1887
Volume 9, Issue 4
  • ISSN 2214-9953
  • E-ISSN: 2214-9961
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Protest graffiti as visual activism provides a democratic space for demonstrators to articulate their narratives. Nevertheless, the lack of leadership in the Chilean social outburst in 2019 becomes a challenge in outlining its impact. Thus, this article provides an empirical case of political graffiti and explains how graffiti had a constitutive role in the social movement and the immediate country’s political course after that. This paper proposes a transdisciplinary approach by combining the analysis of graffiti as contextual texts (Pennycook, 2007) with ‘collective action frames’ in studying political graffiti collected in a six-kilometre walk in Santiago, Chile. As a result, graffiti frameworks of injustice denounce the state and police violence; frameworks of agency tend to organise protesters’ ideas for change, such as a new constitution and the end of the current pension systems; and a strong sense of feminism conforms part of identity frames.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ll.22002.mir
2023-04-11
2024-03-02
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adams, K. L., & Winter, A.
    (1997) Gang Graffiti as a Discourse Genre. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 1(3), 337–360. 10.1111/1467‑9481.00020
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00020 [Google Scholar]
  2. Aguilera, C. Vicente
    (2022) “Chile despertó”: los sentidos políticos en la Revuelta de Octubre. “Chile despertó”: the political meanings in the October Revolt Polis, Revista Latinoamericana, 21(61), 10–31. 10.32735/S0718‑6568/2022‑N61‑1707
    https://doi.org/10.32735/S0718-6568/2022-N61-1707 [Google Scholar]
  3. BBC
    BBC. (October22 2019) Protestas en Chile: “Estamos en guerra”, la frase de Piñera que se le volvió en contra en medio de las fuertes manifestaciones. Protests in Chile: “We are at war”, Piñera’s phrase that turned against him amid the strong demonstrations. BBC world.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. BCN
    BCN (2019) Acuerdo por la paz social y la nueva constitución. Agreement for social peace and the new constitution.: Biblioteca del Congreso NacionalRetrieved fromhttps://www.bcn.cl/procesoconstituyente/detalle_cronograma?id=f_cronograma-1
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A.
    (2000) Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment. Annual review of sociology, 26(1), 611–639. 10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611 [Google Scholar]
  6. Blommaert, J.
    (2016) Meeting of Styles” and the online infrastructures of graffiti. Applied linguistics review, 7(2), 99–115. 10.1515/applirev‑2016‑0005
    https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2016-0005 [Google Scholar]
  7. CC, C. C.
    (2022) Borrador Nueva Constitución. [New Constitution draft]. Retrieved fromwww.chileconvencion.cl
    [Google Scholar]
  8. CHV
    CHV (2019) Chilevisión noticias (TV news channel) «Hasta que la dignidad se haga costumbre»: Cómo surgió la frase emblema del estallido social chileno. “Until dignity becomes customary”: How the emblematic phrase of the Chilean social outbreak arose. InC. Noticias (Ed.), Nacional – Estado de emergencia. Retrieved fromhttps://www.chvnoticias.cl/nacional/hasta-que-la-dignidad-se-haga-costumbre-frase-historia_20191022/
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Claude, M.
    (2020) Retrato de un clan de la Primera Línea [Portrait of a Frontline Clan]. CIPER.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Concha Bell, C.
    (2022, September7 2022) Why did Chile’s new constitution fail?red pepper. Retrieved fromhttps://www.redpepper.org.uk/why-did-chileans-reject-the-new-constitution/
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Dalzell, T., & Victor, T.
    (2012) The New Partridge Dictionary of Slang and Unconventional English (2 ed.). London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781136283055
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781136283055 [Google Scholar]
  12. Donoso, S.
    (2013) Dynamics of Change in Chile: Explaining the Emergence of the 2006 Pingüino Movement. Journal of Latin American studies, 45(1), 1–29. 10.1017/S0022216X12001228
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022216X12001228 [Google Scholar]
  13. (2021) El movimiento estudiantil chileno y su (re)articulación con la política institucional. [The Chilean student movement and its (re)articulation with institutional politics]. InM. A. Garretón (Ed.), Política y movimientos sociales en Chile (pp.77–102). Santiago, Chile: LOM.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Dorfman, A.
