A questionnaire-based study of impersonalization in Romanian and English

References

1. Baayen, R. H.
   2008 Analyzing Linguistic Data: A Practical Introduction to Statistics Using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511801686
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801686 [Google Scholar]
2. Bard, E. G., Robertson, D. and Sorace, A.
   1996 Magnitude Estimation of Linguistic Acceptability. Language72(10): 32–68. 10.2307/416793
   https://doi.org/10.2307/416793 [Google Scholar]
3. Cabredo Hofherr, P.
   2006 “Arbitrary” Pro and the Theory of Pro-Drop. InAgreement and Arguments, P. Ackema, P. Brandt, M. Schoorlemmer and F. Weerman. (eds), 230–257. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Cojocaru, D.
   2003 Romanian Grammar. Durham: Slavic and East European Language Research Center, Duke University.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Coussé, E. and van der Auwera, J.
   2012 Human Impersonal Pronouns in Swedish and Dutch: A Contrastive Study of Man and Men. Languages in Contrast12(2): 121–138. 10.1075/lic.12.2.01cou
   https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.12.2.01cou [Google Scholar]
6. Creissels, D.
   2008a Impersonal and Related Constructions: A Typological Approach. Lyon: Lumière University Lyon 2.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Creissels, D.
   2008b Impersonal Pronouns and Coreference: The Case of French On. Lyon: Lumière University Lyon 2.
   [Google Scholar]
8. D’Alessandro, R.
   2007 Impersonal Si Constructions: Agreement and Interpretation. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110207514
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110207514 [Google Scholar]
9. Data-Bukowska, E.
   2018 The Third Person Plural Impersonal in Swedish: A Typological Account. Linguistica Copernicana15: 163–193. 10.12775/LinCop.2018.012
   https://doi.org/10.12775/LinCop.2018.012 [Google Scholar]
10. De Hoop, H. and Tarenskeen, S.
    2015 It’s All about You in Dutch. Journal of Pragmatics88: 163–175. 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.07.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.07.001 [Google Scholar]
11. Dobrovie-Sorin, C.
    1998 Impersonal Se Constructions in Romance and the Passivization of Unergatives. Linguistic Inquiry29(3): 399–437. 10.1162/002438998553806
    https://doi.org/10.1162/002438998553806 [Google Scholar]
12. Fenger, P.
    2018 How Impersonal does One Get? A Study of Man-Pronouns in Germanic. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics21(3): 291–325. 10.1007/s10828‑018‑9101‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10828-018-9101-0 [Google Scholar]
13. Fernández, S. S.
    2013 Impersonality in Spanish Personal Pronouns. InDeixis and Pronouns in Romance Languages, K. J. Kragh and J. Lindschouw. (eds), 87–107. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.136.06fer
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.136.06fer [Google Scholar]
14. Fonesca-Greber, B. and Waugh, L. R.
    2003 On the Radical Difference between the Subject Personal Pronouns in Written and Spoken European French. InCorpus Analysis: Language Structure and Language Use, P. Leistyna and C. F. Meyer. (eds), 225–240. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 10.1163/9789004334410_013
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004334410_013 [Google Scholar]
15. Gast, V.
    2015 On the Use of Translation Corpora in Contrastive Linguistics: A Case Study of Impersonalization in English and German. Languages in Contrast15(1): 4–33. 10.1075/lic.15.1.02gas
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.15.1.02gas [Google Scholar]
16. Gast, V., Deringer, L., Haas, F. and Rudolf, O.
    2015 Impersonal Uses of the Second Person Singular: A Pragmatic Analysis of Generalization and Empathy Effects. Journal of Pragmatics88: 148–162. 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.12.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.12.009 [Google Scholar]
17. Gast, V. and van der Auwera, J.
    2013 Towards a Distributional Typology of Human Impersonal Pronouns, Based on Data from European Languages. InLanguages Across Boundaries: Studies in the Memory of Anna Siewierska, D. Bakker and M. Haspelmath. (eds), 119–158. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110331127.119
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110331127.119 [Google Scholar]
18. Giacalone Ramat, A. and Sansò, A.
    2007 The Spread and Decline of Indefinite Man-Constructions in European Languages: An Areal Perspective. InEurope and the Mediterranean Linguistic Areas: Convergences from a Historical and Typological Perspective, P. Ramat and E. Roma. (eds), 95–131. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.88.07gia
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.88.07gia [Google Scholar]
19. Gönczöl-Davies, R.
    2008 Romanian: An Essential Grammar. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Haas, F.
    2018a “You can’t Control a Thing like That”: Genre and Change in Modern English Human Impersonal Pronouns. InDiachronic Corpora, Genre and Language Change, R. J. Whitt. (ed.), 171–194. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.85.08haa
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.85.08haa [Google Scholar]
21. Haas, F.
    2018b Changing Human Impersonal Pronouns in English: A Corpus Study. Paper presented at theFifty-First Conference of the Societas Linguistica Europaea. Tallinn, Estonia, 30 August 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Hall, D.
