1887
Volume 8, Issue 2-3
  • ISSN 2214-9953
  • E-ISSN: 2214-9961
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The proliferation of handmade signage, physical installations, and other neighborhood scale visual communication in the months following the outbreak of Covid-19 presented a unique opportunity to consider how new norms of social conduct and community solidarity are established and negotiated in public space. This study examines the cultural and spatial implications of this informal visual communication through street-level photographic analysis conducted over 18 months in communities around the United States, producing a typology of observed phenomena and highlighting differences across time, place, politics, and intentions. In particular, the author illustrates how the signs not only work to negotiate new norms for public conduct during a time of fear, misinformation, and inconsistent guidelines, but in doing so effectively demonstrate what a grassroots community response looks like to this unusual kind of extreme event.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ll.21037.dou
2022-09-01
2022-09-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abuhashesh, M. Y.; Al-Dmour, H.; Masa’deh, R.; Salman, A.; Al-Dmour, R.; Boguszewicz-Kreft, M.; AlAmaireh, Q. N.
    (2021) The Role of Social Media in Raising Public Health Awareness during the Pandemic COVID-19: An International Comparative Study. Informatics8(4): 80. 10.3390/informatics8040080
    https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics8040080 [Google Scholar]
  2. Anfinson, A.
    (2020) Hong Kong’s Paper Cities: Heterotopia and the Semiotic Landscape of Civil Disobedience. InD. Malinowski and S. Tufi (eds.) Reterritorializing Linguistic Landscapes, 137–159. London: Bloomsbury. 10.5040/9781350077997.0015
    https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350077997.0015 [Google Scholar]
  3. Attardo, S.
    (2020) The Linguistics of Humor: An Introduction. London: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198791270.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198791270.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  4. Barsky, L. E., Trainor, J. E., Torres, M. R., & Aguirre, B. E.
    (2007) “Managing Volunteers: FEMA’s Urban Search and Rescue Programme and Interactions with Unaffiliated Responders in Disaster Response.” Disasters, 31(4): 495–507. 10.1111/j.1467‑7717.2007.01021.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7717.2007.01021.x [Google Scholar]
  5. Berg, S. H., O’Hara, J. K., Shortt, M. T., Thune, H., Brønnick, K. K., Lungu, D. A., Røislien, J., Wiig, S.
    (2021) Health authorities’ health risk communication with the public during pandemics: a rapid scoping review. BMC Public Health, 21(1):1401. 10.1186/s12889‑021‑11468‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11468-3 [Google Scholar]
  6. Chimuanya, L. & Ajiboye, E.
    (2016) Socio-Semiotics of Humour in Ebola Awareness Discourse on Facebook. InR. Taiwo, A. Odebunmi and A. Adetunji (eds.) Analyzing Language and Humor in Online Communication, 252–273. Hershey, PA: IGI Global. 10.4018/978‑1‑5225‑0338‑5.ch014
    https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-0338-5.ch014 [Google Scholar]
  7. Comer, J.
    (this issue). ‘Together, soon enough’: Melbourne’s affective-discursive landscape during and since lockdown. Linguistic Landscape. 10.1075/ll.21044.com
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.21044.com [Google Scholar]
  8. Douglas, G. C. C.
    (2014) Do-it-Yourself Urban Design: The Social Practice of Informal ‘Improvement’ Through Unauthorized Alteration. City and Community, 13(1): 5–25. 10.1111/cico.12029
    https://doi.org/10.1111/cico.12029 [Google Scholar]
  9. (2018) The Help-Yourself City: Legitimacy and Inequality in DIY Urbanism. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780190691332.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190691332.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  10. (forth.). Research by the Seat of Your Pants: The Bicycle, the Camera, and the Sequential Case Method in the Study of Urban Informality. InH. Kamalipour, P. Aelbrecht, and N. Peimani eds. The Routledge Handbook of Urban Design Research Methods. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Elias, N.
    (1994 [1939]) The Civilizing Process (Revised Ed.). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Ellickson, R. C.
    (1991) Order Without Law: How Neighbors Settle Disputes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 10.4159/9780674036437
    https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674036437 [Google Scholar]
  13. (1999) The Evolution of Social Norms: A Perspective from the Legal Academy. Yale Law School Program for Law, Economics and Public Policy, Working Paper 230. 10.2139/ssrn.191392
    https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.191392 [Google Scholar]
  14. Finset, A., Bosworth, H., Butow, P., Gulbrandsen, P., Hulsman, R. L., Pieterse, A. H., Street, R., Tschoetschel, R., & van Weert, J.
    (2020) Effective health communication – A key factor in fighting the COVID-19 pandemic. Patient Education and Counseling, 103(5), 873–876. 10.1016/j.pec.2020.03.027
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2020.03.027 [Google Scholar]
  15. Fleming, R. L.
    (2007) The Art of Placemaking: Interpreting Community Through Public Art and Urban Design. London: Merrell.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Fritz, C. E. & Mathewson, J. H.