    (2022, Tue6Sep 2022) Chileans rejected the new constitution, but they still want progressive reforms. The guardian. Retrieved fromhttps://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/sep/06/chile-new-constitution-reject-pinochet
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Espinosa Herrera, G., & Castellanos Obregón, J. M.
    (2016) Procesos de estructuración de prácticas trasgresoras asociadas al consumo de sustancias psicoactivas en universitarios. [Structuring processes of transgressive practices associated with the consumption of psychoactive substances in university students.] Revista latinoamericana de ciencias sociales, niñez y juventud, 16(2), 777–795. 10.11600/1692715x.16209
    https://doi.org/10.11600/1692715x.16209 [Google Scholar]
  16. Gamson, W.
    (1992a) Talking politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. (1992b) The social psychology of collective action. InA. D. Morris & C. M. Mueller (Eds.), Frontiers in social movement theory / edited by Aldon D. Morris and Carol McClurg Mueller. New Haven: Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Goffman, E.
    (1974) Frame analysis : an essay on the organization of experience. New York: Harper and Row.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Gonzalez Hernando, M.
    (2019) On the frontline: Chile is the future. Discover society. Retrived fromhttps://archive.discoversociety.org/2019/12/04/on-the-frontline-chile-is-the-future/
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Gálvez, R., & Kremerman, M.
    (2019) Pensiones por la fuerza, Resultados del sistema de pensiones de las Fuerzas Armadas y de Orden Ideas para el buen vivir. Fundacion sol, 7. ISSN 0719-6741. Retrieved fromhttps://fundacionsol.cl/blog/estudios-2/post/pensiones-por-la-fuerza-2021-6797
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Hanauer, D.
    (2011) The discursive construction of the separation wall at Abu Dis: Graffiti as political discourse. Journal of language and politics, 10(3), 301–321. 10.1075/jlp.10.3.01han
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.10.3.01han [Google Scholar]
  22. (2015) Occupy Baltimore: A Linguistic Landscape Analysis of Participatory Social Contestation in an American City. InR. Rubdy & S. B. Said (Eds.), Conflict, Exclusion and Dissent in the Linguistic Landscape. Language and Globalization (pp.207–222). London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137426284_10
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137426284_10 [Google Scholar]
  23. Hofer, R. P.
    (2020) Chile: Uprising against the subsidiary state. Trimestre económico, 87(346), 333–365. 10.20430/ete.v87i346.1055
    https://doi.org/10.20430/ete.v87i346.1055 [Google Scholar]
  24. Inai-Segovia, D.
    (2019) Imágenes insurgentes como herramientas de contrapoder durante el conflicto socio ambiental en Tranguil (Chile) y el asesinato a Macarena Valdés. [Insurgent images as tools of counter power during the socio-environmental conflict in Tranguil (Chile) and the murder of Macarena Valdés] Revista Científica de Información y Comunicación161, 517–547. 10.12795/IC.2019.i19.16
    https://doi.org/10.12795/IC.2019.i19.16 [Google Scholar]
  25. INDH
    INDH (2020) Archivo de Reportes de Estadísticas en la Crisis Social [Archive of Statistical Reports on the Social Crisis]. Retrieved fromhttps://www.indh.cl/archivo-de-reportes-de-estadisticas/
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Johnston, H.
    (1995) A methodology for frame analysis: from discourse to cognitive schemata. InH. K. Johnston, B. (Ed.), Social Movements and Culture (pp.217–246). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. (2002) Verification and proof in frame and discourse analysis. InB. Klandermans & S. Staggenborg (Eds.), Methods of Social Movements Research (pp.62–91). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Jorgensen, J. N.
    (2008) Urban Wall Languaging. International journal of multilingualism, 5(3), 237–252. 10.1080/14790710802390186
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14790710802390186 [Google Scholar]
  29. Jūratė, R.
    (2017) Linguistic Landscpae of Tbilisi: a case study of graffiti. Respectus philologicus, 32(37). 10.15388/RESPECTUS.2017.32.37.08
    https://doi.org/10.15388/RESPECTUS.2017.32.37.08 [Google Scholar]
  30. Karlander, D.
    (2019) Mobile Semiosis and Mutable Metro Spaces: Train Graffiti in Stockholm’s Public Transport System. InA. Peck, C. Stroud, & Q. Williams (Eds.), Making sense of people and place in Linguistic Landscapes (pp.71–87). London: Bloomsbury Academic.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Lindekilde, L.
