Verbs of perception and evidentiality in English/French translation

References

1. Aikhenvald, A. Y.
   2004 Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780199263882.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199263882.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
2. Aikhenvald, A. Y.
   2007 Information Source and Evidentiality: What can we Conclude. Rivista di Linguistica19(1): 209–227.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Altenberg, B.
   1999 Adverbial Connectors in English and Swedish: Semantic and Lexical Correspondences. InOut of Corpora. Studies in Honour of Stig Johansson, H. Hasselgård and S. Oksefjell (eds), 249–268. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 10.1163/9789004653689_022
   https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004653689_022 [Google Scholar]
4. Anthony, L.
   2020 AntConc (Version 3.5.9) [Computer Software]. Tokyo: Waseda University. Available athttps://www.laurenceanthony.net/software
5. Asudeh, A. and Toivonen, I.
   2017 A Modular Approach to Evidentiality. Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Lexical Functional Grammar (LFG’17). Konstanz, Germany, 25–27 July 2017. Stanford: CSLI Publications. 45–65.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Baker, M.
   1993 Corpus Linguistics and Translation Studies. Implications and Applications. InText and Technology, M. Baker, G. Francis, and E. Tognini-Bonelli (eds), 233–250. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.64.15bak
   https://doi.org/10.1075/z.64.15bak [Google Scholar]
7. Banfield, A.
   1982 Unspeakable Sentences: Narration and Representation in the Language of Fiction. London: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bardière, Y.
   2010 Modus et dictum. Could et les verbes de perception: Valeurs et traduction. Modèles linguistiques31(62): 127–145. 10.4000/ml.235
   https://doi.org/10.4000/ml.235 [Google Scholar]
9. Bardière, Y.
   2015 Les traductions de can et could devant les verbes de perception. Modèles linguistiques36(71): 31–60. 10.4000/ml.2328
   https://doi.org/10.4000/ml.2328 [Google Scholar]
10. Baroni, M. and Bernardini, S.
    2006 A New Approach to the Study of Translationese: Machine-learning the Difference between Original and Translated Text. Literary and Linguistic Computing21(3): 259–274. 10.1093/llc/fqi039
    https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqi039 [Google Scholar]
11. Dufaye, L.
    2014 CAN avec les verbes de perception. InAutour du verbe anglais. Construction, lexique, évidentialité, G. Girard-Gillet (ed.). Paris: Presses Sorbonne Nouvelle.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Frawley, W.
    1984 Prolegomenon to a Theory of Translation. InTranslation: Literary, Linguistic and Philosophical Perspectives, W. Frawley (ed.), 159–175. Newark: University of Delaware Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Galac, Á.
    2020 Semantic Change of Basic Perception Verbs in English, German, French, Spanish, Italian, and Hungarian. Argumentum161: 125–146. 10.34103/ARGUMENTUM/2020/9
    https://doi.org/10.34103/ARGUMENTUM/2020/9 [Google Scholar]
14. Gellerstam, M.
    1986 Translationese in Swedish Novels Translated from English. InTranslation Studies in Scandinavia, L. Wollin and H. Lindquist (eds), 88–95. Lund: CWK Gleerup.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Gisborne, N.
    1996 English Perception Verbs. PhD Thesis, University College London.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Gisborne, N. and Holmes, J.
    2007 A History of English Evidential Verbs of Appearance. English Language & Linguistics11(1): 1–29. 10.1017/S1360674306002097
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674306002097 [Google Scholar]
17. Grezka, A.
    2006 Études du lexique de la perception: Bilan et perspectives. Suvremena lingvistika61(1): 45–67.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Grezka, A.
    2020 Verbes de perception et traitement de la polysémie: Pourquoi et comment ? Actes du Colloque International « La perception : Langue, discours, cognition ». Paris, France. 6–7 December 2019. 29–44.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Grossmann, F. and Tutin, A.
    2010 Evidential Markers in French Scientific Writing: The Case of the French Verb Voir. InLinguistic Realization of Evidentiality in European Languages, G. Diewald and E. Smirnova (eds), 279–308. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110223972.279
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110223972.279 [Google Scholar]
20. Guillemin-Flescher, J.
    1981 Syntaxe comparée du français et de l’anglais: Problémes de traduction. Paris: Ophrys.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Guillemin-Flescher, J.
