1887
Volume 19, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1387-6759
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9897
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Drawing upon recent insights into the role of Goal preference as reflector of cross-linguistic differences, this paper investigates the factors affecting the realization of Goals in motion event descriptions. In particular, it examines the interplay between the lexicalization pattern of a language, on the one hand, and grammatical viewpoint aspect, on the other – factors which have commonly been treated in isolation. In so doing, three typologically distinct languages were examined: English, German and Greek. The empirical basis of this paper includes: (a) a corpus study, in which we examined the distribution of Goals in a small set of verbs, and (b) an experimental verbalization study, from which we elicited descriptions of different motion event types. While the former does not give a clear picture concerning the cross-linguistic differences in Goal prominence, the latter indicates that lexicalization pattern assumes a more prominent role than grammatical viewpoint aspect in affecting Goal realization.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lic.17010.geo
2018-09-10
2019-10-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abraham, W.
    2007 Absent Arguments on the Absentive: An Exercise in Silent Syntax. Grammatical Category or Just Pragmatic Inference?Groninger Arbeiten zur Germanistischen Linguistik45: 3–16.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Anthonissen, L., De Wit, A. and Mortelmans, T.
    2016 Aspect Meets Modality: A Semantic Analysis of the German Am-Progressive. Journal of Germanic Linguistics28(1): 1–30. 10.1017/S1470542715000185
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1470542715000185 [Google Scholar]
  3. Antonopoulou, E.
    1987 Prototype Theory and the Meaning of Verbs, with Special Reference to Modern Greek Verbs of Motion. PhD Thesis, SOAS, University of London.
  4. Athanasopoulos, P. and Bylund, E.
    2013 Does Grammatical Aspect Affect Motion Event Cognition? A Cross-Linguistic Comparison of English and Swedish Speakers. Cognitive Science37: 286–309. 10.1111/cogs.12006
    https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12006 [Google Scholar]
  5. Athanasopoulos, P., Damjanovic, L., Burnand, J. and Bylund, E.
    2015 Learning to Think in a Second Language: Effects of Proficiency and Length of Exposure in English Learners of German. The Modern Language Journal99 (Supplement):138–153. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2015.12183.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2015.12183.x [Google Scholar]
  6. Binnick, R. I.
    2006 Aspect and Aspectuality. InThe Handbook of English Linguistics, B. Aarts and A. McMahon (eds), 244–268. Oxford: Blackwell-Wiley. 10.1002/9780470753002.ch11
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470753002.ch11 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bassea-Bezantakou, C.
    1992Simasiologikes Theories tor Rimaton Kiniseos tis Neas Ellinikis Glossas [A semantic analysis of motion verbs in Modern Greek]. Kardamitsa: Athens.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Beavers, J., Levin, B. and Tham, W. S.
    2010The Typology of Motion Expressions Revisited. Linguistics46: 331–377.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bepperling, S. and Härtl, H.
    2013 Ereigniskonzeptualisierung im Zweitspracherwerb – Thinking for Speaking im Vergleich von Muttersprachlern und Lernern. Zeitschrift für Semiotik35(1–2): 159–191.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Berman, A. R. and Slobin, D.I.
    (eds) 1994Relating Events in Narrative: A Crosslinguistic Developmental Study. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Berthele, R.
    2006Ort und Weg: Die sprachliche Raumreferenz in Varietäten des Deutschen, Rätoromanischen und Französischen. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110890464
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110890464 [Google Scholar]
  12. Berthele, R.
    2017 When bilinguals forget their manners. Language dominance and motion event descriptions in French and German. Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14: 39–70.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Berthele, R. and Stocker, L.
    2017 The Effect of Language Mode on Motion Event Descriptions in German-French Bilinguals. Language and Cognition9(4):648–676. 10.1017/langcog.2016.34
    https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2016.34 [Google Scholar]
  14. Boroditsky, L., Schmidt, A. L. and Webb, P.
    2003 Sex, Syntax, and Semantics. InLanguage in Mind: Advances in the Study of Language and Thought, D. Gentner and S. Goldin-Meadow (eds), 61–79. Cambridge: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Bertinetto, P. M., Ebert, K. and de Groot, C.
