1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Languages in Contrast
  4. Volume 24, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 24, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1387-6759
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9897
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Languages show variation in the encoding of plurality in the domain of foodstuffs. Some foodstuffs are lexicalized by singular mass nouns (e.g., ) and others by plural count nouns (e.g., ). In the paper it is argued on the basis of German and Russian that there is no difference in meaning between these two forms: both denote aggregates as clusters of objects. Since objects are built into clusters, they are inaccessible for counting and both types of nouns uniformly behave like mass nouns. Such a uniform behavior would be unexplainable if these forms differed in meaning and the plural form were a regular count plural. This investigation suggests that two types of plural have to be distinguished: the mass aggregate plural, which indicates a clustered plurality of objects, and the count plural, which designates sets of disjoined objects. Regular plural markers may in principle be ambiguous between these two interpretations. However, if a plural marker is attached to a singulative or unit-denoting morpheme of a noun, the plural is unambiguously interpreted as count plural. The mass aggregate plural may receive a special morphological marking in some languages, as in Russian.

© 2024 John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lic.00048.gei
2024-10-11
2025-04-22

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/lic.00048.gei
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Acquaviva, P.
    2004 Plural mass nouns and the compositionality of number. Verbum26(4): 387–401. Available athdl.handle.net/10197/3898 [last accessed20 June 2024].
     [Google Scholar]
  2. 2008 Lexical plurals. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780199534210.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199534210.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  3. 2015 Singulatives. InWord-Formation. An international handbook for the languages of Europe, P. O. Müller, I. Ohnheiser, S. Olsen and F. Rainer (eds), Vol.21, 1171–1182. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Acquaviva, P. and M. Daniel
    2022 Number in grammar: results and perspectives. InNumber in the World’s Languages, P. Acquaviva and M. Daniel (eds), 833–910. Berlin/Boston: Mouton De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110622713‑024
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110622713-024 [Google Scholar]
  5. Alexiadou, A.
    2015 Deriving Fake Mass Nouns. InProceedings of NELS451. Amherst, MA: GSLA. 11–24.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Chierchia, G.
    2010 Mass nouns, vagueness and semantic variation. Synthese174(1): 99–149. 10.1007/s11229‑009‑9686‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9686-6 [Google Scholar]
  7. Corbett, G. G.
    2000 Number. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139164344
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139164344 [Google Scholar]
  8. Dudenredaktion
    Dudenredaktion (eds) 2009 Die Grammatik. Mannheim: Dudenverlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Geist, L.
    2021 The Diminutive Suffix -k- in Russian and Individuation: An Empirical Investigation. Paper presented atDissecting Morphological Theory: Diminutivization workshop at the 46th Austrian Linguistics Conference (ÖLT). Vienna, 11–12 Dec. 2021.
  10. (in prep.). Mass Plurals in German: An Empirical Study. Manuscript University of Stuttgart.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. 2024 The mass/count distinction in nouns for foodstuffs (Supplementary information). Available athttps://osf.io/4vgka/?view_only=0f7a68fb87774dfb849bacddc407b4a8 [last accessed20 June 2024]
  12. Geist, L. and Błaszczak, J.
    (in press). Distributed Plural hypothesis in Russian and Polish. InSyntax, Semantics, and Lexicon. Papers by and in Honor of Ilse Zimmermann, Ł. Jędrzejowski, C. Umbach and K. Schwabe eds Berlin: Language Science Press (Open Slavic Linguistics).
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Geist, L., Kagan, O. and Erschler, D.
    2023 Mass-Count Distinction and the Russian Singulative Suffix -in-. Journal of Slavic Linguistics31(30): 1–16. Available athttps://ojs.ung.si/index.php/JSL/article/view/172 [last accessed20 June 2024].
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Grimm, S.
    2012 Number and Individuation. PhD thesis, Stanford University.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Gunkel, L., Murelli, A., Schlotthauer, S., Wiese, B. and Zifonun, G.
    2017 Grammatik des Deutschen im Europäischen Vergleich. Das Nominal. Teilband I: Funktionale Domänen, Wort und Wortklassen. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110341461
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110341461 [Google Scholar]
  16. Haspelmath, M. and Karjus, A.
    2017 Explaining Asymmetries in Number marking: Singulatives, Pluratives, and Usage Frequency. Linguistics55(6), 1213–1235. Available athttps://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/ling-2017-0026/html [last accessed20 June 2024].
