1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Linguistic Landscape
  4. Volume 7, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 7, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2214-9953
  • E-ISSN: 2214-9961
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

In Israel, approximately 25,000 Thai laborers are contracted for agricultural work in all parts of the country, following a series of bilateral agreements between the governments of Israel and Thailand. Various NGOs and agencies have documented numerous violations of labor laws in many Israeli farms, including the lack of safety measures, poor working and living conditions, and extremely low salaries. Israeli discourse on the topic vacillates between the interests of farmers, workers, consumers, and the government (Or & Shohamy, 2020), and the occasional appearance of reports about the abuse of workers reignites the debate and tensions surrounding these issues. This longitudinal qualitative study, spanning from 2013 to 2019, focuses on the linguistic landscape (LL) of the Central Arava region – an arid, sparsely populated subdistrict in Southern Israel. What makes this region unique is that the number of Thai migrant workers there equals or slightly exceeds that of Hebrew-speaking Jews. Using an LL approach (Jaworski & Thurlow, 2010Shohamy & Gorter, 2009Shohamy, 2012), the 2013 study sought to explore the visibility and vitality of the Thai language as well as its interactions with other languages. The roles that Thai, Hebrew, English, Arabic, and other languages played in the public space clearly revealed the power relations between the speakers of these languages. The 2018–19 follow-up to the original 2013 findings seeks to track the impact on the public space of recent developments such as population changes, the advent of speakers of other languages to the region, the economic crisis, and the public controversy about the exploitation of workers. The study shows that the number of Thai signs has been significantly reduced in recent years, not only pointing to changes in the multilingual reality of the region, but also raising a series of questions about labor conditions, regulation, informal labor markets, and cases of potential mismatch between reality and perceptions.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ll.20010.or
2021-02-19
2024-09-13