    2000 The Progressive in Europe. InTense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe, Ö. Dahl (ed), 517–558. Berlin: De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Bybee, L. J., Perkins, R. and Pagliuca, W.
    1994The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Comrie, B.
    1976Aspect: An Introduction to the Study of Verbal Aspect and Related Problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Croft, W., Barðdal, J., Hollmann, W., Sotirova, V. and Taoka, C.
    2010 Revising Talmy’s typological classification of complex event constructions. InContrastive Studies in Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language 10], H. C. Boas (ed.), 201–235. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi:  10.1075/cal.10.09cro
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.10.09cro [Google Scholar]
  19. Ebert, K.
    2000 Progressive Markers in Germanic Languages. InTense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe, Ö. Dahl (ed), 605–653. Berlin: De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Filipović, L.
    2007Talking about motion: A crosslinguistic investigation of lexicalization patterns. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi:  10.1075/slcs.91
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.91 [Google Scholar]
  21. Flecken, M., von Stutterheim, C. and Carroll, M.
    2014 Grammatical Aspect Influences Motion Event Perception: Findings from a cross-linguistic nonverbal recognition task. Language and Cognition 6(1):45–78. 10.1017/langcog.2013.2
    https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2013.2 [Google Scholar]
  22. Georgakopoulos, T., & Sioupi, A.
    2015 Framing the Difference between Sources and Goals in Change of Possession Events: A Corpus-based Study in German and Modern Greek. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association3:105–122. 10.1515/gcla‑2015‑0007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/gcla-2015-0007 [Google Scholar]
  23. Giannakidou, A.
    2003 A Puzzle about until and the Present Perfect. InPerfect Explorations, A. Alexiadou, M. Rachert and A. von Stechow (eds), 101–133. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110902358.101
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110902358.101 [Google Scholar]
  24. Goschler, J.
    2013 Motion events in Turkish-German contact varieties. InVariation and Change in the Encoding of Motion Events, J. Goschler & A. Stefanowitsch (eds.), 115–131. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/hcp.41.05gos
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.41.05gos [Google Scholar]
  25. Goutsos, D.
    2010 The Corpus of Greek Texts: A Reference Corpus for Modern Greek. Corpora5(1):29–44. 10.3366/cor.2010.0002
    https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2010.0002 [Google Scholar]
  26. Herweg, M.
    1990Zeitaspekte: Die Bedeutung von Tempus, Aspekt und temporalen Konjunktionen. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag GmbH. 10.1007/978‑3‑663‑01647‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-01647-2 [Google Scholar]
  27. Holton, D., Mackridge, P. and Philippaki-Warburton, I.
    1997Greek: A Comprehensive Reference Grammar of the Modern Language. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Horrocks, G. and Stavrou, M.
    2007 Grammaticalized Aspect and Spatio-Temporal Culmination. Lingua117:605–644. 10.1016/j.lingua.2006.03.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2006.03.007 [Google Scholar]
  29. Johanson, M. and Papafragou, A.
    2010 Universality and Variation in the Acquisition of Path Vocabulary. Proceedings from the 34th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press. Available atpapafragou.psych.​udel.edu/papers/BU%202009-10%20proceedings-JohansonPapafragou-final.pdf [last accessed17 April 2018].
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Kitis, E. and Tsangalidis, A.
