Volume 6, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2214-9953
  • E-ISSN: 2214-9961
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



This article analyses the semiotic landscapes of 19 villages in Low German-speaking northern Germany, thus contributing to the growing body of research in the field of semiotic landscapes in rural settings. Drawing from Blokland’s (2017) typology of community, it analyses the semiotic landscapes of the villages as material manifestations of communicative practices and performances which create fluid, flexible configurations of community. The analysis reveals that signage in this particular rural context reflects social processes by which individuals and communities have constructed new images of themselves by using elements of local tradition, culture, language, and history. In doing so, they have also carved out a specific approach to tourism for themselves, which is opposed to mass and package tourism.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Adler, A. , Ehlers, E. , Goltz, R. , Kleene, A. , & Plewnia, A.
    (2016) Status und Gebrauch des Niederdeutschen. Erste Ergebnisse einer repräsentativen Erhebung. Mannheim: Institut für deutsche Sprache and Institut für niederdeutsche Sprache.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Auer, P.
    (2009) Visible dialect. In: H. Hovmark , I. Stampe Sletten , Iben , & A. Gudiksen (Eds.), I mund og bog. 25 artikler om sprog tilegnet Inge Lise Pedersen pa ̊ 70-a ̊rsdagen d.5.juni 2009 (pp.31–45). Copenhagen: Nordisk Forskningsinstitut.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Backhaus, P.
    (2007) Linguistic Landscape: A Comparative Study of Urban Multilingualism in Tokyo. Clevedon.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Banda, F. & Jimaima, H.
    (2015) The semiotic ecology of linguistic landscapes in rural Zambia. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 19 (5), 643–670. 10.1111/josl.12157
    https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12157 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bell, D.
    (2006) Variations on the rural idyll. In P. Cloke , T. Marsden & P. Mooney (Eds.), Handbook of Rural Studies (pp.149–160). London: Sage. 10.4135/9781848608016.n10
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608016.n10 [Google Scholar]
  6. Blokland, T.
    (2017) Community as urban practice. Cambridge: Polity.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Blommaert, J.
    (2005) Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511610295
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610295 [Google Scholar]
  8. Britain, D.
    (2017) Which way to look? Perspectives on ‘urban’ and ‘rural’ in dialectology. In E. Moore & C. Montgomery (Eds.) Language and a Sense of Place: Studies in Language and Region (pp.171–187). Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/9781316162477.010
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316162477.010 [Google Scholar]
  9. Cloke, P.
    (2006) Conceptualizing rurality. In P. Cloke , T. Marsden & P. Mooney (Eds.), Handbook of Rural Studies (pp.18–28). London: Sage. 10.4135/9781848608016.n2
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608016.n2 [Google Scholar]
  10. Cohen, A.
    (1985) The symbolic construction of community. London: Tavistock. 10.4324/9780203323373
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203323373 [Google Scholar]
  11. Coulmas, F.
    (2009) Linguistic landscaping and the seed of the public sphere. In D. Gorter & E. Shohamy (Eds.), Linguistic Landscape: Expanding the Scenery (pp.13–24). New York/London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Daveluy, M. & Ferguson, J.
    (2009) Scripted Urbanity in the Canadian North. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 19 (1), 78–100. 10.1111/j.1548‑1395.2009.01020.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1395.2009.01020.x [Google Scholar]
  13. Day, G. & Murdoch, J.
    (1993) Locality and community: coming to terms with place. Sociological Review41, 82–111. 10.1111/j.1467‑954X.1993.tb02955.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1993.tb02955.x [Google Scholar]
  14. Dunlevy, D. A.
    (2012) Linguistic Policy and Linguistic Choice: A Study of the Galician Linguistic Landscape. In C. Hélot , M. Barni , R. Janssens , & C. Bagna (Eds.), Linguistic Landscapes, Multilingualism and Social Change (pp.53–68). Frankfurt am Main: Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. DuPuis, M. E.
