1887
image of The directionality of assimilation
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

While the contextually determined alternation of the velar and palatal fricatives [x] and [ç] is highly similar in Greek and German, the directionality of assimilation is strikingly different. Whereas Greek opts for anticipatory assimilation, perseveratory assimilation prevails in German. Moreover, this process stays within the confines of the syllable in Greek but may also cross syllable boundaries in German. A lexicon-wide phonotactic analysis reveals that Greek fricatives are mostly restricted to onset positions. By contrast, in German, 75% of the fricative tokens occur as codas and 25% as onsets. It is argued that anticipatory assimilation in Greek results from the restriction of fricatives to onset sites and that perseveratory assimilation in German stems from the preference of fricatives for coda sites. Thus, a probabilistic phonotactic bias leads to a categorical decision on directionality. The strategy of ignoring syllable boundaries allows German to manage with only one type of assimilation.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lic.00061.ber
2025-11-06
2025-12-04
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Arvaniti, A.
    2007 Greek Phonetics. The State of the Art. Journal of Greek Linguistics: –. 10.1075/jgl.8.08arv
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jgl.8.08arv [Google Scholar]
  2. Baltazani, M., Kainada, E., Revithiadou, A. and Topintzi, N.
    2016 Vocoid-Driven Processes: Palatalization and Glide Hardening in Greek and its Dialects. Glossa: Article 23.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Barry, W. J., Klein, C. and Köser, S.
    1999 Speech Production Evidence for Ambisyllabicity in German. Phonus: –.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bateman, N.
    2007 A Crosslinguistic Investigation of Palatalization. PhD Thesis, University of California at San Diego.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bell, A.
    1971 Some Patterns of Occurrence and Function of Syllable Structure. Stanford University Working Papers on Language Universals: –.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Berg, T.
    1988Die Abbildung des Sprachproduktionsprozesses in einem Aktivationsflussmodell. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783111635750
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111635750 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bhat, D. N. S.
    1978 A General Study of Palatalization. InUniversals of Human Language. Vol. 2: Phonology, J. H. Greenberg, C. A. Ferguson and E. A. Moravcsik (eds), –. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Borowsky, T.
    2000 Word-Faithfulness and the Direction of Assimilation. The Linguistic Review: –. 10.1515/tlir.2000.17.1.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.2000.17.1.1 [Google Scholar]
  9. Casali, R. F.
    1997 Vowel Elision in Hiatus Contexts: Which Vowel Goes?Language: –. 10.2307/415882
    https://doi.org/10.2307/415882 [Google Scholar]
  10. Chamereau, C.
    2000Grammaire du purépecha parlé sur des îles du lac de Patzcuaro. Munich: Lincom.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Cholin, J. and Levelt, W. J. M.
    2009 Effects of Syllable Preparation and Syllable Frequency in Speech Production: Further Evidence for Syllabic Units at a Post-Lexical Level. Language and Cognitive Processes: –. 10.1080/01690960802348852
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960802348852 [Google Scholar]
  12. Clements, G. N.
    1990 The Role of the Sonority Cycle in Core Syllabification. InPapers in Laboratory Phonology. Vol. 1, J. Kingston and M. E. Beckman (eds), –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511627736.017
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627736.017 [Google Scholar]
  13. 1999 Affricates as Noncontoured Stops. InItem Order in Speech and Language, O. Fujimura, B. D. Joseph and B. Palek (eds), –. Prague: Karolinum Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Downing, L. J. and Kadenge, M.
    2020 Re-Placing PStem in the Prosodic Hierarchy. The Linguistic Review: –. 10.1515/tlr‑2020‑2050
    https://doi.org/10.1515/tlr-2020-2050 [Google Scholar]
  15. Flemming, E.
    2002Auditory Representations in Phonology. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Frisch, S. A., Pierrehumbert, J. B. and Broe, M. B.
    2004 Similarity Avoidance and the OCP. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory: –. 10.1023/B:NALA.0000005557.78535.3c
    https://doi.org/10.1023/B:NALA.0000005557.78535.3c [Google Scholar]
  17. Fujimura, O., Macchi, M. J. and Streeter, L. A.
    1978 Perception of Stop Consonants with Conflicting Transitional Cues: A Cross-Linguistic Study. Language and Speech: –. 10.1177/002383097802100408
    https://doi.org/10.1177/002383097802100408 [Google Scholar]
  18. Goldrick, M.
    2004 Phonological Features and Phonotactic Constraints in Speech Production. Journal of Memory and Language: –. 10.1016/j.jml.2004.07.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2004.07.004 [Google Scholar]
  19. Gordon, M. K.
    2016Phonological Typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199669004.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199669004.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  20. Gratsouni, D. and Topintzi, N.
    2020 On the Syllabification of ON (Obstruent-Nasal) Clusters in Greek. Studies in Greek Linguistics: –.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Guion, S. G.
    1998 The Role of Perception in the Sound Change of Velar Palatalization. Phonetica: –. 10.1159/000028423
    https://doi.org/10.1159/000028423 [Google Scholar]
  22. Hall, T. A.
    1989 Lexical Phonology and the Distribution of German [ç] and [x]. Phonology: –. 10.1017/S0952675700000920
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675700000920 [Google Scholar]
  23. Hansson, G.Ó
    2001 Theoretical and Typological Issues in Consonant Harmony. PhD Thesis, University of California at Berkeley.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Höhle, B. and Schriefers, H.
