1887
image of Engaging with customer’s emotions
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Informational-persuasive discourse may be encoded in promotional strategies through which a given product is described in a positive way to persuade potential customers. For this, evaluation may appeal to reason or may tickle emotions ( ). This study compares the way in which advertising texts for herbal tea engage with customers’ emotions in English and in Spanish. We examined the strategies of ‘enjoying the experience’ and ‘aesthetic appeal’ from an Appraisal Theory approach ( ). We categorised these according to the attitude sub-systems of ‘affect’, ‘appreciation’, and ‘judgement’, determined how explicit the evaluation was, and identified gradable resources. Results show that English texts display more ‘affect’-like resources that can awaken a desire in the customer. By contrast, in the Spanish sample ‘appreciation’ resources that evaluate the composition of the product play a greater role. ‘Enjoying the experience’ seems to engage with the customers’ emotions more overtly than ‘aesthetic appeal’.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lic.19016.per
2021-07-20
2021-09-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bednarek, M.
    (2007) Polyphony in Appraisal: Typological and Topological Perspectives. Linguistics and the Human Sciences3(2): 107–136.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bhatia, V. K.
    (2004) Worlds of Written Discourse. London: Continuum International Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Biber, D. and Finegan, E.
    (2009) Styles of Stance in English: Lexical and Grammatical Marking of Evidentiality and Affect. Text – Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse9(1): 93–124.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Biber, D. and Zhang, M.
    (2018) Expressing Evaluation without Grammatical Stance: Informational Persuasion on the Web. Corpora13(1): 97–123. 10.3366/cor.2018.0137
    https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2018.0137 [Google Scholar]
  5. Carretero, M. and Taboada, M.
    (2014) Graduation within the Scope of Attitude in English and Spanish Consumer Reviews of Books and Movies. InEvaluation in Context, G. Thompson and L. Alba-Juez. (eds), 221–239. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.242.11car
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.242.11car [Google Scholar]
  6. (2015) The Annotation of Appraisal: How Attitude and Epistemic Modality Overlap in English and Spanish Consumer Reviews. InThinking Modally: English and Contrastive Studies on Modality, J. R. Zamorano. (ed.), 249–269. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Connor, U.
    (2004) Intercultural Rhetoric Research: Beyond Texts. English for Academic Purposes3: 391–304. 10.1016/j.jeap.2004.07.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2004.07.003 [Google Scholar]
  8. Cook, G.
    (2001) The Discourse of Advertising. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203978153
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203978153 [Google Scholar]
  9. Evans, R.
    (1971) Quote book. Salt Lake City: Publishers Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Flowerdew, J. and Wan, A.
    (2010) The Linguistic and the Contextual in Applied Genre Analysis: The Case of the Company Audit Report. English for Specific Purposes29(2): 78–93. 10.1016/j.esp.2009.07.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2009.07.001 [Google Scholar]
  11. González Rodríguez, M. J.
    (2011) La expresión lingüística de la actitud en el género de opinión: El modelo de la valoración. RLA. Revista de lingüística teórica y aplicada49(1): 109–141. 10.4067/S0718‑48832011000100006
    https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-48832011000100006 [Google Scholar]
  12. González, C. and López, L.
    (2013) Las expresiones agresivas en los comentarios de los usuarios de blogs periodísticos: Un análisis por medio de la teoría de la valoración. Tonos Digital24: n.p.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Hagtvedt, H. and Patrick, V. M.
    (2008) Art Infusion: The Influence of Visual Art on the Perception and Evaluation of Consumer Products. Journal of Marketing Research45: 379–389. 10.1509/jmkr.45.3.379
    https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.45.3.379 [Google Scholar]
  14. Halliday, M. A. K.
    (1985) An Introduction to Functional Grammar (1st ed.). London: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Halliday, M. A. K. and Mathiessen, Ch.
