Volume 5, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2214-9953
  • E-ISSN: 2214-9961
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



The grapheme and symbol has been documented as relatively indeterminate and polysemic (e.g. Gale, 2015). Yet, various typographic, orthographic and other design choices make it particularly salient in the contemporary semiotic landscape. The paper starts by outlining briefly the history of the changing uses and associations of in different areas of social life. This is followed by discussion of the typographic and orthographic salience of , emphasizing its unique, unsettling, and ‘foreignizing’ effect on displayed language. The paper concludes by linking the salience of with a global verbal-visual register that I have called ‘globalese’ (Jaworski, 2015a), and by briefly pointing to its origins in the typographic experiments of avant-garde art.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Appadurai, A.
    1996Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Barthes, R.
    1977Image, Music, Text. London: Fontana.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. 1997 [1979] The Eiffel Tower. InThe Eiffel Tower and Other Mythologies (pp.3–16). Translated byR. Howard. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Chmielewska, E.
    2010 Semiosis takes place or radical uses of quaint theories. InA. Jaworski & C. Thurlow (Eds.), Semiotic Landscapes: Text, Image, Space (pp.274–291). London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Coupland, N.
    2012 Bilingualism on display: The framing of Welsh and English in Welsh public spaces. Language in Society, 41: 1–27. 10.1017/S0047404511000893
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404511000893 [Google Scholar]
  6. Danesi, M.
    2009X-Rated! The Power of Mythical Symbolism in Popular Culture. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. 2017The Semiotics of Emoji. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Dreyfuss, H.
    1984Symbol Sourcebook. An Authoritative Guide To International Graphic Symbols. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Dürscheid, C. & Siever, C. M.
    2017 Jenseits des Alphabets – Kommunikation mit Emojis. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik, 45(2): 256–285. 10.1515/zgl‑2017‑0013
    https://doi.org/10.1515/zgl-2017-0013 [Google Scholar]
  10. Drucker, J.
    1994The Visible Word: Experimental Typography and Modern Art, 1909–1923. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. 1995The Alphabetic Labyrinth. The Letters in History and Imagination. London: Thames & Hudson.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Firmage, R. A.
    1994The Alphabet Abecedarium: Some Notes on Letters. Boston, MA: David R. Godine.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Frutiger, A.
    1998 [1978/1979]Signs and Symbols: Their Design and Meaning. Translated byAndrew Bluhm. London: Ebury Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Gale, C.
    2015 A practice-based evaluation of ambiguity in graphic design, embodied in the multiplicities of X. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Brighton.
  15. Guth, C. M. E.
    2012 The local and the global: Hokusai’s Great Wave in contemporary product design. Design Issues, 28(2): 16–29. 10.1162/DESI_a_00140
    https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00140 [Google Scholar]
  16. Hall, K.
    2007 X (rated). InF. Malti-Douglas (ed.). Encyclopedia of Sex and Gender. Farmington Hills, MI: Macmillan Reference. 1561–1562.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Heller, M. & McElhinny, B.
    2017Language, Capitalism, Colonialism: Toward a Critical History. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Hermeren, G.
    1969Representation and Meaning in the Visual Arts. Lund: Scandinavian University Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Hochschild, A. R.
    1983The Managed Heart. Berkeley, California: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Jaffe, A.
    2009 Entextualization, mediatization and authentication: Orthographic choice in media transcripts. Text & Talk, 9(5): 571–594. 10.1515/TEXT.2009.030
    https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2009.030 [Google Scholar]
  21. Järlehed, J. & Moriarty, M.
    2018 Culture and class in a glass: Scaling the semiofoodscape. Language & Communication, 62: 26–38. 10.1016/j.langcom.2018.05.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2018.05.003 [Google Scholar]