    2020 The Impersonal Gets Personal: A New Pronoun in Multicultural London English. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory38: 117–150. 10.1007/s11049‑019‑09447‑w
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-019-09447-w [Google Scholar]
23. Jensen, T. J. and Gregerson, F.
    2016 What do(es) You Mean? The Pragmatics of Generic Second Person Pronouns in Modern Spoken Danish. Pragmatics26(3): 417–446. 10.1075/prag.26.3.04jen
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.26.3.04jen [Google Scholar]
24. Kitagawa, C. and Lehrer, A.
    1990 Impersonal Uses of Personal Pronouns. Journal of Pragmatics14(5): 739–759. 10.1016/0378‑2166(90)90004‑W
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90004-W [Google Scholar]
25. Kluge, B.
    2016 Generic Uses of the Second Person Singular – How Speakers Deal with Referential Ambiguity and Misunderstanding. Pragmatics26(3): 501–522. 10.1075/prag.26.3.07klu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.26.3.07klu [Google Scholar]
26. Laberge, S. and Sankoff, G.
    1979 Anything You can Do. InDiscourse and Syntax, T. Givón. (ed.), 419–440. New York: Academic Press. 10.1163/9789004368897_018
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368897_018 [Google Scholar]
27. Malamud, S.
    2012 Impersonal Indexicals: One, You, Man and Du. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics15: 1–48. 10.1007/s10828‑012‑9047‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10828-012-9047-6 [Google Scholar]
28. Manea, C.
    2012 Remarks on the Passive Voice in English and Romanian. Studii de Gramatică Contrastivă18: 54–73.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Moltmann, F.
    2010 Generalizing Detached Self-Reference and the Semantics of Generic One. Mind & Language25(4): 440–473. 10.1111/j.1468‑0017.2010.01397.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2010.01397.x [Google Scholar]
30. Myhill, J.
    1997 Toward a Functional Typology of Agent Defocusing. Linguistics35(5): 799–844. 10.1515/ling.1997.35.5.799
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1997.35.5.799 [Google Scholar]
31. O’Connor, P. E.
    1994 “You could Feel it through the Skin”: Agency and Positioning in Prisoners’ Stabbing Stories. Text14(1): 45–75. 10.1515/text.1.1994.14.1.45
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1994.14.1.45 [Google Scholar]
32. Pană Dindelegan, G.
    2008 Construcții pasive și construcții impersonale. InGramatica Limbii Române II: Enunțul, V. Guţu Romalo. (ed.), 133–147. Bucharest: Editura Academiei Române
    [Google Scholar]
33. Pană Dindelegan, G.
    (ed.) 2013 The Grammar of Romanian. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Posio, P. and Vilkuna, M.
    2013 Referential Dimensions of Human Impersonals in Dialectal European Portuguese and Finnish. Linguistics51(1): 177–229. 10.1515/ling‑2013‑0006
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2013-0006 [Google Scholar]
35. Rasinger, S. M.
    2013 Quantitative Research in Linguistics: An Introduction. London: Bloomsbury. 10.5040/9781350284883
    https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350284883 [Google Scholar]
36. Rudolf, O.
    2016 Human Impersonal Strategies in English and Russian: A Comparative Corpus Study. PhD Thesis, University of Jena.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Sansò, A.
    2006 ‘Agent Defocusing’ Revisited: Passive and Impersonal Constructions in some European Languages. InPassivization and Typology: Form and Function, W. Abraham and L. Leisiö. (eds), 232–273. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.68.15san
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.68.15san [Google Scholar]
38. Shibatani, M.
    1985 Passives and Related Constructions: A Prototype Analysis. Language61(4): 821–848. 10.2307/414491
    https://doi.org/10.2307/414491 [Google Scholar]
39. Siewierska, A.
    2004 Person. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511812729
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812729 [Google Scholar]
40. Siewierska, A.
    2008 Ways of Impersonalizing: Pronominal vs. Verbal Strategies. InCurrent Trends in Contrastive Linguistics: Functional and Cognitive Perspectives, M. A. Gómez González, J. Lachlan Mackenzie and E. M. González Álvarez. (eds), 3–26. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sfsl.60.03sie
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sfsl.60.03sie [Google Scholar]
41. Siewierska, A.
    2011 Overlap and Complementarity in Reference Impersonals: Man-Constructions vs. Third Person Plural-Impersonals in the Languages of Europe. InImpersonal Constructions: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective, A. Malchukov and A. Siewierska. (eds), 57–90. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.124.03sie
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.124.03sie [Google Scholar]
42. Siewierska, A. and Papastathi, M.
    2011 Towards a Typology of Third Personal Plural Impersonals. Linguistics49(3): 575–610. 10.1515/ling.2011.018
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2011.018 [Google Scholar]
43. Sprouse, J. and Almeida, D.
    2012 Assessing the Reliability of Textbook Data in Syntax: Adger’s Core Syntax. Journal of Linguistics48(3): 609–652. 10.1017/S0022226712000011
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226712000011 [Google Scholar]
44. Stirling, L. and Manderson, L.
    2011 About You: Empathy, Objectivity and Authority. Journal of Pragmatics43(6): 1581–1602. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.12.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.12.002 [Google Scholar]
45. van der Auwera, J., Gast, V. and Vanderbiesen, J.
    2012 Human Impersonal Pronoun Uses in English, Dutch and German. Leuvense Bijdragen98: 27–64.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Van Olmen, D. and Breed, A.
    2018a Human Impersonal Pronouns in Afrikaans: A Double Questionnaire-Based Study. Language Sciences69: 1–29. 10.1016/j.langsci.2018.05.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2018.05.002 [Google Scholar]
47. Van Olmen, D. and Breed, A.
    2018b Human Impersonal Pronouns in West Germanic: A Questionnaire-Based Comparative Study of Afrikaans, Dutch and English. Studies in Language42(4): 798–846. 10.1075/sl.18036.van
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.18036.van [Google Scholar]
48. Zifonun, G.
    2001 Man lebt nur einmal: Morphosyntax und Semantik des Pronomens man. Deutsche Sprache38(3): 232–253.
    [Google Scholar]