Volume 5, Issue 3
  • ISSN 2214-9953
  • E-ISSN: 2214-9961
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



This paper looks at bikescapes – and particularly dockless share bikes – with a focus on their rapid proliferation and subsequent partial demise in Sydney. Four principal themes emerged from this study: first, bikes are an important part of the cityscape, and studies of urban semiotics need to take greater account of modes of transport. Second, the rise of docked and dockless share bikes has changed the ways the city is felt and perceived: as bikes circulate within the city, these shifting bikescapes make visible changes to the physical city environment. The ebb and flow of dockless bikes – from neat alignments to dispersed arrangements – provide an insight into changing patterns of work, leisure, and mobility, and present entropic rather than ordered city processes. Third, these bikes became significant discourse markers, material artefacts where discourses of consumption, convenience, contamination, and co-operation intersect. Dockless share bikes sit at the hub of a tussle over public and private ownership of space and information, in terms both of their physical incursion into public space and as syphons of personal information. Finally, they suggest not only that aspects of the cityscape may play an active role in semiotic networks, but that the semiotic landscape may be returning our gaze.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Barni, M. and Bagna, C.
    (2015) The critical turn in LL: New methodologies and new items in LL. Linguistic Landscape1(1/2): 6–18. 10.1075/ll.1.1‑2.01bar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.1.1-2.01bar [Google Scholar]
  2. Bailey, M.
    (2017) Obike, Reddy Go are more than bike-sharing companies. Financial Reviewwww.afr.com/technology/obike-reddy-go-are-more-than-bikesharing-companies-20170928-gyqvmg#ixzz4xFxRrMvf
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bennett, J.
    (2010) Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Durham: Duke University Press. 10.1215/9780822391623
    https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822391623 [Google Scholar]
  4. Block, D.
    (2018) Political economy and sociolinguistics: Neoliberalism, inequality and social class. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bordenkircher, B. and O’Neil, R.
    (2018) Dockless Bikes: Regulation Breakdown. Chicago: Twelve Tone Consulting.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bridle, J.
    (2018) New Dark Age: Technology and the End of the Future. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. China Daily
    China Daily (2017) China’s ‘four great new inventions’ in modern timeswww.chinadaily.com.cn/bizchina/tech/2017-08/08/content_30370096.htm
  8. Choo, C.
    (2018) New licensing regime for bike-sharing operators to kick in from October: MOT. https://www.todayonline.com/singapore/new-licensing-regime-bike-sharing-operators-kick-october-mot
  9. City of Sydney
  10. Crommelin, L., Troy, L., Martin, C. and Parkinson, S.
    (2018) Technological disruption in private housing markets: the case of Airbnb, AHURI Final Report 305, Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute Limited, Melbourne, www.ahuri.edu.au/research/final-reports/305, doi:  10.18408/ahuri‑7115201
    https://doi.org/10.18408/ahuri-7115201 [Google Scholar]
  11. Crunchbase
  12. Dardot, P. and Laval, C.
    (2009) La nouvelle raison du monde: Essai sur la société néolibérale. Paris: Éditions La Découverte.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F.
    (1980) Mille plateaux. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Donohue, R.
    (2017) Breaking the cycle. The Saturday Paper, November11 2017 www.abc.net.au/mediawatch/transcripts/s3854796.htm
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Eddie, R.
    (2018) Dockless share bikes impounded from Sydney beaches. https://thenewdaily.com.au/news/state/nsw/2018/03/01/dockless-share-bikes-waverley/
  16. Farivar, C.
    (2018) Habeas data: Privacy versus the rise of surveillance tech. New York: Melville House.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Farrelly, E.
    (2018) Data harvesters take us for a sinister ride. The Sydney Morning Herald, News Review, March10–11, p.30.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Fishman, E., Washington, S. and Haworth, N.
    (2013) Bike Share: A Synthesis of the Literature, Transport Reviews, 33(2): 148–165. 10.1080/01441647.2013.775612
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2013.775612 [Google Scholar]
  19. Fiske, J., Turner, G. and Hodge, B.
    (1987) Myths of Oz: reading Australian popular culture. Sydney, New South Wales: Allen & Unwin.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Flubacher, M.-C. and Del Percio, A.
    (Eds.) (2018) Language, Education and Neoliberalism: Marketization, dispossession, and subversion. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Gorrey, M.