    2005 Expressivity as an Option of Tense-Aspect in Language: The Case of Modern Greek Imperfective Past. InTrends of Linguistics. Reviewing Linguistic Thought. Converging Trends for the 21st Century, S. Marmaridou, K. Nikiforidou & E. Antonopoulou (eds), 143–162. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110920826.143
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110920826.143 [Google Scholar]
  31. Kouklakis, G., Mikros, G., Markopoulos, G. and Koutsis, I.
    2007 Corpus Manager: A Tool for Multilingual Corpus Analysis. InProceedings of the Corpus Linguistics Conference (CL2007), D. Matthew, P. Rayson, S. Hunston and P. Danielsson (eds). Birmingham, UK. Available atucrel.lancs.ac.uk/publications/CL2007/paper/244_Paper.pdf [last accessed17 April 2018].
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Kupietz, M., Belica, C., Keibel, H. and Witt, A.
    2010 The German Reference Corpus DEREKO: A primordial sample for linguistic research. InProceedings of the 7th conference on International Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2010), N. Calzolari (ed.), 1848–1854. Valletta, Malta: ELRA.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Lang, E.
    2011Deutsch – typologisch. Institut für deutsche Sprache und Linguistik. Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin. Materialsammlung.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Levin, B.
    1993English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Lübbe, A. and Rapp, I.
    2011 Aspekt, Temporalität und Argumentstruktur bei attributiven Partizipien des Deutschen. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft30(2):259–299. 10.1515/zfsw.2011.010
    https://doi.org/10.1515/zfsw.2011.010 [Google Scholar]
  36. Malt, C. B., Steven, A. S. and Gennari, P. S.
    2003 Speaking versus Thinking about Objects and Actions. InLanguage in Mind: Advances in the Study of Language and Thought, D. Gentner and S. Goldin-Meadow (eds), 81–111. Cambridge: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Moser, A.
    1994Aktionsart and Aspects of Verb [Pion kai Apopsis tou Rimatos]. Parousia Monograph Series 30. Athens: Parousia.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Özçalışkan, Ş. and Slobin, D.I.
    2000Climb up vs. Ascend Climbing: Lexicalization Choices in Expressing Motion Events with Manner and Path Components. Proceedings of the Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development 24 (Vol.II). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press. 558–570.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Papafragou, A., Massey, C. and Gleitman, L.
    2002 Shake, Rattle, ’n’ Roll: The Representation of Motion in Language and Cognition. Cognition84:189–219. 10.1016/S0010‑0277(02)00046‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00046-X [Google Scholar]
  40. 2006 When English Proposes what Greek Presupposes: The Cross-linguistic Encoding of Motion Events. Cognition98: B75–B87. 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.05.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2005.05.005 [Google Scholar]
  41. Papafragou, A. and Selimis, S.
    2010 Event Categorisation and Language: A Cross-linguistic Study of Motion. Language and Cognitive Processes25: 224–260. 10.1080/01690960903017000
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960903017000 [Google Scholar]
  42. Papafragou, A., Hulbert, J. and Trueswell, J.
    2008 Does Language Guide Event Perception?: Evidence from Eye Movements. Cognition108:155–184. 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.02.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.02.007 [Google Scholar]
  43. Schmiédtova, B.
    2011 Do L2 Speakers Think in the L1 when Speaking in the L2?. VIAL, International Journal of Applied Linguistics8:138–179.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Schmiédtova, B. and Flecken, M.
    2008 Aspectual Concepts across Languages: Some Considerations for Second Language Learning. InCognitive Approaches to Pedagogical Grammar, S. de Knop and T. de Rycker (eds), 357–384. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Schmiedtová, B., von Stutterheim, C. and Carroll, M.
    2011 Language-specific Patterns in Event Construal of Advanced Second Language Speakers. InThinking and Speaking in two Languages, A. Pavlenko (ed), 66–107. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847693389‑005
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847693389-005 [Google Scholar]
  46. Selimis, S.
    2007 Glosiki Kodikopiisi tu Eniologikou Pediu tis Kinisis: Kirioleksia ke Metafora sta Elinika Pedion ke Enilikon [Linguistic Coding of the Concept of Motion: Literal and Metaphorical Expressions in Adult and Child Greek]. PhD Thesis, University of Athens.
