1887
image of Developing beginning language learners’ (meta-)cultural understanding via student-led Linguistic Landscape research
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Practitioners of additional-language (AL) education have consistently argued for the pedagogical benefits of engaging students in Linguistic Landscape (LL) research. The potential of how LL study may contribute to students’ development in (meta-)cultural understanding is yet to be explored. Additionally, while a number of present studies target students at the intermediate or advanced level, student-led LL research projects designed for learners with beginning AL proficiency are under-explored. This paper seeks to fill these gaps by offering a study of undergraduate students learning Chinese and those learning Korean in their first year in the United States. Analysis of student work and pre- and post-project survey data demonstrates that engaging beginning learners of AL in LL research enables them to develop enriched and nuanced understanding of cultural authenticity as well as a deeper appreciation of their target culture. In other words, it is beneficial for promoting their meta-cultural as well as culture-specific learning.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ll.20022.li
2021-07-30
2021-09-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. ACTFL (American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages)
    ACTFL (American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages) (2012) ACTFL proficiency guidelines. AccessedJune 20, 2020. https://www.actfl.org/publications/guidelines-and-manuals/actfl-proficiency-guidelines-2012
  2. Aladje, R. & Jou, B.
    (2016) The linguistic landscape as a learning space for contextual language learning. Journal of Learning Spaces5(2), 66–70.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Appiah, K. A.
    (2006) The case for contamination. The New York Times Magazine, 1January. https://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/01/magazine/the-case-for-contamination.html
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Atlanta, Georgia Population
    Atlanta, Georgia Population. (n.d.). Atlanta, Georgia population: Census 2010 and 2000 interactive map, demographics, statistics, quick facts. Retrieved onJuly 23, 2020fromcensusviewer.com/city/GA/Atlanta
  5. Atlanta, Georgia Population
    Atlanta, Georgia Population 2020 (n.d.). Retrieved onJuly 23, 2020fromhttps://worldpopulationreview.com/us-cities/atlanta-ga-population
  6. Ben-Rafael, E., Shohamy, E., Hasan Amara, M. and Trumper-Hecht, N.
    (2006) Linguistic landscape as symbolic construction of the public space: The case of Israel. International Journal of Multilingualism3(1), pp.7–30. 10.1080/14790710608668383
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14790710608668383 [Google Scholar]
  7. Cenoz, J., & Gorter, D.
    (2008) The linguistic landscape as an additional source of input in second language acquisition. IRAL: International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 46(3), 267–287. 10.1515/IRAL.2008.012
    https://doi.org/10.1515/IRAL.2008.012 [Google Scholar]
  8. Chern, C.-I., & Dooley, K.
    (2014) Learning English by walking down the street. ELT Journal, 68(2), 113–123. 10.1093/elt/cct067
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cct067 [Google Scholar]
  9. Chesnut, M., Lee, V., & Schulte, J.
    (2013) The language lessons around us: Undergraduate English pedagogy and linguistic landscape research. English Teaching; Hamilton, 12(2), 102–120.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Cook, V. J.
    (1992) Evidence for multicompetence. Language Learning, 42(4). 557–591. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1992.tb01044.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1992.tb01044.x [Google Scholar]
  11. Dagenais, D., Moore, D., Sabatier, C., Lamarre, S., & Armand, F.
    (2009) Linguistic landscape and language awareness. InE. Shohamy & D. Gorter (Eds.), Linguistic landscape: Expanding the scenery (pp.253–269). New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Demographics of Atlanta
    Demographics of Atlanta. (n.d.). Retrieved onJuly 23, 2020fromhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Atlanta
  13. Handler, R.
    (1986) Authenticity. Anthropology Today, 2(1). 2–4. 10.2307/3032899
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3032899 [Google Scholar]
  14. Handler, R. & Linnekin, J.
    (1984) Tradition, genuine or spurious. The Journal of American Folklore, 97(385). 273–290. 10.2307/540610
    https://doi.org/10.2307/540610 [Google Scholar]
  15. Hayik, R.
    (2017) Exploring the perceptions of passers-by through the participatory documentary photography tool PhotoVoice. Linguistic Landscape, 3(2), 187–212. doi:  10.1075/ll.3.2.04hay
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.3.2.04hay [Google Scholar]
  16. Huebner, T.
    (2006) Bangkok’s linguistic landscapes: Environmental print, codemixing and language change, International Journal of Multilingualism, 3(1). 31–51. 10.1080/14790710608668384
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14790710608668384 [Google Scholar]
