This deserves a brief mention

References

1. Ädel, A.
   2010 Just to Give you Kind of a Map of Where we are going: A Taxonomy of Metadiscourse in Spoken and Written Academic English. Nordic Journal of English Studies9(2): 69–97. 10.35360/njes.218
   https://doi.org/10.35360/njes.218 [Google Scholar]
2. Augst, G.
   2019 Der Bildungswortschatz. Hildesheim: Olms.
   [Google Scholar]
3. BASE (British Academic Spoken English Corpus)
   BASE (British Academic Spoken English Corpus). Corpus developed at the Universities of Warwick and Reading under the directorship of Hilary Nesi and Paul Thompson.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. and Finegan, E.
   1999 Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Biber, D.
   2006 University Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.23
   https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.23 [Google Scholar]
6. Blanche-Benveniste, C.
   2010 Approches de la langue parlée. Paris: Éditions Ophrys.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Carter, R. and McCarthy, M.
   2017 Spoken Grammar: Where Are we and Where are we going?Applied Linguistics38(1): 1–20. 10.1093/applin/amu080
   https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu080 [Google Scholar]
8. Dang, T. N. Y., Coxhead, A. and Webb, S.
   2017 The Academic Spoken Word List. Language Learning67(4): 959–997. 10.1111/lang.12253
   https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12253 [Google Scholar]
9. Dudley-Evans, A. and Johns, T. F.
   1981 A Team Teaching Approach to Lecture Comprehension for Overseas Students. InThe Teaching of Listening Comprehension, The British Council (ed.), 30–46. London: The British Council.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Dyka, S., Novakova, I. and Siepmann, D.
    2017 A Web of Analogies: Depictive and Reaction Object Constructions in Modern English and French Fiction. InComputational and Corpus-Based Phraseology. Europhras 2017, LNAI 10596, R. Mitkov (ed.), 87–101. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑69805‑2_7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69805-2_7 [Google Scholar]
11. Feilke, H.
    1996 Sprache als Soziale Gestalt. Ausdruck, Prägung und die Ordnung der sprachlichen Typik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Granger, S. and Paquot, M.
    2008 Disentangling the Phraseological Web. InPhraseology: An Interdisciplinary Perspective, S. Granger and F. Meunier (eds), 27–49. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.139.07gra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.139.07gra [Google Scholar]
13. Grieve, J.
    1996 A Dictionary of French Connectors. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Halliday, M. A. K.
    1973 Explorations in the Function of Language. London: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Halliday, M. A. K.
    1994 An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Hamilton, C. E. and Carter-Thomas, S.
    2017 Competing Influences: The Impact of Mode and Language on Verb Type and Density in French and English Scientific Discourse. CHIMERA: Romance Corpora and Linguistic Studies4(1): 13–34.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Hamp-Lyons, E.
    2015 The Future of JEAP and EAP. Journal of English for Academic Purposes201: A1–A4. 10.1016/j.jeap.2015.10.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.10.004 [Google Scholar]
18. Hartwell, L. M., Esperança-Rodier, E. and Tutin, A.
    2017 I Think we Need…: Verbal Expressions of Opinion in Conference Presentations in English and in French. CHIMERA. Romance Corpora and Linguistic Studies4(1): 35–60. Available athttps://revistas.uam.es/index.php/chimera/issue/view/679 [last accessed01.07.2022].
    [Google Scholar]
19. Henschelmann, K.
    2011 Möglichkeiten und Grenzen von Übersetzungswörterbüchern am Beispiel französischer Abstrakta und ihres Entsprechungspotentials im Deutschen. InStudien zum romanisch-deutschen Sprachvergleich, G. Rovere and G. Wotjak (eds), 19–40. Berlin: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Hoey, M.
    1991 Patterns of Lexis in Text. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Kilgarriff, A., Rychlý, P., Smrz, P., and Tugwell, D.
    2004 The Sketch Engine. Proceedings of the Eleventh EURALEX International Congress (EURALEX 2004). Lorient, France. 6–10 July 2004. 105–116.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Legallois, D.
    2022 Routine, routinisation : à quels unités et processus a-t-on affaire exactement ?InLes routines discursives dans le discours scientifique oral et écrit, M. Luodonpää-Manni, F. Grossmann and A. Tutin (eds), 19–35. Grenoble: UGA Editions. 10.4000/books.ugaeditions.27979
    https://doi.org/10.4000/books.ugaeditions.27979 [Google Scholar]
23. Liu, D.
    2012 The Most Frequently-Used Multi-Word Constructions in Academic Written English: A Multi-Corpus Study. English for Specific Purposes31(1): 25–35. 10.1016/j.esp.2011.07.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2011.07.002 [Google Scholar]
24. Love, R., Dembryii, C., Hardie, A., Brezina, V. and McEnery, T.
    2017 The Spoken BNC2014: Designing and Building a Spoken Corpus of Everyday Conversations. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics22(3): 319–344.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Luodonpää-Manni, M., Grossmann, F. and Tutin, A.