  22. Gorter, D. and Cenoz, J.
    (2015) Translanguaging and linguistic landscapes. Linguistic Landscape1(1/2): 54–74. 10.1075/ll.1.1‑2.04gor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.1.1-2.04gor [Google Scholar]
  23. Gottdiener, M.
    (1983) Urban semiotics. InS. Pipkin, M. La Gory, and J. Blau (Eds) Remaking the city: Social science perspectives on urban design (pp.101–114). Albany: State University of New York Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Hamilton, L. and Taylor, N.
    (2017) Ethnography after humanism: Power, politics and method in multi-species research. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/978‑1‑137‑53933‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-53933-5 [Google Scholar]
  25. Han Sun Sheng
    Han Sun Sheng (2017) Bike sharing schemes might seem like a waste of space but the economics makes sense. https://theconversation.com/bike-sharing-schemes-might-seem-like-a-waste-of-space-but-the-economics-makes-sense-83964
  26. Hardt, M., and Negri, A.
    (2017) Assembly. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Harvey, D.
    (2005) A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Hiramoto, M.
    (2015) Inked nostalgia: displaying identity through tattoos as Hawaii local practice, Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 36 (2): 107–123. 10.1080/01434632.2013.804829
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2013.804829 [Google Scholar]
  29. Holborow, M.
    (2015) The Language of Neoliberalism. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315718163
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315718163 [Google Scholar]
  30. Hu, W.
    (2017) More New Yorkers opting for life in the bike lane. New York Times, July30th 2017 https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/30/nyregion/new-yorkers-bike-lanes-commuting.html
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Igo, S.
    (2018) The Known Citizen: A History of Privacy in Modern America. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press. 10.4159/9780674985216
    https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674985216 [Google Scholar]
  32. Karlander, D.
    (2018) Backjumps: writing, watching, erasing train graffiti, Social Semiotics, 28(1) 41–59. 10.1080/10350330.2016.1200802
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2016.1200802 [Google Scholar]
  33. Kell, C.
    (2015) “Making people happen”: materiality and movement in meaning-making trajectories. Social Semiotics, 25 (4): 423–445. 10.1080/10350330.2015.1060666
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2015.1060666 [Google Scholar]
  34. Kitis, E. D. and Milani, T.
    (2015) The performativity of the body: Turbulent spaces in Greece. Linguistic Landscape, 1(3): 268–290. 10.1075/ll.1.3.04kit
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.1.3.04kit [Google Scholar]
  35. Kramsch, C.
    (2014) A researcher’s auto-socioanalysis: making space for the personal. InB. Spolsky, Inbar-Lourie and M. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Challenges for language education and policy: making space for people (pp.235–244). New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Karaçor, E. K.
    (2016) Public vs. Private: The evaluation of different space types in terms of publicness dimension. European Journal of Sustainable Development (2016), 5(3): 51–58.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Larmer, B.
    (2017) China’s Revealing Spin on the ‘Sharing Economy’ https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/20/magazine/chinas-revealing-spin-on-the-sharing-economy.html
  38. Makoni, S. and Makoni, B.
    (2010) Multilingual discourses on wheels and public English in Africa: A case for ‘vague linguistique’. InJ. Maybin & J. Swann (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to English Language Studies (pp.258–270). London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. May, S.
    (2019) Negotiating the multilingual turn in SLA. The Modern Language Journal, 103: 122–129. 10.1111/modl.12531
    https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12531 [Google Scholar]
  40. Myurbo
    Myurbo (2018) myurbo.com
  41. Nemeth, J.
    (2009) Defining a public: The management of privately owned public space. Urban Studies, 46(11): 2463–2490. 10.1177/0042098009342903
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098009342903 [Google Scholar]
  42. Newens, C.
    (2017) Véliberté, egalité, fraternité: is Paris’s seminal bike share scheme out of date?https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2017/dec/07/velib-paris-bike-cycle-share
  43. Ofo
  44. Palin, M.
  45. Peck, A. and Stroud, C.
    (2015) Skinscapes. Linguistic Landscape, 1(1/2): 133–151. 10.1075/ll.1.1‑2.08pec
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.1.1-2.08pec [Google Scholar]
  46. Pennycook, A.
    (2009) Linguistic landscapes and the transgressive semiotics of graffiti. InElana Shohamy and Durk Gorter (Eds.), Linguistic Landscape: Expanding the Scenery, edited (pp.302–312). Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. (2010) Spatial narrations: Graffscapes and city souls. InA. Jaworski and C. Thurlow (Eds) Semiotic Landscapes: Language, Image, Space, (pp.137–150). London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. (2012) Language and mobility: Unexpected places. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847697653
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847697653 [Google Scholar]
  49. (2017) Translanguaging and semiotic assemblages. International Journal of Multilingualism, 14(3): 269–282. 10.1080/14790718.2017.1315810
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2017.1315810 [Google Scholar]
  50. (2018) Posthumanist Applied Linguistics. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Pennycook, A. and Otsuji, E.