  17. Hulstijn, J.
    (2003) Incidental and intentional learning. InDoughty, C. & Long, M. (Eds.) Handbook of second language acquisition, 349–381. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. 10.1002/9780470756492.ch12
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756492.ch12 [Google Scholar]
  18. Lee, H. & Choi, B.
    (2020) A geolocative linguistic landscape project in Korean as Foreign Language education, InDubreil, S., Malinowski, D., Hiram, M. (Eds.). Language Teaching in the Linguistic LandscapeEducational Linguistics 49. Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑55761‑4_9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55761-4_9 [Google Scholar]
  19. Li, Y.
    (forthcoming). Cultural authenticity in the linguistic landscape: Developing additional-language learners’ critical intercultural understanding. InKrompak, E. & Fernandez-Mallat, V. eds. Linguistic landscape and educational spaces. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Li, Y., Wen, X., & Xie, T.
    (2014) CLTA 2012 survey of college-level Chinese language programs in North America. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association, 49 (1), 1–49.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Lindholm, C.
    (2008) Culture and authenticity. Malden, MA; Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Lou, J.
    (2016) The linguistic landscape of Chinatown: A sociolinguistic ethnography. Bristol, UK; Buffalo, NY: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781783095636
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783095636 [Google Scholar]
  23. Manan, S., & David, M.
    (2016) Language ideology and the linguistic landscape: A study in Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia. Linguistics and the Human Sciences, 11(1), 51–66. 10.1558/lhs.v11i1.20228
    https://doi.org/10.1558/lhs.v11i1.20228 [Google Scholar]
  24. Michalovich, A.
    (2019) Reframing the linguistic to analyze the landscape: The role of metaphor elicitation for the critical interpretation of multimodal advertising media. Linguistic Landscape, 5(1), 28–51. doi:  10.1075/ll.18020.mic
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.18020.mic [Google Scholar]
  25. Nakayama, T. K. & Martin, J. N.
    (2017) Critical intercultural communication, overview. InY. Y. Kim (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of intercultural communication (pp.1–13). Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118783665.ieicc0194
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118783665.ieicc0194 [Google Scholar]
  26. National Standards for Foreign Language Education Project
    National Standards for Foreign Language Education Project (1999) Standards for foreign language learning in the 21st century. Lawrence, KS: Allen Press, Inc
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Rowland, L.
    (2013) The pedagogical benefits of a linguistic landscape project in Japan. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 16(4), 494–505. 10.1080/13670050.2012.708319
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2012.708319 [Google Scholar]
  28. Sayer, P.
    (2010) Using the linguistic landscape as a pedagogical resource. ELT Journal, 64(2), 143–154. 10.1093/elt/ccp051
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccp051 [Google Scholar]
  29. Shohamy, E. & Waksman, S.
    (2009) Linguistic land-scape as an ecological arena: Modalities, meanings, negotiations, education. InShohamy, E. & Gorter, D. (Eds.), Linguistic landscape: Expanding the scenery. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Taylor, J.
    (2001) Authenticity and sincerity in tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 28(1). 7–26. 10.1016/S0160‑7383(00)00004‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-7383(00)00004-9 [Google Scholar]
  31. Taylor-Leech, K.
    (2012) Language Choice as an index of identity: Linguistic landscape in Dili, Timor-Leste, International Journal of Multilingualism, 9(1), 15–34. 10.1080/14790718.2011.583654
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2011.583654 [Google Scholar]
  32. Theodossopoulos, D.
    (2013) Laying claim to authenticity: Five anthropological dilemmas. Anthropological Quarterly86 (2), 337–360. 10.1353/anq.2013.0032
    https://doi.org/10.1353/anq.2013.0032 [Google Scholar]
  33. Van de Port, M.
    (2004) Registers of incontestability: The question for authenticity in academia and beyond. Ethnofoor, XVII(1/2). 7–22.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. US Census Bureau
    US Census Bureau (2010–2018) American community survey. Race: Table B02001.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. US Census Bureau
    US Census Bureau (2012) American community survey 5-year estimates, 2012. Language most commonly spoken at home, other than English or Spanish. AAPI data.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Wilson, Jill H. & Singer, A.
    (2011) Immigrants in 2010 metropolitan America: A decade of change. Brookings Institution. Retrieved onJuly, 6. 2020fromhttps://www.brookings.edu/wpcontent/uploads/2016/06/1024_immigration_singer.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ll.20022.li
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ll.20022.li
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error