Volume 3, Issue 3
  • ISSN 2214-9953
  • E-ISSN: 2214-9961
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes


In ethnographically oriented linguistic landscape studies, social spaces are studied in co-operation with research participants, many times through mobile encounters such as walking. Talking, walking, photographing and video recording as well as writing the fieldwork diary are activities that result in the accumulation of heterogeneous, multimodal corpora. We analyze data from a Hungarian school ethnography project to reconstruct fieldwork encounters and analyze embodiment, the handling of devices (e.g. the photo camera) and verbal interaction in exploratory, participant-led walking tours. Our analysis shows that situated practices of embodied conduct and verbal interaction blur the boundaries between observation and observers, and thus LL research is not only about space- and place-making and sense-making routines, but the fieldwork encounters are also transformative and contribute to space- and place-making themselves. Our findings provide insight for ethnographic researchers and enrich the already robust qualitative and quantitative strategies employed in the field.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Aiestaran, J. , Cenoz, J. & Gorter, D.
    (2010) Multilingual cityscapes. In E. Shohamy , E. Ben-Rafael , & M. Barni (Eds.), Linguistic Landscape in the City (pp.219–234). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson, J.
    (2004) Talking whilst walking: A geographical archaeology of knowledge. Area, 36(3), 254–261. doi: 10.1111/j.0004‑0894.2004.00222.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0004-0894.2004.00222.x [Google Scholar]
  3. Aro, M.
    (2012) Effects of authority: Voicescapes in children’s beliefs about the learning of English. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 22 (3), 331–346. doi: 10.1111/j.1473‑4192.2012.00314.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2012.00314.x [Google Scholar]
  4. Baynham, M.
    (2010) Stance, positioning, and alignment in narratives of professional experience. Language in Society, 40, 63–74. doi: 10.1017/S0047404510000898
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404510000898 [Google Scholar]
  5. Barker, V. & Giles, H.
    (2002) Who supports the English-only movement?Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 23(5), 353–370. doi: 10.1080/01434630208666474
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01434630208666474 [Google Scholar]
  6. Blommaert, J.
    (2013) Ethnography, Superdiversity and Linguistic Landscapes. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bradley, J.
    (2016) Liquid Methodologies: using a linguistic ethnographic approach to study multilingual phenomena. Working Papers in Translanguaging and Translation, 18. www.birmingham.ac.uk/generic/tlang/index.aspx
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Brown, K. D.
    (2012) The linguistic landscape of educational spaces. In D. Gorter , H. F. Marten , & L. V. Mensel (Eds.), Minority Languages in the Linguistic Landscape (pp.281–298). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230360235_16
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230360235_16 [Google Scholar]
  9. Brown, L. & Durrheim, K.
    (2009) Different kinds of knowing: Generating qualitative data through mobile interviewing. Qualitative Inquiry, 15(5), 911–930. doi: 10.1177/1077800409333440
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800409333440 [Google Scholar]
  10. Bucholtz, M. & Hall, K.
    (2016) Embodied sociolinguistics. In N. Coupland (Ed.), Sociolinguistics: Theoretical Debates (pp.173–197). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781107449787.009
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107449787.009 [Google Scholar]
  11. Certeau, M. de
    (1984) The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Cloke, P. J. , Cook, I. , Crang, Ph ., Goodwin, M. , Painter, J. & Philo, Ch
    (2004) Practising Human Geography. London: SAGE.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Dagenais, D. , Moore, D. , Sabatier, C. , Lamarre, P. , & Armand, F.
    (2009) Linguistic landscape and language awareness. In E. Shohamy & D. Gorter (Eds.), Linguistic Landscape: Expanding the Scenery (pp.253–269). New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Evans, J. & Jones, P.
    (2011) The walking interview: Methodology, mobility and place. Applied Geography, 31(2), 849–858. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.09.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.09.005 [Google Scholar]
  15. Facer, K. & Enright, B.
    (2016) Creating Living Knowledge. Bristol: University of Bristol/AHRC Connected Communities.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Gál, J. Z.
    (2014) Tan, rend [Discipline, order]. Vasárnapi Hírek [Sunday News], Aug31st. vasarnapihirek.hu/szerintem/gal_j_zoltan_tan_rend
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Garvin, R.
    (2010) Responses to the linguistic landscape in Memphis, Tennessee: An urban space in Transition. In E. Shohamy , E. Ben-Rafael , & M. Barni (Eds.), Linguistic Landscape in the City (pp.252–271). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Guilat, Y.
    (2016) Redefining the Public Space as a Semiotic Resource through Institutional Art Events. In R. J. Blackwood , E. Lanza & H. Woldemariam (Eds.), Negotiating and Contesting Identities in Linguistic Landscapes (pp.163–180). London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Jaspers, J. & Vershueren, J.
    (Eds.) 2011 Multilingual structures and agencies. A special issue forJournal of Pragmatics43(5), 1157–1287. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.10.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.10.011 [Google Scholar]
  20. Kitis, D. E. & Milani, T. M.
    (2015) The performativity of the body. Linguistic Landscape, 1(3), 268–290. doi: 10.1075/ll.1.3.04kit
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.1.3.04kit [Google Scholar]
  21. Knoblauch, H. , Schnettler, B. , & Raab, J.
    (2012) Video-Analysis: Methodological Aspects of Interpretive Audiovisual Analysis in Social Research. In H. Knoblauch , B. Schnettler , J. Raab , & H. Soeffner (Eds.), Video Analysis: Methodology and Methods: Qualitative Audiovisual Data Analysis in Sociology, 3rd ed (pp.9–26). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Kusenbach, M.
