1887
image of Examining social class and multilingualism through the Linguistic Landscape
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This article presents a methodological proposal for using the Linguistic Landscape (LL) to examine the intersection of multilingualism and social class in urban settings. The article draws from a study that considered how patterns of linguistic diversity in public signage in a mid-sized US city mapped onto socioeconomic levels. The main innovation for LL methodology is the study’s use of census data and geographic information system (GIS) to increase representativeness using two main constructs (social class and linguistic diversity). After presenting the project design, the challenge of creating representative mapping in the LL is considered, with the solutions the research team generated. Finally, we discuss several practical issues specific to doing LL fieldwork in urban contexts: access, safety, and photography.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ll.20032.lu
2021-11-09
2021-12-03
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Andersson, E. K., Lyngstad, T. H., & Sleutjes, B.
    (2018) Comparing patterns of segregation in North-Western Europe: A multiscalar approach. European Journal of Population, 34(2), 151–168. doi:  10.1007/s10680‑018‑9477‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-018-9477-1 [Google Scholar]
  2. Backhaus, P.
    (2007) Linguistic landscapes: A comparative study of urban multilingualism in Tokyo. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. doi:  10.21832/9781853599484
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853599484 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bagna, C. & Barni, M.
    (2006) Per una mappatura dei repertori linguistici urbani: nuovi strumenti e metodologie. InN. De Blasi and C. Marcato (eds), La città e le sue lingue: Repertori linguistici urbani. Naples: Liguori Editore.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Ben-Rafael, E., Shohamy, E., Hasan Amara, M., & Trumper-Hecht, N.
    (2006) Linguistic landscape as symbolic construction of the public space: The case of Israel. International journal of multilingualism, 3(1), 7–30. doi:  10.1080/14790710608668383
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14790710608668383 [Google Scholar]
  5. Blackwood, R.
    (2015) LL explorations and methodological challenges: Analysing France’s regional languages. Linguistic Landscape, 1(1–2), 38–53. doi:  10.1075/ll.1.1‑2.03bla
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.1.1-2.03bla [Google Scholar]
  6. Block, D.
    (2014) Social class in applied linguistics. London & New York: Routledge. doi:  10.4324/9781315871141
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315871141 [Google Scholar]
  7. Blommaert, J.
    (2013) Ethnography, superdiversity and linguistic landscapes: Chronicles of complexity. Bristol: Multilingual matters. doi:  10.21832/9781783090419
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783090419 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bogatto, F., & Hélot, C.
    (2010) Linguistic landscape and language diversity in Strasbourg: The ‘Quartier Gare’. Linguistic landscape in the city, 15, 275–291. doi:  10.21832/9781847692993‑017
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847692993-017 [Google Scholar]
  9. Busch, B.
    (2010) School language profiles: Valorizing linguistic resources in heteroglossic situations in South Africa. Language and education, 24(4), 283–294. doi:  10.1080/09500781003678712
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09500781003678712 [Google Scholar]
  10. Cenoz, J., & Gorter, D.
    (2006) Linguistic landscape and minority languages. International Journal of Multilingualism, 3(1), 67–80. doi:  10.1080/14790710608668386
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14790710608668386 [Google Scholar]
  11. City-data.com
    City-data.com (2017) Columbus, Ohio (OH) income map, earnings map, and wages data. Accessible at: www.city-data.com/income/income-Columbus-Ohio.html. (Accessed, October 31 2020).
  12. De Costa, P.
    (2016) Ethics in applied linguistics research: Language researcher narratives. New York & London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Edelman, L.
    (2009) What’s in a name? Classification of proper names by language. InShohamy & D. Gorter (eds), Linguistic landscape: Expanding the scenery, (pp.141–154). London & New York: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203930960
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203930960 [Google Scholar]
  14. Escandón, A.
    (2019) Linguistic practices and the linguistic landscape along the U.S.-Mexico border: Translanguaging in Tijuana. Unpublished doctoral thesis. Southampton, UK: University of Southampton.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Gaiser, L. & Matras, Y.
    (2016) The spatial construction of civic identities: A study of Manchester’s linguistic landscapes. University of Manchester: Manchester.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Gorter, D.
    (2019) Methods and Techniques for Linguistic Landscape Research: About Definitions, Core Issues, and Technological Issues. InM. Pütz & N. Mundt, Expanding the linguistic landscape: Linguistic diversity, multimodality and the use of space as a semiotic resource. (pp.38–57). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. doi:  10.21832/9781788922166‑005
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781788922166-005 [Google Scholar]
  17. Gorter, D. & Cenoz, J.
    (2017) Linguistic landscape and multilingualism. InJ. Cenoz, D. Gorter and S. May (eds) Language Awareness and Multilingualism (pp.1–13). doi:  10.1007/978‑3‑319‑02240‑6_27
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02240-6_27 [Google Scholar]
  18. Hult, F. M.
    (2013) Drive-thru linguistic landscaping: Constructing a linguistically dominant place in a bilingual space. International Journal of Bilingualism, 18(5), 507–523. doi:  10.1177/1367006913484206
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006913484206 [Google Scholar]
  19. Jaworski, A., & Thurlow, C.
    (2010) Introducing semiotic landscapes. InA. Jaworski & C. Thurlow (Eds.), Semiotic landscapes: Language, image, space (pp.1–40). London & New York: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Kotze, C. R., & du Plessis, T.