    (1957) Convergence Behavior in Disasters: A Problem of Social Control. Committee on Disaster Studies, Disaster Research Group.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Gibbs, J. P.
    (1965) Norms: The Problem of Definition and Classification. American Journal of Sociology, 70(5), 586–594. 10.1086/223933
    https://doi.org/10.1086/223933 [Google Scholar]
  18. Gorter, D.
    (2006) Further Possibilities for Linguistic Landscape Research. InD. Gorter (ed.) Linguistic Landscape: A New Approach to Multilingualism, 81–89. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781853599170‑006
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853599170-006 [Google Scholar]
  19. (2019) Methods and Techniques for Linguistic Landscape Research: About Definitions, Core Issues and Technological Innovations. InM. Pütz and N. Mundt (eds.) Expanding the Linguistic Landscape: Multilingualism, Language Policy and the Use of Space as a Semiotic Resource, 38–57. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Gotham, K. F.
    (2012) Make it Right? Brad Pitt, Post-Katrina Rebuilding, and the Spectacularization of Disaster. InR. Mukherjee & S. Banet-Weiser (eds.), Commodity Activism: Cultural Resistance in Neoliberal Times, 97–113. New York: New York University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Horne, C. & Mollborn, S.
    (2020) Norms: An Integrated Framework. Annual Review of Sociology, 46 (1): 467–487. 10.1146/annurev‑soc‑121919‑054658
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-121919-054658 [Google Scholar]
  22. Kalocsányiová, E., Essex, R. & Poulter, D.
    (2021) Risk and Health Communication during Covid-19: A Linguistic Landscape Analysis, Health Communication. 10.1080/10410236.2021.1991639
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2021.1991639 [Google Scholar]
  23. Kendra, J. M. & Wachtendorf, T.
    (2001) Rebel Food… Renegade Supplies: Convergence After the World Trade Center Attack. University of Delaware Disaster Research Center, DRC Preliminary Paper No. 316.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Klein, N.
    (2008) The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism. New York: Henry Holt.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Klinenberg, E.
    (2002) Heat Wave: A Social Autopsy of Disaster. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226026718.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226026718.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  26. (2018) Palaces for the People: How Social Infrastructure Can Help Fight Inequality, Polarization, and the Decline of Civic Life. New York: Crown.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Koslov, L.
    (2016) The Case for Retreat. Public Culture, 28(2), 359–87. 10.1215/08992363‑3427487
    https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-3427487 [Google Scholar]
  28. The Lancet
    The Lancet (2020) COVID-19: fighting panic with information (editorial). Lancet, 395(10224). 537. 10.1016/S0140‑6736(20)30379‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30379-2 [Google Scholar]
  29. Larsen, R.
    (2020) How to See the World When You’re Stuck at Home. The New York Times, 24March 2020 Accessed13 Feb. 2022fromhttps://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/24/travel/coronavirus-virtual-travel.html
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Lou, J. J., Peck, A. & Malinowski, D.
    (2021) The Linguistic Landscape of COVID-19 Workshop: Background. The Linguistic Landscape of COVID-19 (blog). https://www.covidsigns.net/background
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Lydon, M. & Garcia, A.
    (2015) Tactical Urbanism: Short-Term Action for Long-Term Change. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Lyth, A., Spinaze, A., Watson, P. & Johnston, F. H.
    (2018) Place, human agency and community resilience – considerations for public health management of smoke from prescribed burning, Local Environment, 23:10, 975–990. 10.1080/13549839.2018.1508205
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2018.1508205 [Google Scholar]
  33. Madden, K.
    (2011) Placemaking in Urban Design. InT. Banejee & A. Loukaitou-Sideris (eds.), Companion to Urban Design, 654–662, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Marshall, S.
    (2021) Navigating COVID-19 Linguistic Landscapes in Vancouver’s North Shore: Official Signs, Grassroots Literacy Artefacts, Monolingualism, and Discursive Convergence. International Journal of Multilingualism (onlineJan. 2021) 10.1080/14790718.2020.1849225
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2020.1849225 [Google Scholar]
  35. Mautner, G.
    (2012) Language, Space, and the Law: A Study of Directive Signs. International Journal of Speech Language and the Law, 19(2), 189–217. 10.1558/ijsll.v19i2.189
    https://doi.org/10.1558/ijsll.v19i2.189 [Google Scholar]
  36. Milak, E.
    (this issue). (Un)masking Seoul: The mask as a static and dynamic semiotic device for renegotiating space. Linguistic Landscape. 10.1075/ll.21029.mil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.21029.mil [Google Scholar]
  37. Modan, G. & Wells, K. J.
    (this issue). Signs at work: New labor relations and structures of feeling in Washington, D.C.’s Covid landscape. Linguistic Landscape. 10.1075/ll.21041.mod
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.21041.mod [Google Scholar]
  38. Montano, S. & Savitt, A.
    (2020) “Not All Disasters are Disasters: Pandemic Categorization and Its Consequences.” Items: Insights from the Social Sciences, Social Sciences Research Council website, 10Sept. 2020 Accessed29 Oct. 2021fromhttps://items.ssrc.org/covid-19-and-the-social-sciences/disaster-studies/not-all-disasters-are-disasters-pandemic-categorization-and-its-consequences/
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Nezlek, J. B. & Derks, P.