    (2003) Street Phenomenology. The Go-Along as Ethnographic Research Tool. Ethnography, 4(3), 455–485. doi: 10.1177/146613810343007
    https://doi.org/10.1177/146613810343007 [Google Scholar]
  23. Laihonen, P.
    (2008) Language ideologies in interviews: A conversation analysis approach. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 12(5), 668–693. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2008.00387.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00387.x [Google Scholar]
  24. Laihonen, P. & Szabó, T. P.
    (2017) Investigating visual practices in educational settings: schoolscapes, language ideologies and organizational cultures. In M. Martin-Jones & D. Martin (Eds.), Researching multilingualism: Critical and ethnographic approaches (pp.121–138). New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Landry, R. & Bourhis, R. Y.
    (1997) Linguistic landscape and ethnolinguistic vitality. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 16(1), 23–49. doi: 10.1177/0261927X970161002
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X970161002 [Google Scholar]
  26. Lou, J. J.
    (2016) The Linguistic Landscape of Chinatown: A Sociolinguistic Ethnography. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Malinowski, D.
    (2009) Authorship in the linguistic landscape: A multimodal-performative view. In E. Shohamy & D. Gorter (Eds.), Linguistic Landscape: Expanding the Scenery (pp.107–125). New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. (2010) Showing seeing in the Korean linguistic cityscape. In E. Shohamy , E. Ben-Rafael , & M. Barni (Eds.), Linguistic Landscape in the City (pp.199–215). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Mondada, L.
    (2013) Displaying, contesting and negotiating epistemic authority in social interaction: Descriptions and questions in guided visits. Discourse Studies, 15(5), 597–626. doi: 10.1177/1461445613501577
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445613501577 [Google Scholar]
  30. Moriarty, M.
    (2014) Languages in motion: Multilingualism and mobility in the linguistic landscape. International Journal of Bilingualism, 18(5), 457–463. doi: 10.1177/1367006913484208
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006913484208 [Google Scholar]
  31. Nind, M.
    (2014) What is Inclusive Research?London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Norris, S.
    (2004) Analyzing multimodal interaction. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Pappenhangen, R. , Scarvaglieri, C. & Redder, A.
    (2016) Expanding the Linguistic Landscape Scenery? Action theory and ‘Linguistic Soundscaping’. In R. J. Blackwood , E. Lanza & H. Woldemariam (Eds.), Negotiating and Contesting Identities in Linguistic Landscapes (pp.147–162). London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Peck, A. & Stroud, Ch
    (2015) Skinskapes. Linguistic Landscape, 1(1/2), 133–151. doi: 10.1075/ll.1.1‑2.08pec
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.1.1-2.08pec [Google Scholar]
  35. Pennycook, A. & Otsuji, E.
    (2015) Making scents of the landscape. Linguistic Landscape, 1(1/2), 191–212. doi: 10.1075/ll.1.3.01pen
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.1.3.01pen [Google Scholar]
  36. Pink, S. , Hubbard, P. , O’Neill, M. , & Radley, A.
    (2010) Walking across disciplines: From ethnography to arts practice. Visual Studies, 25(1), 1–7. doi: 10.1080/14725861003606670
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14725861003606670 [Google Scholar]
  37. Sannino, A.
    (2010) Teachers’ talk of experiencing: Conflict, resistance and agency. Teaching and Teacher Education26, 838–844. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2009.10.021
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.10.021 [Google Scholar]
  38. Scollon, R. & Scollon, S.
    (2003) Discourses in Place: Language in the Material World. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203422724
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203422724 [Google Scholar]
  39. Stroud, Ch
    (2016) Turbulent Linguistic Landscapes and the Semiotics of Citizenship. In R. J. Blackwood , E. Lanza & H. Woldemariam (Eds.), Negotiating and Contesting Identities in Linguistic Landscapes (pp.3–18). London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Stroud, Ch ., & Jegels, D.
    (2014) Semiotic landscapes and mobile narrations of place: Performing the local. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 228, 179–199.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Stroud, Ch . & Mpendukana, S.
    (2009) Towards a material ethnography of linguistic landscape. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 13(3), 363–386. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2009.00410.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2009.00410.x [Google Scholar]
  42. Szabó, T. P.
    (2015) The Management of Diversity in Schoolscapes: An Analysis of Hungarian Practices. Apples: Journal of Applied Language Studies, 9(1), 23–51. doi: 10.17011/apples/2015090102
    https://doi.org/10.17011/apples/2015090102 [Google Scholar]
  43. Troyer, R. A.
    (2012) English in the Thai linguistic netscape. World Englishes, 31(1), 93–112. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑971X.2011.01742.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.2011.01742.x [Google Scholar]
  44. Troyer, R. A. , Cáceda, C. , & Giménez-Eguibar, P.
    (2015) Unseen Spanish in Small-Town America: A Minority Language in the Linguistic Landscape. In R. Rudby & S. Ben Said (Eds.), Conflict, Exclusion and Dissent in the Linguistic Landscape (pp.52–76). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Troyer, R. A. & Szabó, T. P.
    (2017) Representation and Videography in Linguistic Landscape Studies. Linguistic Landscape, 3(1), 56–77. doi: 10.1075/ll.3.1.03tro
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.3.1.03tro [Google Scholar]
  46. Vähäsantanen, K.
    (2015) Professional agency in the stream of change. Teaching and Teacher Education47, 1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2014.11.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.11.006 [Google Scholar]
  47. Waksman, Sh . & E. Shohamy
    (2016, April). Mediating LL: focus on tour guides. Presentation at the8th Linguistic Landscapes International Workshop. University of Liverpool.
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error