    (2006) Landscapes of desire?In P. Cloke , T. Marsden & P. Mooney (Eds.), Handbook of Rural Studies (pp.124–132). London: Sage. 10.4135/9781848608016.n8
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608016.n8 [Google Scholar]
  16. Ehlers, K.-H.
    (2018) Geschichte der mecklenburgischen Regionalsprache seit dem Zweiten Weltkrieg. Varietätenkontakt zwischen Alteingesessenen und immigrierten Vertriebenen. Berlin: Lang. 10.3726/b14252
    https://doi.org/10.3726/b14252 [Google Scholar]
  17. Halfacree, K.
    (2006) Rural space: constructing a threefold architecture. In P. Cloke , T. Marsden & P. Mooney (Eds.), Handbook of Rural Studies (pp.44–62). London: Sage. 10.4135/9781848608016.n4
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608016.n4 [Google Scholar]
  18. Harding, A. & Blokland, T.
    (2014) Urban theory: A critical introduction to power, cities and urbanism in the 21st century. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Heller, M. , Jaworski, A. , & Thurlow, C.
    (2014) Introduction: Sociolinguistics and tourism – mobilities, markets, multilingualism. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 18(4), 425–458. 10.1111/josl.12091
    https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12091 [Google Scholar]
  20. Heller, M. , Pujolar, J. , & Duchêne, A.
    (2014) Linguistic commodification in tourism. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 18(4), 539–566. 10.1111/josl.12082
    https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12082 [Google Scholar]
  21. Hoggart, K.
    (1990) Let’s do away with rural. Journal of Rural Studies, 6, 245–257. 10.1016/0743‑0167(90)90079‑N
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0743-0167(90)90079-N [Google Scholar]
  22. Hoogstraat, J.
    (1997) Von Ostfriesland nach Amerika. Second edition. Norden: Soltau Kurier.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Järlehed, J. & Jaworski, A.
    (2015) Typographic landscaping: creativity, ideology, movement. Social Semiotics, 25 (2), 117–125. 10.1080/10350330.2015.1010318
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2015.1010318 [Google Scholar]
  24. Jaworski, A. & Thurlow, C.
    (2010) Introducing Semiotic Landscapes. In A. Jaworski & C. Thurlow (Eds.), Semiotic Landscapes: Language, Image, Space (pp.1–40). London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Juffermans, K. & Coppoolse, J.
    (2012) How literate, low-literate and non-literate readers read the linguistic landscape in a Gambian village. In C. Hélot , M. Barni , R. Janssens , & C. Bagna (Eds.), Linguistic Landscapes, Multilingualism and Social Change (pp.233–248). Frankfurt am Main: Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Kamwangamalu, N. M. & Tovares, A. V.
    (2019) Urban and rural language contact. In J. Darquennes , J. S. Salmons & W. Vandenbussche (Eds.), Language Contact. An International Handbook. Volume1 (pp.310–332). New York: de Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Kelly-Holmes, H. & Pietikäinen, S.
    (2014) Commodifying Sami culture in an indigenous tourism site. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 18 (4), 518–538. 10.1111/josl.12092
    https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12092 [Google Scholar]
  28. Laitinen, M.
    (2014) 630 kilometres by bicycle: observations of English in urban and rural Finland. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 228, 55–77.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Liepins, R.
    (2000a) New energies for an old idea: reworking approaches to ‘community’ in contemporary rural studies. Journal of Rural Studies, 16, 23–36. 10.1016/S0743‑0167(99)00042‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0743-0167(99)00042-X [Google Scholar]
  30. (2000b) Exploring rurality through ‘community’: discourses, practices and spaces shaping Australian and New Zealand rural ‘communities’. In: Journal of Rural Studies, 16, 325–342. 10.1016/S0743‑0167(99)00067‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0743-0167(99)00067-4 [Google Scholar]
  31. Möller, F.
    (2008) Plattdeutsch im 21. Jahrhundert. Bestandsaufnahmen und Perspektiven. Leer: Schuster.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Mühlan-Meyer, T. & Lützenkirchen, F.
