Volume 5, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2214-9953
  • E-ISSN: 2214-9961
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



Spatially interested sociolinguistics has cared little about the semiotics of nonexistence. The present article argues that the field would benefit from deepening its interest in questions of erasure and relative absence. A case in point, as the article shows, is graffiti. By analysing some semiotic facets of the erasure of graffiti, the article brings home the point that a semiotics of nonexistence is deeply embedded in the semiotic regimentation of space. The persistence of this condition calls for an analytical sensitisation to less obvious forms of semiosis.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Austin, J.
    2016 From the city walls to ‘clean trains’: Graffiti in New York City, 1969–1990. InJ. Ross (Ed.), Routledge handbook of graffiti and street art (pp.223–233). Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Ayuntamiento de Madrid
    Ayuntamiento de Madrid 2009 Ordenanza de limpieza de espacios públicos y gestión de residuos. BOAM, 5904: 6–24.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Baudrillard, J.
    2007Why hasn’t everything disappeared already?London: Seagull.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Billig, M.
    2006 A Psychoanalytic Discursive Psychology: from consciousness to unconsciousness. Discourse Studies8(17): 17–24. 10.1177/1461445606059546
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445606059546 [Google Scholar]
  5. Castleman, C.
    1982Getting up. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Cresswell, T.
    1992 The crucial ‘where’ of graffiti: A geographical analysis of reactions to graffiti in New York. Environment and Planning D, 10(3): 329–344. 10.1068/d100329
    https://doi.org/10.1068/d100329 [Google Scholar]
  7. Deleuze, G. & Guattari, F.
    1987A thousand plateaus. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Ehrenfeucht, R.
    2014 Art, public spaces, and private property along the streets of New Orleans. Urban Geography, 35 (7): 965–979. 10.1080/02723638.2014.945260
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2014.945260 [Google Scholar]
  9. Gonçalves, K.
    2019 The semiotic paradox of street Art: Gentrification and the commodification of Bushwick, Brooklyn. InA. Peck, C. Stroud, & Q. Williams (Eds.), Making sense of people and place in linguistic landscapes (pp.141–158). London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Graham, S. & Thrift, N.
    2007 Out of order: Understanding repair and maintenance. Theory, Culture and Society24(1): 1–25. 10.1177/0263276407075954
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276407075954 [Google Scholar]
  11. Hansen, S. & Flynn, D.
    2015 ’This is not a Banksy!’: Street art as aesthetic protest. Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, 29(6): 898–912. 10.1080/10304312.2015.1073685
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2015.1073685 [Google Scholar]
  12. Hutton, C.
    1990Abstraction and instance. Oxford: Pergamon.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Ingold, T.
    2007Lines. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203961155
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203961155 [Google Scholar]
  14. Iverson, K.
    2010 The wars on graffiti and the new military urbanism. City, 14(1–2): 115–134. 10.1080/13604810903545783
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13604810903545783 [Google Scholar]
  15. Irvine, J. & Gal, S.
    2000 Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. InP. Kroskrity (Ed.), Regimes of Language (pp.35–83). SAR Press: Santa Fe.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Jaworski, A.
    1992The power of silence. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. 2018a The art of silence in upmarket spaces of commerce. InM. Pütz & N. Mundt (Eds.), Expanding the linguistic landscape. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781788922166‑008
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781788922166-008 [Google Scholar]
  18. 2018b Visual silence and non-normative sexualities: Art, transduction and performance. Gender and Language, 10(3): 433–454. 10.1558/genl.v10i3.32038
    https://doi.org/10.1558/genl.v10i3.32038 [Google Scholar]
  19. Jaworski, A. & Thurlow, C.
    (Eds.) 2010Semiotic landscapes. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Karlander, D.
    2018 Backjumps: writing, watching, erasing train graffiti. Social Semiotics, 28(1): 41–59. 10.1080/10350330.2016.1200802
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2016.1200802 [Google Scholar]
  21. Kimvall, J.
    2014The g-word. Stockholm: Dokument.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Kramer, R.
    2017The rise of legal graffiti writing in New York and beyond. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑981‑10‑2800‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2800-7 [Google Scholar]
  23. Leibniz, G. W.
    1969 [1714] The principles of nature and of grace, based on reason. InL. E. Loemaker (Ed.), Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz: Philosophical papers and letters (pp.636–642). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Linguistic Landscape
    Linguistic Landscape 2015Linguistic landscape. An international journal. Retrieved fromhttps://benjamins.com/catalog/ll
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Loos, A.
    1962 [1908] Ornament und Verbrechen. InF. Glück (Ed.), Sämtliche Schriften, vol.1 (pp.276–288). Herold: Vienna.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Mairie de Paris
    Mairie de Paris 2018Déclarez une anomalie sur l’espace public ou dans un équipement municipal. Retrieved fromhttps://teleservices.paris.fr/dansmarue
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Peck, A. & Stroud, C.
    2015 Skinscapes. Linguistic Landscape, 1(1), 133–151.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Peck, A., Stroud, C. & Williams, Q.
    (Eds.) 2019Making sense of people and place in linguistic landscapes. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Pennycook, A.
    2010 Spatial narrations: Graffscapes and city souls. InA. Jaworski & C. Thurlow (Eds.), Semiotic landscapes (pp.137–150). London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Peirce, C. S.
    1932 The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Vol. II: Elements of Logic. InC. Hartshorne, P. Weiss (Eds.), The collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vol.1–6. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Sanmartín, P., Cappitelli, F. & Mitchell, R.
    2014 Current methods of graffiti removal: A review. Construction and Building Materials, 71: 363–374. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.08.093
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.08.093 [Google Scholar]
  32. Shohamy, E. & Gorter, D.
    (Eds.) 2009Linguistic landscape. Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Stockholms stad
    Stockholms stad 2015Policy mot klotter och liknande skadegörelse i Stockholm. Retrieved fromwww.stockholm.se/PageFiles/77860/Klotterpolicy.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Thurlow, C. & Jaworski, A.
    2010 Silence is golden: The ‘anti-communicational’ linguascaping of super-elite mobility. InA. Jaworski & C. Thurlow (Eds.), Semiotic landscapes. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. 2014 Visible-invisible: The social semiotics of labour in luxury tourism. InT. Birtchnell & J. Caletrío (Eds.), Elite Mobilities (pp.176–193). London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Thurlow, C. & Moshin, J.
    2018 What the f#@$! Policing and performing the unmentionable in the news. InM. Shröter & C. Taylor (Eds.), Exploring Silence and Absence in Discourse (pp.305–328). London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑64580‑3_11
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64580-3_11 [Google Scholar]
  37. Wacquant, L.
    2009Punishing the poor. Durham: Duke University Press. 10.1215/9780822392255
    https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822392255 [Google Scholar]
  38. Wollman, N. (producer) & Good, M.
    (director) 2011Vigilante vigilante. USA: Open Ranch.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Young, A.
    2010 Negotiating consent or zero tolerance? Responding to graffiti and street art in Melbourne. City, 14(1–2): 99–114. 10.1080/13604810903525215
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13604810903525215 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): absence; erasure; graffiti; regimentation; semiotics; writing
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error