The intricate construction of projection in news reports

References

1. Akerejola, E.
   2005 A Systemic Functional Grammar of Òkó. PhD thesis, Macquarie University.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Alonso Belmonte, I.
   (ed.) 2007 Different Approaches to Newspaper Opinion Discourse. Special Issue ofRevista Electrónica de Lingüística Aplicada. Asociación Española de Lingüística Aplicada (AESLA).
   [Google Scholar]
3. Arús-Hita, J.
   2018 A Contrastive Description of Projection in English and Spanish across Ranks: From the Clause Nexus to the Group. InPerspectives from Systemic Functional Linguistics, A. Sellami-Baklouti and L. Fontaine (eds), –. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315299877‑9
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315299877-9 [Google Scholar]
4. Arús-Hita, J., Teruya, K., Bardi, M. A., Kashyap, A. K. and Mwinlaaru, I.
   2018 Quoting and Reporting across Languages. A Systemic Functional Approach. Word(): –. 10.1080/00437956.2018.1463001
   https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.2018.1463001 [Google Scholar]
5. Bardi, M. A.
   2008 A Systemic Functional Description of the Grammar of Arabic. PhD thesis, Macquarie University.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bell, A.
   1991 The Language of News Media. London: Blackwell.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bermúdez, F.
   2016 Rumores y otros malos hábitos. El condicional evidencial en español. Cuadernos de Lingüística de El Colegio de México(): –. 10.24201/clecm.v3i2.37
   https://doi.org/10.24201/clecm.v3i2.37 [Google Scholar]
8. Boehm, V. and Hennemann, A.
   2014 The Evidential Use of the Spanish Imperfect and the Conditional in Journalistic Contexts. Studia Neophilologica: –. 10.1080/00393274.2014.933661
   https://doi.org/10.1080/00393274.2014.933661 [Google Scholar]
9. Caffarel, A.
   2006 A Systemic Functional Grammar of French. From Grammar to Discourse. London: Continuum.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Caffarel, A., Martin, J. R. and Matthiessen, C. M. I. M.
    2004 Language Typology: A Functional Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.253
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.253 [Google Scholar]
11. Dafouz, E.
    2008 The Pragmatic Role of Textual and Interpersonal Metadiscourse Markers in the Construction and Attainment of Persuasion: A Cross-Linguistic Study of Newspaper Discourse. Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2007.10.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.10.003 [Google Scholar]
12. Davies, M.
    2004 BYU-BNC. (Based on the British National Corpus from Oxford University Press). Available atcorpus.byu.edu/bnc/ [last accessed22 July 2023].
    [Google Scholar]
13. Dendale, P.
    2014 Le conditionnel de reprise : Son apparition en français et son traitement dans les grammaires du XVIe au XXe siècle. InMédiativité, Polyphonie et Modalité en Français : Études Synchroniques et Diachroniques, E. Oppermann-Marsaux, A. Rodriguez and J. C. Anscombre (eds), –. Paris: Presses Sorbonne Nouvelle. 10.4000/books.psn.2889
    https://doi.org/10.4000/books.psn.2889 [Google Scholar]
14. Durrell, M.
    2011 Hammer’s German Grammar and Usage (5th ed). London: Hodder Education.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Fairclough, N.
    1995 Media Discourse. London: Edward Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Fawcett, R.
    2000 A Theory of Syntax for Systemic Functional Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.206
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.206 [Google Scholar]
17. Halliday, M. A. K. and Matthiessen, C. M. I. M.
    2014 Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar (4th ed). London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203783771
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203783771 [Google Scholar]
18. Hyland, K.
    2005 Stance and Engagement: A Model of Interaction in Academic Discourse. Discourse Studies(): –. 10.1177/1461445605050365
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605050365 [Google Scholar]
19. Hyland, K. and Feng, J.
    2016 Change of Attitude? A Diachronic Study of Stance. Written Communication(): –. 10.1177/0741088316650399
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088316650399 [Google Scholar]
20. Hyland, K. and Sancho Guinda, C.
    2012 Stance and Voice in Written Academic Genres. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137030825
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137030825 [Google Scholar]
21. Jaffe, A.
    2012 Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Kaltenböck, G., Mihatsch, W. and Schneide, S.