    (2017) Visuelle Mehrsprachigkeit in der Metropole Ruhr – eine Projektpräsentation: Aufbau und Funktionen der Bilddatenbank ‘Metropolenzeichen’. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Linguistik, 66, 79–98. 10.1515/zfal‑2017‑0003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/zfal-2017-0003 [Google Scholar]
  33. Pietikäinen, S. , Lane, P. , Salo, H. , & Laihiala-Kankainen, S.
    (2011) Frozen actions in the Arctic linguistic landscape: a nexus analysis of language processes in visual space International Journal of Multilingualism , 8(4), 277–298. 10.1080/14790718.2011.555553
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2011.555553 [Google Scholar]
  34. Pietikäinen, S. , Kelly-Holmes, H. , Jaffe, A. & Coupland, N.
    (2016) Sociolinguistics from the periphery. Small languages in new circumstances. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781316403617
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316403617 [Google Scholar]
  35. Reershemius, G.
    (2002) Bilingualismus oder Sprachverlust? Zur Lage und zur aktiven Verwendung des Niederdeutschen in Ostfriesland am Beispiel einer Dorfgemeinschaft. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik69 (2), 163–181.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. (2009) Post-Vernacular Language Use in a Low German Linguistic Community. Journal of Germanic Linguistics21, 131–147. 10.1017/S1470542709000221
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1470542709000221 [Google Scholar]
  37. (2011) Reconstructing the past? Low German and the creating of regional identity in public language display. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 32(1), 33–54. 10.1080/01434632.2010.536238
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2010.536238 [Google Scholar]
  38. (2017) Autochthonous heritage languages and social media: writing and bilingual practices in Low German on Facebook. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 38 (1), 35–49. 10.1080/01434632.2016.1151434
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2016.1151434 [Google Scholar]
  39. (2018) Lamppost Networks: stickers as a genre in urban semiotic landscapes. Social Semiotics. doi:  10.1080/10350330.2018.1504652
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2018.1504652 [Google Scholar]
  40. (in press). Transgressive Diskurse im ländlichen Raum. Eine Untersuchung der ‘semiotic landscapes’ in einer nordwestdeutschen Landgemeinde. In H. F. Martens & E. Ziegler Eds. Linguistic Landscapes im deutschsprachigen Raum. Berlin: Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Scollon, R. & Scollon, S. W.
    (2003) Discourses in Place: Language in the Material World. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203422724
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203422724 [Google Scholar]
  42. (2001) Discourse and Intercultural Communication. In D. Schiffrin , D. Tannen & H. Hamilton (Eds), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp.538–547). Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Short, B.
    (2006) Idyllic Ruralities. In P. Cloke , T. Marsden & P. Mooney (Eds.), Handbook of Rural Studies (pp.133–148). London: Sage. 10.4135/9781848608016.n9
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608016.n9 [Google Scholar]
  44. Spitzmüller, J.
    (2015) Graphic Variation and Graphic Ideologies: A Metapragmatic Approach. Social Semiotics, 25 (2), 126–141. 10.1080/10350330.2015.1010323
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2015.1010323 [Google Scholar]
  45. Stöckl, H.
    (2005) Typography: body and dress of a text – a signing mode between language and image. Visual Communication, 4(2), 205–214. 10.1177/1470357205053403
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357205053403 [Google Scholar]
  46. Vandekerckhove, R.
    (2010) Urban and rural language. In P. Auer & J. E. Schmidt (Eds), Language and Space. An International Handbook of Linguistic Variation. Theories and Methods (pp.315–332). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. van Leeuwen, T.
    (2005) Typographic meaning. Visual Communication, 4 (2), 138–143. 10.1177/1470357205053749
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357205053749 [Google Scholar]
  48. Woods, M.
    (2011) Rural. London/New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Ziegler, E.
    (2013) Visuelle Mehrsprachigkeit in der Metropole Ruhr. Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik, 10, 299–301.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Ziegler, E. , Eickmans, H. , Schmitz, U. , Uslucan, H.-H. , Gehne, D. H. , Kurtenbach, S. , Mühlan-Meyer, T. , & Wachendorff, I.
    (2018) Metropolenzeichen. Atlas zur visuellen Mehrsprachigkeit der Metropole Ruhr. Duisburg: Universitätsverlag.
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): commodification; Low German; rural communities; semiotic landscapes; tourism
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error