    (2004) An Introduction to Functional Grammar (3rd edition). London: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. HGS
    HGS (2016) CX Trends forecast: A Summary of the top 10 Disrupters. Hinduja Global Solutions. Available athttps://docplayer.net/15400509-Cx-trends-forecast-a-summary-of-the-top-10-disrupters.html [last accessed17 December 2018].
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Hood, S. and Martin, J. R.
    (2007) Invoking Attitude: The Play of Graduation in Appraising Discourse. InContinuing Discourse on Language: A Functional Perspective (Vol.2), R. Hassan, C. M. I. M. Mathiessen and J. Webster. (eds), 739–764, London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Hunston, S. and Thompson, G.
    (2000) Evaluation in Text. Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: OUP.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Izquierdo, M. and Pérez Blanco, M.
    (2020) A Multi-Level Contrastive Analysis of Promotional Strategies in Specialised Discourse. English for Specific Purposes58: 43–57. 10.1016/j.esp.2019.12.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2019.12.002 [Google Scholar]
  20. (2016) The Herbal Tea Promotional Text in English and Spanish: A Contrastive Rhetoric Study. Paper presented at theEighth International Conference on Corpus Linguistics (AELINCO). University of Málaga, Spain, 2–4 March 2016.
  21. Janoschka, A.
    (2004) Web Advertising. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.131
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.131 [Google Scholar]
  22. Jingxia, L. V. and Zhaodan, S.
    (2012) A Comparative Study of Tea Customs. Cross-Cultural Communication8(2): 128–133.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Kaltenbacher, M.
    (2006) Culture Related Linguistic Differences in Tourist Websites: The Emotive and the Factual. A Corpus Analysis within the Framework of Appraisal. InSystem and Corpus. Exploring Connections, G. Thompson and S. Hunston. (eds), 269–292. London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Krishna, A., Cian, L. and Sokolova, T.
    (2016) The Power of Sensory Marketing in Advertising. Current Opinion in Psychology10: 142–147. 10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.01.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.01.007 [Google Scholar]
  25. Labrador, B., Ramón, N., Aláiz-Moretón, H. and Sanjurjo-González, H.
    (2014) Rhetorical Structure and Persuasive Language in the Subgenre of Online Advertisements. English for Specific Purposes34: 38–47. 10.1016/j.esp.2013.10.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2013.10.002 [Google Scholar]
  26. Labrador, B. and Ramón, R.
    (2015) ‘Perfectly Smooth, Creamy and Full Flavoured’: Online Cheese descriptions. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 198: 226–232. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.440
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.440 [Google Scholar]
  27. Lavid, J., Carretero, M. and Zamorano, J. R.
    (2016) Contrastive Annotation of Epistemicity in the MULTINOT Project: Preliminary Steps. Proceedings of the Twelfth Joint ACL-ISO Workshop on Interoperable Semantic Annotation (ISA-12). Portoroz, Slovenia, 28 May 2016. 81–88.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. López-Arroyo, B. and Roberts, R.
    (2014) English and Spanish Descriptors in Wine Tasting Terminology. Terminology20(1): 25–49. 10.1075/term.20.1.02lop
    https://doi.org/10.1075/term.20.1.02lop [Google Scholar]
  29. Macken-Horarik, M. and Isaac, A.
    (2014) Appraising Appraisal. InEvaluation in Context, J. Thompson and A. Juez. (eds), 67–92. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.242.04mac
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.242.04mac [Google Scholar]
  30. Martin, J. R.
    (2000) Beyond Exchange: Appraisal Systems in English. InEvaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, S. Hunston and G. Thompson. (eds), 142–175. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Martin, J. R. and White, P. R. R.
    (2005) The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230511910
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511910 [Google Scholar]
  32. Medium
    Medium. (n.d.). 21 beautiful lessons that you can learn from ‘Seth Godin’. Available athttps://medium.com/indian-thoughts/21-beautiful-lessons-you-can-learn-from-seth-godin-7c7d2c22e80 [last accessed28 January 2019].
