1887
image of Linguistic landscapes as discursive frame
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Previous research on the Linguistic Landscapes of Chinatowns has highlighted the perceptions and experiences of long-term residents ( ). To explore Chinatown in the eyes of newly arrived migrants, this paper presents a study of the Linguistic Landscape of the Triangle de Choisy, the Chinatown in Paris. Drawing upon Scollon and Scollon’s geosemiotic framework ( ) and Augé’s place theory ( ), it analyzes 130 photographs of the field and four interviews with newly arrived Chinese migrants. It is found that the Linguistic Landscape of the Chinatown constructs a coherent semiotic aggregate for the newcomers as an identifiable, relational, and historical transnational space that helps to orient them in a new country. Thus, this study illustrates how the Linguistic Landscape of Chinatown could serve as structured and structuring discursive frame ( ) in the lives of new migrants.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ll.20009.zha
2021-03-02
2021-05-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Amos, H. W.
    (2016) Chinatown by numbers. Linguistic Landscape, 2(2), 127–156. 10.1075/ll.2.2.02amo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.2.2.02amo [Google Scholar]
  2. Augé, M.
    (1995) Non-places: Introduction to an Anthropology of Supermodernity. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Backhaus, P.
    (2007) Linguistic landscapes: A comparative study of urban multilingualism in Tokyo (Vol.136). Clevedon: Multilingual matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Blommaert, J.
    (2013) Ethnography, superdiversity and linguistic landscapes: Chronicles of complexity (Vol.18). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781783090419
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783090419 [Google Scholar]
  5. Blommaert, J., & Maly, I.
    (2016) Ethnographic Linguistic Landscape Analysis and Social Change: A case study. InK. Arnaut, J. Blommaert, B. Rampton, & M. Spotti (Eds.), Language and Superdiversity (pp.191–211). New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Coupland, N., & Garrett, P.
    (2010) Linguistic landscapes, discursive frames and metacultural performance: The case of Welsh Patagonia. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 2010(205), 7–36.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Daniels, S. & Cosgrove, D.
    (1993) Spectacle and text: Landscape metaphors in cultural geography, inJ. Duncan and D. Ley (Eds), Place/Culture/Representation. London: Routledge, 57–77.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Dufoix, S.
    (2008) Diasporas. London: University of California Press. 10.1525/california/9780520253599.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520253599.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  9. Foucault, M.
    (1967) Des espace autres. RetrievedJune 30, 2020, fromhttps://foucault.info/documents/heterotopia/foucault.heteroTopia.fr/
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Garvin, R. T.
    (2010) Responses to the linguistic landscape in Memphis, Tennessee: An urban space in transition. InE. Shohamy, E. Rafael, and M. Barni (Eds.) Linguistic landscape in the city (pp.252–271). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847692993‑016
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847692993-016 [Google Scholar]
  11. Goffman, E.
    (1971[1959]) The presentation of self in everyday life. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Gorter, D.
    2015 The inaugural editorial of Linguistic Landscape: An international journal. Retrieved on16 August, 2019, fromhttps://benjamins.com/catalog/ll
  13. Guillon, M., & Taboada-Leonetti, I.
    (1986) Le triangle de Choisy, un quartier chinois à Paris. Paris: CIEMI-L’Harmattan.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Hassoun, J. P., & Tan, Y. P.
    (1986) Les Chinois de Paris: minorité culturelle ou constellation ethnique?Terrain, 7, 34–44. 10.4000/terrain.2909
    https://doi.org/10.4000/terrain.2909 [Google Scholar]
  15. Hobsbawm, E.
    (1983) Introduction: Inventing tradition. InE. Hobsbawm & T. Ranger (Eds.), The invention of tradition (pp.1–14). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Jaworski, A., & Thurlow, C.
    (2010) Introducing semiotic landscapes. InA. Jaworski & C. Thurlow (Eds), Semiotic landscapes: Language, image, space (pp.1–40). London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Lee, J. W., & Lou, J. J.
