1887
Volume 19, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1387-6759
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9897
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This article compares the grammaticalizing human impersonal pronoun () in Afrikaans to fully grammaticalized and non-grammaticalized in Dutch. It is shown that and can still be used lexically, unlike and , and that () and are restricted to non-referential indefinite, universal-internal uses while exhibits the whole range of (non-) referential indefinite ones. Despite the latter’s presence in the earliest Afrikaans data, it is argued not to have influenced the development of () . This pronoun and Dutch are also found to have syntactic functions other than subjecthood, unlike . The contrast is attributed to their different degrees of grammaticalization. Lastly, the Afrikaans ‘man’-pronoun is shown to differ from its Dutch counterparts in relying on the second person singular for suppletion, though forms of () are found to occasionally occur instead.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lic.17004.van
2018-06-05
2019-10-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Cabredo Hofherr, P.
    2010 Binding Properties of Impersonal Human Pronouns in Generic and Episodic Contexts. Available atarchive.sfl.cnrs.fr/sites/sfl/IMG/pdf/impers​May2010CabredoHofherrManOnLa.pdf [last accessed on6 April 2017].
  2. Conradie, C. J.
    2017 Root Semantics. Taalportaal. Available attaalportaal.org/​taalportaal/topic/pid/topic-14857881438688606 [last accessed on4 October 2017].
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Coussé, E. and van der Auwera, J.
    2012 Human Impersonal Pronouns in Swedish and Dutch: a Contrastive Study of Man and Men . Languages in Contrast12(2):121–138. 10.1075/lic.12.2.01cou
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.12.2.01cou [Google Scholar]
  4. De Smet, H.
    n.d.Die Burger Corpus. Leuven: Leuven University.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Donaldson, B. C.
    1993A Grammar of Afrikaans. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110863154
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110863154 [Google Scholar]
  6. Draye, L.
    2014Man en men: een Wereld van Verschil. InPatroon en Argument, F. Van de Velde , H. Smessaert , F. Van Eynde and S. Verbrugge (eds), 241–253. Leuven: Leuven University Press. 10.2307/j.ctt14jxsr0.19
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt14jxsr0.19 [Google Scholar]
  7. Egerland, V.
    2003 Impersonal Pronouns in Scandinavian and Romance. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax71:75–102.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Fenger, P.
    2016 How Impersonal does One Get? A Study of Man-Pronouns in Germanic. Available athttps://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/002802 [last accessed on6 April 2017].
  9. Gast, V. and van der Auwera, J.
    2013 Towards a Distributional Typology of Human Impersonal Pronouns, Based on Data from European Languages. InLanguages Across Boundaries, D. Bakker and M. Haspelmath (eds), 119–158. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110331127.119
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110331127.119 [Google Scholar]
  10. Giacalone Ramat, A. and Sansò, A.
    2007 The Spread and Decline of Indefinite Man-Constructions in European Languages: an Areal Perspective. InEurope and the Mediterranean Linguistic Areas, P. Ramat and E. Roma (eds), 95–131. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.88.07gia
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.88.07gia [Google Scholar]
  11. Gries, S.Th.
    2013 Elementary Statistical Testing with R. InResearch Methods in Language Variation and Change, M.G. Krug and J. Schlüter (eds), 361–381. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511792519.024
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511792519.024 [Google Scholar]
  12. Grondelaers, S. , Deygers, K. , Van Aken, H. , Van Den Heede, V. and Speelman, D.
    2000 Het ConDiv-Corpus Geschreven Nederlands. Nederlandse Taalkunde5(4):356–363.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Hoekstra, J.
    2010 On the Impersonal Pronoun Men in Modern West Frisian. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics13(1):35–64. 10.1007/s10828‑010‑9036‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10828-010-9036-6 [Google Scholar]
  14. Kirsten, J.
    2016 Grammatikale Verandering in Afrikaans van 1911–2010. PhD dissertation, North-West University Vanderbijlpark.
  15. Rayson, P. E. and Garside, R.
    2000 Comparing Corpora Using Frequency Profiling. Proceedings of the Association for Computational Linguistics Workshop on Comparing Corpora at their 38th Annual Meeting. Hong Kong, China, 7 October 2000. Association for Computational Linguistics. 1–6. 10.3115/1117729.1117730
    https://doi.org/10.3115/1117729.1117730 [Google Scholar]
  16. Siewierska, A. and Papastathi, M.
    2011 Towards a Typology of Third Personal Plural Impersonals. Linguistics49(3):575–610. 10.1515/ling.2011.018
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2011.018 [Google Scholar]
  17. Taalkommissie
    Taalkommissie 2010Taalkommissiekorpus. Pretoria: Suid-Afrikaanse Akademie vir Wetenskap en Kuns.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Weerman, F.
    2006 It’s the Economy, Stupid: een Vergelijkende Blik op Men en Man . InNederlands tussen Duits en Engels, M. Hüning , U. Vogl , T. van der Wouden and A. Verhagen (eds), 19–47. Leiden: Stichting Neerlandistiek Leiden.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/lic.17004.van
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/lic.17004.van
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Afrikaans/Dutch , grammaticalization , impersonal and pronoun
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error