    (2001) Use of humor as a coping mechanism,psychological adjustment,and social interaction. Humor, 14(4), 395–413. 10.1515/humr.2001.011
    https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.2001.011 [Google Scholar]
  40. O’Brien, P. W. & Mileti, D. S.
    (1993) Citizen Participation in Emergency Response. InP. Bolton (ed.) The Loma Prieta, California, Earthquake of October 17, 1989 – Public Response, 23–30. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Ogiermann, E. & Bella, S.
    (2021) On the dual role of expressive speech acts: Relational work on signs announcing closures during the Covid-19 pandemic. Journal of Pragmatics184, 1–17. 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.07.020
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.07.020 [Google Scholar]
  42. Parsons, T.
    (1937 [1968]) The Structure of Social Action. A Study in Social Theory with Special Reference to a Group of Recent European Writers, New York, London: Free Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Peleg, K., Bodas, M., Hertelendy, A. J., Kirsch, T. D.
    (2021) The COVID-19 pandemic challenge to the All-Hazards Approach for disaster planning. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 55, 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102103
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102103 [Google Scholar]
  44. Phyak, P. & Sharma, B. K.
    (this issue). Citizen Linguistic Landscape, bordering practices, and semiotic ideology in the COVID-19 pandemic. Linguistic Landscape. 10.1075/ll.21035.phy
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.21035.phy [Google Scholar]
  45. Rydlink, K.
    (2020) Wie geht es weiter mit dem Coronavirus?Spiegel, 12Dec 2020 Accessed13 Feb. 2022fromhttps://www.spiegel.de/wissenschaft/medizin/coronavirus-wie-geht-es-weiter-mit-sars-cov-2-a-73160cc3-8dbc-4a89-90b0-c489bfd53661
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Strange, L.
    (this issue). Covid-19 and public responsibility: A multimodal critical discourse analysis of blaming the public during the UK’s third wave. Linguistic Landscape. 10.1075/ll.21034.str
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.21034.str [Google Scholar]
  47. Sunstein, C. R.
    (1996) Social Norms and Social Roles. Columbia Law Review, 96 (4), 903–968. 10.2307/1123430
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1123430 [Google Scholar]
  48. Suttles, G. D.
    (1976) Urban Ethnography: Situational and Normative Accounts. Annual Review of Sociology, 2, 1–18. 10.1146/annurev.so.02.080176.000245
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.02.080176.000245 [Google Scholar]
  49. Svennevig, J.
    (2021) How to do things with signs: The formulation of directives on signs in public spaces. Journal of Pragmatics, 175, 165–183. 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.01.016
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.01.016 [Google Scholar]
  50. Theng, A. J., Tse, V. W. S. & Wu, J. Z. Z.
    (this issue). Complicating solidarity: The Hong Kong Covid-19 landscape. Linguistic Landscape. 10.1075/ll.21036.the
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.21036.the [Google Scholar]
  51. Thomas, D.
    (2016) Placemaking: An Urban Design Methodology. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315648125
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315648125 [Google Scholar]
  52. Tierney, K., Lindell, M. K. & Perry, R. W.
    (2001) Facing the Unexpected: Disaster Preparedness and Response in the United States. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry / National Academy Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Thompson, T., Benz, J., Agiesta, J., Cagney, K., & Meit, M.
    (2013) Resilience in the Wake of Superstorm Sandy (AP-NORC Research Highlights). Chicago: Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Troyer, R. A. & Szabó, T. P.
    (2017) Representation and Videography in Linguistic Landscape Studies. Linguistic Landscape, 3(1), 56–77. 10.1075/ll.3.1.03tro
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.3.1.03tro [Google Scholar]
  55. Tsao, S-F., H. Chen, T. Tisseverasinghe, Y. Yang, L. Li, & Z. A. Butt
    (2021) What social media told us in the time of COVID-19: a scoping review. The Lancet3(3): E175–E194. 10.1016/S2589‑7500(20)30315‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30315-0 [Google Scholar]
  56. Yao, X.
    (2021) Face masks, materiality and exclusion in the COVID-19 semiotic landscape. Social Semiotics. 10.1080/10350330.2021.2016032
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2021.2016032 [Google Scholar]
  57. Young, H. P.
    (2015) The Evolution of Social Norms. Annual Review of Economics, 7(1): 359–387. 10.1146/annurev‑economics‑080614‑115322
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-080614-115322 [Google Scholar]
  58. Zhou, F.
    (this issue). Aggressive banners, dialect-shouting village heads, and their online fame: Construction and consumption of rural Linguistic Landscapes in China’s anti-Covid campaign. Linguistic Landscape. 10.1075/ll.21032.zho
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.21032.zho [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ll.21037.dou
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ll.21037.dou
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Covid-19; disaster response; informal urbanism; pandemic; signs; social norms; volunteerism
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error