    (2015a) Metrolingualism: Language and the city. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315724225
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315724225 [Google Scholar]
  52. (2015b) Making scents of the landscape. Linguistic Landscape, 1(3): 191–212. 10.1075/ll.1.3.01pen
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.1.3.01pen [Google Scholar]
  53. (2017) Fish, phone cards and semiotic assemblages in two Bangladeshi shops in Sydney and Tokyo, Social Semiotics, 27(4): 434–450. 10.1080/10350330.2017.1334391
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2017.1334391 [Google Scholar]
  54. Ravelli, L. and McMurtrie, R.
    (2016) Multimodality in the built environment: Spatial discourse analysis. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Schiffrin, D.
    (1988) Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Scholz, T.
    (2016) Uberworked and underpaid: How workers are disrupting the digital economy. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Schor, J. B. and Attwood-Charles, W.
    (2017) The “sharing” economy: labor, inequality and sociability on for-profit platforms. Sociology Compass, 2017, 11, e12493. doi:  10.1111/soc4.12493
    https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12493 [Google Scholar]
  58. Schor, J. B., & Fitzmaurice, C. J.
    (2015) Collaborating and Connecting: The emergence of the sharing economy. InL. Reisch and J. Thogersen, (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Sustainable Consumption (pp.410–425). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Shaheen, S., Guzman, S., & Zhang, H.
    (2010) Bikesharing in Europe, the Americas, and Asia: Past, present, and future. Transportation Research Record2143, 159–167. 10.3141/2143‑20
    https://doi.org/10.3141/2143-20 [Google Scholar]
  60. Shaw, B.
    (2017) Posthuman urbanism: Mapping bodies in contemporary city space. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Shohamy, E.
    (2015) LL research as expanding language and language policy. Linguistic Landscape1(1/2) 152–171. 10.1075/ll.1.1‑2.09sho
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.1.1-2.09sho [Google Scholar]
  62. Shohamy, A. and Ben-Rafael, E.
    (2015) Introduction: Linguistic landscape, a new journal. Linguistic Landscape, 1(1/2): 1–5.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Slee, T.
    (2015) What’s yours is mine: Against the sharing economy. New York; London: OR Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Small, A.
    (2018) Ofo Beats a Retreat From the Dockless Bikesharing Battlehttps://www.citylab.com/transportation/2018/08/the-great-dockless-bikesharing-shakeout/566891/
  65. Standing, G.
    (2011) The precariat: the new dangerous class. London: Bloomsbury. 10.5040/9781849664554
    https://doi.org/10.5040/9781849664554 [Google Scholar]
  66. Stephany, A.
    (2015) The Business of Sharing. Basingstoke: Palgrave. 10.1057/9781137376183
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137376183 [Google Scholar]
  67. Sumpter, D.
    (2018) Outnumbered: Exploring the Algorithms that Control Our Lives. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Sundararajan, A.
    (2016) The Sharing Economy: The End of Employment and the Rise of Crowd-Based Capitalism, Cambridge: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Taylor, A.
    (2018) The Bike-Share Oversupply in China: Huge Piles of Abandoned and Broken Bicycles. https://www.theatlantic.com/photo/2018/03/bike-share-oversupply-in-china-huge-piles-of-abandoned-and-broken-bicycles/556268/
  70. Thurlow, C.
    (2016) Queering critical discourse studies or/and performing ‘post-class’ ideologies. Critical Discourse Studies, 13(5), 485–514. 10.1080/17405904.2015.1122646
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2015.1122646 [Google Scholar]
  71. Yang, Y.
    (2018) Singapore requires ‘geofencing’ for all bike-sharing operators in the city by the end of this year. https://www.scmp.com/tech/enterprises/article/2149218/singapore-requires-geofencing-all-bike-sharing-operators-city-end
  72. Zuboff, S.
    (2019) The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. London: Profile Books.
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error