi: 10.1515/9783110220599
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110220599 [Google Scholar]
29. Dunn, J.
    1928 A grammar of the Portuguese language. Hispanic Society of America.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Eddington, D.
    2000 Spanish stress assignment within the analogical modeling of language. Language76: 92–109. doi: 10.1353/lan.2000.0022
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2000.0022 [Google Scholar]
31. Eddington, D.
    2006 Paradigm uniformity and analogy: the capitalistic versus militaristic debate. International Journal of English Studies6: 1–18.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Elvira, J.
    1993 Verbos defectivos en español. Actas do XXIX Congreso de Lingüística e Filoloxía Románicas 5. Fundación Pedro Barrié de la Maza, Conde Fenosa. 573–580.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Enghels, R. and Jansegers, M.
    2013 On the crosslinguistic equivalence of sentir(e) in Romance languages: A contrastive study in semantics. Linguistics51(5): 957–991. doi: 10.1515/ling‑2013‑0034
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2013-0034 [Google Scholar]
34. Hills, E. , Ford, J. and Coutinho de Siquiera, J.
    1925 A Portuguese grammar. Boston; New York: D.C. Heath and Company.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Hutchinson, A. and Lloyd, J.
    2003 Portuguese: an essential grammar. New York; London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Maiden, M.
    2001 A strange affinity: perfecto y tiempos afines. Bulletin of Hispanic Studies78: 441–464. doi: 10.3828/bhs.78.4.441
    https://doi.org/10.3828/bhs.78.4.441 [Google Scholar]
37. Maiden, M.
    2001 Di nuovo sulle alternanze velari nel verbo italiano e spagnolo. Cuadernos de filología italiana8: 39–61.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Maiden, M.
    2004 Morphological Autonomy and Diachrony. Yearbook of Morphology, G. Booij and J. van Marle (eds), 137–75. London: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Matthews, P. H.
    1991 Morphology. Cambridge: CUP. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139166485
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166485 [Google Scholar]
40. O’Neill, P.
    2009 Los verbos defectivos en la lengua española: estudio sincrónico y diacrónico descriptivo basado en datos de corpus. Boletín de la Real Academia Española300: 255–287.
    [Google Scholar]
41. O’Neill, P.
    2010 Una explicación teórica de la defectividad verbal en la lengua española. Boletín de la Real Academia Española302: 265–289.
    [Google Scholar]
42. O’Neill, P.
    2011a Alternancias vocálicas en el presente de los verbos en -ir. Un análisis desde la Morfología Autónoma. Revista de la Historia de la Lengua Española6: 87–129.
    [Google Scholar]
43. O’Neill, P.
    2011b New perspectives on the effects of yod in Ibero-Romance. Bulletin of Spanish Studies89(5): 665–697. doi: 10.1080/14753820.2012.696175
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14753820.2012.696175 [Google Scholar]
44. O’Neill, P.
    2011c The Evolution of ‘el pretérito y tiempos afines’ in Ibero-Romance. Bulletin of Hispanic Studies88: 851–878. doi: 10.3828/bhs.2011.47
    https://doi.org/10.3828/bhs.2011.47 [Google Scholar]
45. O’Neill, P.
    2011d The Ibero-Romance Verb: allomorphy and the notion of the morphome. DPhil thesis. Available atwww.academia.edu [https://sheffield.academia.edu/PaulONeill].
46. O’Neill, P.
    2014 The morphome in constructive and abstractive models of morphology. Morphology24: 25–70. doi: 10.1007/s11525‑014‑9232‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-014-9232-1 [Google Scholar]
47. O’Neill, P.
    2015 The Origin and Spread of Velar Allomorphy in the Spanish Verb. Bulletin of Hispanic Studies92(5): 489–518. doi: 10.3828/bhs.2015.29
    https://doi.org/10.3828/bhs.2015.29 [Google Scholar]
48. O’Neill
    (forthcoming (a)). Defective verbs in Portuguese: a corpus study.
    [Google Scholar]
49. O’Neill
    (forthcoming (b)). Inflectional Defectiveness.
    [Google Scholar]
50. O’Neill
    (forthcoming (c)). Defective verbs in Spanish and Portuguese and the role of frequency in morphological paradigms.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Real Academia Española
    Real Academia Española 1854 Gramática de la lengua castellana. Madrid: Imprenta Nacional.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Real Academia Española
    Real Academia Española 1973 Esbozo de una nueva gramática de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Real Academia Española y la Asociación de Academias de la Lengua
    Real Academia Española y la Asociación de Academias de la Lengua 2009 Nueva gramática de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Salvá, V.
    1830 Gramática de la lengua castellana. Paris: Demonville.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Scalise, S.
    1984 Generative morphology. Dordrecht: Foris.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Seco, M.
    1989 Gramatica esencial del español: introduccion al estudio de la lengua. Madrid: Aguilar.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Silva, E. and Tavares, A.
    1977 Dicionário dos verbos portugueses: conjugação e regências. Porto: Porto Editora.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Sims, A.
    2007 Minding the gaps: Inflectional defectiveness in paradigmatic morphology. PhD thesis: Linguistics Department, The Ohio State University.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Sims, A.
    2016 Inflectional Defectiveness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Skousen, R.
    1989 Analogical modeling of language. Dordrecht: Kluwer/Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Stemberger, J. and MacWhinney, B.
    1988 Are inflected forms stored in the lexicon?InTheoretical Morphology. Approaches in modern linguistics, M. Hammond and M. Noonan (eds), 101–116. San Diego: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Stump, G.
    2001 Inflectional morphology: a theory of paradigm structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511486333
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486333 [Google Scholar]
63. Vázquez Cuesta, P. and Méndes da Luz, M.
    1971 Gramática portuguesa. Madrid: Gredos.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Wheeler, M.
    2011 The evolution of a morphome in Catalan verb inflection, with evidence from a medieval corpus. InMorphological Autonomy: Perspectives from Romance Inflectional Morphology, M. Maiden , J. C. Smith , M. Goldbach and M. -O. Hinzelin (eds), 183–210. Oxford: OUP. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199589982.003.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199589982.003.0010 [Google Scholar]