  22. Jaworski, A.
    2015aGlobalese: A new visual-linguistic register. Social Semiotics, 25(2): 217–235. 10.1080/10350330.2015.1010317
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2015.1010317 [Google Scholar]
  23. 2015b Word cities and language objects: ‘Love’ sculptures and signs as shifters. Linguistic Landscape1(1–2): 75–94. 10.1075/ll.1.1‑2.05jaw
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.1.1-2.05jaw [Google Scholar]
  24. 2016 Faces, gestures, poses: Commodification of non-verbal behaviour in contemporary consumer culture. Keynote paper presented at the37th International LAUD Symposium, ‘Linguistic Landscapes and Superdiversity in the City’, University of Koblenz-Landau, 4–6 April 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. in press. Writing as assemblage: Multilingualism, multimodality and materiality. International Journal of Multilingualism.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. forthc.‘Smile!’: Happiness and affective labour in contemporary semiotic landscape.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Karlander, D.
    2019a A semiotics of nonexistence: Erasure and erased writing under anti-graffiti regimes. Linguistic Landscape, 5 (2): 198–216. 10.1075/ll.18023.kar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.18023.kar [Google Scholar]
  28. 2019bArtificial language and visions of hope. Paper presented at the HKU Colloquium on ‘Sociolinguistics and the Humanities’, University of Hong Kong, 26March 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Ledin, P. & Machin, D.
    2018Doing Visual Analysis: From Theory to Practice. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Lee, C.
    2015 Digital discourse@public space: Flows of language online and offline. InRodney Jones, Alice Chik and Christof Hafner (Eds.), Discourse and Digital Practices: Doing Discourse Analysis in the Digital Age. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Paul, A.
    2014 From stasis to ékstasis: Four types of chiasmus. InBoris Wiseman & Anthony (Eds.), Chiasmus and Culture (pp.19–44). New York: Berghahn.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Paul, A. & Wiseman, B.
    2014 Introduction. InBoris Wiseman & Anthony (Eds.), Chiasmus and Culture (pp.1–16). New York: Berghahn.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Pelkey, J.
    2017The Semiotics of X: Chiasmus, Cognition, and Extreme Body Memory. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Porębski, M.
    1972Ikonosfera. Warszawa: PWN.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Roy, M.
    2001Sign After the X. Vancouver: Arsenal Pulp Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Sacks, D.
    2003The Alphabet. London: Hutchinson.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. 2010Alphabets: A Miscellany of Letters. London: Black Dog Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Scollon, R. & Wong Scollon, S.
    2003Discourses in Place: Language in the Material World. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203422724
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203422724 [Google Scholar]
  39. Thurlow, C.
    forthc.When globalese meets localese: Transformational tactics in/of the global semioscape – A Bernese case study. Social Semiotics.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Thurlow, C. & Aiello, G.
    2007 National pride, global capital: A social semiotic analysis of trnasnational visual branding in the airline industry. Visual Communication, 6(3): 305–344. 10.1177/1470357207081002
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357207081002 [Google Scholar]
  41. Thurlow, C. & Moshin, J.
    2018 What the f#@$!: Policing and performing the unmentionable in the news. InM. Schröter and C. Taylor (Eds.), Exploring Silence and Absence in Discourse (pp.305–328). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑64580‑3_11
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64580-3_11 [Google Scholar]
  42. Van Leeuwen, T.
    2001 Semiotics and iconography. InT. van Leeuwen & C. Jewitt (Eds.), Handbook of Visual Analysis (pp.92–118). London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. 2005Introducing Social Semiotics. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. 2006 Towards a semiotics of typography. Information Design Journal + Document Design14(2): 139–155. 10.1075/idj.14.2.06lee
    https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.14.2.06lee [Google Scholar]
  45. 2008 New forms of writing, new visual competencies. Visual Studies23(2): 130–135. 10.1080/14725860802276263
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14725860802276263 [Google Scholar]
  46. In press. The new visuality of writing.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Wales, K.
    1989A Dictionary of Stylistics. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Wong, A.
    2013 Brand names and unconventional spelling: A two-pronged analysis of the orthographic construction of brand identity. Written Language & Literacy, 16(2): 115–145. 10.1075/wll.16.2.01won
    https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.16.2.01won [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error