1887
Volume 5, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2214-9953
  • E-ISSN: 2214-9961
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper proposes as a framework for expanding the focus of semiotic landscape studies by centering migration, inequality, and social exclusion. In so doing, the article adds to the work of Mpendukana and Stroud (2018) and Kerfoot and Hytlenstam (2017) in uncovering how place is structured by issues of affect, voice, and visibility. In my paper, I turn to a case study of the spatializing practices of refugees and asylum seekers in Ireland, and the ways they counteract the mainstream semiotic mediation of their experiences. In particular, I focus on the semiotic landscapes of where asylum seekers address mistreatment in their host country. By examining material produced by refugees and asylum seekers themselves, my paper demonstrates how enclosed spaces are a methodological venue for the field, while arguing also for a more thorough engagement with the theory and politics of visibility/voice.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ll.19002.mor
2019-07-22
2019-08-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Agamben, G.
    1998Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. 1999Remnants of Auschwitz: The Witness and the Archive. New York: Zone Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bauman, Z.
    2007Liquid Times. London: Polity.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Blackwood, R.
    2019 Language, images, and Paris Orly airport on Instagram: multilingual approaches to identity and self-representation on social media. International Journal of Multilingualism, 7–24. doi:  10.1080/14790718.2018.1500257
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2018.1500257 [Google Scholar]
  5. Blommaert, J.
    2010The Sociolinguistics of Globalisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511845307
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511845307 [Google Scholar]
  6. Butler, J.
    (2015) Notes toward a performative theory of assembly, vol.1. Harvard University Press. 10.4159/9780674495548
    https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674495548 [Google Scholar]
  7. Castells, M.
    The rise of the networked society. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Chouliaraki, L.
    2008 The mediation of suffering and the vision of a cosmopolitan public. Television & new media, 9(5): 371–391. doi:  10.1177/1527476408315496
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476408315496 [Google Scholar]
  9. 2017 The self-representation of migrants and refugees in digital news. Popular Culture, 15(2): 78–94. doi:  10.1080/15405702.2017.1281415
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15405702.2017.1281415 [Google Scholar]
  10. Couldry, N.
    2010Why voice matters: Culture and politics after neoliberalism. London: Sage publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Diken, B.
    2004 From refugee camp to gated community: bio politics and the end of the city. Citizenship studies, 8(1): 83–106. 10.1080/1362102042000178373
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1362102042000178373 [Google Scholar]
  12. Elias, N.
    2000The civilising process. Oxford: UK Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Fraser, N.
    2010Scales of Justice: Reimagining Political Space in a Globalizing World. New York: Columbia University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Goffman, E.
    1963Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. London: Penguin.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Gonçalves, K.
    2019 YO! or OY? – say what? Creative place-making through a metrolingual artifact in Dumbo, Brooklyn. International Journal of Multilingualism, 16(1): 42–58. 10.1080/14790718.2018.1500259
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2018.1500259 [Google Scholar]
  16. Irvine, J. & Gal, S.
    2000 Language ideology and linguistic differentiation: InP. V. Kroskrity (Ed.), Regimes of Language: Ideologies, Polities and Identities (pp.35–79). Santa Fe: School of Advanced Research.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Järlehed, J. & Moriarty, M.
    2018 Culture and class in a glass: Scaling the semiofoodscape. Language and Communication, 62: 26–38. doi:  10.1016/j.langcom.2018.05.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2018.05.003 [Google Scholar]
  18. Jaworski, A.
    2018 The art of silence in upmarket spaces of commerce. InM. Pütz & N. Mundt (Eds.), Expanding the Linguistic Landscape: Multilingualism, Language Policy and the Use of Space as a Semiotic Resource. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781788922166‑008
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781788922166-008 [Google Scholar]
  19. Jaworski, A. & Thurlow, C.
    2013 The (de-) centering spaces of airports: Framing mobility and multilingualism. InS. Pietikäinen, & H. Kelly-Holmes (Eds.), Multilingualism and the periphery (pp.154–198). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199945177.003.0009
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199945177.003.0009 [Google Scholar]
  20. 2010 Introducing semiotic landscapes. InA. Jaworski & C. Thurlow (Eds.), Semiotic landscapes: Language Image, Space (pp.1–40). London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Karlander, D.
    2018 Backjumps: writing, watching, erasing train graffiti. Social Semiotics, 28(1): 41–59. doi:  10.1080/10350330.2016.1200802
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2016.1200802 [Google Scholar]
  22. Kerfoot, C. & Hytlenstam, K.
    (Eds.) 2017Entangled Discourses: South-North Orders of Visibility. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315640006
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315640006 [Google Scholar]
  23. Krzyzanowski, M.
    2016 Recontextualisations of neoliberalism and the increasingly conceptual nature of discourse: Challenges for critical discourse studies. Discourse and Society, 27(3): 308–321. 10.1177/0957926516630901
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926516630901 [Google Scholar]
  24. 2018 Discursive shifts in ethno-nationalist politics: On politicization and mediatisation of the ‘Refugee Crisis’ in Poland. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies, 16(1–2): 76–96. doi:  10.1080/15562948.2017.1317897
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15562948.2017.1317897 [Google Scholar]
  25. Lou, J. J. & Jaworski, A.
    2016 Itineraries of protest signage: Semiotic landscape and the mythologizing of the Hong Kong umbrella movement. Journal of Language and Politics, 15(5): 612–645. doi:  10.1075/jlp.15.5.06lou
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.15.5.06lou [Google Scholar]
  26. Loyal, S. & Quilley, S.
    2016 Categories of state control: Asylum seekers and the direct provision and dispersal system in Ireland. Social Justice, 43(4).
