oa English complex premodifiers and their German and Swedish correspondences

References

1. Altenberg, B., Aijmer, K. and Svensson, M.
   1999 The English-Swedish Parallel Corpus (ESPC): Manual. Department of English, Lund University.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Baker, M.
   1993 Corpus Linguistics and Translation Studies: Implications and Applications. InText and Technology: In Honour of John Sinclair, M. Baker, G. Francis and E. Tognini-Bonelli (eds), 233–250. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.64.15bak
   https://doi.org/10.1075/z.64.15bak [Google Scholar]
3. Bauer, L., Lieber, R. and Plag, I.
   2013 The Oxford Reference Guide to English Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198747062.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198747062.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
4. Bauer, L. and Renouf, A.
   2001 A Corpus-Based Study of Compounding in English. Journal of English Linguistics29(2): 101–123. 10.1177/00754240122005251
   https://doi.org/10.1177/00754240122005251 [Google Scholar]
5. Bauer, L.
   2009 IE, Germanic: Danish. InThe Oxford Handbook of Compounding, R. Lieber and P. Stekauer (eds), 400–416. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Biber, D. and Gray, B.
   2016 Grammatical Complexity in Academic English. Linguistic Change in Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. and Finegan, E.
   1999 Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Biber, D., Grieve, J. and Iberri-Shea, G.
   2009 Noun Phrase Modification. InOne Language, Two Grammars? Differences between British and American English, G. Rohdenburg and J. Schlüter (eds), 182–193. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511551970.010
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511551970.010 [Google Scholar]
9. Carlsson, M.
   2004 Deutsch und Schwedisch im Kontrast: Zur Distribution nominaler und verbaler Ausdrucksweise in Zeitungstexten. PhD Thesis. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Chesterman, A.
    2004 Hypotheses about Translation Universals. InClaims, Changes and Challenges in Translation Studies, G. Hansen, K. Malmkjaer and D. Gile (eds), 1–14. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.50.02che
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.50.02che [Google Scholar]
11. Crawford Camiciottoli, B.
    2020 Hyphenated Phrasal Expressions in Fashion Journalism: A Diachronic Corpus-Assisted Study of Vogue Magazine. Lingue Culture Mediazioni/Languages Cultures Mediation71: 137–158.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Fabricius-Hansen, C.
    2010 Adjektiv-/Partizipialattribute im diskursbezogenen Kontrast (Deutsch–Englisch/Norwegisch). Deutsche Sprache38(2): 175–192. 10.37307/j.1868‑775X.2010.02.06
    https://doi.org/10.37307/j.1868-775X.2010.02.06 [Google Scholar]
13. Hansen, S. and Hansen-Schirra, S.
    2012 Grammatical Shifts in English-German Noun Phrases. InCross-Linguistic Corpora for the Study of Translations: Insights from the Language Pair English-German, S. Hansen-Schirra, E. Steiner and S. Neumann (eds), 133–145. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110260328.133
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110260328.133 [Google Scholar]
14. Hein, K.
    2018 Heile-Welt-Gerede und ”im-fremden-Bett-schlaf-ich-immer-schlecht-Sensibelchen“. Phrasenkomposita als konstruktionsgrammatisch erfassbarer Fall sprachlicher Verfestigung. InSprachliche Verfestigung. Wortverbindungen, Muster, Phrasem-Konstruktionen, K. Steyer (ed.), 73–102. Tübingen: Narr Francke Attempto.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Hilpert, M.
    2015 From Hand-Carved to Computer-Based: Noun-Participle Compounding and the Upward Strengthening Hypothesis. Cognitive Linguistics26(1): 113–147. 10.1515/cog‑2014‑0001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2014-0001 [Google Scholar]
16. Ingo, R.
    2007 Konsten att översätta: Översättandets praktik och didaktik. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Levin, M. and Ström Herold, J.
