Volume 8, Issue 2-3
  • ISSN 2214-9953
  • E-ISSN: 2214-9961
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



Prior to the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic in Hong Kong, there had been an extended period of civic unrest which began as opposition to an extradition bill but which later grew into a larger socio-political movement. We consider the relationship between ongoing political sentiments and the Covid-19 pandemic as evident through public signs; particularly, how commercial signage aligns and disaligns with government discourse on solidarity evident through recontextualization of the official tagline “Together, we fight the virus!” We suggest three analytical categories: (1) signs which demonstrate an alignment stance with the institutional sense of solidarity; (2) alignment with the pro-democracy movement, and thus disalignment from the institutional sense; and (3) politically ambiguous stances appealing to a broad understanding of solidarity for commercial gain. The pandemic occurring at a politically sensitive time has caused and made evident fractures in the way solidarity is construed, resulting in (dis)alignment and differing stances arising from the various social actors who have emplaced signs.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Anfinson, A.
    (2020) Hong Kong’s Paper Cities: Heterotopia and the Semiotic Landscape of Civil Disobedience. InD. Malinowski & S. Tufi (eds.), Reterritorializing Linguistic Landscapes: Questioning Boundaries and Opening Spaces (pp.137–159). London: Bloomsbury. 10.5040/9781350077997.0015
    https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350077997.0015 [Google Scholar]
  2. Borba, R.
    (2018) Injurious signs: The geopolitics of hate and hope in the linguistic landscape of a political crisis. InA. Peck, C. Stroud, & Q. Williams (eds.), Making sense of people and place in linguistic landscapes (pp.161–181). London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Chan, R. K. H.
    (2021) Tackling COVID-19 risk in Hong Kong: Examining distrust, compliance and risk management. Current Sociology, 69(4), 547–565. 10.1177/0011392121990026
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392121990026 [Google Scholar]
  4. Comer, J.
    (this issue). ‘Together, soon enough’: Melbourne’s affective-discursive landscape during and since lockdown. Linguistic Landscape. 10.1075/ll.21044.com
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.21044.com [Google Scholar]
  5. Dean, J.
    (1995) Reflective Solidarity. Constellations, 2(1), 114–140. 10.1111/j.1467‑8675.1995.tb00023.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8675.1995.tb00023.x [Google Scholar]
  6. Du Bois, J. W.
    (2007) The stance triangle. InR. Englebretson (Ed.), Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction (pp.139–182): Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.164.07du
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.164.07du [Google Scholar]
  7. Fairclough, N.
    (1992) Intertextuality in critical discourse analysis. Linguistics and Education, 4(3), 269–293. 10.1016/0898‑5898(92)90004‑G
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0898-5898(92)90004-G [Google Scholar]
  8. Hanauer, D. I.
    (2015) Occupy Baltimore: A Linguistic Landscape Analysis of Participatory Social Contestation in an American City. InR. Rubdy & S. B. Said (eds.), Conflict, Exclusion and Dissent in the Linguistic Landscape (pp.207–222). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. 10.1057/9781137426284_10
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137426284_10 [Google Scholar]
  9. Hartley, K., & Jarvis, D. S. L.
    (2020) Policymaking in a low-trust state: legitimacy, state capacity, and responses to COVID-19 in Hong Kong. Policy and Society, 39(3), 403–423. 10.1080/14494035.2020.1783791
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2020.1783791 [Google Scholar]
  10. Hopkyns, S., & van den Hoven, M.
    (2022) Linguistic diversity and inclusion in Abu Dhabi’s linguistic landscape during the COVID-19 period. Multilingua, 41(2): 201–232. 10.1515/multi‑2020‑0187
    https://doi.org/10.1515/multi-2020-0187 [Google Scholar]
  11. Ismangil, M., & Lee, M.
    (2020) Protests in Hong Kong during the Covid-19 pandemic. Crime, Media, Culture, 17(1), 17–20. 10.1177/1741659020946229
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1741659020946229 [Google Scholar]
  12. Johnstone, B.
    (2018) Discourse Analysis (3 ed.). London: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Jones, R. H., & Chau, D.
    (2021) Metalinguistic tactics in the Hong Kong protest movement. Journal of Language and Politics. 21(1): 143–172. 10.1075/jlp.21017.jon
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.21017.jon [Google Scholar]
  14. Lau, B. H. P., Chan, C. L. W., & Ng, S.-M.
    (2021) Resilience of Hong Kong people in the COVID-19 pandemic: lessons learned from a survey at the peak of the pandemic in Spring 2020. Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development, 31(1–2), 105–114. 10.1080/02185385.2020.1778516
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02185385.2020.1778516 [Google Scholar]
  15. Leech, G. N.
    (1983) Principles of pragmatics. London; New York: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Liao, S.