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Maguire, M. & Murphy, F.
    2012 Boundaries of the state and politics of everyday life in Ireland. Anthropology News, 53(2): 6–7.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Malinowski, D.
    2015 Opening spaces of learning in the linguistic landscape. Linguistic Landscape, 1(1): 95–113. doi:  10.1075/ll.1.1‑2.06mal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.1.1-2.06mal [Google Scholar]
  29. Martín-Rojo, L.
    2014 Taking over the Square: The role of linguistic practices in contesting urban spaces. Journal of Language and Politics, 13(4): 623–652. doi:  10.1075/jlp.13.4.03mar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.13.4.03mar [Google Scholar]
  30. Milani, T.
    2017 The politics of the margins: Multi-semiotic and affective strategies of voice and visibility. InC. Kerfoot & K. Hytlenstam (Eds.), Entangled Discourses: South-North Orders of Visibility (pp.173–188). London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315640006‑10
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315640006-10 [Google Scholar]
  31. Milani, T. & Levon, E.
    in press. Israel as homotopia: Language, space and vicious belonging. Language in Society.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Mirzoeff, N.
    2011 The right to look. Critical Inquiry, 37(3): 473–496. doi:  10.1086/659354
    https://doi.org/10.1086/659354 [Google Scholar]
  33. Moriarty, M.
    2015 Indexing authenticity: The linguistic landscape of an Irish tourist town. International Journal of the Sociology of Language (232): 195–214.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Mpendukana, S. & Stroud, C.
    2018 Of monkeys, shacks and loos: Changing times, changing places. InPeck, A., Stroud, C. & Williams, Q. (Eds.), Making Sense of People and Place in Linguistic Landscapes (pp.183–200). London: Bloomsbury Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Nedelijkovic, V.
    2018 ‘Reiterating asylum archive: Documenting DP in Ireland’ Research in Drama Education: The Journal of Applied Theatre Performance23(2): 289–293. 10.1080/13569783.2018.1440202
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13569783.2018.1440202 [Google Scholar]
  36. O’Reilly, Z.
    2018 Living liminality: everyday experiences of asylum seekers in the ‘direct provision’ system in Ireland. Gender, Place and Culture, 25(6): 821–842. 10.1080/0966369X.2018.1473345
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2018.1473345 [Google Scholar]
  37. Peck, A., Stroud, C. & Williams, Q.
    (Eds.) 2018Making sense of people and place. London: Bloomsbury Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Pennycook, A.
    2009 Linguistic landscapes and the transgressive semiotics of graffiti. InShohamy & Gorter (Eds.), Linguistic Landscape: Expanding the scenery (pp.342–352). London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Pugliese, J.
    2009 Crisis heterotopias and border zones of the dead. Continuum, 23(5): 663–679. 10.1080/10304310903183627
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10304310903183627 [Google Scholar]
  40. Sandoval, C. & Latorre, G.
    2008 Chicana/o artivism: Judy Baca’s digital work with youth of color. InA. Everett (Ed.), Learning race and ethnicity: Youth and digital media (pp.81–108).
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Sandvik, K. B.
    2010 Unpacking world refugee day: Humanitarian governance and human rights practice?Journal of Human Rights Practice, 2: 287–298. 10.1093/jhuman/huq003
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/huq003 [Google Scholar]
  42. Sheller, M. & Urry, J.
    2006 The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 38(2): 207–226. 10.1068/a37268
    https://doi.org/10.1068/a37268 [Google Scholar]
  43. Stroud, C.
    2016 Turbulent linguistic landscapes and the semiotics of citizenship. InR. Blackwood, E. Lanza & H. Woldemariam (Eds.), Negotiating and Contesting Identities in Linguistic Landscapes (pp.3–18). London, New York: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Thurlow, C.
    2019 Semiotic creativities in and with space: binaries and boundaries, beware!International Journal of Multilingualism, 16 (1): 94–104. 10.1080/14790718.2018.1500264
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2018.1500264 [Google Scholar]
  45. Thurlow, C. & Jaworski, A.
    2018 Word-things and thing-words: The transmodal production of privilege and status. InJ. R. Cavanaugh & S. Shankar (eds), Language and materiality: Ethnographical and theoretical explorations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Waksman, S. & Shohamy, E.
    2016 Linguistic landscape of social protests: Moving from ‘open’ to ‘institutional’ spaces. InR. Blackwood, E. Lanza. & H. Woldemariam (Eds.), Negotiating and Contesting Identities in Linguistic Landscapes (pp.85–99). London: Bloomsbury Academic.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Zetter, R.
    2007 More labels, fewer refugees: Remaking the refugee label in the era of globalisation. Journal of Refugee Studies, 20 (2): 172–192. 10.1093/jrs/fem011
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/fem011 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ll.19002.mor
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ll.19002.mor
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): agency , refugeescape , transgressive semiotic landscaping , visibility and voice
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error