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Kagan, O. and Nurmio, S.
    2024 Diminutive or singulative? The suffixes -in and -k in Russian. InDiminutives across Languages, Theoretical Frameworks and Linguistic Domains, S. Manova, L. Grestenberger, and K. Korecky-Kröll (eds), 65–88. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. Available at10.1515/9783110792874‑003/html [last accessed20 June 2024].
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110792874-003/html [Google Scholar]
  18. Khrizman, K.
    2016 Numerous Issues in the Semantics of Numeral Constructions in Russian. PhD thesis, Bar-Ilan University.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Kupietz, M., Lüngen, H., Kamocki, P. and Witt, A.
    2018 The German Reference Corpus DeReKo: New Developments — New Opportunities. InProceedings of the 11th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2018. Miyazaki (Japan): European Language Resources Association (ELRA), 4353–4360. Available athttps://aclanthology.org/L18-1689.pdf [last accessed26 June 2024]
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Mathieu, É.
    2012 Flavors of Division. Linguistic Inquiry431, 650–679. 10.1162/ling_a_00110
     https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00110 [Google Scholar]
  21. 2014 Many a plural. InWeak Referentiality, A. Aguilar-Guevara, B. Le Bruyn and J. Zwart (eds), 157–181. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.219.07mat
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.219.07mat [Google Scholar]
  22. Mihatsch, W.
    2016 Collectives, Object Mass Nouns and Individual Count Nouns. Lingvisticæ Investigationes39(2): 289–308. 10.1075/li.39.2.05mih
     https://doi.org/10.1075/li.39.2.05mih [Google Scholar]
  23. Musatov, V. N.
    2015 Singuljativy s sovremennov russkom jazyke. Moscow: Flinta.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Rothstein, S.
    2011 Counting, Measuring and the Semantics of Classifiers. Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication61, Article 15, 1–42. Available at10.4148/biyclc.v6i0.1582 [last accessed20 June 2024].
     https://doi.org/10.4148/biyclc.v6i0.1582 [Google Scholar]
  25. 2016 Counting and Measuring: A Theoretical and Crosslinguistic Account. Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication111, Article 8, 1–49. Available at10.4148/1944‑3676.1106 [last accessed26 June 2024].
     https://doi.org/10.4148/1944-3676.1106 [Google Scholar]
  26. Savčuk, S. O., Arxangelʹskij, T. A., Bonč-Osmolovskaja, A. A., Donina, O. V., Kuznecova, Ju. N., Ljaševskaja, O. N., Orexov, B. V. and Podrjadčikova, M. V.
    2024 Nacionalʹnyj korpus russkogo jazyka 2.0: novye vozmožnosti i perspektivy razvitija. Voprosy jazykoznanija 2024, 21, 7–34. Available at10.31857/0373‑658X.2024.2.7‑34 [last accessed26 June 2024].
     https://doi.org/10.31857/0373-658X.2024.2.7-34 [Google Scholar]
  27. Schwarzschild, R.
    2011 Stubborn Distributivity, Multiparticipant Nouns and the Count/Mass Distinction. InProceedings of NELS391. Amherst: GLSA Publications, University of Massachusetts. 661–678
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Stolz, T.
    2001 Singulative-Collective: Natural Morphology and Stable Classes in Welsh Number Inflexion on Nouns. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung54(1): 52–76.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Sutton, P. R. and Filip, H.
    2021 The Count/Mass Distinction for Granular Nouns. InCountability in Natural Language, H. Filip (ed). Cambridge: Cambrige University Press. 10.1017/9781316823774.011
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316823774.011 [Google Scholar]
  30. Švedova, N. Ju.
    (eds) 1980 Russkaja grammatika. Moskva: Rossijskaja akademija nauk.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Vries, H. de
    2020 Collective Nouns. InThe Oxford Handbook of Grammatical Number, P. C. Hofherr and J. Doetjes (eds), 257–274. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Wągiel, M.
    2021 Slaic Derived Collective Nouns as Spatial and Social Clusters. InFormal Approaches to Number in Slavic and Beyond, M. Dočekal and M. Wągiel (eds), 175–205. Berlin: Language Science Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Wągiel, M. and Shlikhutka, N.
    2023 Clustering and Declustering Things: The Meaning of Collective and Singulative Morphology in Ukrainian. InProceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory331. Washington, DC: Linguistic Society of America. 194–214.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Wierzbicka, A.
    1988 The Semantics of Grammar. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.18
     https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.18 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/lic.00048.gei
Loading
The mass/count distinction in nouns for foodstuffs
Languages in Contrast 24, 297 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.00048.gei
/content/journals/10.1075/lic.00048.gei
/content/journals/10.1075/lic.00048.gei
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): aggregate nouns; collectives; German/Russian; mass/count distinction; plural

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error