Motivating an English-German contrast in word-formation

References

1. Bauer, L.
   1983 English Word-formation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139165846
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165846 [Google Scholar]
2. Bauer, L.
   2011 Compounds and minor word-formation types. InThe Handbook of English Linguistics, B. Aarts and A. McMahon (eds), 483–506. London: Blackwell.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Berg, T.
   1998 The incompatibility of morpheme orders and lexical categories and its historical implications. English Language and Linguistics2: 245–262. doi: 10.1017/S1360674300000873
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674300000873 [Google Scholar]
4. Berg, T. , Helmer, S. , Neubauer, M. , and Lohmann, A.
   2012 Determinants of the extent of compound use: A contrastive analysis. Linguistics50: 269–303. doi: 10.1515/ling‑2012‑0010
   https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2012-0010 [Google Scholar]
5. Booij, G.
   2010 Construction Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Botha, R.
   1981 A Base Rule Theory of Afrikaans Synthetic Compounding. InThe Scope of Lexical Rules, M. Moortgat , H. v.d. Hulst and T. Hoekstra (eds), 1–77. Dordrecht: Foris.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bybee, J.
   2010 Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511750526
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750526 [Google Scholar]
8. Carstairs-McCarthy, A.
   2002 An Introduction to English Morphology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Donalies, E.
   2011 Basiswissen deutsche Wortbildung. Tübingen: Francke.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Dudenredaktion
    Dudenredaktion 2000 Duden: Die deutsche Rechtschreibung, 22nd ed.Mannheim: Dudenverlag.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Dudenredaktion
    Dudenredaktion 2005 Duden: Die Grammatik, 5th ed.Mannheim: Dudenverlag.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Eisenberg, P.
    2004 Grundriss der deutschen Grammatik: Das Wort, 2nd ed.Stuttgart: Metzler. doi: 10.1007/978‑3‑476‑03763‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-03763-3 [Google Scholar]
13. Erben, J.
    2006 Einführung in die deutsche Wortbildungslehre, 6th ed.Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Eschenlohr, S.
    1999 Vom Nomen zum Verb: Konversion, Präfigierung und Rückbildung im Deutschen. Hildesheim/Zürich/New York: Georg Olms Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Fischer, O.
    2007 Morphosyntactic Change: Formal and Functional Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Fleischer, W. and Barz, I.
    2012 Wortbildung der deutschen Gegenwartssprache, 4th ed.Berlin: de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110256659
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110256659 [Google Scholar]
17. Gast, V.
    2008 V-N compounds in English and German. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik56: 269–282. doi: 10.1515/zaa.2008.56.3.269
    https://doi.org/10.1515/zaa.2008.56.3.269 [Google Scholar]
18. Gast, V. and Haas, F.
    2008 On reflexive and reciprocal readings of anaphors in German and other European languages. InReciprocity and Reflexivity Theoretical and Typological Explorations, E. König and V. Gast (eds), 307–346.Berlin: de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Grimm, J. and Grimm, W.
    1854–1961 Deutsches Wörterbuch. Leipzig.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Haas, F.
    2010 Reciprocity in English: Historical Development and Synchronic Structure. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Haselow, A.
    2011 Typological Changes in the Lexicon: Analytic Tendencies in English Noun Formation. Berlin: de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110238211
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110238211 [Google Scholar]
22. Hiltunen, R.
    1983 The Decline of the Prefixes and the Beginning of the English Phrasal Verb: The Evidence from some Old and early Middle English Texts. Turku/Helsinki: Turun Yliopiso.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Itkonen, E.
    2005 Analogy as Structure and Process. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/hcp.14
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.14 [Google Scholar]
24. Kastovsky, D.
    2006 Vocabulary. InA History of the English Language, R. Hogg and D. Denison (eds), 199–270. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511791154.005
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791154.005 [Google Scholar]
25. Kemmer, S.
    1993 The Middle Voice. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.23
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.23 [Google Scholar]
26. Koehn, P.
    2005 Europarl: A parallel corpus for statistical machine translation. MT Summit5: 79–86.
    [Google Scholar]
27. König, E. and Gast, V.
    2012 Understanding English-German Contrasts, 3rd ed.Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Lehmann, C.
    2008 Roots, stems and word classes. Studies in Language32: 546–567. doi: 10.1075/sl.32.3.04leh
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.32.3.04leh [Google Scholar]
29. Lieber, R.
    2009 IE, Germanic: English. InThe Oxford Handbook of Compounding, R. Lieber and P. Stekauer (eds), 357–369. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Lohde, M.
    2006 Wortbildung des modernen Deutschen. Tübingen: Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Marchand, H.
    1969 The Categories and Types of Present-day English Word Formation. München: Beck.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Oxford English Dictionary
    Oxford English Dictionary. Available online atwww.oed.com [last accessed2 June 2016]
33. Plank, F.
    2008 Thoughts on the origin, progress, and pro status of reciprocal forms in Germanic, occasioned by those of Bavarian. InReciprocity and Reflexivity Theoretical and Typological Explorations, E. König and V. Gast (eds), 347–373.Berlin: de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Raffelsiefen, R.
    1998 Semantic stability in derivationally related words. InHistorical linguistics 1995, volume 2, R. M. Hogg and L. van Bergen (eds), 247–267. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cilt.162.19raf
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.162.19raf [Google Scholar]
35. Schmid, H.-J.
    2011 English Morphology and Word-Formation: An Introduction. Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Schmid, H.-J.
    2015 The scope of word-formation research. InWord-Formation. An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe. Vol.I. (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft / Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science (HSK) 40/1), P. O. Müller , I. Ohnheiser , S. Olsen and F. Rainer (eds), 1–21. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Schröder, A.
    2011 On the Productivity of Verbal Prefixation in English: Synchronic and Diachronic Perspectives. Tübingen: Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Vogel, P.M.
    1996 Wortarten und Wortartenwechsel: Zu Konversion und verwandten Erscheinungen im Deutschen und in anderen Sprachen. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110905106
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110905106 [Google Scholar]
39. Wiemer, B. and Nedjalkov, V. P.
    2007 Reciprocal and reflexive constructions in German. InReciprocal Constructions, V. P. Nedjalkov (ed.), 455–512. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.71.17wie
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.71.17wie [Google Scholar]