    (2014) Discourse and Frame Analysis. InD. Porta (Ed.), Methodological Practices in Social Movement Research (pp.196–227). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198719571.003.0009
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198719571.003.0009 [Google Scholar]
  32. Llanos, B.
    (2021) Revuelta feminista en Chile: cultura visual y performance. The feminist revolt in Chile: visual culture and performanceLiteratura y Linguística, 441, 169–184. 10.29344/0717621X.44.3024
    https://doi.org/10.29344/0717621X.44.3024 [Google Scholar]
  33. Lou, J., & Jaworski, A.
    (2016) Itineraries of protest signage: Semiotic landscape and the mythologizing of the Hong Kong Umbrella Movement. Journal of language and politics, 15(5), 609–642. 10.1075/jlp.15.5.06lou
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.15.5.06lou [Google Scholar]
  34. Marquez, F.
    (2020) ‘For anthropology from the debris: The social revolt in Plaza Dignidad, Santiago de Chile’. Revista, 180(45), P1–P13. 10.32995/rev180.Num‑45.(2020).art‑717
    https://doi.org/10.32995/rev180.Num-45.(2020).art-717 [Google Scholar]
  35. Martin, D., & Shaw, D.
    (2021) Chilean and Transnational Performances of Disobedience: LasTesis and the Phenomenon of Un violador en tu camino. Bulletin of Latin American Research, 40(5), 712–729. 10.1111/blar.13215
    https://doi.org/10.1111/blar.13215 [Google Scholar]
  36. Mayol, A.
    (2019) Big Bang. Estallido social 2019. Modelo derrumbado – sociedad rota – política inútil. Santiago: Catalonia.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. McGowan, C.
    (2018) Poet, hero, rapist – outrage over Chilean plan to rename airport after Neruda. The Guardian, Retrieved from: https://www.theguardian.com/books/2018/nov/23/chile-neruda-airport-rename-outrage-admitted-rape-memoirs
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Molina Loyola, M. E.
    (2020) Arte urbano, política y memoria en 2019: Primeros pasos hacia la conformación de un archivo del muralismo político en Santiago de Chile. E-ciencias de la información, 10(1). 10.15517/eci.v10i1.37277
    https://doi.org/10.15517/eci.v10i1.37277 [Google Scholar]
  39. Nogueira Alcalá, H.
    (2021) Presentación. Introduction. Estudios constitucionales, 191, 1–4. 10.4067/S0718‑52002021000200001
    https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-52002021000200001 [Google Scholar]
  40. Noonan, R. K.
    (1995) Women against the State: Political Opportunities and Collective Action Frames in Chile’s Transition to Democracy. Sociological Forum (Randolph, N.J.), 10(1), 81–111. 10.1007/BF02098565
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02098565 [Google Scholar]
  41. Partridge, E.
    (1967) A dictionary of slang and unconventional English: coloquialisms and catch-phrases, solecisms and catachreses, nicknames, vulgarisms and such Americanisms as have been naturalized / Eric Partridge (Sixth edition / Suppl. revised and enlarged.). London: Routledge & Paul.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Pennycook, A.
    (2007) Global Englishes and Transcultural Flows. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. (2009a) Linguistic Landscapes and transgressive semiotics on graffiti. InE. S. and. D. Gorter (Ed.), Linguistic Landscape expanding the scenery. (pp.302–312), New York and London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. (2009b) Spatial narrations: Graffscapes and city souls. InA. Jaworski & C. Thurlow (Eds.), Semiotic landscape. Language, image, space (pp.137–150). New York: Continuum International Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Poulter, J.
    (2020) How ‘ACAB’ Became the Universal Anti-Police Slogan. VICE, News. 8 June. Retrieved fromhttps://www.vice.com/en/article/akzv48/acab-all-cops-are-bastards-origin-story-protest
    [Google Scholar]
  46. radioUChile
    radioUChile (2013) “Marca tu Voto AC” hace positivo balance de la campaña. “Mark your vote AC” makes a positive balance of the campaign. Radio Universidad de Chile. Retrieved fromradio.uchile.cl/2013/12/16/marca-tu-voto-ac-hace-positivo-balance-de-la-campana/
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Rojo, L.
