Volume 21, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1387-6759
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9897
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



This article presents a contrastive analysis of the English copular subschema [ + past participle] and the equivalent copular subschema [ + past participle] in French, based on web data. It is shown that both patterns are almost equally productive at the subject complement level. Furthermore, a more in-depth analysis demonstrates that, in the segment of participles with a high adjectival potential, accumulates more participle tokens than . Conversely, the reverse holds true for participles with a high verbal potential, in which case is characterized by more participle tokens than . This high amount of combinations between and eventive participles also suggests a higher degree of passivity for . However, in the segment of participles with an intermediate verbal potential, is slightly more type frequent than , which hints at an emerging productivity in this area for as well.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Baayen, R. H. and Lieber, R.
    1991 Productivity and English Derivation: A Corpus-Based Study. Linguistics29(5): 801–844. 10.1515/ling.1991.29.5.801
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1991.29.5.801 [Google Scholar]
  2. Baayen, R. H.
    1993 On Frequency, Transparency and Productivity. InYearbook of Morphology 1992, G. Booij and J. van Marle (eds), 181–208. Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978‑94‑017‑3710‑4_7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3710-4_7 [Google Scholar]
  3. 2009 Corpus Linguistics in Morphology: Morphological Productivity. InCorpus Linguistics, A. Lüdeling , M. Kytö and M. Kytö (eds), 899–919. Berlin: de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Baroni, M. and Evert, S.
    2014 The ZipfR Package for Lexical Statistics: A Tutorial Introduction. Available atzipfr.r-forge.r-project.org/materials/zipfrtutorial.pdf [last accessed1 June 2019].
  5. Craig, C. G.
    1991 Ways to Go in Rama: A Case Study in Polygrammaticalization. InApproaches to Grammaticalization. Volume II. Types of grammatical markers, E. C. Traugott and B. Heine (eds), 455–492. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/tsl.19.2.20cra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.19.2.20cra [Google Scholar]
  6. De Sutter, G.
    2005 Rood, Groen, Corpus! Een Taalgebruiksgebaseerde Analyse van Woordvolgordevariatie in Tweeledige Werkwoordelijke Eindgroepen. PhD Thesis, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Dik, S. C.
    1987 Copula Auxiliarization: How and Why?InHistorical Development of Auxiliaries, M. Harris and P. Ramat (eds), 53–84. Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110856910.53
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110856910.53 [Google Scholar]
  8. Gaeta, L. and Ricca, D.
    2006 Productivity in Italian Word Formation: A Variable-Corpus Approach. Linguistics44(1): 57–89. 10.1515/LING.2006.003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/LING.2006.003 [Google Scholar]
  9. Goldberg, A. E.
    1995Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Guehria, W.
    2011 La Structure Attributive avec devenir comme Construction Marquée dans l’Ensemble Sous-Déterminé des Phrases de Forme NVétat Adj . Langue Française171(3): 135–146. 10.3917/lf.171.0135
    https://doi.org/10.3917/lf.171.0135 [Google Scholar]
  11. Hopper, P. J. and Thompson, S. A.
    1980 Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse. Language56(2): 251–299. 10.1353/lan.1980.0017
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1980.0017 [Google Scholar]
  12. Kilgarriff, A. , Baisa, V. , Bušta, J. , Jakubíček, M. , Kovář, V. , Michelfeit, J. , Rychlý, P. and Suchomel, V.
    2014 The Sketch Engine: Ten Years On. Lexicography1(1): 7–36. 10.1007/s40607‑014‑0009‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s40607-014-0009-9 [Google Scholar]
  13. Laca, B.
    2000 Auxiliarisation et Copularisation. Revue de Linguistique Romane64: 427–443.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Raineri, S.
    2010 Analyse Contrastive Français-Anglais du Passif dans une Perspective Constructionnelle : Sens et Fonction de BE Ven, ETRE Vé, GET Ven et SE FAIRE Ver . PhD Thesis, Université de la Sorbonne nouvelle – Paris III.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Sansò, A. and Ramat, A. G.
    2015 Deictic Motion Verbs as Passive Auxiliaries: The Case of Italian andare ‘go’ and venire ‘come’. Transactions of the Philological Society114(1): 1–24. 10.1111/1467‑968X.12059
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-968X.12059 [Google Scholar]
  16. Sleeman, P.
    2014 From Participle to Adjective in Germanic and Romance. InAdjectives in Germanic and Romance, P. Sleeman , F. Van de Velde and H. Perridon (eds), 171–198. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/la.212.07sle
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.212.07sle [Google Scholar]
  17. Wickham, H.
    2009Ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. New York: Springer. 10.1007/978‑0‑387‑98141‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-98141-3 [Google Scholar]
  18. Zeldes, A.
    2012Productivity in Argument Selection from Morphology to Syntax. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110303919
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110303919 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): become; copular construction; English/French; passive construction; productivity
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error