  47. Selimis, S. and Katis, D.
    2010 Motion Descriptions in English and Greek: A Cross-typological Developmental Study of Conversations and Narratives. Linguistik Online42:57–76.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Sioupi, A.
    2014Aspektdistinktionen im Vergleich. Deutsch/Englisch – Griechisch. Tübingen: Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Slobin, D.I.
    1996a From ‘Thought and Language’ to ‘Thinking for Speaking’. InRethinking Linguistic Relativity, J. J. Gumperz and S. C. Levinson (eds), 70–96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Slobin, D. I.
    1996b Two Ways to Travel: Verbs of Motion in English and Spanish. InGrammatical constructions: Their Form and Meaning, S. Thompson and M. Shibatani (eds), 195–219. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Slobin, D.I.
    2003 Language and Thought Online: Cognitive Consequences of Linguistic Relativity. InLanguage in Mind: Advances in the Study of Language and Thought, D. Gentner and S. Goldin-Meadow (eds), 157–192. Cambridge: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. 2004 The many Ways to Search for a Frog: Linguistic Typology and the Expression of Motion Events. InRelating Events in Narrative: Typological and Contextual Perspectives, S. Strömqvist and L. Verhoeven (eds), 219–257. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Smith, C.
    1991/1997The Parameter of Aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑015‑7911‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7911-7 [Google Scholar]
  54. Soroli, E.
    2012 Variation in Spatial Language and Cognition: Exploring Visuo-spatial Thinking and Speaking Cross-linguistically. Cognitive Processing13: 333–337. 10.1007/s10339‑012‑0494‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-012-0494-4 [Google Scholar]
  55. Soroli, E. and Verkerk, A.
    2017 Motion Events in Greek: Methodological and Typological Issues. CogniTextes6(1): 1–53.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. von Stutterheim, C., Carroll, M. and Klein, W.
    2009 New perspectives in Analyzing Aspectual Distinctions across Languages. InThe Expression of Time, W. Klein and P. Li (eds), 195–216. Berlin: de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. von Stutterheim, C., Andermann, M., Carroll, M., Flecken, M. and Schmiedtová, B.
    2012 How Grammaticized Concepts Shape Event Conceptualization in Language Production: Insights from Linguistic Analysis, Eye Tracking Data, and Memory Performance. Linguistics50(4): 833–867. 10.1515/ling‑2012‑0026
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2012-0026 [Google Scholar]
  58. von Stutterheim, C. and Nüse, R.
    2003 Processes of Conceptualisation in Language Production. Linguistics41(5):851–881.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. von Stutterheim, C., Nüse, R. and Murcia-Serra, J.
    2003 Crosslinguistic Differences in the Conceptualization of Events. InInformation structure in a Cross-linguistic Perspective, H. Hasselgard, S. Johansson, B. Behrens & C. Fabricius-Hansen (eds), 179–198. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. von Stutterheim, C., Bouhaous, A. and Carroll, M.
    2017 From Time to Space: The Impact of Aspectual Categories on the Construal of Motion Events: The Case of Tunisian Arabic and Modern Standard Arabic. Linguistics55(1): 207–249. 10.1515/ling‑2016‑0038
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2016-0038 [Google Scholar]
  61. Talmy, L.
    2000Toward a Cognitive Semantics, Vol. II: Typology and Process in Concept Structuring. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Vigliocco, G., Vinson, P. D., Paganelli, F. and Dworzynski, K.
    2005 Grammatical Gender Effects on Cognition: Implications for Language Learning and Language Use. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General134(4): 501–520. 10.1037/0096‑3445.134.4.501
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.134.4.501 [Google Scholar]
  63. Vogel, P. M.
    2007 Anna ist essen! Neue Überlegungen zum Absentiv. InKopulaverben und Kopulasätze: Intersprachliche and Intrasprachliche Aspekte, L. Geist & B. Rothstein (eds), 253–284. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783110938838.253
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110938838.253 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/lic.17010.geo
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/lic.17010.geo
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error