1887
image of Review of Georgiafentis, Giannoulopoulou, Koloipoulou & Tsokoglou (2020): Contrastive Studies in Morphology and Syntax
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

There is no abstract available for this article.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lic.21003.cat
2021-04-20
2021-05-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abraham, W.
    1990 Zur heterogenen Entfaltung der Modalpartikel im Ahd und Mhd. InNeuere Forschungen zur historischen Syntax des Deutschen: Referate der 36. Internationalen Fachkonferenz Eichstätt 1989, A. Betten (ed.), 124–138. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783111708751.124
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111708751.124 [Google Scholar]
  2. 1991 Discourse Particles in German: How does their Illocutive Force Come about?InDiscourse Particles, W. Abraham (ed.), 203–252. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.12.08abr
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.12.08abr [Google Scholar]
  3. Augst, G.
    1975 Über das Fugenmorphem bei Zusammensetzungen. InUntersuchungen zum Morpheminventar der deutschen Gegenwartssprache, G. Augst (ed.), 71–155. Tübingen, Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Belletti, A.
    2004 Aspects of the Low IP Area. InThe Structure of CP and IP, L. Rizzi (ed.), 16–51. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Dahl, Ö. and Velupillai, V.
    2013 The Past Tense. InThe World Atlas of Language Structures (WALS) Online, M. S. Dryer and M. Haspelmath (eds). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available atwals.info/chapter/66 [last accessed10 February 2021].
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Lindstedt, J.
    2000 Linguistic Balkanization: Contact-Induced Change by Mutual Reinforcement. InLanguages in Contact. Studies in Slavic and General Linguistics, D. Gilbers, J. Nerbonne and J. Schaeken (eds), 231–246. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Özsoy, A. S.
    2009 Turkish as a (non)-wh-in-situ Language. InTurcological Letters to Bernt Brendemoen, É. Á. Csató, G. Ims, J. Parslow, F. Thiesen and E. Türker (eds), 221–232. Oslo: Novus Forlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Samek-Lodovici, V.
    2015The Interaction of Focus, Givenness, and Prosody. A Study of Italian Clause Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198737926.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198737926.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  9. Werner, M.
    2016 Die Entwicklungslogik der nominalen Determinativkomposition im Deutschen – verstanden als Grammatikalisierung. Linguistik Online77(3): 91–128. Available athttps://bop.unibe.ch/linguistik-online/article/view/2908. doi:  10.13092/lo.77.2908
    https://doi.org/10.13092/lo.77.2908 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/lic.21003.cat
Loading
  • Article Type: Book Review
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error