    2010 New Approaches to Hedging. Bingley: Emerald Publishing. 10.1163/9789004253247
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004253247 [Google Scholar]
23. Lavid, J., Arús-Hita, J. and Zamorano, J. R.
    2010 Systemic Functional Grammar of Spanish. A Contrastive Study with English. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Lavid, J., Arús-Hita, J. and Moratón, L.
    2009 Comparison and Translation: Towards a Combined Methodology for Contrastive Corpus Studies. International Journal of English Studies. Special issue on Recent and Applied Corpus Studies, P. Cantos and A. Sánchez (eds): –.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Marín-Arrese, J. I., Hassler, G. and Carretero, M.
    (eds) 2017 Evidentiality Revisited: Cognitive Grammar, Functional and Discourse-Pragmatic Perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.271
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.271 [Google Scholar]
26. Martin, J. R. and White, P. R. R.
    2005 The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230511910
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511910 [Google Scholar]
27. Matthiessen, C. M. I. M.
    1996 Tense in English seen through Systemic Functional Theory. InMeaning and Form: Systemic Functional Interpretations. Meaning and Choice in Language. Studies for Michael Halliday, M. Berry, C. Butler, R. Fawcett and G. Huang (eds), –. Norwood: Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Matthiessen, C. M. I. M.
    1995 Lexicogrammatical Cartography: English Systems. Tokyo: International Language Science Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. and Teruya, K.
    2014 Projection as a Fractal Motif: Semantic and Lexicogrammatical Manifestations. Draft.
    [Google Scholar]
30. McEnery, T. and Wilson, A.
    2001 Corpus Linguistics (2nd ed). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Pérez-Venerós, M. and Elorza, I.
    2014 Constructing Stance by Means of Attribution. How is the ‘Evaluative Space’ Filled in Science Popularizations in English?InSubjectivity and Epistemicity. Corpus, Discourse, and Literary Approaches to Stance, D. Glynn and M. Sjölin (eds), –. Lund: Lund Studies in English.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Ras, I. A.
    2015 ‘The Alleged Fraud’: Modality in a Corpus of Corporate Fraud News. Paper presented at theAnnual Conference of the Poetics and Linguistics Association (PALA), Kent, 11 March 2015. Available athttps://www.pala.ac.uk/uploads/2/5/1/0/25105678/ras_ilse.pdf [last accessed13 April 2023].
    [Google Scholar]
33. Real Academia Española: Banco de datos (CREA)
    Real Academia Española: Banco de datos (CREA) [online]. Corpus de Referencia del Español Actual. Available atwww.rae.es [last accessed22 January 2023].
    [Google Scholar]
34. Scollon, R.
    1998 Mediated Discourse as Social Interaction: A Study of News Discourse. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Shu-Kun, C.
    2016 Circumstantiation of Projection: Functional Syntax of Angle in English and Chinese. Ampersand: –. 10.1016/j.amper.2016.05.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2016.05.002 [Google Scholar]
36. Teruya, K.
    2007 A Systemic Functional Grammar of Japanese. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Van Dijk, T. A.
    1988 News as Discourse. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Wang, W.
    2008 Newspaper Commentaries on Terrorism in China and Australia: A Contrastive Genre Study. InContrastive Rhetoric: Reaching to Intercultural Rhetoric, U. Connor, E. Nagelhout and W. Rozycki (eds), –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.169.11wan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.169.11wan [Google Scholar]
39. White, P. R. R.
    1998 Telling Media-Tales: The News Story as Rhetoric. PhD thesis, University of Sydney.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Xuan, W. and Chen, S.
    2020 Taking Stock of Accumulated Knowledge in Projection Studies from Systemic Functional Linguistics: A Research Synthesis. Functional Linguistics():–. 10.1186/s40554‑019‑0070‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1186/s40554-019-0070-7 [Google Scholar]
41. Yang, G.
    2017 Hypotactic and Embedded Projections of Sentence Segments in Chinese. Contemporary Linguistics(): –.
    [Google Scholar]