    1995 Ambisyllabizität im Deutschen: Psycholinguistische Evidenz. InAspekte der Sprachbeschreibung, B. Höhle and H. Schriefers (eds), –. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783110958874.85
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110958874.85 [Google Scholar]
  25. Hyman, L. M.
    2002 Is There a Right-to-Left Bias in Vowel Harmony?Paper presented at the9th International Phonology Meeting, Vienna, 1 November 2002.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. 2008 Directional Asymmetries in the Morphology and Phonology of Words, with Special Reference to Bantu. Linguistics: –. 10.1515/LING.2008.012
    https://doi.org/10.1515/LING.2008.012 [Google Scholar]
  27. Hymes, D. H.
    1955 The Language of the Kathlamet Chinook. PhD Thesis, Indiana University.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Joseph, B. D. and Tserdanelis, G.
    2003 Modern Greek. InVariation Typology, T. Roelke (ed.), –. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110202021.5.823
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110202021.5.823 [Google Scholar]
  29. Jun, J.
    1995 Perceptual and Articulatory Factors in Place Assimilation: An Optimality-Theoretic Approach. PhD Thesis, University of California at Los Angeles.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Kappa, I.
    1995 Silbenphonologie im Deutschen und Neugriechischen. PhD Thesis, Universität Salzburg.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Kessler, B. and Treiman, R.
    1997 Syllable Structure and the Distribution of Phonemes in English Syllables. Journal of Memory and Language: –. 10.1006/jmla.1997.2522
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1997.2522 [Google Scholar]
  32. Kim, K.
    2001 A Phonetically Based Account of Phonological Stop Assibilation. Phonology: –. 10.1017/S095267570100402X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S095267570100402X [Google Scholar]
  33. Kochetov, A.
    2011 Palatalization. InThe Blackwell Companion to Phonology. Vol. 3, M. van Oostendorp, C. J. Ewen, E. V. Hume and K. Rice (eds), –. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781444335262.wbctp0071
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444335262.wbctp0071 [Google Scholar]
  34. 2016 Palatalization and Glide Strengthening as Competing Repair Strategies: Evidence from Kirundi. Glossa: Article 14.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Laeufer, C.
    1992 Patterns of Voicing-Conditioned Vowel Duration in French and English. Journal of Phonetics: –. 10.1016/S0095‑4470(19)30648‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30648-5 [Google Scholar]
  36. Langdon, M.
    1970A Grammar of Diegueño. The Mesa Grande Dialect. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Lombardi, L.
    1999 Positional Faithfulness and Voicing Assimilation in Optimality Theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory: –. 10.1023/A:1006182130229
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006182130229 [Google Scholar]
  38. Loughnane, R.
    2009 A Grammar of Oksapmin. PhD Thesis, University of Melbourne.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Maddieson, I.
    1984Patterns of Sounds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511753459
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511753459 [Google Scholar]
  40. Malikouti-Drachman, A.
    2001 Greek Phonology: A Contemporary Perspective. Journal of Greek Linguistics: –.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Merchant, J.
    1996 Alignment and Fricative Assimilation in German. Linguistic Inquiry: –.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Michailovsky, B.
    1981 Grammaire de la langue hayu (Nepal). PhD Thesis, University of California at Berkeley.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Noske, M.
    1997 Feature Spreading as Dealignment: The Distribution of [ç] and [x] in German. Phonology: –. 10.1017/S0952675797003357
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675797003357 [Google Scholar]
  44. Pinnow, J.
    1988Die Sprache der Chiricahua-Apachen. Hamburg: Buske.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. PONS Kompaktwörterbuch Griechisch
    PONS Kompaktwörterbuch Griechisch 2015 Stuttgart: PONS.
  46. Pouplier, M., Hoole, P. and Scobbie, J. M.
    2011 Investigating the Asymmetry of English Sibilant Assimilation: Acoustic and EMG Data. Laboratory Phonology: –. 10.1515/labphon.2011.001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/labphon.2011.001 [Google Scholar]
  47. Recasens, D.
    1999 Lingual Coarticulation. InCoarticulation: Theory, Data and Techniques, W. J. Hardcastle and N. Hewlett (eds), –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486395.005
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486395.005 [Google Scholar]
  48. Ronneberger-Sibold, E.
    1988 Verschiedene Wege der Phonemisierung bei Deutsch (regionalsprachlich) ç, x. Folia Linguistica: –. 10.1515/flin.1988.22.3‑4.301
    https://doi.org/10.1515/flin.1988.22.3-4.301 [Google Scholar]
  49. Steriade, D.
    2001 Directional Asymmetries in Place Assimilation: A Perceptual Account. InThe Role of Speech Perception in Phonology, E. Hume and K. Johnson (eds), –. San Diego: Academic Press. 10.1163/9789004454095_013
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004454095_013 [Google Scholar]
  50. van Lessen Kloeke, W.
    1982Deutsche Phonologie und Morphologie. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783111357171
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111357171 [Google Scholar]
  51. Vennemann, T.
    1988Preference Laws for Syllable Structure. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Webb, C.
    1982 A Constraint on Progressive Consonant Assimilation. Linguistics: –. 10.1515/ling.1982.20.3‑4.309
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1982.20.3-4.309 [Google Scholar]
  53. Wiese, R.
    1988Silbische und lexikalische Phonologie. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783111594729
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111594729 [Google Scholar]
  54. 1996The Phonology of German. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Zsiga, E. C.
    2011 Local Assimilation. InThe Blackwell Companion to Phonology. Vol. 3, M. van Oostendorp, C. J. Ewen, E. V. Hume and K. Rice (eds), –. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781444335262.wbctp0081
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444335262.wbctp0081 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/lic.00061.ber
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/lic.00061.ber
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: velar fricative ; directionality ; assimilation ; palatal fricative ; German/Greek
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error