    (2010) Language visibility in the Xhariep–a comparison of the linguistic landscape of three neighbouring towns. Language Matters: Studies in the Languages of Africa, 41(1), 72–96. doi:  10.1080/10228195.2010.494682
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10228195.2010.494682 [Google Scholar]
  21. Lai, M. L.
    (2013) The linguistic landscape of Hong Kong after the change of sovereignty. International Journal of Multilingualism, 10(3), 251–272. doi:  10.1080/14790718.2012.708036
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2012.708036 [Google Scholar]
  22. Landry, R., & Bourhis, R. Y.
    (1997) Linguistic Landscape and Ethnolinguistic Vitality. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 16(1), 23–49. doi:  10.1177/0261927X970161002
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X970161002 [Google Scholar]
  23. Lee, J. S.
    (2019) Multilingual advertising in the linguistic landscape of Seoul. World Englishes, 38(3), 500–518. doi:  10.1111/weng.12427
    https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12427 [Google Scholar]
  24. Leeman, J., & Modan, G.
    (2009) Commodified language in Chinatown: A contextualized approach to linguistic landscapel. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 13(3), 332–362. doi:  10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2009.00409.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2009.00409.x [Google Scholar]
  25. Martínez García, M., Sayer, P., Lu, X., & Martens, B.
    (2021) Examining social class around language diversity through the linguistic landscape. Paper Session. The American Association for Applied Linguistics (AAAL) 2021 Virtual Conference.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Maxim, H. H.
    (2020) A Methodological and Pedagogical Framework for Designing L2 Student-Based Linguistic Landscape Research. InS. Dubreil, D. Malinowski & H. Maxim (eds), Reterritorializing Linguistic Landscapes: Questioning Boundaries and Opening Spaces, (pp.346–363). New York: Bloomsbury Publishing. doi:  10.5040/9781350077997.0027
    https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350077997.0027 [Google Scholar]
  27. Purschke, C.
    (2017) Surveying the linguistic landscape of a multilingual country by smartphone. Introducing Lingscape in Luxembourg. InH. Markus, C. Purschke & E. Ziegler (eds), Sprachräume: Konfigurationen, Interaktionen, Perzeptionen. Linguistik Online 85.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. B.
    (2003) Discourses in place: Language in the material world. London and New York: Routledge. doi:  10.4324/9780203422724
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203422724 [Google Scholar]
  29. Shohamy, E.
    (2019) Linguistic landscape after a decade: An overview of themes, debates and future directions. InM. Pütz & N. Mundt (eds), Expanding the linguistic landscape: Linguistic diversity, multimodality and the use of space as a semiotic resource, 25–37. doi:  10.21832/9781788922166‑004
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781788922166-004 [Google Scholar]
  30. Shohamy, E., & Gorter, D.
    (2009) Linguistic landscape: Expanding the scenery. London & New York: Routledge. doi:  10.4324/9780203930960
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203930960 [Google Scholar]
  31. Soukup, B.
    (2020) Survey area selection in Variationist Linguistic Landscape Study (VaLLS): A report from Vienna, Austria. Linguistic Landscape, 6(1), 52–79. doi:  10.1075/ll.00017.sou
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.00017.sou [Google Scholar]
  32. Stroud, C., & Mpendukana, S.
    (2010) Multilingual signage: A multimodal approach to discourses of consumption in a South African township. Social Semiotics, 20(5), 469–493. doi:  10.1080/10350330.2010.513174
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2010.513174 [Google Scholar]
  33. US Census Bureau
    US Census Bureau (2017) Median household income & language spoken at home, 2013–2017 American Community Survey 5-year estimates. Retrieved fromhttps://data.census.gov/
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Van Mensel, L., Vandenbroucke, M., & Blackwood, R.
    (2017) Linguistic Landscapes. InO. García, N. Flores, & M. Spotti (eds), The Oxford handbook of language and society (pp.423–449). New York: Oxford University Press. doi:  10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190212896.013.5
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190212896.013.5 [Google Scholar]
  35. Ziegler, E., Schmitz, U., & Uslucan, H. H.
    (2018) Attitudes toward visual multilingualism in the linguistic landscape of the Ruhr Area. Expanding the linguistic landscape: Linguistic diversity, multimodality and the use of space as a semiotic resource, 264–299. doi:  10.21832/9781788922166‑015
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781788922166-015 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ll.20032.lu
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ll.20032.lu
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error