    (2019) The ordinary semiotic landscape of an unordinary place: spatiotemporal disjunctures in Incheon’s Chinatown. International Journal of Multilingualism, 16(2), 187–203. 10.1080/14790718.2019.1575837
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2019.1575837 [Google Scholar]
  18. Leeman, J., & Modan, G.
    (2010) Selling the city: Language, ethnicity and commodified space. InE. Shohamy, E. Rafael, and M. Barni (Eds.) Linguistic landscape in the city (pp.182–198). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847692993‑012
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847692993-012 [Google Scholar]
  19. Lou, J.
    (2007) Revitalizing Chinatown into a heterotopia: A geosemiotic analysis of shop signs in Washington, DC’s Chinatown. Space and Culture, 10(2), 170–194. 10.1177/1206331206298547
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331206298547 [Google Scholar]
  20. Lou, J. J.
    (2009) Situating linguistic landscape in time and space: A multidimensional study of the discursive construction of Washington, DC Chinatown. Doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. (2010) Chinese on the side: The marginalization of Chinese in the linguistic and social landscapes of Chinatown in Washington, DC. InE. Shohamy, E. Rafael, and M. Barni (Eds.) Linguistic landscape in the city (pp.96–114). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847692993‑008
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847692993-008 [Google Scholar]
  22. (2016) The linguistic landscape of Chinatown: A sociolinguistic ethnography. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781783095636
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783095636 [Google Scholar]
  23. Ma, Mung E., Guillon, M.
    (1992) Dispositif économique et ressources spatiales: éléments d’une économie de diaspora. Revue européenne des migrations internationales, 8(3), 175–193. 10.3406/remi.1992.1343
    https://doi.org/10.3406/remi.1992.1343 [Google Scholar]
  24. Malinowski, D.
    (2009) Authorship in the linguistic landscape: A multimodal-performative view. InE. Shohamy and D. Gorter (Eds.) Linguistic landscape: Expanding the Scenery (pp.107–125). New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. (2010) Showing seeing in the Korean linguistic cityscape. InE. Shohamy, E. Rafael, and M. Barni (Eds.) Linguistic landscape in the city (pp.199–215). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847692993‑013
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847692993-013 [Google Scholar]
  26. Peck, A., Stroud, C., & Williams, Q.
    (Eds.) (2018) Making Sense of People and Place in Linguistic Landscapes. London: Bloomsbury Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Pennycook, A., & Otsuji, E.
    (2015) Metrolingualism: Language in the city. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315724225
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315724225 [Google Scholar]
  28. Portugali, J.
    (Ed.) (1996) The construction of cognitive maps (Vol.32). Springer Science & Business Media. 10.1007/978‑0‑585‑33485‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-585-33485-1 [Google Scholar]
  29. Proshansky, H. M., Fabian, A. K., & Kaminoff, R.
    (1983) Place-identity: Physical world socialization of the self. Journal of environmental psychology, 3, 57–83. 10.1016/S0272‑4944(83)80021‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(83)80021-8 [Google Scholar]
  30. Raulin, A.
    (2000) L’ethnique est quotidian: Diasporas, marchés et cultures métropolitaines. Paris: L’Harmattan.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. (2008) Utopies locales et laboratoire social: l’exemple du 13e arrondissement de Paris. L’Année sociologique, 58(1), 47–70. 10.3917/anso.081.0047
    https://doi.org/10.3917/anso.081.0047 [Google Scholar]
  32. Sales, R., Hatziprokopiou, P., Christiansen, F., D’Angelo, A., Liang, X., Lin, X., & Montagna, N.
    (2011) London’s Chinatown: Diaspora, identity and belonging. International Journal of Business and Globalisation, 7(2), 195–231. 10.1504/IJBG.2011.041832
    https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBG.2011.041832 [Google Scholar]
  33. Schütz, A.
    (1944) The stranger: An essay in social psychology. American journal of Sociology, 49(6), 499–507. 10.1086/219472
    https://doi.org/10.1086/219472 [Google Scholar]
  34. Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. W.
    (2003) Discourses in place: Language in the material world. London and New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203422724
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203422724 [Google Scholar]
  35. Sharma, B. K.
    (2019) The scarf, language, and other semiotic assemblages in the formation of a new Chinatown. Applied Linguistics Review, 1(ahead-of-print).
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Sörlin, S.
    (1999) The articulation of territory: landscape and the constitution of regional and national identity. Norsk geografisk Tidsskrift-Norwegian journal of geography, 53(2–3), 103–112. 10.1080/00291959950136821
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00291959950136821 [Google Scholar]
  37. Spolsky, B.
    (2009) Language management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511626470
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511626470 [Google Scholar]
  38. Wang, Gungwu
    (2000) The Chinese Overseas: From Earthbound China to the Quest for Autonomy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Wu, H., Techasan, S., & Huebner, T.
    (2020) A new Chinatown? Authenticity and conflicting discourses on Pracha Rat Bamphen Road. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 1–19. doi:  10.1080/01434632.2020.1746318
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2020.1746318 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ll.20009.zha
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ll.20009.zha
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: diaspora; Chinatown; Paris; place; new migrants; linguistic landscape; discursive frame; space
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error