    (2021) Feeling the 2019 Hong Kong anti-ELAB movement: emotion and affect on the Lennon Walls. Chinese Journal of Communication. 10.1080/17544750.2021.1954964
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2021.1954964 [Google Scholar]
  17. Marshall, S.
    (2021) Navigating COVID-19 linguistic landscapes in Vancouver’s North Shore: official signs, grassroots literacy artefacts, monolingualism, and discursive convergence. International Journal of Multilingualism. 10.1080/14790718.2020.1849225
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2020.1849225 [Google Scholar]
  18. Modan, G. & Wells, K. J.
    (this issue). Signs at work: New labor relations and structures of feeling in Washington, D.C.’s Covid landscape. Linguistic Landscape. 10.1075/ll.21041.mod
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.21041.mod [Google Scholar]
  19. Pang, L.
    (2021) Mask as identity? The political subject in the 2019 Hong Kong’s social unrest. Cultural Studies, 36(4): 624–643. 10.1080/09502386.2021.1882522
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2021.1882522 [Google Scholar]
  20. Petrović, T.
    (2018) Political Parody and the Politics of Ambivalence. Annual Review of Anthropology, 47(1), 201–216. 10.1146/annurev‑anthro‑102215‑100148
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102215-100148 [Google Scholar]
  21. Scollon, R. & Scollon, S. W.
    (2001) Intercultural Communication: A Discourse Approach (2 ed.). Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Seals, C. A.
    (2017) Analyzing the linguistic landscape of mass-scale events. Linguistic Landscape, 3(3), 267–285. 10.1075/ll.17012.sea
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.17012.sea [Google Scholar]
  23. Starr, R. L., Go, C., & Pak, V.
    (2021) ‘Keep calm, stay safe, and drink bubble tea’: Commodifying the crisis of Covid-19 in Singapore advertising. Language in Society, 51(2): 333–359. 10.1017/S0047404521000567
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404521000567 [Google Scholar]
  24. Tam, L.
    (2020, 31July). Heartbreaking, utterly shameful, and a dark stain on city’s reputation: Covid-19 restaurant ban exposed disconnect between politicians and public. South China Morning Post. Retrieved fromhttps://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/society/article/3095485/heartbreaking-utterly-shameful-and-dark-stain-citys
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Tay, D.
    (2021) Is the Social Unrest like COVID-19 or Is COVID-19 like the Social Unrest? A Case Study of Source-target Reversibility. Metaphor and Symbol, 36(2), 99–115. 10.1080/10926488.2021.1887708
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2021.1887708 [Google Scholar]
  26. Tomasini, F.
    (2021) Solidarity in the Time of COVID-19?Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 30(2), 234–247. 10.1017/S0963180120000791
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180120000791 [Google Scholar]
  27. Tse, V. W. S., Wu, J. Z. Z., & Theng, A. J.
    (Forthcoming). “Money can buy health”: Risk and Protection in Hong Kong’s COVID-19 advertisement-scape. Pragmatics and Society.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. van Leeuwen, T.
    (2004) Ten Reasons Why Linguists Should Pay Attention to Visual Communication. InP. LeVine & R. Scollon (eds.), Discourse and Technology: Multimodal Discourse Analysis (pp.7–20). Washington DC, USA: Georgetown University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Wallaschek, S.
    (2019) The Discursive Construction of Solidarity: Analysing Public Claims in Europe’s Migration Crisis. Political Studies, 68(1), 74–92. 10.1177/0032321719831585
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321719831585 [Google Scholar]
  30. Walton, S., & Jaffe, A.
    (2011) “Stuff White People Like”: Stance, Class, Race, and Internet Commentary. InC. Thurlow & K. Mroczek (eds.), Digital Discourse: Language in the New Media (pp.198–219). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199795437.003.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199795437.003.0010 [Google Scholar]
  31. Wang, Y., Feng, D., & Ho, W. Y. J.
    (2021) Identity, lifestyle, and face-mask branding: A social semiotic multimodal discourse analysis. Multimodality & Society, 1(2), 216–237. 10.1177/26349795211014809
    https://doi.org/10.1177/26349795211014809 [Google Scholar]
  32. Wong, B.
    (2021, 28July). National security law: protest slogan ‘Liberate Hong Kong’ can have multiple meanings, but is it ultimately a call for secession?South China Morning Post. Retrieved fromhttps://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/law-and-crime/article/3142767/national-security-law-protest-slogan-liberate-hong
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Zhang, L.-T., & Zhao, S.
    (2020) Diaspora micro-influencers and COVID-19 communication on social media: The case of Chinese-speaking YouTube vloggers. Multilingua, 39(5), 553–563. 10.1515/multi‑2020‑0099
    https://doi.org/10.1515/multi-2020-0099 [Google Scholar]
  34. Zhu, H.
    (2020) Countering COVID-19-related anti-Chinese racism with translanguaged swearing on social media. Multilingua, 39(5), 607–616. 10.1515/multi‑2020‑0093
    https://doi.org/10.1515/multi-2020-0093 [Google Scholar]
  35. (2021) Sense and Sensibility: Urban Public Signs during a Pandemic. InR. H. Jones (ed.), Viral Discourse (pp.37–48). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Zhu, H., & Li, W.
    (2016) “Where are you really from?”: Nationality and Ethnicity Talk (NET) in everyday interactions. Applied Linguistics Review, 7(4), 449–470. 10.1515/applirev‑2016‑0020
    https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2016-0020 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): advertisement; Covid-19; Hong Kong; Linguistic Landscape; solidarity; stance
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error