    (2014) Taking over the Square: The role of linguistic practices in contesting urban spaces. Journal of language and politics, 13(4), 623–652. 10.1075/jlp.13.4.03mar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.13.4.03mar [Google Scholar]
  48. (ed.) (2016) Occupy: the spatial dynamics of discourse in global protest movements. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/bct.83
    https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.83 [Google Scholar]
  49. Rubdy, R., & Said, S. B.
    (2015) Conflict, exclusion and dissent in the linguistic landscape. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137426284
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137426284 [Google Scholar]
  50. Scollon, R., & Wong Scollon, S.
    (2003) Discourses in place: language in the material world. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203422724
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203422724 [Google Scholar]
  51. Seals, C. A.
    (2015) Overcoming Erasure: Reappropriation of Space in the Linguistic Landscape of Mass-Scale Protests. InR. Rubdy & S. B. Said (Eds.), Conflict, Exclusion and Dissent in the Linguistic Landscape. Language and Globalization (pp.223–238). London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137426284_11
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137426284_11 [Google Scholar]
  52. Seloni, L., & Sarfati, Y.
    (2017) Linguistic landscape of Gezi Park protests in Turkey: A discourse analysis of graffiti. Journal of language and politics, 16(6), 782–808. 10.1075/jlp.15037.sel
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.15037.sel [Google Scholar]
  53. Serafini
    Serafini (2020) ‘A rapist in your path: Transnational feminist protest and why (and how) performance matters. European journal of cultural studies, 23(2), 290–295. 10.1177/1367549420912748
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549420912748 [Google Scholar]
  54. Snow, D.
    (2013) Framing and Social Movements. InThe Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social and Political Movements. (pp.1–7), Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 10.1002/9780470674871.wbespm434
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470674871.wbespm434 [Google Scholar]
  55. Snow, D. & Benford, R.
    (1992) Master frames and cycles of protest. InA. M. a. C. M. Muelle (Ed.), Frontiers in Social Movement Theory (pp.133–155). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. (1988) Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilisation. International Social Movement Research, 11, 197–217.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Somma, N., Bargsted, M., Disi Pavlic, R., & Medel, R.
    (2021) No water in the oasis: the Chilean Spring of 2019–2020. Social movement studies, 20(4), 495–502. 10.1080/14742837.2020.1727737
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2020.1727737 [Google Scholar]
  58. Soto Barrientos, F.
    (2014) Asamblea Constituyente: La experiencia latinoamericana y el actual debate en Chile [Constituent Assembly: The Latin American experience and the current debate in Chile]. Estudios constitucionales (Universidad de Talca. Centro de Estudios Constitucionales), 12(1), 397–428. 10.4067/S0718‑52002014000100010
    https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-52002014000100010 [Google Scholar]
  59. Spyer Dulci, T., & Alvarado Sadivia, V.
    (2021) El Estallido Social en Chile: ¿rumbo a un Nuevo Constitucionalismo? [The Social Outbreak in Chile: towards a New Constitutionalism?] Revista katálysis, 24(1). 10.1590/1982‑0259.2021.e73555
    https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0259.2021.e73555 [Google Scholar]
  60. Stroud, C.
    (2016) Turbulent Linguistic Landscapes and the Semiotics of Citizenship. InR. Blackwood (Ed.), Negotiating and Contesting Identities in Linguistic Landscapes (pp.3–18). London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. (2018) Linguistic Citizenship. InL. Lim, C. Stroud, & L. Wee (Eds.), The multilingual citizen : towards a politics of language for agency and change, (pp.17–39). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781783099665‑004
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783099665-004 [Google Scholar]
  62. Torres, S.
    (2019) The protests in Chile aren’t about 30 pesos. They’re about 30 years of failure. The Washington Post. October23. Retrieved fromhttps://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/10/23/protests-chile-arent-about-pesos-theyre-about-years-failure/
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Vicari, S.
    (2010) Measuring collective action frames: A linguistic approach to frame analysis. Poetics (Amsterdam), 38(5), 504–525. 10.1016/j.poetic.2010.07.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2010.07.002 [Google Scholar]
  64. Waldner, L. K., & Dobratz, B. A.
    (2013) Graffiti as a Form of Contentious Political Participation: Graffiti as Contentious Political Participation. Sociology compass, 7(5), 377–389. 10.1111/soc4.12036
    https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12036 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ll.22002.mir
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ll.22002.mir
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error