    1984a Énonciation, perception et traduction. Langages (73): 74–97. 10.3406/lgge.1984.1166
    https://doi.org/10.3406/lgge.1984.1166 [Google Scholar]
22. Guillemin-Flescher, J.
    1984b Traduire l’inattestable. Cahiers Charles V6(1): 131–151. 10.3406/cchav.1984.958
    https://doi.org/10.3406/cchav.1984.958 [Google Scholar]
23. Johansson, S.
    2007 Seeing through Multilingual Corpora. InCorpus Linguistics 25 Years on, R. Facchinetti (ed.), 51–72. Amsterdam: Brill Rodopi. 10.1163/9789401204347_005
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401204347_005 [Google Scholar]
24. Koppel, M. and Ordan, N.
    2011 Translationese and its Dialects. Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. Portland, Oregon, USA, 19–24 June 2011. 1318–1326.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M.
    1980 Metaphors we Live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
26. McEnery, T. and Xiao, R.
    2007 Parallel and Comparable Corpora: What are they up to?InIncorporating Corpora: The Linguist and the Translator, G. Anderman and M. Rogers (eds), 18–31. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781853599873‑005
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853599873-005 [Google Scholar]
27. Miller, P.
    2008 Prédication et Évidentialité: de l’Emploi Copule des Verbes de Perception en Anglais. Faits de Langues, 31(1): 253–262. 10.1163/19589514‑31‑32‑01‑900000024
    https://doi.org/10.1163/19589514-31-32-01-900000024 [Google Scholar]
28. Neagu, M.
    2013 What is Universal and what is Language Specific in the Polysemy of Perception Verbs?Revue Roumaine de Linguistique58(3): 329–343.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Øverås, L.
    1998 In Search of the Third Code: An Investigation of Norms in Literary Translation. Meta43(4): 557–570. 10.7202/003775ar
    https://doi.org/10.7202/003775ar [Google Scholar]
30. Patrick, D. and Van Bogaert, J.
    2007 A Semantic Description of French Lexical Evidential Markers and the Classification of Evidentials. Rivista di linguistica19(1): 65–89.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Piron, S.
    2001 Les verbes de perception en français: Une analyse des entrées de dictionnaires. Actes des XVes Journées de Linguistique. Quebec, Canada, 15–16 March 2001. 119–128.
    [Google Scholar]
32. R Core Team
    R Core Team 2021 R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
    [Google Scholar]
33. San Roque, L., Kendrick, K. H., Norcliffe, E. and Majid, A.
    2018 Universal Meaning Extensions of Perception Verbs are Grounded in Interaction. Cognitive Linguistics29(3): 371–406. 10.1515/cog‑2017‑0034
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2017-0034 [Google Scholar]
34. Schmid, H.
    1994 Probabilistic Part-of-Speech Tagging Using Decision Trees. Proceedings of the International Conference on New Methods in Language Processing. Manchester, UK.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Teich, E.
    2003 Cross-Linguistic Variation in System and Text: A Methodology for the Investigation of Translations and Comparable Texts. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110896541
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110896541 [Google Scholar]
36. Viberg, A.
    1983 The Verbs of Perception: A Typological Study. Linguistics211: 123–162. 10.1515/ling.1983.21.1.123
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1983.21.1.123 [Google Scholar]
37. Vinay, J.-P. and Darbelnet, J.
    1958 Stylistique comparée du français et de l’anglais. Paris: Didier.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Volansky, V., Ordan, N. and Wintner, S.
    2015 On the Features of Translationese. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities30(1): 98–118. 10.1093/llc/fqt031
    https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqt031 [Google Scholar]
39. Wyld, H.
    2021 Degrés de subjectivisation dans la représentation linguistique de la perception: Le cas de la perception directe dans les récits en anglais. Anglophonia. French Journal of English Linguistics311. 10.4000/anglophonia.4440
    https://doi.org/10.4000/anglophonia.4440 [Google Scholar]