  33. Myers, G.
    (1994) Words in Ads. London: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Orts Llopis, M. Á.
    (2017) The Expression of Emotion in Institutionalized Legal Opinion. A Contrastive Spanish-English Pre-Translational Study. RESLA30(2): 611–635. 10.1075/resla.00009.ort
    https://doi.org/10.1075/resla.00009.ort [Google Scholar]
  35. Patrick, V. M.
    (2016) Everyday Consumer Aesthetics. Current Opinion in Psychology (10): 60–64. 10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.12.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.12.007 [Google Scholar]
  36. Pérez Blanco, M. and Izquierdo, M.
    (forthcoming). Developing a Corpus-Informed Tool for Spanish Professionals Writing Specialised Texts in English. InCorpora in Translation Research: Recent Advances and Applications, J. Lavid and J. R. Zamorano eds Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. (2017) ‘Deliciously Nutty, Pleasantly Sweet’: A Phraseological Study of Tea Tasting Notes. Paper presented at theCLAVIER Conference, Bari, Italy, 30 November–2 December 2017.
  38. Pizarro, I.
    (2018) Online Product Descriptions: A Corpus-Based Contrastive Analysis of their Visual Elements. Paper presented at theTenth International Conference on Corpus Linguistics (CILC). Cáceres, Spain, 9–11 May 2018.
  39. Sanfélix Genovés, J., Palop Larrea, V., Rubio Gomis, E. and Martínez-Mir, I.
    (2001) Consumo de hierbas medicinales y medicamentos. Atención Primaria28(5): 311–314. 10.1016/S0212‑6567(01)70381‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0212-6567(01)70381-2 [Google Scholar]
  40. Sano, M.
    (2011) Characteristic Linguistic Patterns of Evaluative Expressions in Blog Articles: An Exploration of the Relationship between Evaluative Criteria and the Explicitness/Implicitness of the Expressions from a Perspective of Appraisal Theory. Mathematical Linguistics27(7): 249–269.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Smith, J. B. and Colgate, M.
    (2007) Customer Value Creation: A Practical Framework. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice15: 7–23. 10.2753/MTP1069‑6679150101
    https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679150101 [Google Scholar]
  42. Taboada, M. and Carretero, M.
    (2012) Contrastive Analysis of Evaluation in Text: Key Issues in the Design of an Annotation System for Attitude Applicable to Consumer Reviews in English and Spanish. Linguistics and the Human Sciences6: 275–295. 10.1558/lhs.v6i1‑3.275
    https://doi.org/10.1558/lhs.v6i1-3.275 [Google Scholar]
  43. Taboada, M., Carretero, M. and Hinnell, J.
    (2014) Loving and Hating the Movies in English, German and Spanish. Languages in Contrast14(1): 127–161. 10.1075/lic.14.1.07tab
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.14.1.07tab [Google Scholar]
  44. Taboada, M. and Grieve, J.
    (2004) Analyzing Appraisal Automatically. InExploring Attitude and Affect in Text: Theories and Applications. Papers from 2004 AAII Spring Symposium, 158–161. Stanford: Stanford AAAI (American Association of Artificial Intelligence) Technical Reports.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Tarta, C.
    (2014) The Use of Aesthetics through Visual Style as a Marketing Tool – A Literature Review. Marketing from Information to Decision7: 248–264.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Wang, Y. J., Cruthirds, K. W., Axinn, C. N. and Guo, C.
    (2013) In Search of Aesthetics in Consumer Marketing: An Examination of Aesthetic Stimuli from the Philosophy of Art and the Psychology of art. Academy of Marketing Studies Journal17(2): 37–55.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Wislocka, B.
    (2014) Appraisal Theory Applied to the Wine Tasting Sheet in English and Spanish. Ibérica27: 97–120.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/lic.19016.per
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/lic.19016.per
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error