    2017 Premodification in Translation: English Hyphenated Premodifiers in Fiction and their Translations into German and Swedish. InCross-linguistic Correspondences. From Lexis to Genre, T. Egan and H. Dirdal (eds), 149–175. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.191.06lev
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.191.06lev [Google Scholar]
18. Levin, M. and Ström Herold, J.
    2021 On Brackets in Translation (or how to Elaborate in Brackets). Bergen Language and Linguistics Studies11(1): 121–144. 10.15845/bells.v11i1.3441
    https://doi.org/10.15845/bells.v11i1.3441 [Google Scholar]
19. Ljung, M.
    2000 Text Condensation in the Press: The Case of Compound Adjectival Premodifiers. InWords: Structure, Meaning, Function; A Festschrift for Dieter Kastovsky, C. Dalton-Puffer and N. Ritt (eds), 205–215. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110809169.205
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110809169.205 [Google Scholar]
20. Mackenzie, J. L.
    2018 Self-Prefixed Verbs: Analogy in the Functional Discourse Grammar Lexicon. Word Structure11(1): 67–94. 10.3366/word.2018.0116
    https://doi.org/10.3366/word.2018.0116 [Google Scholar]
21. Magnusson, G.
    1995 Deutsch-Schwedisch kontrastiv: Stolpersteine bei avancierter Übersetzung. Moderna språk89(2): 164–179.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Magnusson, G.
    2002 Zur syntaktischen Densität in deutschen und schwedischen Sachtexten. Eine kontrastive Studie zum Adjektivsuffix -bar. Studia Neophilologica741: 76–97.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Mair, C.
    2006 Twentieth-Century English: History, Variation and Standardization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486951
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486951 [Google Scholar]
24. Meibauer, J.
    2007 How Marginal are Phrasal Compounds? Generalized Insertion, Expressivity, and I/Q-Interaction. Morphology17(2): 233–259. 10.1007/s11525‑008‑9118‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-008-9118-1 [Google Scholar]
25. Mellenius, I.
    2004 Word Formation. InThe Acquisition of Swedish Grammar, G. Josefsson, C. Platzack and G. Håkansson (eds), 75–93. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lald.33.04mel
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.33.04mel [Google Scholar]
26. Pastor-Gomez, I.
    2011 The Status and Development of N+N Sequences in Contemporary English Noun Phrases. Bern: Peter Lang. 10.3726/978‑3‑0351‑0193‑5
    https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-0351-0193-5 [Google Scholar]
27. Plag, I.
    2003 Word-Formation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511841323
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511841323 [Google Scholar]
28. Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. and Svartvik, J.
    1985 A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Rush, S.
    1998 The Noun Phrase in Advertising English. Journal of Pragmatics29(2): 155–171. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(97)00053‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(97)00053-2 [Google Scholar]
30. Smitterberg, E.
    2021 Syntactic Change in Late Modern English. Studies on Colloquialization and Densification. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108564984
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108564984 [Google Scholar]
31. Ström Herold, J. and Henriksson, H.
    2022 Angekommen im Schwedischen? Deutsche Partizipialkonstruktionen in schwedischer Übersetzung. Moderna Språk116(1): 67–97. 10.58221/mosp.v116i1.6931
    https://doi.org/10.58221/mosp.v116i1.6931 [Google Scholar]
32. Teleman, U., Andersson, E. and Hellberg, S.
    1999 Svenska Akademiens Grammatik. Stockholm: Norstedts.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Thelen, M.
    2015 The Interaction between Terminology and Translation. Or where Terminology and Translation Meet. Trans-kom8(2): 347–381.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Toury, G.
    2012 Descriptive Translation Studies – and Beyond. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.100
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.100 [Google Scholar]
35. Trips, C.
    2012 Empirical and Theoretical Aspects of Phrasal Compounds: Against the “Syntax Explains it all” Attitude. Proceedings of the Eighth Mediterranean Morphology Meeting (MMM8). Cagliari, Italy, 14–17 September 2011. 322–346.
    [Google Scholar]