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/ll.20010.or
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Arnaut, K., Karrebæk, M. S., Spotti, M., & Blommaert, J.
    (Eds.) (2017) Engaging superdiversity: Recombining spaces, times and language practices. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. BBC
    BBC (2018, November23). Thai labourers in Israel tell of harrowing conditions. Retrieved from BBC: https://www.bbc.com/news/av/world-middle-east-46311922/thai-labourers-in-israel-tell-of-harrowing-conditions
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Ben-Rafael, E., Shohamy, E., Amara, M., & Trumper-Hecht, N.
    (2006) Linguistic landscape as symbolic construction of the public space: The case of Israel. International Journal of Multilingualism, 3(1), 7–30. 10.1080/14790710608668383
     https://doi.org/10.1080/14790710608668383 [Google Scholar]
  4. Blommaert, J.
    (2010) The sociolinguistics of globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511845307
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511845307 [Google Scholar]
  5. Boels, D.
    (2016) The informal economy: Seasonal work, street selling and sex work. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑43123‑9
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43123-9 [Google Scholar]
  6. Buckingham, L.
    (2015) Commercial signage and the linguistic landscape of Oman. World Englishes, 34(3), 411–435. 10.1111/weng.12146
     https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12146 [Google Scholar]
  7. Dailey, R. M., Giles, H., & Jansma, L. L.
    (2005) Language attitudes in an Anglo-Hispanic context: The role of the linguistic landscape. Language & Communication, 25, 27–38. 10.1016/j.langcom.2004.04.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2004.04.004 [Google Scholar]
  8. Dong, J.
    (2020) Space, signs, and legitimate workers’ identities: An ethnography of a Beijing “urban village”. Social Semiotics, 30(2), 151–167. 10.1080/10350330.2018.1532655
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2018.1532655 [Google Scholar]
  9. Faist, T.
    (2010) Diaspora and transnationalism: What kind of dance partners?InR. Bauböck, & T. Faist (Eds.), Diaspora and transnationalism: Concepts, theories and methods (pp.9–34). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Frölich, M., Kaplan, D., Pagés, C., Rigolini, J., & Robalino, D.
    (Eds.) (2014) Social insurance, informality, and labor markets: How to protect workers while creating good jobs. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199685233.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199685233.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  11. Huebner, T.
    (2006) Bangkok’s linguistic landscapes: Environmental print, codemixing and language change. International Journal of Multilingualism, 3(1), 31–51. 10.1080/14790710608668384
     https://doi.org/10.1080/14790710608668384 [Google Scholar]
  12. Irvine, J. T., & Gal, S.
    (2000) Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. InP. V. Kroskrity (Ed.), Regimes of language: Ideologies, politics, and identities (pp.35–83). Santa Fe, New Mexico: School of American Research Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Jakobson, R.
    (1995) The speech event and the functions of language. InL. R. Waugh, & M. Monville-Burston (Eds.), On language (pp.69–79). Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Jaworski, A., & Thurlow, C.
    (Eds.) (2010) Semiotic landscapes: Language, image, space. London: Continuum.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Kaminer, M.
    (2019a) By the sweat of other brows: Thai migrant labor and the transformation of Israeli settler agriculture. A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Ann Arbor, Michigan: The University of Michigan.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. (2019b) At the zero degree / Below the minimum: Wage as sign in Israel’s split labor market. Dialectical Anthropology, 43, 317–332. 10.1007/s10624‑019‑09560‑7
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10624-019-09560-7 [Google Scholar]
  17. Kochav, S.
    (2018) The Linguistic Landscape of religious expression in Israel. Linguistic Landscape, 4(1), 29–52. 10.1075/ll.17004.koc
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.17004.koc [Google Scholar]
  18. Kymlicka, W., & Patten, A.
    (2003) Language rights and political theory. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 3–21. 10.1017/S0267190503000163
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190503000163 [Google Scholar]
  19. Leonard, M.
    (1998) Invisible work, invisible workers: The informal economy in Europe and the US. Basingstoke and London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230371873
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230371873 [Google Scholar]
  20. May, S.
    (2012) Language and minority rights: Ethnicity, nationalism and the politics of language (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Mehrotra, S., & Biggeri, M.
    (2007) Asian informal workers: Global risks, local protection. Abingdon: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203966532
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203966532 [Google Scholar]
  22. Milani, T. M., Levon, E., Gafter, R. J., & Or, I. G.
    (2018) Tel Aviv as a space of affirmation versus transformation: Language, citizenship, and the politics of sexuality in Israel. Linguistic Landscape, 4(3), 278–297. 10.1075/ll.18006.mil
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.18006.mil [Google Scholar]
  23. Or, I. G., & Shohamy, E.
    (2020) “Youth should be sent here to absorb Zionism”: Jewish farmers and Thai migrant workers in southern Israel. InM. Rheindorf, & R. Wodak (Eds.), Sociolinguistic perspectives on migration control: Language policy, identity and belonging (pp.148–169). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781788924689‑008
     https://doi.org/10.21832/9781788924689-008 [Google Scholar]
  24. Peck, A., & Banda, F.
    (2014) Observatory’s linguistic landscape: Semiotic appropriation and the reinvention of space. Social Semiotics, 24(3), 302–323. 10.1080/10350330.2014.896651
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2014.896651 [Google Scholar]
  25. Pennycook, A.
    (2012) Language and mobility: Unexpected places. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847697653
     https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847697653 [Google Scholar]
  26. Pennycook, A., & Otsuji, E.
    (2015) Making scents of the landscape. Linguistic Landscapes, 1(3), 191–212. 10.1075/ll.1.3.01pen
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.1.3.01pen [Google Scholar]
  27. Rheindorf, M., & Wodak, R.
    (Eds.) (2020) Sociolinguistic perspectives on migration control: Language policy, identity and belonging. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Serwe, S. K., & De Saint-Georges, I.
    (2014) “Ohne Glutamat/Without MSG”: Shelf label design in a Thai supermarket. InK. Horner, I. De Saint-Georges, & J.-J. Weber (Eds.), Multilingualism and mobility in Europe: Policies and practices. Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Shani, L.
    (2015) Red peppers and acacia yellowing: Man and nature in the tension between agriculture and environment in the Arava (PhD dissertation). Tel Aviv: Tel Aviv University.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Shoham, S.
    (2017) Pickers and packers: Translocal narratives of returning Thai agriculture labour migrants from Israel. Master’s Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Global Studies. Berlin: Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Shohamy, E.
    (2008) At what cost? Methods of language revival and protection: Examples from Hebrew. InK. A. King, N. Schilling-Estes, L. Fogle, J. J. Lou, & B. Soukup (Eds.), Sustaining language diversity: Endangered and minority languages and language varieties (pp.205–218). Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. (2012) Linguistic landscapes and multilingualism. InM. Martin-Jones, A. Blackledge, & A. Creese (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of multilingualism (pp.538–551). Abingdon & New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. (2015) LL research as expanding language and language policy. Linguistic Landscape, 1(1–2), 152–171. 10.1075/ll.1.1‑2.09sho
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.1.1-2.09sho [Google Scholar]
  34. (2019) Linguistic landscape after a decade: An overview of themes, debates and future directions. InM. Pütz, & N. Mundt (Eds.), Expanding the linguistic landscape: Linguistic diversity, multimodality and the use of space as a semiotic resource (pp.25–37). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Shohamy, E., & Gorter, D.
    (2009) Introduction. InE. Shohamy, & D. Gorter (Eds.), Linguistic landscape: Expanding the scenery (pp.1–10). New York & Abingdon: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Shohamy, E., & Waksman, S.
    (2017) A synthesis analysis of a longitudinal LL research in Tel Aviv-Jaffa: Masks and illusions. Paper presented at theLinguistic Landscapes 9 conference, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Skutnabb-Kangas, T.
    (2006) Language policy and linguistic human rights. InT. Ricento (Ed.), An introduction to language policy: Theory and method (pp.273–291). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Spolsky, B.
    (2014) The languages of the Jews: A sociolinguistic history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781107295292
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107295292 [Google Scholar]
  39. Spolsky, B., & Shohamy, E.
    (1999) The languages of Israel: Policy, ideology and practice. Clevedon & Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. U.S. Department of State
    U.S. Department of State (2013) ISRAEL: Tier 1. Retrieved from 2013 Trafficking in Persons Report: https://www.state.gov/j/tip/rls/tiprpt/countries/2013/215486.htm
     [Google Scholar]
  41. U.S. Department of State
    U.S. Department of State (2017) ISRAEL: Tier 1. Retrieved from 2017 Trafficking in Persons Report : https://www.state.gov/j/tip/rls/tiprpt/countries/2017/271210.htm
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Vertovec, S.
    (2009) Transnationalism. Abingdon: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203927083
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203927083 [Google Scholar]
  43. Wee, L., & Goh, R. B.
    (2020) Language, space, and cultural play: Theorizing affect in the semiotic landscape. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Williams, C. C., & Windebank, J.
    (1998) Informal employment in the advanced economies: Implications for work and welfare. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Yaron, L., & Breiner, J.
    (2019, March8). ‘I feel exploited’: African, Asian students at Tel Aviv University put to work on farms for degree. Retrieved fromHaaretz.com: https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium-african-asian-students-say-israeli-university-put-them-to-work-on-farms-1.7001672
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/ll.20010.or
Loading
Regime changes and the impact of informal labor
Linguistic Landscape 7, 151 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.20010.or
/content/journals/10.1075/ll.20010.or
/content/journals/10.1075/ll.20010.or
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): communicative language functions; informal labor economy; Israel; longitudinal LL research; migrant workers; Thai language

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error