1887
Volume 6, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2214-9953
  • E-ISSN: 2214-9961
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

While the role of time and emotion have been acknowledged in linguistic and semiotic landscapes research, the particular qualities of tempo and affect have rarely been discussed directly. This case study from an Italian-American festival in South Philadelphia, a diverse and changing urban neighborhood, demonstrates how the two qualities work together to influence the discursive construction of identity for residents as they interact with the space. Ethnographic observation and photographs from the two days of the festival, as well as interviews with locals, frame the discussion of how to explore the landscape through this lens. The paper encourages researchers to devote more attention to the abstract qualities of landscapes, and serves as a starting point for critical examinations of a place and the distribution of capital among its occupants.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ll.00018.nie
2020-03-16
2020-04-01
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aronin, L., & Ó Laoire, M.
    (2013) The material culture of multilingualism: moving beyond the linguistic landscape. International Journal of Multilingualism, 10(3), 225–235. 10.1080/14790718.2012.679734
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2012.679734 [Google Scholar]
  2. Backhaus, P.
    (2005) Signs of multilingualism in Tokyo – a diachronic look at the linguistic landscape. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 2005 (175–176), 103–121.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Barad, Karen
    (2007) Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. 10.1215/9780822388128
    https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822388128 [Google Scholar]
  4. Baudrillard, J.
    (1994) Simulacra and simulation. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Blommaert, J.
    (2007) Sociolinguistic scales. Intercultural pragmatics, 4(1), 1–19. 10.1515/IP.2007.001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/IP.2007.001 [Google Scholar]
  6. (2013) Ethnography, superdiversity and linguistic landscapes: Chronicles of complexity. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781783090419
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783090419 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bondi, L.
    (2004) Locating identity politics. InKeith, M. & Pile, S. (eds.). Place and the Politics of Identity. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Cronin, A. M.
    (2006) Advertising and the metabolism of the city: urban space, commodity rhythms. Environment and Planning D: Society & Space, 24.4(2006): 615–632. 10.1068/d389t
    https://doi.org/10.1068/d389t [Google Scholar]
  9. de Saint-Georges, I.
    (2004) Materiality in discourse: The influence of space and layout in making meaning. InLeVine, P. & Scollon, R. (eds.). Discourse and technology: Multimodal discourse analysis. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. DiPilla, M.
    (2016) South Philadelphia’s Little Italy and 9th Street Italian Market. Charleston, SC: Arcadia Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Duff, C.
    (2010) On the role of affect and practice in the production of place. Environment and Planning D: Society & Space, 28.5(2010): 881–895. 10.1068/d16209
    https://doi.org/10.1068/d16209 [Google Scholar]
  12. Hult, F. M.
    (2008) Language ecology and linguistic landscape analysis. InLinguistic Landscape (pp.96–144). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Iedema, R.
    (2003) Multimodality, resemiotization: Extending the analysis of discourse as multi-semiotic practice. Visual communication, 2(1), 29–57. 10.1177/1470357203002001751
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357203002001751 [Google Scholar]
  14. Jaworski, A., & Thurlow, C.
    (2010) Introducing semiotic landscapes. Inibid. (eds.). Semiotic landscapes: Language, image, space. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Labov, W.
    (2008) Mysteries of the substrate. InMeyerhoff, M. & Nagy, N. (eds.). Social lives in language-Sociolinguistics and multilingual speech communities: Celebrating the work of Gillian Sankoff. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/impact.24.19lab
    https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.24.19lab [Google Scholar]
  16. Luconi, S.
    (2001) From paesani to white ethnics: The Italian experience in Philadelphia. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Massumi, B.
    (2002) Parables for the virtual: movement, affect, sensation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. 10.1215/9780822383574
    https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822383574 [Google Scholar]
  18. Peck, A., & Banda, F.
    (2014) Observatory’s linguistic landscape: semiotic appropriation and the reinvention of space. Social semiotics, 24(3), 302–323. 10.1080/10350330.2014.896651
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2014.896651 [Google Scholar]
  19. Pile, S.
    (2010) Emotions and affect in recent human geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 35(1), 5–20. 10.1111/j.1475‑5661.2009.00368.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2009.00368.x [Google Scholar]
  20. Rubdy, R.
    (2015) Conflict and exclusion: The linguistic landscape as an arena of contestation. InConflict, exclusion and dissent in the linguistic landscape (pp.1–24). London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137426284_1
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137426284_1 [Google Scholar]
  21. Saverino, J.
    (2010) Mapping Memories in Stone: Italians and the Transformation of a Philadelphia Landscape. InTakenaka, A. & Osirim, M. J. (eds.). Global Philadelphia: Immigrant Communities Old and New. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Scollon, R.
    (1998) Mediated discourse as social interaction. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. W.
    (2003) Discourses in Place: Language in the material world. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203422724
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203422724 [Google Scholar]
  24. Scollon, S. W.
    (2004) Nexus analysis: Discourse and the emerging internet. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203694343
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203694343 [Google Scholar]
  25. Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. W.
    (2007) Nexus analysis: Refocusing ethnography on action. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 11(5), 608–625. 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2007.00342.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2007.00342.x [Google Scholar]
  26. Seals, C. A.
    (2011) Reinventing the linguistic landscape of a national protest. Working Papers of the Linguistics Circle, 21(1), 190–202.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Shouse, E.
    (2005) Feeling, emotion, affect. M/c journal, 8(6), 26.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Simpson, P.
    (2008) Chronic everyday life: Rhythmanalysing street performance. Social & Cultural Geography, 9(7), 807–829. 10.1080/14649360802382578
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14649360802382578 [Google Scholar]
  29. Spivak, G. C.
    (1988) Can the subaltern speak?InNelson, C. & Grossberg, L. (eds.). Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press. 10.1007/978‑1‑349‑19059‑1_20
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19059-1_20 [Google Scholar]
  30. Stanger-Ross, J.
    (2010) Staying Italian: Urban Change and Ethnic Life in Postwar Toronto and Philadelphia. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Stroud, C., & Mpendukana, S.
    (2009) Towards a material ethnography of linguistic landscape: Multilingualism, mobility and space in a South African township. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 13(3), 363–386. 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2009.00410.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2009.00410.x [Google Scholar]
  32. Stroud, C., & Jegels, D.
    (2014) Semiotic landscapes and mobile narrations of place: Performing the local. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 2014(228), 179–199.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Troyer, R. A., & Szabó, T. P.
    (2017) Representation and videography in linguistic landscape studies. Linguistic Landscape, 3(1), 56–77. 10.1075/ll.3.1.03tro
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.3.1.03tro [Google Scholar]
  34. Tuan, Y. F.
    (1977) Space and place: The perspective of experience. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. United Merchants of the S. 9th Business Association
    United Merchants of the S. 9th Business Association (2018) The South 9th Street Italian Market Festival. RetrievedJuly 18, 2018fromwww.italianmarketfestival.com
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Wee, L.
    (2016) Situating affect in linguistic landscapes. Linguistic Landscape, 2 (2), 105-126. 10.1075/ll.2.2.01wee
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.2.2.01wee [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ll.00018.nie
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ll.00018.nie
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error