oa A contrastive analysis of (-)ish in English and Swedish blogs

References

1. Andersen, G.
   2020 Three Cases of Phraseological Borrowing: A Comparative Study of As If, Oh Wait and the Ever Construction in the Scandinavian languages. Ampersand71:1–9. 10.1016/j.amper.2020.100062
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2020.100062 [Google Scholar]
2. Andersen, G.
   2021 What Governs Speakers’ Choices of Borrowed vs. Domestic Variants of Discourse-Pragmatic Variables?InDiscourse-Pragmatic Variation and Change in English. New Methods and Insights, E. Peterson, T. Hiltunen and J. Kern (eds), 251–271. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Beeching, K.
   2018 Metacommenting in English and French. A Variational Pragmatics Approach. InPositioning the Self and Others. Linguistic Perspectives, K. Beeching, C. Ghezzi and P. Molinelli (eds), 127–153. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.292.06bee
   https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.292.06bee [Google Scholar]
4. Bochnak, M. R. and Csipak, E.
   2014 A New Metalinguistic Degree Morpheme. Proceedings of SALT241: 432–452. 10.3765/salt.v24i0.2450
   https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v24i0.2450 [Google Scholar]
5. Borin, L., Forsberg, M. and Roxendal, J.
   2012 Korp-the Corpus Infrastructure of Språkbanken. InProceedings of LREC 2012, 474–478Istanbul, Turkey: European Language Resources Association (ELRA).
   [Google Scholar]
6. Eitelmann, M., Haugland, K. and Haumann, D.
   2020 From Engl-isc to Whatever-ish: A Corpus-Based Investigation of –ish Derivation in the History of English. English Language and Linguistics24(4): 801–831. 10.1017/S1360674319000340
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674319000340 [Google Scholar]
7. Eitelmann, M. and Haumann, D.
   2022 Extravagance in Morphology. InExtravagant Morphology. Studies in Rule-Bending, Pattern-Extending and Theory-Challenging Morphology, M. Eitelmann and D. Haumann (eds), 1–18. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.223.01eit
   https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.223.01eit [Google Scholar]
8. Fraser, B.
   2010 Pragmatic Competence: The Case of Hedging. InNew Approaches to Hedging, G. Kaltenböck, W. Mihatsch and S. Schneider (eds), 15–34. United Kingdom: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. 10.1163/9789004253247_003
   https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004253247_003 [Google Scholar]
9. Fung, L. and Carter, R. D.
   2007 Discourse Markers and Spoken English: Native and Learner Use in Pedagogic Settings. Applied Linguistics28(3): 410–439. 10.1093/applin/amm030
   https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm030 [Google Scholar]
10. Harris, T.
    2020 -ish/Ish: Aspects of a Suffix Turned Free Morpheme. Inaugural Dissertation, Universität Mannheim.
11. Heine, B., Kaltenböck, G., Kuteva, T. and Long, H.
    2021 The Rise of Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108982856
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108982856 [Google Scholar]
12. Heyd, T.
    2017 Chapter 6. Blogs. InPragmatics of Social Media, Hoffmann, T. and Bublitz, W. (eds), 151–172. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110431070‑006
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110431070-006 [Google Scholar]
13. Hoffmann, T.
    2020 Construction Grammar and Creativity: Evolution, Psychology, and Cognitive Science. Cognitive Semiotics13(1). 10.1515/cogsem‑2020‑2018
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogsem-2020-2018 [Google Scholar]
14. Hopper, P. J. and Traugott, E. C.
    2003 Grammaticalization. 2nd ed.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139165525
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165525 [Google Scholar]
15. Josephson, O.
    2018 ”Ish” är typ samma som ”typ” fast tvärtom, ish. Svenska Dagbladet20 November 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Kehoe, A. and Gee, M.
    2012 Reader Comments as an Aboutness Indicator in Online Texts: Introducing the Birmingham Blog Corpus. InAspects of Corpus Linguistics: Compilation, Annotation, Analysis. Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English, S. Oksefjell Ebeling, J. Ebeling and H. Hasselgård (eds), 272–292. Volume121. Helsinki: Varieng.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Kuzmack, S.
    2007 Ish: How a Suffix Became a Word. Ms, University of Chicago.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Lutzky, U. and Gee, M.
    2018 ‘I Just Found Your Blog’. The Pragmatics of Initiating Comments on Blog Posts. Journal of Pragmatics1291: 173–184. 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.03.016
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.03.016 [Google Scholar]
19. Nilssen, S. and Kinn, T.
    2017 A Chameleon Abroad: English -ish and ish Used in Norwegian. Maal og minne21: 123–143.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Norde, M.
    2009 Degrammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199207923.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199207923.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
21. Norde, M.
    2017 The Multilingual Constructicon. “Ish” in Dutch, Swedish and Norwegian. Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin. Available athttps://www.academia.edu/35229797 [last accessed14 December 2023].
    [Google Scholar]
22. OED = Oxford English Dictionary
    OED = Oxford English Dictionary. Available athttp://www.oed.com/ [last accessed14 December, 2023].
23. Oltra-Massuet, I.
    2017 Towards a Morphosyntactic Analysis of -ish. Word Structure10(19): 54–78. 10.3366/word.2017.0100
    https://doi.org/10.3366/word.2017.0100 [Google Scholar]
24. Peterson, E., Hiltunen, T. and Vaatovaara, J.
    2022 A Place for Pliis in Finnish. A Discourse- Pragmatic Variation Account of Position. InDiscourse-Pragmatic Variation and Change:Theory, Innovations, Contact, E. Peterson, T. Hiltunen and J. Kern (eds), 272–292. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108864183.015
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108864183.015 [Google Scholar]
25. Pierce, M.
    2014 The Further Degrammaticalization of -ish. American Speech89(1): 115–118. 10.1215/00031283‑2726431
    https://doi.org/10.1215/00031283-2726431 [Google Scholar]
26. Pierce, M.
    2015 More on -ish. American Speech89(1): 115–118. 10.1215/00031283‑2726431
    https://doi.org/10.1215/00031283-2726431 [Google Scholar]
27. Rosenkvist, H. and Skärlund, L.
    2013 Grammaticalization in the Present. The Changes of Modern Swedish Typ. InSynchrony and Diachrony. A Dynamic Interface, A. Giacalone Ramat, C. Mauri and P. Molinelli (eds), 313–337. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.133.13ros
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.133.13ros [Google Scholar]
28. SAOB
    SAOB 1981 Ordbok över Svenska språket utgiven av Svenska Akademien. Lund: AB Gleerupska universitetsbokhandeln.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Stange, U.
    2020 ‘Holding Grudges is So Last Century’: The Use of GenX So as a Modifier of Noun Phrases. Journal of English Linguistics, 48(2): 107–136. 10.1177/0075424220911070
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424220911070 [Google Scholar]
30. Sugawara, A.
    2012 Semantics of English Suffix (-)ish. Paper presented at theconference of the Chicago Linguistic Society 48, Chicago, 19–21 April 2012.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Traugott, E. C. and Trousdale, G.
    2013 Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001 [Google Scholar]