    (eds) 2022 Les routines discursives dans le discours scientifique oral et écrit. Grenoble: UGA Editions. 10.4000/books.ugaeditions.27874
    https://doi.org/10.4000/books.ugaeditions.27874 [Google Scholar]
26. Martin, J. R.
    1992 English Text. System and Structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.59
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.59 [Google Scholar]
27. Mauranen, A.
    2003 “But Here’s a Flawed Argument”: Socialisation into and Through Metadiscourse. InCorpus Analysis, P. Leistyna and C. F. Meyer (eds), 19–34. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
    [Google Scholar]
28. McCarthy, M., and Carter, R.
    1995 Spoken Grammar: What Is it and How can we Teach it?ELT Journal49(3): 207–218. 10.1093/elt/49.3.207
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/49.3.207 [Google Scholar]
29. Mel’cuk, I.
    2011 Phrasèmes dans le dictionnaire. InLe figement linguistique: la parole entrâvée, J.-C. Anscombre and S. Mejri (eds), 41–62. Paris: Honoré Champion.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Simpson, R. C., Briggs, S. L., Ovens, J. and Swales, J. M.
    2002 The Michigan Corpus of Academic Spoken English. Ann Arbor: The Regents of the University of Michigan.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Nesi, H. and Basturkmen, H.
    2006 Lexical Bundles and Discourse Signalling in Academic Lectures. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics11(3): 283–304. 10.1075/ijcl.11.3.04nes
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.11.3.04nes [Google Scholar]
32. Scott, M.
    2006 Key words and genres. InTextual patterns: Key words and Corpus Analysis in Language Education, M. Scott and C. Tribble (eds), 73–90. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.22
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.22 [Google Scholar]
33. Siepmann, D.
    2005 Discourse Markers across Languages. A Contrastive Study of Second-Level Discourse Markers in Native and Non-Native Text with Implications for General and Pedagogic Lexicography. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Siepmann, D.
    2009 Dictionnairique et lexicologie contrastive: rendre l’impossible possible?Cahiers de lexicologie94(1): 173–198.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Siepmann, D.
    2018 L’évolution de la langue des sciences sociales et humaines de 1950 à 2000. InÉtudes diachroniques du français et perspectives sociétales, P. Blumenthal and D. Vigier (eds), 239–268. Berlin: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Siepmann, D.
    2020 Dictionary of Academic Usage: Words, Phrases and Model Texts for Writers and Speakers (English and German) / Wörterbuch der allgemeinen Wissenschaftssprache: Wörter, Wendungen und Mustertexte für Schreiber und Sprecher (Deutsch und Englisch). Bonn: DHV.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Siepmann, D.
    2021 German and English: Academic Usage and Academic Translation. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Siepmann, D., Gallagher, J. and Le Foll, E.
    in preparation. Dictionary of Academic Usage: Words, Phrases and Model Texts for Writers and Speakers (English and French).
    [Google Scholar]
39. Simpson-Vlach, R. and Ellis, N. C.
    2010 An Academic Formulas List: New Methods in Phraseology Research. Applied Linguistics31(4): 487–512. 10.1093/applin/amp058
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp058 [Google Scholar]
40. Tutin, A.
    2007 Autour du lexique et de la phraséologie des écrits scientifiques. Revue française de linguistique appliquée12(2): 5–14. 10.3917/rfla.122.0005
    https://doi.org/10.3917/rfla.122.0005 [Google Scholar]
41. Tutin, A.
    2014 La phraséologie transdisciplinaire des écrits scientifiques: des collocations aux routines sémantico-rhétoriques. InL’écrit scientifique: du lexique au discours. Autour de scientext, A. Tutin and F. Grossmann (eds), 27–44. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Vinay, J. P. and Darbelnet, J.
    1958 Stylistique comparée du français et de l’anglais. Paris: Didier.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Wingrove, P.
    2017 How Suitable are TED Talks for Academic Listening?Journal of English for Academic Purposes301: 79–95. 10.1016/j.jeap.2017.10.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2017.10.010 [Google Scholar]
44. Yujing, J. and Tutin, A.
    2019 Les routines de reformulation dans les écrits scientifiques en français. Studii de lingvistică9(2): 177–200.
    [Google Scholar]